Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant TachycardiaWATER ATTACNCT05109273
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablation With Irrigated Catheter and Three-dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping
An observational study of Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant Tachycardia, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The WATER ATTAC study aims at multicentric, longitudinal, perspective evaluation of safety and efficacy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) performed combining irrigated ablation catheter and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant Tachycardia
- What is being tested?
- Transcatheter ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 289 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 31 Jul 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 12 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing EPS for SVT, with confirm of AVNRT at EPS, treated with transcatheter ablation by means of irrigated catheter and 3D electroanatomic mapping system
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing electrophysiologic study (EPS) for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
- evidence of dual AV node pathway or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) induction at EPS
- Attempt of AVNRT ablation with irrigated catheter and three-dimensionale electroanatomic mapping system
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Ablation with non-irrigated catheter
- Ablation without electroanatomic mapping system
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablation With irrigATEd catheteR And Three-dimensional elecTroAnatomiC Mapping (WATER ATTAC)
The WATER ATTAC study aims at multicentric, longitudinal, perspective evaluation of safety and efficacy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) performed combining irrigated ablation catheter and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. Efficacy and rate of complications will be evaluated over medium and long term follow-up.
Read the detailed description
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia in clinical practice, more common in women than in men. It can occur at all ages, but it is more likely to begin in young adults, with average age of onset around 32 years. Due to its sudden onset and cessation it is classified in the group of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVT), accounting for almost two thirds of the total.
AVNRT is a regular supraventricular tachycardia resulting from formation of reentry circuit confined to atrioventricular node and perinodal atrial tissue. About 80-90% of patients with AVNRT have the common form of arrhythmia, also called "typical" or "slow-fast" type.
Slow-fast AVNRT usually begins when premature atrial complex (PAC) arrives at AV node when fast pathway is in its refractory period. Therefore, antegrade conduction along fast pathway is blocked. If premature beat arrives in specific time window, slow pathway, with shorter refractory period, is available for conduction to ventricle. Premature beat leads through slow way, and, through final common way, to His bundle. As a result, PR interval of premature beat will be longer than normal beats conducted through fast track. If fast pathway has recovered its excitability by the time impulse of the slow pathway reaches distal junction of the two paths, impulse can lead retrograde through fast pathway. Circuit can then become repetitive with antegrade conduction along slow pathway and retrograde conduction along fast pathway with consequent triggering of sustained tachycardia. This proposed mechanism explains series of clinical observations of AVNRTs: single PAC can initiate arrhythmia and in the same way penetration in reentry circuit by PAC can abruptly interrupt arrhythmia.
Up to 20% of patients with AVNRT have uncommon forms of arrhythmia, referred to as "atypical" AVNRT. There are cases in which antegrade conduction can occur along fast pathway with retrograde conduction along slow pathway (fast-slow type).
Some patients, on the other hand, have more slow pathways, in which both antegrade and retrograde pathways of circuit use slow AV nodal pathways (slow-slow type).
For patients with AVNRT episodes that occur frequently and are poorly tolerated or require hospitalization, the only chronic therapy recommended in class I by international guidelines is catheter ablation. Evidence from randomized trials has shown that catheter ablation is significantly superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing hospital admission for recurrences of tachycardia at 5 years.
AVNRT catheter ablation is a procedure that involves cardiac mapping and subsequent ablation of the arrhythmic substrate. Cardiac mapping refers to the careful movement of a mapping or ablation catheter in the area of interest, probing site where ablation will be able to cure arrhythmia. Cardiac mapping during electrophysiological testing identifies temporal and spatial distributions of electrical potentials generated by myocardium during normal and abnormal rhythms. This process allows to describe spread of activation from its inception to its completion within a region of interest and, in its usual application, is focused towards identifying site of origin or critical site of conduction for arrhythmia. The recurrence rate after radiofrequency catheter ablation varies from 3.5 to 5.2% during a 6 - 24 months follow-up.
The most worrying complication related to AVNRT ablation is iatrogenic disturbance of atrioventricular conduction requiring pacemaker implantation. According to large recent trial, 3% of patients treated with AVNRT ablation underwent pacemaker implantation during a median follow-up of 4 years [9]. In particular, the risk of pacemaker implantation is present not only in the periprocedural period, but persists during the long-term follow-up.
Since the first description of radiofrequency ablation directed to site of slow pathway and guided by fluoroscopic anatomical landmarks or intracardiac electrograms, technique for AVNRT ablation has been implemented in years. One of the major improvements was three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping. Electroanatomic (or electromagnetic) mapping, available in many electrophysiology laboratories, is based on use of special catheter with locatable sensor tip, connected to mapping and navigation system. The system can generate color-coded static maps or animated dynamic maps of activation wavefront. These images can define reentrant circuits as well as site of origin of ectopic activity with centrifugal, regional or asymmetric diffusion of electrical activity. A major advantage of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping is its ability to allow catheter to anatomically and accurately "revisit" critically important recording site previously identified during electrophysiological study, even if tachycardia is no longer present or inducible. This accurate repositioning can allow further application of the radiofrequency current to critical sites that otherwise cannot be performed with high degree of accuracy and reproducibility. Furthermore, direct visualization of anatomical structures such as coronary sinus ostium, tricuspid anulus and bundle of His allows to delineate in precise and 3D way the Koch triangle, which is crucial a reference to perform ablation of slow pathway without affecting the atrioventricular node.
Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system also reduces or avoids radiation exposure and improve accuracy in localization and ablation of target site by means of three-dimensional visualization of anatomical map, with high success rates and reducing rate of complications and recurrences. The use of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping has been associated with significant reduction in patient radiation dose, operator radiation dose, and total fluoroscopy time.
Another technical improvement was irrigation of distal electrode of ablation catheter with saline and heparin, which reduced the risk of complications such as thrombus and steam pop formation. While in non-irrigated catheters, energy delivery is limited by temperature at catheter-tissue interface, irrigated catheters allow for greater energy delivery and create deeper lesions. Use of irrigated catheters for AVNRT ablation increased from 0% in 2005 to 23% in 2015 but still remains low. Combination of irrigation and flexible tip allows stable contact with myocardial tissue with uniform delivery of radiofrequency and continuous cooling.
In 2019, our group released an initial report on efficacy and safety of AVNRT ablation with new flexible tip open irrigated catheter (FlexAbilityTM, Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) combined with 3D EAM system (EnSite PrecisionTM, Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA).
Our study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of flexible tip open irrigated catheter ablative technique used in combination with 3D EAM. Our group recently published a subsequent work on a larger cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. About 150 patients were enrolled with mean follow-up period of 38 months. Acute procedural success rate was 96.7% (145/150 patients). During follow-up, 11 patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence (7.3%). No patient developed atrioventricular conduction block requiring pacemaker implantation (0%). In our study, therefore, results related to acute procedural success and long-term follow-up showed that AVNRT can be treated safely and effectively with irrigated flexible tip catheters and 3D EAM.
With the WATER ATTAC study we want to verify if the same results can be obtained by expanding the sample size in a multicentric context, with the aim of externally validating AVNRT tranascatheter ablation procedure with irrigated catheter and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of AVNRT ablations performed by combining irrigated catheter with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. The effectiveness of procedure and incidence of complications in medium and long term follow-up will be evaluated.
- Being tested
- Transcatheter ablation
- Keywords
- AVNRT, Ablation, Electroanatomical mapping system, Irrigated catheter, Radiofrequency, Arrhythmias, Electrophysiology, SVT, Slow-Fast
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcatheter ablationProcedure or surgery
Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping and radiofrequency ablation with irrigated catheter
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural success
Recurrence of AVNRT during follow-up
Measured: 12 months
Procedural complication
AV iatrogenic block
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Acute success rate
Non-inducibility of AVNRT or absence of dual AV node pathway
Measured: Immediate post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion31 Jul 2024
- Study completion31 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant TachycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 12 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Ferrara
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matteo Bertini, University Hospital of Ferrara
- Investigators
- Matteo Bertini, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Università degli Studi di Ferrara
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05109273
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 676/2021/Oss/AOUFe
- Acronym
- WATER ATTAC
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablation With irrigATEd catheteR And Three-dimensional elecTroAnatomiC Mapping (WATER ATTAC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05109273
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WATER ATTAC / 676/2021/Oss/AOUFe
- Keywords
- AVNRT, Ablation, Electroanatomical mapping system, Irrigated catheter, Radiofrequency, Arrhythmias, Electrophysiology, SVT
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of FerraraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The WATER ATTAC study aims at multicentric, longitudinal, perspective evaluation of safety and efficacy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) performed combining irrigated ablation catheter and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. Efficacy and rate of complications will be evaluated over medium and long term follow-up.
Detailed description
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia in clinical practice, more common in women than in men. It can occur at all ages, but it is more likely to begin in young adults, with average age of onset around 32 years. Due to its sudden onset and cessation it is classified in the group of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVT), accounting for almost two thirds of the total.
AVNRT is a regular supraventricular tachycardia resulting from formation of reentry circuit confined to atrioventricular node and perinodal atrial tissue. About 80-90% of patients with AVNRT have the common form of arrhythmia, also called "typical" or "slow-fast" type.
Slow-fast AVNRT usually begins when premature atrial complex (PAC) arrives at AV node when fast pathway is in its refractory period. Therefore, antegrade conduction along fast pathway is blocked. If premature beat arrives in specific time window, slow pathway, with shorter refractory period, is available for conduction to ventricle. Premature beat leads through slow way, and, through final common way, to His bundle. As a result, PR interval of premature beat will be longer than normal beats conducted through fast track. If fast pathway has recovered its excitability by the time impulse of the slow pathway reaches distal junction of the two paths, impulse can lead retrograde through fast pathway. Circuit can then become repetitive with antegrade conduction along slow pathway and retrograde conduction along fast pathway with consequent triggering of sustained tachycardia. This proposed mechanism explains series of clinical observations of AVNRTs: single PAC can initiate arrhythmia and in the same way penetration in reentry circuit by PAC can abruptly interrupt arrhythmia.
Up to 20% of patients with AVNRT have uncommon forms of arrhythmia, referred to as "atypical" AVNRT. There are cases in which antegrade conduction can occur along fast pathway with retrograde conduction along slow pathway (fast-slow type).
Some patients, on the other hand, have more slow pathways, in which both antegrade and retrograde pathways of circuit use slow AV nodal pathways (slow-slow type).
For patients with AVNRT episodes that occur frequently and are poorly tolerated or require hospitalization, the only chronic therapy recommended in class I by international guidelines is catheter ablation. Evidence from randomized trials has shown that catheter ablation is significantly superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing hospital admission for recurrences of tachycardia at 5 years.
AVNRT catheter ablation is a procedure that involves cardiac mapping and subsequent ablation of the arrhythmic substrate. Cardiac mapping refers to the careful movement of a mapping or ablation catheter in the area of interest, probing site where ablation will be able to cure arrhythmia. Cardiac mapping during electrophysiological testing identifies temporal and spatial distributions of electrical potentials generated by myocardium during normal and abnormal rhythms. This process allows to describe spread of activation from its inception to its completion within a region of interest and, in its usual application, is focused towards identifying site of origin or critical site of conduction for arrhythmia. The recurrence rate after radiofrequency catheter ablation varies from 3.5 to 5.2% during a 6 - 24 months follow-up.
The most worrying complication related to AVNRT ablation is iatrogenic disturbance of atrioventricular conduction requiring pacemaker implantation. According to large recent trial, 3% of patients treated with AVNRT ablation underwent pacemaker implantation during a median follow-up of 4 years [9]. In particular, the risk of pacemaker implantation is present not only in the periprocedural period, but persists during the long-term follow-up.
Since the first description of radiofrequency ablation directed to site of slow pathway and guided by fluoroscopic anatomical landmarks or intracardiac electrograms, technique for AVNRT ablation has been implemented in years. One of the major improvements was three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping. Electroanatomic (or electromagnetic) mapping, available in many electrophysiology laboratories, is based on use of special catheter with locatable sensor tip, connected to mapping and navigation system. The system can generate color-coded static maps or animated dynamic maps of activation wavefront. These images can define reentrant circuits as well as site of origin of ectopic activity with centrifugal, regional or asymmetric diffusion of electrical activity. A major advantage of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping is its ability to allow catheter to anatomically and accurately "revisit" critically important recording site previously identified during electrophysiological study, even if tachycardia is no longer present or inducible. This accurate repositioning can allow further application of the radiofrequency current to critical sites that otherwise cannot be performed with high degree of accuracy and reproducibility. Furthermore, direct visualization of anatomical structures such as coronary sinus ostium, tricuspid anulus and bundle of His allows to delineate in precise and 3D way the Koch triangle, which is crucial a reference to perform ablation of slow pathway without affecting the atrioventricular node.
Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system also reduces or avoids radiation exposure and improve accuracy in localization and ablation of target site by means of three-dimensional visualization of anatomical map, with high success rates and reducing rate of complications and recurrences. The use of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping has been associated with significant reduction in patient radiation dose, operator radiation dose, and total fluoroscopy time.
Another technical improvement was irrigation of distal electrode of ablation catheter with saline and heparin, which reduced the risk of complications such as thrombus and steam pop formation. While in non-irrigated catheters, energy delivery is limited by temperature at catheter-tissue interface, irrigated catheters allow for greater energy delivery and create deeper lesions. Use of irrigated catheters for AVNRT ablation increased from 0% in 2005 to 23% in 2015 but still remains low. Combination of irrigation and flexible tip allows stable contact with myocardial tissue with uniform delivery of radiofrequency and continuous cooling.
In 2019, our group released an initial report on efficacy and safety of AVNRT ablation with new flexible tip open irrigated catheter (FlexAbilityTM, Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) combined with 3D EAM system (EnSite PrecisionTM, Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA).
Our study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of flexible tip open irrigated catheter ablative technique used in combination with 3D EAM. Our group recently published a subsequent work on a larger cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. About 150 patients were enrolled with mean follow-up period of 38 months. Acute procedural success rate was 96.7% (145/150 patients). During follow-up, 11 patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence (7.3%). No patient developed atrioventricular conduction block requiring pacemaker implantation (0%). In our study, therefore, results related to acute procedural success and long-term follow-up showed that AVNRT can be treated safely and effectively with irrigated flexible tip catheters and 3D EAM.
With the WATER ATTAC study we want to verify if the same results can be obtained by expanding the sample size in a multicentric context, with the aim of externally validating AVNRT tranascatheter ablation procedure with irrigated catheter and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of AVNRT ablations performed by combining irrigated catheter with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. The effectiveness of procedure and incidence of complications in medium and long term follow-up will be evaluated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 12 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing EPS for SVT, with confirm of AVNRT at EPS, treated with transcatheter ablation by means of irrigated catheter and 3D electroanatomic mapping system
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing electrophysiologic study (EPS) for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
- evidence of dual AV node pathway or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) induction at EPS
- Attempt of AVNRT ablation with irrigated catheter and three-dimensionale electroanatomic mapping system
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Ablation with non-irrigated catheter
- Ablation without electroanatomic mapping system
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter ablationThree-dimensional electroanatomic mapping and radiofrequency ablation with irrigated catheter | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Procedural success
Time frame: 12 months
Recurrence of AVNRT during follow-up
Procedural complication
Time frame: 12 months
AV iatrogenic block
1 secondary outcome
Acute success rate
Time frame: Immediate post-procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant Tachycardia
Recruiting
NASVAL-SVT: Nasal Swab Versus Modified Valsalva for Supraventricular Tachycardia
Supraventricular Tachycardia, Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
Recruiting
Localization of Anatomical Structures Involved in Nodal Tachycardias by High Density Mapping.
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia, Supraventricular Tachycardia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparative Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of Concealed and Manifest Accessory Pathways: a Single Center, Retrospective Observational Study
Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardias, Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Differentiate AVNRT from Orthodromic AVRT
SVT
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided Slow Pathway Cryoablation
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matteo Bertini, MD, PhD principal investigator
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant Tachycardia, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural success (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.