AzTrials
AzTrials

DeliriumPREVEDELNCT05108207

A Software to Prevent Delirium (PREVEDEL) in Hospitalized Older Adults

A study testing Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in people with Delirium and Confusion, run by University of Chile at 1 site in Chile.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Delirium, is a clinical condition characterized by acute and fluctuating deterioration of the cognitive state, generally secondary to an acute pathology. It is a common condition in hospitalized older adults and it develops in 20-30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward and up to 80% of those… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
What is being tested?
Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteChile
Study dates
1 Aug 2021to 15 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 65 years or older.
  • Hospitalized less than an 48 hours ago in a general ward or in the intermediate care unit. Participating health center: 1) Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, 2) Hospital San Juan de Dios, 3) Clínica Las Condes, 4) Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr Luis Tisné.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of full or syndromal delirium (CAM+ or presence of one core elements).
  • History of dementia (AD8 greater than 2 points).
  • Non-Spanish speaking patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Eduardo Tobar Almonacid, MD contact

+56992368717

etobar@hcuch.cl

Maricel A Garrido Montenegro, MSc contact

+56229788038

mgarridom@hcuch.cl

Chile1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Chile

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan

    Eduardo Tobar, MD, +56229786009, etobar@hcuch.cl

    Eduardo Tobar, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: Software-guided Cognitive Stimulation Prevents the Development of Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Delirium, is a clinical condition characterized by acute and fluctuating deterioration of the cognitive state, generally secondary to an acute pathology. It is a common condition in hospitalized older adults and it develops in 20-30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative outcomes in older adults, such as longer hospitalizations, higher mortality, and short and medium-term institutionalization. Randomized clinical trials have shown that delirium is preventable through non-pharmacological prevention measures, decreasing its incidence by 30 to 50%. These interventions include promoting physical activity, facilitating the use of glasses and hearing aids, cognitive stimulation, and providing frequent reorientation of time and space, among others.

Read more

These measures are currently seldom applied in hospitals in Chile and around the world for various reasons some of which include the heavy workload of clinical staff, the lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.

The main objective is to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status(full/subsyncromal delirium) in hospitalized older adults.

Method/Design: randomized controlled trial, parallel groups, multicenter.

Participants: patients 65 years or older who have been hospitalized for less than 48 hours in the general ward or in the intermediate care unit of 4 hospitals in Santiago, Chile.

Intervention: participants in the intervention group will use a tablet with cognitive stimulation software for delirium prevention for 5 continuous days versus the control group who will use the tablet without the software.

Evaluations: The incidence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium, duration, density of delirium, cognitive and functional status at discharge, adherence to prevention measures, as well as demographic variables of interest will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Background. Delirium is a clinical condition characterized by acute cognitive impairment, of fluctuating course, generally secondary to an acute pathology, which appears after the interaction between predisposing factors and well described precipitants. It is a very common condition in older adults, observed in 20% to 30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward, and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative clinical outcomes which include longer hospitalizations, increased direct and indirect costs, functional impairment, greater risk of mortality, increased risk of institutionalization, and deterioration in long-term cognitive status, among others.

Subsyndromal delirium (SSD) is a milder state characterised by the presence of certain delirium symptoms but without meeting full diagnostic criteria thresholds, is also associated with poor posthospitalization outcomes similar to those associated with delirium. The reported frequency of subsyndromal delirium varies (7-50%) according to the definition applied and the clinical population studied. Its incidence in the general medicine ward is 17%.

The frequency of delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) in the general room is approximately 25%.

It is known that delirium in hospitalized older adults is preventable. In multiple randomized clinical trials, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD), shown to reduce its incidence by 30-50%7.

Despite the high evidence supporting them, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium are poorly implemented in hospitals in Chile and around the world for several reasons, such as the heavy workload of clinical staff, lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.

Prior to this clinical trial, local pilot studies have shown some progress in this area. On the one hand, it has been reported that the incorporation of software technology through a "PREVEDEL" tablet is feasible and can be implemented on a hospital level, with possible effects on decreasing delirium. On the other hand, the implementation of nPPD following a theoretical model improves the adherence of health personnel.

Therefore, a multicenter randomized clinical trial is proposed, which seeks to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by the PREVEDEL software prevents delirium in hospitalized older adults and whether it is a technology that can be used in others hospital centers.

Centers and place where data is collected. Chile. These are: Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Hospital San Juan de Dios (HSJD), Clínica Las Condes (CLC) and Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr. Luis Tisné (HLT). Two are public institutions and two are private institutions.

Intervention.

Interventions to implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD) in the centers that will participate in the RCT.

Three months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study

Interventions to perform an RCT where the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus a placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults is compared.

Standard non-pharmacological prevention measures

According to the recommendations in the literature and those made by local studies, the following standard non-pharmacological delirium prevention measures were defined:

Study groups Control Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL).

Experimental Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL).

To evaluate patient adherence and how the tablet is used, both groups will have an application installed in their devices that will allow them to keep track of the time of use and applications used.

Software content

  1. Desktop module.
  2. The exercise module.
  3. Games module.
  4. The documentary module.
  5. Alert module.
  6. Configuration module, allows software customization.
  7. Registration system.

OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS

General To assess whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status in hospitalized older adults.

Specifics

  • Implement a program of nPPD at the centers that will participate in the randomized clinical trial (RCT).
  • Conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults.

Hypothesis Cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software decreases the incidence of delirium status in hospitalized older adults.

Study sample.

For the calculation of the sample size, local and literature data were considered. A delirium status prevalence of 20% is estimated in the Control group and a decrease of this to 8% in the Intervention group. In this way, with a power of 80%, and an alpha of 0.05 bilaterally, 147 patients will be enrolled in each group. If add to this a 10% loss of follow-up, the overall sample size is 320 patients.

Randomization. Randomization was performed with computer-generated random permuted blocks using a centralized, secure Web-based randomization service.

Masking The enrollers, evaluators and healthcare personnel (nurses, physical therapists, physicians, occupational therapists) do not know the assigned group. Both groups receive a tablet of the same dimensions and with the same basic applications. However, blinding the patient is not possible, since when exploring the tablet, he or she will recognize whether or not it has the PREVEDEL program included. To reduce this bias, the staff that delivers the tablet encourages both groups to use its different basic applications (access the Internet) and that any doubts may have participants about its use should be made to the tablet coordinator, so that the evaluators or healthcare personnel remain masked.

The time between assignment and delivery of the tablet is between 4 to 12 hours in all participating centers. This variable will be measured for later analysis.

Statistical Methods For the descriptive analysis of the variables will use the mean (standard deviation), median (25-75 percentiles), or proportions as appropriate to the type and distribution of the data.

Analytical Statistics: For the primary outcome, a comparison of proportions between patients who develop delirium and subsyndromal delirium in both groups will be made, using Fisher's exact test, and as a measure of efficacy, an OR (95% CI) will be estimated. If there is any baseline variable that is not matched by the randomization, efficacy analyses will be carried out by means of logistic regression with the main variable being the treatment, and the adjustment variables those that the randomization would not have been able to match. Additionally, to compare the effect of the intervention over time, a time-to-event analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Maier procedure and then the Cox regression model to adjust for baseline variables and the presence of the intervention. For the secondary outcomes, the Fisher's exact test or t-Test will be used, as appropriate, for the type and distribution of the data. Linear regression or multivariate logistics will also be performed, as appropriate, to evaluate the impact of the intervention, adjusting for the input covariates. A bilateral p 0.05 significance level will be used for all analyses.

Ethics Committee The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Clinical Hospital of the University of Chile and its approval was validated by the ethics committees of the respective participating centers (Registry No. 049, July 31, 2019).

Trial Steering Committee

Committee was formed with 3 international experts in the "Trial Steering Committee" (TSC) area. This committee will watch over the following aspects:

  • Supervise and guarantee scientific quality.
  • Advise on study protocol, recruitment progress, adherence, follow-up and data quality.
  • Review the recommendations of the data analysis and monitoring committee.
  • Review the publications in the primary trials.

For the fulfillment of the objectives, the TSC will meet before, in the middle and at the end of the recruitment.

Informed Consent The informed consent will be given by the patient himself and obtained by one of the main investigators.

Being tested
Prevention software, Placebo, Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium
Keywords
delirium, prevention, cognitive stimulation
Medical subject headings
Delirium, Confusion, Neurobehavioral Manifestations, Neurologic Manifestations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prevention softwareOther

    The software is installed on an Alcatel OneTouch Pixi-3 10 tablet and is delivered every day to each patient between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm, with nighttime pickup (8:00 pm to 09:00 am), so the patient can rest and to charge the device. The first day, a previously trained health professional delivers the tablet and trains the older adults in its use, taking 10 to 15 minutes. The day after the tablet is delivered, the same person goes to the patient's room to check if he or she has any doubts or problems with its use. Both groups are advised to use the tablet 3 times a day, at least 10 minutes each time.

  • PlaceboOther

    All patients will have a tablet without the software PREVEDEL between 09:00-19:00 hrs.

  • Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent deliriumOther

    Three months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study.

Study groups in NCT05108207
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupPlacebo comparatorwill receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL).
Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium
Experimental GroupExperimentalwill receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL).
Receives: Other: Prevention software; Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delirium Status (delirium and subsyndromal delirium)

    To evaluate the incidence of delirium and incidence of subsyndromal with Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).

    Measured: 5 days

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Duration of delirium

    To evaluate duration in days.

    Measured: 5 days of protocol and 2 days of follow-up.

  2. Density of delirium

    Understood as the ratio between the duration of the event and the exposure time (time spent in the protocol).

    Measured: 5 days.

  3. Level of independence in basic activities of daily living

    To evaluate level of independence in activities of daily living at discharge with Functional Independence Measure.Scoring ranges from 13 to 126 points, with higher scores indicative of better performance.

    Measured: At day 0 and 5.

  4. Cognitive level

    Evaluate cognitive performance at hospital discharge with Montreal cognitive Assessment. Scoring ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicative of better performance.

    Measured: At day 0 and 5.

  5. Adherence to prevention measures

    Assessment of adherence to 4 non-pharmacological prevention domains (12 indicators): Management of environment (visible clock, visible calendar, decrease physical restrictions, early mobilization), (indication of relative rest, encourage patient to sit and stand), correction of sensory deficits (availability of glasses, hearing aids, and dentures when necessary), management of medications (decrease the use of benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, and metoclopramide when possible).

    Measured: At day 0 and 30 (before and after training in prevention measure).

  6. Time of use of electronic device

    The usage time on the mobile device (with internal device registration) will be recorded.

    Measured: 5 days

  7. Hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay in days.From the day of admission to the hospital until discharge.

    Measured: Through study completion an average of 30 days

  8. 90-day mortality

    90-day mortality check by civil registry.

    Measured: At 90 day.

  9. Difficulty falling and staying asleep due to device use.

    Every day when removing the device, the person will be asked ¿Have you had difficulty falling and staying asleep due to device use?

    Measured: Every day for 5 days.

  10. Headache due to the device use.

    Every day when removing the device, the person will be asked Have you had a headache due to the device use? If the answer is yes, the intensity of the pain will be scored, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the greatest pain.

    Measured: Every day for 5 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT). CONSORT methodological recommendations are used for reporting non-pharmacological trials, in addition to TIDieR and SPIRIT recommendations.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
320 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05108207
Sponsor's protocol ID
ID16AM2080
Acronym
PREVEDEL
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
5 Aug 2021
Last updated
4 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

    PubMed 23992774
  • Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, Fong TG, Gross A, Inouye SK, Jones RN. Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):30-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923.

    PubMed 22762316
  • Veiga D, Luis C, Parente D, Fernandes V, Botelho M, Santos P, Abelha F. Postoperative delirium in intensive care patients: risk factors and outcome. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;62(4):469-83. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70146-0.

    PubMed 22793963
  • Leslie DL, Zhang Y, Holford TR, Bogardus ST, Leo-Summers LS, Inouye SK. Premature death associated with delirium at 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1657-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1657.

    PubMed 16043686
  • Sepulveda E, Leonard M, Franco JG, Adamis D, McCarthy G, Dunne C, Trzepacz PT, Gaviria AM, de Pablo J, Vilella E, Meagher DJ. Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 1;7:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28116342
  • Meagher D, O'Regan N, Ryan D, Connolly W, Boland E, O'Caoimhe R, Clare J, Mcfarland J, Tighe S, Leonard M, Adamis D, Trzepacz PT, Timmons S. Frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in an adult acute hospital population. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;205(6):478-85. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.139865. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

    PubMed 25359923
  • Abraha I, Trotta F, Rimland JM, Cruz-Jentoft A, Lozano-Montoya I, Soiza RL, Pierini V, Dessi Fulgheri P, Lattanzio F, O'Mahony D, Cherubini A. Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent and Treat Delirium in Older Patients: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR project ONTOP Series. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0123090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123090. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26062023
  • Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM Jr. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901.

    PubMed 10053175
  • Alvarez EA, Garrido MA, Tobar EA, Prieto SA, Vergara SO, Briceno CD, Gonzalez FJ. Occupational therapy for delirium management in elderly patients without mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit: A pilot randomized clinical trial. J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 10.

    PubMed 27660922
  • Nydahl P, Dewes M, Dubb R, Hermes C, Kaltwasser A, Krotsetis S, von Haken R. Survey among critical care nurses and physicians about delirium management. Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Jan;23(1):23-29. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12299. Epub 2017 May 18.

    PubMed 28523698
  • Xing J, Sun Y, Jie Y, Yuan Z, Liu W. Perceptions, attitudes, and current practices regards delirium in China: A survey of 917 critical care nurses and physicians in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8028. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008028.

    PubMed 28953621
  • Alvarez EA, Garrido M, Ponce DP, Pizarro G, Cordova AA, Vera F, Ruiz R, Fernandez R, Velasquez JD, Tobar E, Salech F. A software to prevent delirium in hospitalised older adults: development and feasibility assessment. Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):239-245. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz166.

    PubMed 31957783
  • Garrido MA, Alvarez EA, Ponce DP, Salech F, Tobar DI, Tobar EA. Consolidated framework for advancing implementation science for the implementation process and adherence assessment of a non-pharmacological delirium prevention program. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;36(2):302-313. doi: 10.1002/gps.5425. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

    PubMed 32892410
  • Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):823-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01674.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

    PubMed 18384586
  • Young Y, Fan MY, Hebel JR, Boult C. Concurrent validity of administering the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument by interview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;88(9):766-70. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a9f1d6.

    PubMed 19487922

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in people with Delirium and Confusion, run by University of Chile at 1 site in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eduardo Tobar Almonacid, MD (+56992368717, etobar@hcuch.cl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delirium Status (delirium and subsyndromal delirium) (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05108207, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in