AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Caries in ChildrenNCT05110534

Supportive Caries Preventive Programme in Children Undergoing Dental General Anaesthesia

A study testing additional oral hygiene appointments in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early childhood caries is a persistent problem often leading to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 5 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries in Children
What is being tested?
additional oral hygiene appointments
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
406 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 Oct 2017to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 5 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 2-5 years old children attending dental treatment under general anaesthesia
  • parental approval

Who cannot join

  • children above 5 years old
  • no parental approval

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald

    Greifswald, D-17457

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial on an Supportive Caries Preventive Programme in Children Undergoing Dental General Anaesthesia

Early childhood caries is a persistent problem often leading to dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.

In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, 408 children (age 2-5 years, mean 4.2+-1.04) intended for general anaesthesia were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups with or without two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia. At baseline and at 6-/12-month follow-ups, Approximal Plaque Index (API), gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI), caries and initial caries index: initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth (idmft) were recorded.

Read the detailed description

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is considered to be a global problem, as it is one of the most prevalent diseases in childhood. This leads to a severe problem in the caries risk children being highly affected by ECC, mostly also non-cooperative and from lower socio-economic background. The dental treatment for these pre-school children often requires general anaesthesia (GA), which is associated with health risks and considerable costs.

Thus, this study was to investigate the preventive effect of two additional intensive oral hygiene appointments before and after general anaesthesia.

After approval by the Ethics Committee at the University of Greifswald (No. BB 078/17), children with an age range from 2 to 5 years assigned for dental treatment under general anaesthesia were recruited.

After obtaining informed consent from the parents, the participants were randomly allocated to the test and control groups by a computer-generated random sequence prepared by a statistician, blinded to the recruiting person. Both groups received a baseline examination and the standard preventive program offered within the German National Health System consisting of explaining the etiology of caries and preventive approaches such as practical training of the parents in tooth brushing in their child as well as recommending fluoridated toothpaste and a reduction of cariogenic snacks. Finally fluoride varnish was applied. The test group received two additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions using plaque disclosing agent, toothbrushing and fluoride application, one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia.

The baseline and follow-up examinations at 6 and 12 months recorded caries, fillings and missing teeth due to caries according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and it included initial caries lesions according to International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS 1-3). The subcomponents were also added up as initial, decayed, missing, filled, teeth/surfaces (idmft/idmfs). Due to the young age of the children, only primary teeth were of relevance.

In addition, the Approximal Plaque Index (API) and the gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) were taken. The examiners were blinded regarding the group status of the children, as other practice personal had to perform the preventive sessions.

Sample size calculation and statistical analyses:

The expected difference in new caries lesions between test and control groups was taken as an outcome parameter for sample size calculation. Previous regional studies had shown a mean caries development of 2 +-1.5 per year after the general anaesthesia. An intensive prevention program may result in a caries reduction of 30%, corresponding to 0.5-0.6 dmft less in the test group. With α being 0.05 and a power β of 0.80, 142 children were needed in each group, with a drop-out of 30% (62 children) this would mean a total sample size of 408 children at baseline.

The collected data were entered in Excel (Microsoft, USA), then transferred to Stata (Version 14.2; Stata Corp, College Station, USA) for further statistical analysis. Due to the large sample size and the randomization matching or data linkage analysis were not required, but a drop-out analysis was carried out to exclude a bias caused by attrition within the study. A modelling of continuous variables was carried out using restricted cubic splines. Mixed models were used for adjusting the analyses of changes within every group between baseline and recalls and between the two groups. Linear models were used for calculating the absolute effect and ordinal logistic regression for calculating the relative effect via odds ratios.

Being tested
additional oral hygiene appointments
Keywords
General anaesthesia, Children, Caries prevention, Pediatric dentistry

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • additional oral hygiene appointmentsBehavioural

    Two additional preventive sessions including oral hygiene instructions one week before the date of the general anaesthesia treatment and at the control visit about a week after the general anaesthesia.

Study groups in NCT05110534
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalReceived two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments; one week before the general anaesthesia treatment and one week after the general anaesthesia.
Receives: Behavioral: additional oral hygiene appointments
Control groupNo interventionReceived only standard prevention, without two additional preventive oral hygiene appointments before and after the general anaesthesia.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Approximal Plaque Index (API)

    an index to assess oral health by calculating the accumulated dental plaque on teeth surfaces

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Gingiva Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI)

    an index to assess oral health by calculating the inflammation and bleeding of the gingiva sulcus

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Caries and Initial Caries Index: decayed, missing, filled teeth (idmft)

    WHO index to assess caries prevalence and caries status

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized Controlled Trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
406 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05110534
Sponsor's protocol ID
BB 078/17
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
3 Nov 2021
Last updated
8 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing additional oral hygiene appointments in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Approximal Plaque Index (API) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in