AzTrials
AzTrials

High Altitude Pulmonary HypertensionNCT05112172

Effect of Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Who Experience an Altitude Related Adverse Health Effect (ARAHE) During 30h Exposure to 2500m

A study testing Oxygen Therapy in people with High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension and Oxygen Therapy, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study whether oxygen therapy titrated to maintain oxygenation (SpO2) > 90% at 2500m would resolve altitude-related adverse health effects, symptoms and impaired exercise during 30h exposure to high altitude. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Oxygen Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
18 Oct 2021to 15 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • PH class I (PAH) or IV (CTEPH) diagnosed according to guidelines: mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 wood units, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg during baseline measures at the diagnostic right-heart catheterization

Who cannot join

  • resting partial pressure of oxygen <8 kilopascal at Zurich at 490 m low altitude
  • exposure to an altitude >1000 m for ≥3 nights during the last 2 weeks before the study
  • inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • other clinically significant concomitant end-stage disease (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Respiratory Clinic, University Hospital of Zurich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Hypoxia on Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension and Treatment of Adverse Effects

To study whether oxygen therapy titrated to maintain oxygenation (SpO2) > 90% at 2500m would resolve altitude-related adverse health effects, symptoms and impaired exercise during 30h exposure to high altitude.

Read the detailed description

Patients with pulmonary hypertension who reveal an altitude-related adverse health effects at 2500m will be given oxygen therapy by nasal cannula titrated to maintain the oxygen saturation above 90%. The study will investigate, whether this measure will restore altitude-induced impairment to baseline levels at low altitude.

Being tested
Oxygen Therapy
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary edema of mountaineers

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oxygen TherapyOther

    Oxygen Therapy in patients developing an altitude related adverse health effect (ARAHE) during 30h exposure to 2500m of high altitude

Study groups in NCT05112172
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oxygen TherapyExperimentalOxygen Therapy in patients developing an altitude related adverse health effect (ARAHE) during 30h exposure to 2500m of high altitude
Receives: Other: Oxygen Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recovery from ARAHE

    Proportion of patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension experiencing an ARAHE at 2500 m of high altitude and receiving oxygen therapy titrated to achieve SpO2 ≥ 90% who recover from ARAHE, have improved symptoms and achieve constant work-rate exercise time within a minimal important difference as defined for patients with respiratory disease within 1.75 min of baseline value at 490 m; time frame within 6 h after initiation of oxygen therapy.

    Measured: 30 hours

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Constant work-rate exercise time

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in constant work-rate exercise time cycle exercise test at 75% Wmax at low altitude

    Measured: 30 hours

  2. Maximum work-rate in incremental ramp cycle exercise tests

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in maximal exercise capacity during a incremental ramp cycle exercise test

    Measured: 30 hours

  3. Hemodynamics

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in hemodynamics assessed by echocardiography at rest including pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart function assessed as tricuspid plane systolic excursion and fractional area change.

    Measured: 30 hours

  4. Borg dyspnoea scale

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in post-exercise Borg dyspnoea scale going from 1-10 scores with higher values meaning worse dyspnea

    Measured: 30 hours

  5. Visual Analogue Scale

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in symptoms assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale for dyspnoea, a 10cm line from left to right where patients have to add a cross-line with higher values meaning better feeling.

    Measured: 30 hours

  6. Cognitive testing

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in cognitive function tests

    Measured: 30 hours

  7. sit-to-stand test

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in sit-to-stand test

    Measured: 30 hours

  8. Sleep disordered breathing

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in sleep disordered breathing

    Measured: 30 hours

  9. 6 minute walk test

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude in 6 minute walk test

    Measured: 30 hours

  10. Acute Mountain Sickness Score

    Difference with oxygen therapy at high altitude vs. low altitude baseline in symptoms assessed by the Lake Louise acute mountain sickness score going from 0-12 points with mild AMS as 3-5 points, moderate AMS as 6-9 points, and severe AMS as 10-12 points.

    Measured: 30 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2021
  2. Study start18 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05112172
Sponsor's protocol ID
OVERALP II B
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
14 Oct 2021
Last updated
11 May 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Schneider SR, Muller J, Bauer M, Mayer L, Luond L, Ulrich T, Furian M, Forrer A, Carta A, Schwarz EI, Bloch KE, Lichtblau M, Ulrich S. Overnight exposure to high altitude in pulmonary hypertension: adverse events and effect of oxygen therapy. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jan 27;45(4):309-311. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad789. No abstract available.

    PubMed 38079468

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oxygen Therapy in people with High Altitude Pulmonary Hypertension and Oxygen Therapy, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recovery from ARAHE (time frame: 30 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05112172, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in