Food InsecurityNCT05109351
Communication and Marketing of School Meals
A study testing Participating to Boost Meal Participation in people with Food Insecurity, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Currently, millions of children in preschools, schools, and in afterschool continue to receive breakfast, lunch, snacks and supper through these programs. Thanks to federal nutrition standards and reimbursements, school meals are generally healthier than meals from home, particularly for students from low-income… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Insecurity
- What is being tested?
- Participating to Boost Meal Participation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 711 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2022to 21 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Elementary schools in California's San Joaquin Valley
Who cannot join
- Staff and parents who do not read or speak English or Spanish
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Examining Communication and Marketing Strategies to Reduce Food Insecurity Among Latinx Children in California's San Joaquin Valley
Currently, millions of children in preschools, schools, and in afterschool continue to receive breakfast, lunch, snacks and supper through these programs. Thanks to federal nutrition standards and reimbursements, school meals are generally healthier than meals from home, particularly for students from low-income households. Participation in these programs, beginning in the earliest years, reduces food insecurity and improves child health and academic performance. Despite USDA administrative flexibilities issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, participation in school nutrition programs has decreased. This trial will examine whether an intervention that focuses on communicating the benefits of child nutrition programs and establishes a feasible and sustainable strategy for parents to provide ongoing feedback to improve the appeal, cultural relevance, and quality of school meals will increase school meal participation to reduce food insecurity and promote child health.
Read the detailed description
Childhood food insecurity, is associated with anemia, obesity, and diabetes, as well as poor academic performance. In the U.S., food insecurity rates are higher among low-income households of color. During COVID-19, food insecurity has rapidly increased due to unprecedented rates of unemployment. While 15% of U.S. households with children reported food insecurity before the pandemic, this rose to 35% in April 2020. Even as early as 1946, when the National School Lunch Program was developed, high-quality nutrition was recognized as essential for children to be healthy, to perform well in school, and to go on to lead productive lives. Moreover, free and reduced-price meals provide vital income support for low-income households. Thanks to USDA administrative flexibilities issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, most U.S. children are eligible to pick up free meals at local schools. Despite this, participation in school nutrition programs is less than one third of that prior to the pandemic, resulting in a 2.1 billion dollar loss in revenue for school meal programs. Unfortunately, even prior to the pandemic, participation in school nutrition programs by eligible children is much lower than it should be, particularly for school breakfast programs and during the summer. Parents are critical to facilitating and encouraging their children's participation in school meals. Despite this, few U.S. studies examine parents' perceptions of school meals. Studies that do exist suggest that when parents perceive school meals negatively, it deters participation in the programs. Previous research indicates that parents may not know that school meals must meet strict nutrition standards. Moreover, parents also lack a vehicle for sharing ideas for improving meals with districts, further hindering participation in nutrition programs. Therefore, in order to increase participation in these programs, it is important to develop strategies for communicating with parents about the health, economic, and academic benefits of school meals and to provide a mechanism for parents to provide input and implement changes.
This study's central hypothesis is that an intervention that focuses on communicating the benefits of child nutrition programs and establishes a feasible and sustainable strategy for parents to provide ongoing feedback to improve the appeal, cultural relevance, and quality of school meals will increase school meal participation to reduce food insecurity and promote child health, well-being, and educational outcomes. This will be tested through a cluster randomized controlled trial in 6 schools in California's San Joaquin Valley (SJV), which is largely rural, and home to many low-income, Latino, agricultural-worker families. SJV's rates of poverty, food insecurity, and diet-related diseases are some of the highest in the state. Given the immense need, it is particularly unfortunate that the school nutrition programs are not more fully utilized, particularly during the pandemic. Marketing and communication options developed by a group of research and marketing experts, parents, school nutrition staff, and other school stakeholders will include Promotion strategies for communicating with parents about the benefits of school meals and Product strategies for improving the branding, design, packaging, quality, cultural appeal, and variety of school meals. Specific intervention examples could include (1) communicating information about school nutrition standards and the importance of meals for health and learning, (2) designing more environmentally friendly packaging, perhaps including positive messaging, to replace distribution in plastic wrappings, or (3) emphasizing meals' local, sustainable and cultural appropriateness. Researchers will conduct surveys at baseline and 9 months to assess 1) parents' satisfaction of meals, 2) household food insecurity using the 18-item US Household Food Security Survey Module, and 3) school food nutrition staff's practices surrounding school meal participation. Data on school-meal participation throughout the study period will be obtained from school food service directors.
If successful, the model can support policy advocacy nationally and also be promoted to and adapted by other schools, as this is a ubiquitous problem. To date, there is little work on this topic.
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity
- Being tested
- Participating to Boost Meal Participation
- Keywords
- marketing, communication, schools, nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Participating to Boost Meal ParticipationBehavioural
The Participating to Boost Meal Participation intervention consists of utilizing marketing and communication strategies to promote school meal participation in elementary school students.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participating to Boost Meal Participation | Experimental | Intervention group will receive marketing and communication strategies developed by researchers, community organizations, parents, school nutrition directors, and other school stakeholders. Receives: Behavioral: Participating to Boost Meal Participation |
| Control | No intervention | Usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in school meal participation
School meal participation data will be collected from participating school food service via directors via surveys. Data is also publicly available through California Department of Education Nutrition Services and will be obtained but this data is usually not available in real-time.
Measured: Baseline and at 2-3 months follow-up
Change in parents' satisfaction
Surveys will be conducted to assess parents' satisfaction of school meals
Measured: Baseline and at 2-3 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in household food insecurity
Surveys will be conducted to assess changes in household food insecurity using the 18-item US Household Food Security Survey Module
Measured: Baseline and 2-3-months after the start of the study.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2021
- Study start13 Jan 2022
- Primary completion21 Aug 2024
- Study completion21 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Food InsecurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 711 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anisha I Patel, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Anisha Patel, MD, MSPH, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05109351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 62682
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Examining Communication and Marketing Strategies to Reduce Food Insecurity Among Latinx Children in California's San Joaquin Valley
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05109351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 62682
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity
- Keywords
- marketing, communication, schools, nutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 711 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Currently, millions of children in preschools, schools, and in afterschool continue to receive breakfast, lunch, snacks and supper through these programs. Thanks to federal nutrition standards and reimbursements, school meals are generally healthier than meals from home, particularly for students from low-income households. Participation in these programs, beginning in the earliest years, reduces food insecurity and improves child health and academic performance. Despite USDA administrative flexibilities issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, participation in school nutrition programs has decreased. This trial will examine whether an intervention that focuses on communicating the benefits of child nutrition programs and establishes a feasible and sustainable strategy for parents to provide ongoing feedback to improve the appeal, cultural relevance, and quality of school meals will increase school meal participation to reduce food insecurity and promote child health.
Detailed description
Childhood food insecurity, is associated with anemia, obesity, and diabetes, as well as poor academic performance. In the U.S., food insecurity rates are higher among low-income households of color. During COVID-19, food insecurity has rapidly increased due to unprecedented rates of unemployment. While 15% of U.S. households with children reported food insecurity before the pandemic, this rose to 35% in April 2020. Even as early as 1946, when the National School Lunch Program was developed, high-quality nutrition was recognized as essential for children to be healthy, to perform well in school, and to go on to lead productive lives. Moreover, free and reduced-price meals provide vital income support for low-income households. Thanks to USDA administrative flexibilities issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, most U.S. children are eligible to pick up free meals at local schools. Despite this, participation in school nutrition programs is less than one third of that prior to the pandemic, resulting in a 2.1 billion dollar loss in revenue for school meal programs. Unfortunately, even prior to the pandemic, participation in school nutrition programs by eligible children is much lower than it should be, particularly for school breakfast programs and during the summer. Parents are critical to facilitating and encouraging their children's participation in school meals. Despite this, few U.S. studies examine parents' perceptions of school meals. Studies that do exist suggest that when parents perceive school meals negatively, it deters participation in the programs. Previous research indicates that parents may not know that school meals must meet strict nutrition standards. Moreover, parents also lack a vehicle for sharing ideas for improving meals with districts, further hindering participation in nutrition programs. Therefore, in order to increase participation in these programs, it is important to develop strategies for communicating with parents about the health, economic, and academic benefits of school meals and to provide a mechanism for parents to provide input and implement changes.
This study's central hypothesis is that an intervention that focuses on communicating the benefits of child nutrition programs and establishes a feasible and sustainable strategy for parents to provide ongoing feedback to improve the appeal, cultural relevance, and quality of school meals will increase school meal participation to reduce food insecurity and promote child health, well-being, and educational outcomes. This will be tested through a cluster randomized controlled trial in 6 schools in California's San Joaquin Valley (SJV), which is largely rural, and home to many low-income, Latino, agricultural-worker families. SJV's rates of poverty, food insecurity, and diet-related diseases are some of the highest in the state. Given the immense need, it is particularly unfortunate that the school nutrition programs are not more fully utilized, particularly during the pandemic. Marketing and communication options developed by a group of research and marketing experts, parents, school nutrition staff, and other school stakeholders will include Promotion strategies for communicating with parents about the benefits of school meals and Product strategies for improving the branding, design, packaging, quality, cultural appeal, and variety of school meals. Specific intervention examples could include (1) communicating information about school nutrition standards and the importance of meals for health and learning, (2) designing more environmentally friendly packaging, perhaps including positive messaging, to replace distribution in plastic wrappings, or (3) emphasizing meals' local, sustainable and cultural appropriateness. Researchers will conduct surveys at baseline and 9 months to assess 1) parents' satisfaction of meals, 2) household food insecurity using the 18-item US Household Food Security Survey Module, and 3) school food nutrition staff's practices surrounding school meal participation. Data on school-meal participation throughout the study period will be obtained from school food service directors.
If successful, the model can support policy advocacy nationally and also be promoted to and adapted by other schools, as this is a ubiquitous problem. To date, there is little work on this topic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participating to Boost Meal Participation | Experimental | Behavioral: Participating to Boost Meal ParticipationIntervention group will receive marketing and communication strategies developed by researchers, community organizations, parents, school nutrition directors, and other school stakeholders. |
| Control | No intervention | –Usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Elementary schools in California's San Joaquin Valley
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Staff and parents who do not read or speak English or Spanish
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Participating to Boost Meal ParticipationThe Participating to Boost Meal Participation intervention consists of utilizing marketing and communication strategies to promote school meal participation in elementary school students. | Behavioural | Participating to Boost Meal Participation |
Primary outcome
Change in school meal participation
Time frame: Baseline and at 2-3 months follow-up
School meal participation data will be collected from participating school food service via directors via surveys. Data is also publicly available through California Department of Education Nutrition Services and will be obtained but this data is usually not available in real-time.
Change in parents' satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline and at 2-3 months follow-up
Surveys will be conducted to assess parents' satisfaction of school meals
1 secondary outcome
Change in household food insecurity
Time frame: Baseline and 2-3-months after the start of the study.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Food Insecurity
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Addressing Food Insecurity in Pregnancy
Food Insecurity, Pregnancy
Active, not recruiting
Pilot of Continuous Glucose Monitor-Augmented Food Is Medicine
Nutrition, Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anisha Patel, MD, MSPH principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Participating to Boost Meal Participation in people with Food Insecurity, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in school meal participation (time frame: Baseline and at 2-3 months follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2024.