AzTrials
AzTrials

Nutrient DeficiencyNCT05110235

PEG Application Experiences to Geriatric Patients

An observational study of Nutrient Deficiency and Gastrostomy, run by Okan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is currently the chosen minimally invasive, endoscopic procedure for medium- and long-term enteral feeding in cases who need palliative care. The presented study evaluated geriatric (> 65-year-old) PEG-applied patients at our institution. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Nutrient Deficiency, Gastrostomy
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Dec 2017to 30 May 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: We retrospectively assessed the medical datum of PEG applied >65-year-old patients at our institution between December 2017 and March 2021. And, we excluded the patients who were not treated in our palliative care center. Table 1. shows the contraindications for PEG placement.

Inclusion Criteria: PEG applied >65-year-old patients at our institution between December 2017 and March 2021 -

Exclusion Criteria: We excluded the patients who were not treated in our palliative care center

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Okan University Hospital

    Istanbul, 34734

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY APPLICATION EXPERIENCES TO GERIATRIC PATIENTS IN PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is currently the chosen minimally invasive, endoscopic procedure for medium- and long-term enteral feeding in cases who need palliative care. The presented study evaluated geriatric (> 65-year-old) PEG-applied patients at our institution.

Read the detailed description

Palliative care is a treatment method that focuses on the patient and patient's family, aims to minimize the complaints caused by chronic diseases that cannot be treated, and increases life quality. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence defines palliative care as; the active, holistic care of patients with an advanced progressive illness. Management of pain and other symptoms and providing psychological, social, and spiritual support is paramount. Anorexia, weight loss, and sarcopenia are highly visible and distressing reminders of the life-limiting disease's influence on patients who require palliative care. Given this multifaceted and significant role, it is not unexpected that nutritional treatment method choices can be challenging.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a minimally-invasive endoscopic procedure that creates a passage from the patient's stomach to the abdominal wall via a feeding tube and provides a means of feeding if oral intake is not adequate. This safe and effective minimally-invasive option has been utilized in medical practice for over 40 years. PEG has advantages such as being minimally invasive, causing a low rate of complications and morbidity, and providing a long-lasting and safe feeding route. It is currently the chosen procedure for medium- and long-term enteral feeding in cases who need palliative care.

The application of PEG in geriatric-palliative care has not been well discussed. With the development of endoscopic procedures and PEG devices, this minimally invasive method can be applied more safely, even in challenging cases. This study discuss the indications of PEG in the field of palliative care of geriatric patients.

Keywords
Geriatrics, Nutrition, PEG, Gastrostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hemoglobin (gr/dl)

    30 th day hemoglobin levels after PEG application

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Albumin (gr/dl)

    30 th day albumin levels after PEG application

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion30 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05110235
Sponsor's protocol ID
56665618-204.01.08
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
13 Oct 2021
Last updated
5 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nutrient Deficiency and Gastrostomy, run by Okan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hemoglobin (gr/dl) (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in