AzTrials
AzTrials

MelanomaPhase 1/2NCT05116202

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Melanoma (Morpheus-Melanoma)

A Phase 1/2 study testing Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and RO7247669 2100 mg in people with Melanoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of treatment combinations in cancer immunotherapy (CIT)-naive participants with resectable Stage III melanoma (Cohort 1) and in participants with Stage IV melanoma (Cohort 2). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma
What is being tested?
Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and RO7247669 2100 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
14 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
2 Feb 2022to 28 May 2024
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1
  • Histologically confirmed resectable Stage III melanoma according to AJCC-8 and no history of in-transit metastases within the last 6 months
  • Fit and planned for CLND
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1
  • Availability of a representative tumor specimen
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
Show all 17Show fewer
  • For patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: stable anticoagulant regimen
  • Negative HIV test, negative hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), and negative total hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) test, and negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) at screening. Patients with a positive HIV test at screening are eligible provided they are stable on anti-retroviral therapy, have a CD4 count >= 200/μL, and have an undetectable viral load.
  • ECOG PS of 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy >= 3 months, as determined by the investigator
  • Histologically confirmed Stage IV (metastatic) cutaneous melanoma according to AJCC-8
  • Disease progression during or following at least one but no more than two lines of treatment for metastatic disease
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1
  • Availability of a representative tumor specimen
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
  • For patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: stable anticoagulant regimen
  • Negative HIV test, negative hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), and negative total hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) test, and negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) at screening. Patients with a positive HIV test at screening are eligible provided they are stable on anti-retroviral therapy, have a CD4 count >= 200/μL, and have an undetectable viral load.

Who cannot join

  • Mucosal, uveal and acral lentiginous melanoma
  • Distantly metastasized melanoma
  • History of in-transit metastases within the last 6 months
  • Prior radiotherapy
  • Prior immunotherapy, including anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies, and other systemic therapy for melanoma
  • Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents within 4 weeks or 5 drug-elimination half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
  • Known immunodeficiency or conditions requiring treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication, or anticipation of need for systemic immunosuppressant medication during study treatment
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency
  • Mucosal and uveal melanoma
  • Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents within 4 weeks or 5 drug-elimination half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
  • Known immunodeficiency or conditions requiring treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication, or anticipation of need for systemic immunosuppressant medication during study treatment
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency
  • Symptomatic, untreated, or progressing CNS metastases
  • Active or history of carcinomatous meningitis/leptomeningeal disease
  • Uncontrolled tumor-related pain
  • Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures
  • Uncontrolled or symptomatic hypercalcemia

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 5 countries.

14 sites in 5 countries

United States4 sites
  • City of Hope

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute - W LA Office

    Los Angeles, California, 90025

  • Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

France4 sites
  • Hopital de la Timone

    Marseille, 13005

  • APHP - Hospital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75475

  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Institut Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

Italy4 sites
  • Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia

    Milan, Lombardy, 20141

  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale

    Naples, Campania, 80131

  • Ospedale S.Maria della Misericordia

    Perugia, Umbria, 06132

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese

    Siena, Abruzzo, 53100

Other trials in Italy

Australia1 site
  • Melanoma Institute Australia

    North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060

Other trials in Australia

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Phase Ib/II, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Umbrella Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Melanoma (Morpheus-Melanoma)

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of treatment combinations in cancer immunotherapy (CIT)-naive participants with resectable Stage III melanoma (Cohort 1) and in participants with Stage IV melanoma (Cohort 2). The study is designed with the flexibility to open new treatment arms as new treatments become available, close existing treatment arms that demonstrate minimal clinical activity or unacceptable toxicity, and modify the participant population.

Conditions
Melanoma
Being tested
Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, RO7247669 2100 mg, Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NivolumabDrug

    Nivolumab will be administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

  • IpilimumabDrug

    Ipilimumab will be administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg by IV on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

  • RO7247669 2100 mgDrug

    RO7247669 will be administered at a dose of 2100 mg by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

  • AtezolizumabDrug

    Also called Tecentriq, RO5541267

    Atezolizumab will be administered at a dose of 1200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

  • TiragolumabDrug

    Also called RO7092284

    Tiragolumab will be administered at a dose of 600 mg IV on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

  • RO7247669 600 mgDrug

    RO7247669 will be administered at a dose of 600 mg by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.

Study groups in NCT05116202
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1: Nivolumab + IpilimumabActive comparatorCohort 1 participants in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) on Day 1 of each cycle (cycle length 21 days) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Nivolumab; Drug: Ipilimumab
Cohort 1: RO7247669 2100 mgExperimentalCohort 1 participants in the RO7247669 arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: RO7247669 2100 mg
Cohort 1: + Atezolizumab + TiragolumabExperimentalCohort 1 participants in the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Atezolizumab; Drug: Tiragolumab
Cohort 1: RO7247669 2100 mg + TiragolumabExperimentalCohort 1 participants in the RO7247669 plus tiragolumab arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: RO7247669 2100 mg; Drug: Tiragolumab
Cohort 2: RO7247669 2100 mg + TiragolumabExperimentalCohort 2 participants in RO7247669 plus tiragolumab arm will receive treatment until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator after an integrated assessment of radiographic and biochemical data, local biopsy results (if available), and clinical status.
Receives: Drug: RO7247669 2100 mg; Drug: Tiragolumab
Cohort 1: RO7247669 600 mgExperimentalCohort 1 participants in the RO7247669 arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: RO7247669 600 mg
Cohort 1: RO7247669 600 mg + TiragolumabExperimentalCohort 1 participants in the RO7247669 plus tiragolumab arm will receive treatment for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery, or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Tiragolumab; Drug: RO7247669 600 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pathologic Response Rate (pRR) for Cohort 1 as Determined by Independent Pathologic Review

    pRR was defined as the percentage of participants with pathologic complete response (pCR), pathologic near complete response (pnCR), and pathologic partial response (pPR) as determined by an independent pathologic review. pCR was defined as a complete absence of viable tumor cells, pnCR as > 0 to ≤ 10% of viable tumor cells, and pPR was defined as > 10 to ≤ 50% of viable tumor cells in the dissected lymph node. Participants with missing or no pathologic response assessment, including participants who did not proceed to complete lymph node dissection (CLND), were classified as non-responders. pRR was calculated for each arm along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Clopper-Pearson method. The difference in pRR between the experimental arms and the control arm was calculated, along with 95% CIs using the Wald method with continuity correction.

    Measured: Time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7)

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 2 as Determined by the Investigator

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in the short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in the absence of CR. Participants with missing or no response assessments were classified as non-responders. ORR was calculated for each arm, along with 95% CIs using Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: From randomization up to approximately 3.6 months

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. pRR for Cohort 1 as Determined by Local Pathologic Assessment

    pRR was defined as the percentage of participants with pCR, pnCR, and pPR as determined by a local pathologic review. pCR was defined as a complete absence of viable tumor cells, pnCR as > 0 to ≤ 10% of viable tumor cells, and pPR was defined as > 10 to ≤ 50% of viable tumor cells in the dissected lymph node. Participants with missing or no pathologic response assessment, including participants who did not proceed to CLND, were classified as non-responders. pRR was calculated for each arm along with 95% CIs using Clopper-Pearson method. The difference in pRR between the experimental arms and the control arm was calculated, along with 95% CIs using the Wald method with continuity correction.

    Measured: Time of surgery ( scheduled at Week 7)

  2. Event-free Survival (EFS) for Cohort 1

    EFS was defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events (whichever occurs first): documented disease progression (PD) that precludes surgery, as assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1, local, regional, or distant disease recurrence, or death from any cause. PD = as at least a 20% increase in smallest sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD on study (including baseline). Local recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth within 2 cm of the primary lesion's tumor bed; regional recurrence as any nodal or non-nodal tumor lesions that are > 2 cm from the primary lesion but not beyond the regional nodal basin; distant recurrence as any non-local/non-regional recurrence. Participants without disease recurrence, progression, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for EFS, and 95% CIs was constructed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From randomization to disease progression, disease recurrence or death or last tumor assessment (up to 22.51 months)

  3. Relapse-free Survival (RFS) for Cohort 1

    RFS was defined as the time from surgery to the first documented recurrence of disease or death from any cause. Recurrent disease includes local, regional, or distant recurrence: local recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth within 2 cm of the primary lesion's tumor bed; regional recurrence as any nodal or non-nodal tumor lesions that are more than 2 cm from the primary lesion but are not beyond the regional nodal basin; distant recurrence as any non-local/non-regional recurrence. Participants without disease recurrence or death at the time of analysis were censored at the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for RFS, and 95% CIs were constructed using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From surgery (scheduled at Week 7) to first documented disease recurrence or death or last tumor assessment (up to 20.9 months)

  4. Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 1

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for OS, 95% CIs were constructed using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From randomization to death from any cause or last known to be alive (Up to 25 months)

  5. ORR for Cohort 1

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in the absence of CR. Participants with missing or no response assessments were classified as non-responders. ORR was calculated for each arm, along with 95% CIs using the Clopper-Pearson method. The difference in ORR between the experimental arms and the control arm was calculated, along with 95% CIs using the Wald method with continuity correction.

    Measured: Prior to surgery (up to Week 6)

  6. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of AEs Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v5.0) for Cohort 1

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. Severity was determined per NCI CTCAE v5.0 Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated; Grade 2:Moderate; minimal, local/non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3: Severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening: hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling or limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs in the same category at the worst (highest) NCIC-CTCAE grade for an individual are counted only once.

    Measured: From initiation of study treatment up to 135 days (Serious AEs and AESI) or 30 days (all other AEs) after the final dose of study treatment or until initiation of new systemic anti-cancer therapy (Up to 5.6 months)

  7. Number of Participants With Immune-related AEs Grade ≥ 3 for Cohort 1

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom/disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. Participants with immune-related adverse events Grade ≥ 3 were reported.

    Measured: From initiation of study treatment up to 135 days after the final dose of study treatment (Up to 5.6 months)

  8. Rate of Delayed Surgery Due to Treatment-related AEs

    Rate of delayed surgery due to treatment related AEs was defined as the percentage of participants for whom surgery was delayed due to treatment-related AEs for more than 2 weeks. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom/disease temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether considered related to the investigational product.

    Measured: Time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7) up to 40.1 weeks

  9. Duration of Surgery Delay Due to Treatment-related AEs

    Duration of surgery delay due to treatment related AEs was calculated on the participants for whom surgery was delayed due to treatment-related AEs for more than 2 weeks. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom/disease temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether considered related to the investigational product.

    Measured: Time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7) up to 40.1 weeks

  10. Surgical Complication Rates for Cohort 1

    Surgical complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo surgical classification. Complication rates for every grade were reported and scored for participants who underwent CLND. The Surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo can be classified into the following grades: Grade I: Any complication that does not need pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Grade II: Complications that require pharmacological treatment with drugs or blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition. Grade III: Complications that require surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention with (Grade IIIb) or without (Grade IIIa) general anesthesia. Grade IV: Life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management, which may be single organ (Grade IVa) or multiorgan (Grade IVb) dysfunction. Grade V: Complications that might cause the death of a participant. Values have been rounded off to 2 decimal digits.

    Measured: At treatment discontinuation visit (Week 13) and Surgery Follow-Up (6 months after surgery)

  11. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 2

    PFS after randomization/enrollment was defined as the time from randomization/enrollment to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD on the study (including baseline) and/or unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion and/or any new lesion. Participants without documented disease progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for PFS, with 95% CIs constructed by using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From randomization/enrollment to first documented disease progression or death or last tumor assessment (up to 3.6 months)

  12. OS for Cohort 2

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for OS, with 95% CIs constructed by using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.

    Measured: From randomization/enrollment to death from any cause or last known to be alive (Up to 24.2 months)

  13. OS Rates at Specific Timepoints for Cohort 2

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS rate is percentage of participants who were event free for OS. Participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. OS rate at specific time points were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CIs calculated based on Greenwood's estimate for the variance.

    Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12

  14. Duration of Response (DOR) for Cohort 2

    DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (OR) to disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. OR was defined as a CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR = disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR = at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD on the study (including baseline). Participants without PD or death at time of analysis were censored at time of last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median for DOR, with 95% CIs constructed using Brookmeyer \& Crowley method.

    Measured: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR to disease progression or death from any cause (up to 3.6 months)

  15. Disease Control Rate (DCR) for Cohort 2

    DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 12 weeks or a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in the absence of CR. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD on the study (including baseline). DCR was calculated for each treatment arm, with 95% CIs estimated through use of Clopper-Pearson's exact method.

    Measured: From randomization up to 3.6 months

  16. Number of Participants With AEs and Severity of AEs Determined According to NCI CTCAE v5.0 for Cohort 2

    An AE=any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. AE can therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign, symptom/disease temporally associated with using an investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. Severity was determined per NCI CTCAE v5.0 Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3: Severe/medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening: hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling/limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences/urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs in 1 individual are counted once at highest grade.

    Measured: From initiation of study treatment up to 135 days (Serious AEs and AESI) or 30 days (all other AEs) after the final dose of study treatment or until initiation of new systemic anti-cancer therapy (Up to 10 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2021
  2. Study start2 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion28 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05116202
Sponsor's protocol ID
BO43328
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
22 Oct 2021
Last updated
18 Jul 2025
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level data through the clinical study data request platform (www.vivli.org). Further details on Roche's criteria for eligible studies are available here ( https://vivli.org/ourmember/roche/). For further details on Roche's Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here (https://www.roche.com/research\_and\_development/who\_we\_are\_how\_we\_work/clinical\_trials/our\_commitment\_to\_data\_sharing.htm).

Publications

  • Long GV, Nair N, Marbach D, Scolyer RA, Wilson S, Cotting D, Staedler N, Amaria RN, Ascierto PA, Tarhini AA, Robert C, Hamid O, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Lebbe C, Munoz-Couselo E, Menzies AM, Pages C, Curigliano G, Mandala M, Jessop N, Bader U, Perdicchio M, Teichgraber V, Muecke M, Markert C, Blank C. Neoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial. Nat Med. 2025 Nov;31(11):3700-3712. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03967-2. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

    PubMed 40993242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and RO7247669 2100 mg in people with Melanoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in United States, France, Italy, Australia, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pathologic Response Rate (pRR) for Cohort 1 as Determined by Independent Pathologic Review (time frame: Time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05116202, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in