Dental Caries in ChildrenNCT05110534
Supportive Caries Preventive Programme in Children Undergoing Dental General Anaesthesia
A study testing additional oral hygiene appointments in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Early childhood caries is a persistent problem often leading to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 5 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries in Children
- What is being tested?
- additional oral hygiene appointments
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 406 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 31 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 5 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- 2-5 years old children attending dental treatment under general anaesthesia
- parental approval
Who cannot join
- children above 5 years old
- no parental approval
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald
Greifswald, D-17457
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial on an Supportive Caries Preventive Programme in Children Undergoing Dental General Anaesthesia
Early childhood caries is a persistent problem often leading to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.
In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, 408 children (age 2-5 years, mean 4.2+-1.04) intended for general anaesthesia were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups with or without two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia. At baseline and at 6-/12-month follow-ups, Approximal Plaque Index (API), gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI), caries and initial caries index: initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth (idmft) were recorded.
Read the detailed description
Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is considered to be a global problem, as it is one of the most prevalent diseases in childhood. This leads to a severe problem in the caries risk children being highly affected by ECC, mostly also non-cooperative and from lower socio-economic background. The dental treatment for these pre-school children often requires general anaesthesia (GA), which is associated with health risks and considerable costs.
Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.
After approval by the Ethics Committee at the University of Greifswald (No. BB 078/17), children with an age range from 2 to 5 years assigned for dental treatment under general anaesthesia were recruited.
After obtaining informed consent from the parents, the participants were randomly allocated to the test and control groups by a computer-generated random sequence prepared by a statistician, blinded to the recruiting person. Both groups received a baseline examination and the standard preventive program offered within the German National Health System consisting of explaining the etiology of caries and preventive approaches such as practical training of the parents in tooth brushing in their child as well as recommending fluoridated toothpaste and a reduction of cariogenic snacks. Finally fluoride varnish was applied. The test group received two additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions using plaque disclosing agent, toothbrushing and fluoride application, one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia.
The baseline and follow-up examinations at 6 and 12 months recorded caries, fillings and missing teeth due to caries according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and it included initial caries lesions according to International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS 1-3). The subcomponents were also added up as initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth/surfaces (idmft/idmfs). Due to the young age of the children, only primary teeth were of relevance.
In addition, the Approximal Plaque Index (API) and the gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) were taken. The examiners were blinded regarding the group status of the children, as other practice personal had to perform the preventive sessions.
Sample size calculation and statistical analyses:
The expected difference in new caries lesions between test and control groups was taken as an outcome parameter for sample size calculation. Previous regional studies had shown a mean caries development of 2 +-1.5 per year after the general anaesthesia. An intensive prevention program may result in a caries reduction of 30%, corresponding to 0.5-0.6 dmft less in the test group. With α being 0.05 and a power β of 0.80, 142 children were needed in each group, with a drop-out of 30% (62 children) this would mean a total sample size of 408 children at baseline.
The collected data were entered in Excel (Microsoft, USA), then transferred to Stata (Version 14.2; Stata Corp, College Station, USA) for further statistical analysis. Due to the large sample size and the randomization matching or data linkage analysis were not required, but a drop-out analysis was carried out to exclude a bias caused by attrition within the study. A modelling of continuous variables was carried out using restricted cubic splines. Mixed models were used for adjusting the analyses of changes within every group between baseline and recalls and between the two groups. Linear models were used for calculating the absolute effect and ordinal logistic regression for calculating the relative effect via odds ratios.
- Conditions
- Dental Caries in Children
- Being tested
- additional oral hygiene appointments
- Keywords
- General anaesthesia, Children, Caries prevention, Pediatric dentistry
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
additional oral hygiene appointmentsBehavioural
Two additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Received two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments; one week before the general anaesthesia treatment and one week after the general anaesthesia. Receives: Behavioral: additional oral hygiene appointments |
| Control group | No intervention | Received only standard prevention, without two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Approximal Plaque Index (API)
an index to assess oral health by calculating the accumulated dental plaque on teeth surfaces
Measured: 1 year
Gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI)
an index to assess oral health by calculating the inflammation and bleeding of the gingiva sulcus
Measured: 1 year
Caries and Initial Caries Index: decayed, missing, filled teeth (idmft)
WHO index to assess caries prevalence and caries status
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2017
- Primary completion20 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental Caries in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 406 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medicine Greifswald
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gemeinsamer Bundesaussschuss
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohamad Alkilzy, PD Dr., Principal investigator, Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of GreifswaldChristian Splieth, Prof. Dr., Study chair, Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05110534
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BB 078/17
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial on an Supportive Caries Preventive Programme in Children Undergoing Dental General Anaesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05110534
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BB 078/17
- Conditions
- Dental Caries in Children
- Keywords
- General anaesthesia, Children, Caries prevention, Pediatric dentistry
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 406 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medicine GreifswaldUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gemeinsamer Bundesaussschuss
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Early childhood caries is a persistent problem often leading to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.
In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, 408 children (age 2-5 years, mean 4.2+-1.04) intended for general anaesthesia were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups with or without two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia. At baseline and at 6-/12-month follow-ups, Approximal Plaque Index (API), gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI), caries and initial caries index: initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth (idmft) were recorded.
Detailed description
Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is considered to be a global problem, as it is one of the most prevalent diseases in childhood. This leads to a severe problem in the caries risk children being highly affected by ECC, mostly also non-cooperative and from lower socio-economic background. The dental treatment for these pre-school children often requires general anaesthesia (GA), which is associated with health risks and considerable costs.
Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.
After approval by the Ethics Committee at the University of Greifswald (No. BB 078/17), children with an age range from 2 to 5 years assigned for dental treatment under general anaesthesia were recruited.
After obtaining informed consent from the parents, the participants were randomly allocated to the test and control groups by a computer-generated random sequence prepared by a statistician, blinded to the recruiting person. Both groups received a baseline examination and the standard preventive program offered within the German National Health System consisting of explaining the etiology of caries and preventive approaches such as practical training of the parents in tooth brushing in their child as well as recommending fluoridated toothpaste and a reduction of cariogenic snacks. Finally fluoride varnish was applied. The test group received two additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions using plaque disclosing agent, toothbrushing and fluoride application, one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia.
The baseline and follow-up examinations at 6 and 12 months recorded caries, fillings and missing teeth due to caries according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and it included initial caries lesions according to International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS 1-3). The subcomponents were also added up as initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth/surfaces (idmft/idmfs). Due to the young age of the children, only primary teeth were of relevance.
In addition, the Approximal Plaque Index (API) and the gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) were taken. The examiners were blinded regarding the group status of the children, as other practice personal had to perform the preventive sessions.
Sample size calculation and statistical analyses:
The expected difference in new caries lesions between test and control groups was taken as an outcome parameter for sample size calculation. Previous regional studies had shown a mean caries development of 2 +-1.5 per year after the general anaesthesia. An intensive prevention program may result in a caries reduction of 30%, corresponding to 0.5-0.6 dmft less in the test group. With α being 0.05 and a power β of 0.80, 142 children were needed in each group, with a drop-out of 30% (62 children) this would mean a total sample size of 408 children at baseline.
The collected data were entered in Excel (Microsoft, USA), then transferred to Stata (Version 14.2; Stata Corp, College Station, USA) for further statistical analysis. Due to the large sample size and the randomization matching or data linkage analysis were not required, but a drop-out analysis was carried out to exclude a bias caused by attrition within the study. A modelling of continuous variables was carried out using restricted cubic splines. Mixed models were used for adjusting the analyses of changes within every group between baseline and recalls and between the two groups. Linear models were used for calculating the absolute effect and ordinal logistic regression for calculating the relative effect via odds ratios.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: additional oral hygiene appointmentsReceived two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments; one week before the general anaesthesia treatment and one week after the general anaesthesia. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Received only standard prevention, without two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 2-5 years old children attending dental treatment under general anaesthesia
- parental approval
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- children above 5 years old
- no parental approval
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| additional oral hygiene appointmentsTwo additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Approximal Plaque Index (API)
Time frame: 1 year
an index to assess oral health by calculating the accumulated dental plaque on teeth surfaces
Gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI)
Time frame: 1 year
an index to assess oral health by calculating the inflammation and bleeding of the gingiva sulcus
Caries and Initial Caries Index: decayed, missing, filled teeth (idmft)
Time frame: 1 year
WHO index to assess caries prevalence and caries status
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2021.
Related trials for Dental Caries in Children
Not yet recruiting
This Feasibility Study Will Evaluate the Study Protocols for Treatment and Follow-up Controls of Primary Molars With Caries in Children Treated With Stainless Steel Crowns or Conventional Fillings. Treatment Success and Potential Failures Will be Followed at 3, 6 and 12 Months Post Treatment.
Dental Caries, Early Childhood Caries (ECC)
Recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Cariostatic Efficacy of Nano Silver Fluoride (NSF) vs. Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) in Children
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Bioactive Glass Varnish on Salivary Parameters in Children: Randomized Controlled Trial
Prevention of Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth in Children
Dental Caries, Tooth Injuries
Recruiting
Powered vs Manual Toothbrush Use: Its Effect on Caries Risk in Pre-Adolescents
Caries Risk, Caries, Dental
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamad Alkilzy, PD Dr. principal investigator
Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald
Christian Splieth, Prof. Dr. study chair
Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing additional oral hygiene appointments in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Approximal Plaque Index (API) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2021.