DeliriumPREVEDELNCT05108207
A Software to Prevent Delirium (PREVEDEL) in Hospitalized Older Adults
A study testing Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in people with Delirium and Confusion, run by University of Chile at 1 site in Chile.
Trial summary
Background Delirium, is a clinical condition characterized by acute and fluctuating deterioration of the cognitive state, generally secondary to an acute pathology. It is a common condition in hospitalized older adults and it develops in 20-30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward and up to 80% of those… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Delirium, Confusion, Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- What is being tested?
- Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChile
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 15 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 65 years or older.
- Hospitalized less than an 48 hours ago in a general ward or in the intermediate care unit. Participating health center: 1) Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, 2) Hospital San Juan de Dios, 3) Clínica Las Condes, 4) Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr Luis Tisné.
Who cannot join
- Presence of full or syndromal delirium (CAM+ or presence of one core elements).
- History of dementia (AD8 greater than 2 points).
- Non-Spanish speaking patients.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Chile1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan
Eduardo Tobar, MD, +56229786009, etobar@hcuch.cl
Eduardo Tobar, MD
About this study
Official title: Software-guided Cognitive Stimulation Prevents the Development of Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial
Background
Delirium, is a clinical condition characterized by acute and fluctuating deterioration of the cognitive state, generally secondary to an acute pathology. It is a common condition in hospitalized older adults and it develops in 20-30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative outcomes in older adults, such as longer hospitalizations, higher mortality, and short and medium-term institutionalization. Randomized clinical trials have shown that delirium is preventable through non-pharmacological prevention measures, decreasing its incidence by 30 to 50%. These interventions include promoting physical activity, facilitating the use of glasses and hearing aids, cognitive stimulation, and providing frequent reorientation of time and space, among others.
Read more
These measures are currently seldom applied in hospitals in Chile and around the world for various reasons some of which include the heavy workload of clinical staff, the lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.
The main objective is to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status(full/subsyncromal delirium) in hospitalized older adults.
Method/Design: randomized controlled trial, parallel groups, multicenter.
Participants: patients 65 years or older who have been hospitalized for less than 48 hours in the general ward or in the intermediate care unit of 4 hospitals in Santiago, Chile.
Intervention: participants in the intervention group will use a tablet with cognitive stimulation software for delirium prevention for 5 continuous days versus the control group who will use the tablet without the software.
Evaluations: The incidence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium, duration, density of delirium, cognitive and functional status at discharge, adherence to prevention measures, as well as demographic variables of interest will be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
Background. Delirium is a clinical condition characterized by acute cognitive impairment, of fluctuating course, generally secondary to an acute pathology, which appears after the interaction between predisposing factors and well described precipitants. It is a very common condition in older adults, observed in 20% to 30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward, and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative clinical outcomes which include longer hospitalizations, increased direct and indirect costs, functional impairment, greater risk of mortality, increased risk of institutionalization, and deterioration in long-term cognitive status, among others.
Subsyndromal delirium (SSD) is a milder state characterised by the presence of certain delirium symptoms but without meeting full diagnostic criteria thresholds, is also associated with poor posthospitalization outcomes similar to those associated with delirium. The reported frequency of subsyndromal delirium varies (7-50%) according to the definition applied and the clinical population studied. Its incidence in the general medicine ward is 17%.
The frequency of delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) in the general room is approximately 25%.
It is known that delirium in hospitalized older adults is preventable. In multiple randomized clinical trials, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD), shown to reduce its incidence by 30-50%7.
Despite the high evidence supporting them, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium are poorly implemented in hospitals in Chile and around the world for several reasons, such as the heavy workload of clinical staff, lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.
Prior to this clinical trial, local pilot studies have shown some progress in this area. On the one hand, it has been reported that the incorporation of software technology through a "PREVEDEL" tablet is feasible and can be implemented on a hospital level, with possible effects on decreasing delirium. On the other hand, the implementation of nPPD following a theoretical model improves the adherence of health personnel.
Therefore, a multicenter randomized clinical trial is proposed, which seeks to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by the PREVEDEL software prevents delirium in hospitalized older adults and whether it is a technology that can be used in others hospital centers.
Centers and place where data is collected. Chile. These are: Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Hospital San Juan de Dios (HSJD), Clínica Las Condes (CLC) and Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr. Luis Tisné (HLT). Two are public institutions and two are private institutions.
Intervention.
Interventions to implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD) in the centers that will participate in the RCT.
Three months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study
Interventions to perform an RCT where the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus a placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults is compared.
Standard non-pharmacological prevention measures
According to the recommendations in the literature and those made by local studies, the following standard non-pharmacological delirium prevention measures were defined:
Study groups Control Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL).
Experimental Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL).
To evaluate patient adherence and how the tablet is used, both groups will have an application installed in their devices that will allow them to keep track of the time of use and applications used.
Software content
- Desktop module.
- The exercise module.
- Games module.
- The documentary module.
- Alert module.
- Configuration module, allows software customization.
- Registration system.
OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS
General To assess whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status in hospitalized older adults.
Specifics
- Implement a program of nPPD at the centers that will participate in the randomized clinical trial (RCT).
- Conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults.
Hypothesis Cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software decreases the incidence of delirium status in hospitalized older adults.
Study sample.
For the calculation of the sample size, local and literature data were considered. A delirium status prevalence of 20% is estimated in the Control group and a decrease of this to 8% in the Intervention group. In this way, with a power of 80%, and an alpha of 0.05 bilaterally, 147 patients will be enrolled in each group. If add to this a 10% loss of follow-up, the overall sample size is 320 patients.
Randomization. Randomization was performed with computer-generated random permuted blocks using a centralized, secure Web-based randomization service.
Masking The enrollers, evaluators and healthcare personnel (nurses, physical therapists, physicians, occupational therapists) do not know the assigned group. Both groups receive a tablet of the same dimensions and with the same basic applications. However, blinding the patient is not possible, since when exploring the tablet, he or she will recognize whether or not it has the PREVEDEL program included. To reduce this bias, the staff that delivers the tablet encourages both groups to use its different basic applications (access the Internet) and that any doubts may have participants about its use should be made to the tablet coordinator, so that the evaluators or healthcare personnel remain masked.
The time between assignment and delivery of the tablet is between 4 to 12 hours in all participating centers. This variable will be measured for later analysis.
Statistical Methods For the descriptive analysis of the variables will use the mean (standard deviation), median (25-75 percentiles), or proportions as appropriate to the type and distribution of the data.
Analytical Statistics: For the primary outcome, a comparison of proportions between patients who develop delirium and subsyndromal delirium in both groups will be made, using Fisher's exact test, and as a measure of efficacy, an OR (95% CI) will be estimated. If there is any baseline variable that is not matched by the randomization, efficacy analyses will be carried out by means of logistic regression with the main variable being the treatment, and the adjustment variables those that the randomization would not have been able to match. Additionally, to compare the effect of the intervention over time, a time-to-event analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Maier procedure and then the Cox regression model to adjust for baseline variables and the presence of the intervention. For the secondary outcomes, the Fisher's exact test or t-Test will be used, as appropriate, for the type and distribution of the data. Linear regression or multivariate logistics will also be performed, as appropriate, to evaluate the impact of the intervention, adjusting for the input covariates. A bilateral p 0.05 significance level will be used for all analyses.
Ethics Committee The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Clinical Hospital of the University of Chile and its approval was validated by the ethics committees of the respective participating centers (Registry No. 049, July 31, 2019).
Trial Steering Committee
Committee was formed with 3 international experts in the "Trial Steering Committee" (TSC) area. This committee will watch over the following aspects:
- Supervise and guarantee scientific quality.
- Advise on study protocol, recruitment progress, adherence, follow-up and data quality.
- Review the recommendations of the data analysis and monitoring committee.
- Review the publications in the primary trials.
For the fulfillment of the objectives, the TSC will meet before, in the middle and at the end of the recruitment.
Informed Consent The informed consent will be given by the patient himself and obtained by one of the main investigators.
- Being tested
- Prevention software, Placebo, Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium
- Keywords
- delirium, prevention, cognitive stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Delirium, Confusion, Neurobehavioral Manifestations, Neurologic Manifestations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prevention softwareOther
The software is installed on an Alcatel OneTouch Pixi-3 10 tablet and is delivered every day to each patient between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm, with nighttime pickup (8:00 pm to 09:00 am), so the patient can rest and to charge the device. The first day, a previously trained health professional delivers the tablet and trains the older adults in its use, taking 10 to 15 minutes. The day after the tablet is delivered, the same person goes to the patient's room to check if he or she has any doubts or problems with its use. Both groups are advised to use the tablet 3 times a day, at least 10 minutes each time.
PlaceboOther
All patients will have a tablet without the software PREVEDEL between 09:00-19:00 hrs.
Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent deliriumOther
Three months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | will receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL). Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | will receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL). Receives: Other: Prevention software; Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delirium Status (delirium and subsyndromal delirium)
To evaluate the incidence of delirium and incidence of subsyndromal with Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).
Measured: 5 days
Secondary outcomes (10)
Duration of delirium
To evaluate duration in days.
Measured: 5 days of protocol and 2 days of follow-up.
Density of delirium
Understood as the ratio between the duration of the event and the exposure time (time spent in the protocol).
Measured: 5 days.
Level of independence in basic activities of daily living
To evaluate level of independence in activities of daily living at discharge with Functional Independence Measure.Scoring ranges from 13 to 126 points, with higher scores indicative of better performance.
Measured: At day 0 and 5.
Cognitive level
Evaluate cognitive performance at hospital discharge with Montreal cognitive Assessment. Scoring ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicative of better performance.
Measured: At day 0 and 5.
Adherence to prevention measures
Assessment of adherence to 4 non-pharmacological prevention domains (12 indicators): Management of environment (visible clock, visible calendar, decrease physical restrictions, early mobilization), (indication of relative rest, encourage patient to sit and stand), correction of sensory deficits (availability of glasses, hearing aids, and dentures when necessary), management of medications (decrease the use of benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, and metoclopramide when possible).
Measured: At day 0 and 30 (before and after training in prevention measure).
Time of use of electronic device
The usage time on the mobile device (with internal device registration) will be recorded.
Measured: 5 days
Hospital stay
Length of hospital stay in days.From the day of admission to the hospital until discharge.
Measured: Through study completion an average of 30 days
90-day mortality
90-day mortality check by civil registry.
Measured: At 90 day.
Difficulty falling and staying asleep due to device use.
Every day when removing the device, the person will be asked ¿Have you had difficulty falling and staying asleep due to device use?
Measured: Every day for 5 days.
Headache due to the device use.
Every day when removing the device, the person will be asked Have you had a headache due to the device use? If the answer is yes, the intensity of the pain will be scored, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the greatest pain.
Measured: Every day for 5 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DeliriumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT). CONSORT methodological recommendations are used for reporting non-pharmacological trials, in addition to TIDieR and SPIRIT recommendations.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chile
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eduardo Tobar, University of Chile
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05108207
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ID16AM2080
- Acronym
- PREVEDEL
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
PubMed 23992774Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, Fong TG, Gross A, Inouye SK, Jones RN. Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):30-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923.
PubMed 22762316Veiga D, Luis C, Parente D, Fernandes V, Botelho M, Santos P, Abelha F. Postoperative delirium in intensive care patients: risk factors and outcome. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;62(4):469-83. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70146-0.
PubMed 22793963Leslie DL, Zhang Y, Holford TR, Bogardus ST, Leo-Summers LS, Inouye SK. Premature death associated with delirium at 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1657-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1657.
PubMed 16043686Sepulveda E, Leonard M, Franco JG, Adamis D, McCarthy G, Dunne C, Trzepacz PT, Gaviria AM, de Pablo J, Vilella E, Meagher DJ. Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 1;7:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28116342Meagher D, O'Regan N, Ryan D, Connolly W, Boland E, O'Caoimhe R, Clare J, Mcfarland J, Tighe S, Leonard M, Adamis D, Trzepacz PT, Timmons S. Frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in an adult acute hospital population. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;205(6):478-85. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.139865. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
PubMed 25359923Abraha I, Trotta F, Rimland JM, Cruz-Jentoft A, Lozano-Montoya I, Soiza RL, Pierini V, Dessi Fulgheri P, Lattanzio F, O'Mahony D, Cherubini A. Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent and Treat Delirium in Older Patients: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR project ONTOP Series. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0123090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123090. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26062023Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM Jr. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901.
PubMed 10053175Alvarez EA, Garrido MA, Tobar EA, Prieto SA, Vergara SO, Briceno CD, Gonzalez FJ. Occupational therapy for delirium management in elderly patients without mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit: A pilot randomized clinical trial. J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
PubMed 27660922Nydahl P, Dewes M, Dubb R, Hermes C, Kaltwasser A, Krotsetis S, von Haken R. Survey among critical care nurses and physicians about delirium management. Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Jan;23(1):23-29. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12299. Epub 2017 May 18.
PubMed 28523698Xing J, Sun Y, Jie Y, Yuan Z, Liu W. Perceptions, attitudes, and current practices regards delirium in China: A survey of 917 critical care nurses and physicians in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8028. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008028.
PubMed 28953621Alvarez EA, Garrido M, Ponce DP, Pizarro G, Cordova AA, Vera F, Ruiz R, Fernandez R, Velasquez JD, Tobar E, Salech F. A software to prevent delirium in hospitalised older adults: development and feasibility assessment. Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):239-245. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz166.
PubMed 31957783Garrido MA, Alvarez EA, Ponce DP, Salech F, Tobar DI, Tobar EA. Consolidated framework for advancing implementation science for the implementation process and adherence assessment of a non-pharmacological delirium prevention program. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;36(2):302-313. doi: 10.1002/gps.5425. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
PubMed 32892410Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):823-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01674.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
PubMed 18384586Young Y, Fan MY, Hebel JR, Boult C. Concurrent validity of administering the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument by interview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;88(9):766-70. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a9f1d6.
PubMed 19487922
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Software-guided Cognitive Stimulation Prevents the Development of Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05108207
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREVEDEL / ID16AM2080
- Keywords
- delirium, prevention, cognitive stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChileUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background
Delirium, is a clinical condition characterized by acute and fluctuating deterioration of the cognitive state, generally secondary to an acute pathology. It is a common condition in hospitalized older adults and it develops in 20-30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative outcomes in older adults, such as longer hospitalizations, higher mortality, and short and medium-term institutionalization. Randomized clinical trials have shown that delirium is preventable through non-pharmacological prevention measures, decreasing its incidence by 30 to 50%. These interventions include promoting physical activity, facilitating the use of glasses and hearing aids, cognitive stimulation, and providing frequent reorientation of time and space, among others.
These measures are currently seldom applied in hospitals in Chile and around the world for various reasons some of which include the heavy workload of clinical staff, the lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.
The main objective is to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status(full/subsyncromal delirium) in hospitalized older adults.
Method/Design: randomized controlled trial, parallel groups, multicenter.
Participants: patients 65 years or older who have been hospitalized for less than 48 hours in the general ward or in the intermediate care unit of 4 hospitals in Santiago, Chile.
Intervention: participants in the intervention group will use a tablet with cognitive stimulation software for delirium prevention for 5 continuous days versus the control group who will use the tablet without the software.
Evaluations: The incidence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium, duration, density of delirium, cognitive and functional status at discharge, adherence to prevention measures, as well as demographic variables of interest will be evaluated.
Detailed description
Background. Delirium is a clinical condition characterized by acute cognitive impairment, of fluctuating course, generally secondary to an acute pathology, which appears after the interaction between predisposing factors and well described precipitants. It is a very common condition in older adults, observed in 20% to 30% of patients hospitalized in a general ward, and up to 80% of those hospitalized in critical care units. Delirium is associated with negative clinical outcomes which include longer hospitalizations, increased direct and indirect costs, functional impairment, greater risk of mortality, increased risk of institutionalization, and deterioration in long-term cognitive status, among others.
Subsyndromal delirium (SSD) is a milder state characterised by the presence of certain delirium symptoms but without meeting full diagnostic criteria thresholds, is also associated with poor posthospitalization outcomes similar to those associated with delirium. The reported frequency of subsyndromal delirium varies (7-50%) according to the definition applied and the clinical population studied. Its incidence in the general medicine ward is 17%.
The frequency of delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) in the general room is approximately 25%.
It is known that delirium in hospitalized older adults is preventable. In multiple randomized clinical trials, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD), shown to reduce its incidence by 30-50%7.
Despite the high evidence supporting them, non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium are poorly implemented in hospitals in Chile and around the world for several reasons, such as the heavy workload of clinical staff, lack of trained personnel, and, in general, the absence of systematic implementation processes.
Prior to this clinical trial, local pilot studies have shown some progress in this area. On the one hand, it has been reported that the incorporation of software technology through a "PREVEDEL" tablet is feasible and can be implemented on a hospital level, with possible effects on decreasing delirium. On the other hand, the implementation of nPPD following a theoretical model improves the adherence of health personnel.
Therefore, a multicenter randomized clinical trial is proposed, which seeks to evaluate whether cognitive stimulation guided by the PREVEDEL software prevents delirium in hospitalized older adults and whether it is a technology that can be used in others hospital centers.
Centers and place where data is collected. Chile. These are: Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Hospital San Juan de Dios (HSJD), Clínica Las Condes (CLC) and Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr. Luis Tisné (HLT). Two are public institutions and two are private institutions.
Intervention.
Interventions to implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium (nPPD) in the centers that will participate in the RCT.
Three months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study
Interventions to perform an RCT where the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus a placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults is compared.
Standard non-pharmacological prevention measures
According to the recommendations in the literature and those made by local studies, the following standard non-pharmacological delirium prevention measures were defined:
Study groups Control Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL).
Experimental Group: will receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL).
To evaluate patient adherence and how the tablet is used, both groups will have an application installed in their devices that will allow them to keep track of the time of use and applications used.
Software content
- Desktop module.
- The exercise module.
- Games module.
- The documentary module.
- Alert module.
- Configuration module, allows software customization.
- Registration system.
OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS
General To assess whether cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software prevents delirium status in hospitalized older adults.
Specifics
- Implement a program of nPPD at the centers that will participate in the randomized clinical trial (RCT).
- Conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the effect of the use of PREVEDEL versus placebo (Tablet without PREVEDEL) in the prevention of delirium in older adults.
Hypothesis Cognitive stimulation guided by PREVEDEL software decreases the incidence of delirium status in hospitalized older adults.
Study sample.
For the calculation of the sample size, local and literature data were considered. A delirium status prevalence of 20% is estimated in the Control group and a decrease of this to 8% in the Intervention group. In this way, with a power of 80%, and an alpha of 0.05 bilaterally, 147 patients will be enrolled in each group. If add to this a 10% loss of follow-up, the overall sample size is 320 patients.
Randomization. Randomization was performed with computer-generated random permuted blocks using a centralized, secure Web-based randomization service.
Masking The enrollers, evaluators and healthcare personnel (nurses, physical therapists, physicians, occupational therapists) do not know the assigned group. Both groups receive a tablet of the same dimensions and with the same basic applications. However, blinding the patient is not possible, since when exploring the tablet, he or she will recognize whether or not it has the PREVEDEL program included. To reduce this bias, the staff that delivers the tablet encourages both groups to use its different basic applications (access the Internet) and that any doubts may have participants about its use should be made to the tablet coordinator, so that the evaluators or healthcare personnel remain masked.
The time between assignment and delivery of the tablet is between 4 to 12 hours in all participating centers. This variable will be measured for later analysis.
Statistical Methods For the descriptive analysis of the variables will use the mean (standard deviation), median (25-75 percentiles), or proportions as appropriate to the type and distribution of the data.
Analytical Statistics: For the primary outcome, a comparison of proportions between patients who develop delirium and subsyndromal delirium in both groups will be made, using Fisher's exact test, and as a measure of efficacy, an OR (95% CI) will be estimated. If there is any baseline variable that is not matched by the randomization, efficacy analyses will be carried out by means of logistic regression with the main variable being the treatment, and the adjustment variables those that the randomization would not have been able to match. Additionally, to compare the effect of the intervention over time, a time-to-event analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Maier procedure and then the Cox regression model to adjust for baseline variables and the presence of the intervention. For the secondary outcomes, the Fisher's exact test or t-Test will be used, as appropriate, for the type and distribution of the data. Linear regression or multivariate logistics will also be performed, as appropriate, to evaluate the impact of the intervention, adjusting for the input covariates. A bilateral p 0.05 significance level will be used for all analyses.
Ethics Committee The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Clinical Hospital of the University of Chile and its approval was validated by the ethics committees of the respective participating centers (Registry No. 049, July 31, 2019).
Trial Steering Committee
Committee was formed with 3 international experts in the "Trial Steering Committee" (TSC) area. This committee will watch over the following aspects:
- Supervise and guarantee scientific quality.
- Advise on study protocol, recruitment progress, adherence, follow-up and data quality.
- Review the recommendations of the data analysis and monitoring committee.
- Review the publications in the primary trials.
For the fulfillment of the objectives, the TSC will meet before, in the middle and at the end of the recruitment.
Informed Consent The informed consent will be given by the patient himself and obtained by one of the main investigators.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT). CONSORT methodological recommendations are used for reporting non-pharmacological trials, in addition to TIDieR and SPIRIT recommendations.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo, Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent deliriumwill receive the standard delirium prevention measures outlined above, plus the use of a mobile device without delirium prevention software for 5 days (Control Group: nPPD package, without PREVEDEL). |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Prevention software, Other: Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent deliriumwill receive the standard delirium prevention measures, plus the use of a mobile device with PREVEDEL software for 5 days (Experimental Group: nPPD package, with PREVEDEL). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients 65 years or older.
- Hospitalized less than an 48 hours ago in a general ward or in the intermediate care unit. Participating health center: 1) Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, 2) Hospital San Juan de Dios, 3) Clínica Las Condes, 4) Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr Luis Tisné.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of full or syndromal delirium (CAM+ or presence of one core elements).
- History of dementia (AD8 greater than 2 points).
- Non-Spanish speaking patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention softwareThe software is installed on an Alcatel OneTouch Pixi-3 10 tablet and is delivered every day to each patient between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm, with nighttime pickup (8:00 pm to 09:00 am), so the patient can rest and to charge the device. The first day, a previously trained health professional delivers the tablet and trains the older adults in its use, taking 10 to 15 minutes. The day after the tablet is delivered, the same person goes to the patient's room to check if he or she has any doubts or problems with its use. Both groups are advised to use the tablet 3 times a day, at least 10 minutes each time. | Other | Experimental Group |
| PlaceboAll patients will have a tablet without the software PREVEDEL between 09:00-19:00 hrs. | Other | Control Group |
| Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent deliriumThree months before the start of the clinical trial, an intervention is carried out in the Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Intermediate Care Unit services of the 4 participating centers in order to establish a homogeneous plan of nPPD and assess adherence. The implementation methodology in the first stage will be according to the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) model, used in a local pilot study. | Other | Control Group, Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Delirium Status (delirium and subsyndromal delirium)
Time frame: 5 days
To evaluate the incidence of delirium and incidence of subsyndromal with Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).
10 secondary outcomes
Duration of delirium
Time frame: 5 days of protocol and 2 days of follow-up.
Density of delirium
Time frame: 5 days.
Level of independence in basic activities of daily living
Time frame: At day 0 and 5.
Cognitive level
Time frame: At day 0 and 5.
Adherence to prevention measures
Time frame: At day 0 and 30 (before and after training in prevention measure).
Time of use of electronic device
Time frame: 5 days
Hospital stay
Time frame: Through study completion an average of 30 days
90-day mortality
Time frame: At 90 day.
Difficulty falling and staying asleep due to device use.
Time frame: Every day for 5 days.
Headache due to the device use.
Time frame: Every day for 5 days.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 23992774Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 22762316Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, Fong TG, Gross A, Inouye SK, Jones RN. Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):30-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923.
- Results publication: PubMed 22793963Veiga D, Luis C, Parente D, Fernandes V, Botelho M, Santos P, Abelha F. Postoperative delirium in intensive care patients: risk factors and outcome. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;62(4):469-83. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70146-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 16043686Leslie DL, Zhang Y, Holford TR, Bogardus ST, Leo-Summers LS, Inouye SK. Premature death associated with delirium at 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1657-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1657.
- Results publication: PubMed 28116342Sepulveda E, Leonard M, Franco JG, Adamis D, McCarthy G, Dunne C, Trzepacz PT, Gaviria AM, de Pablo J, Vilella E, Meagher DJ. Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 1;7:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 25359923Meagher D, O'Regan N, Ryan D, Connolly W, Boland E, O'Caoimhe R, Clare J, Mcfarland J, Tighe S, Leonard M, Adamis D, Trzepacz PT, Timmons S. Frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in an adult acute hospital population. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;205(6):478-85. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.139865. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 26062023Abraha I, Trotta F, Rimland JM, Cruz-Jentoft A, Lozano-Montoya I, Soiza RL, Pierini V, Dessi Fulgheri P, Lattanzio F, O'Mahony D, Cherubini A. Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent and Treat Delirium in Older Patients: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR project ONTOP Series. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0123090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123090. eCollection 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 10053175Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM Jr. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901.
- Results publication: PubMed 27660922Alvarez EA, Garrido MA, Tobar EA, Prieto SA, Vergara SO, Briceno CD, Gonzalez FJ. Occupational therapy for delirium management in elderly patients without mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit: A pilot randomized clinical trial. J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 28523698Nydahl P, Dewes M, Dubb R, Hermes C, Kaltwasser A, Krotsetis S, von Haken R. Survey among critical care nurses and physicians about delirium management. Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Jan;23(1):23-29. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12299. Epub 2017 May 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 28953621Xing J, Sun Y, Jie Y, Yuan Z, Liu W. Perceptions, attitudes, and current practices regards delirium in China: A survey of 917 critical care nurses and physicians in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8028. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008028.
- Results publication: PubMed 31957783Alvarez EA, Garrido M, Ponce DP, Pizarro G, Cordova AA, Vera F, Ruiz R, Fernandez R, Velasquez JD, Tobar E, Salech F. A software to prevent delirium in hospitalised older adults: development and feasibility assessment. Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):239-245. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz166.
Related trials for Delirium
RecruitingObservational study
The Impact of Fast-Track Anesthesia on Postoperative Neurocognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Delirium - Postoperative, Cardiac Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Prediction and Prevention of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity
Dementia, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Lactium Premedication to Prevent Emergence Agitation
Lactium, Premedication
Not yet recruiting
DEXmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia and Delirium Prevention After NEUROsurgery (DEX-NEURO Trial)
Neurosurgery, Brain Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prevention software and Implement a program of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in people with Delirium and Confusion, run by University of Chile at 1 site in Chile.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eduardo Tobar Almonacid, MD (+56992368717, etobar@hcuch.cl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delirium Status (delirium and subsyndromal delirium) (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05108207, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.