AzTrials
AzTrials

Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular EdemaNCT05117411

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Pseudophakic Cystoid Edema

An observational study of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema, run by Federico II University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the retinal vascular features in macula and papillary regions in patients affected by pseudophakic cystoid edema using optical coherence tomography angiography Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema
What is being tested?
OCTA and pseudophakin cystoid edema
How many people
25 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The participans were older than 18 years with diagnosis of pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema. The participans did not present other ophthalmological diseases.

Who may be able to join

  • age older than 60 years
  • diagnosis of pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema
  • treatment-naïve for pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema
  • absence of other ocular diseases, responsible for macular edema (retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration)

Who cannot join

  • age younger than 60 years
  • No diagnosis of pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema
  • previous treatment for pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema
  • presence of other ocular diseases, responsible for macular edema (retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration)

About this study

Official title: Peripapillary Vascular Density in the Pathogenesis of Pseudophakic Cystoid Edema

This study evaluates the retinal vascular features in macula and papillary regions in patients affected by pseudophakic cystoid edema using optical coherence tomography angiography

Read the detailed description

Pseudophakic cystoid edema represents one of the most common causes of poor visual outcome following cataratta surgery.

It is still source of debate the pathogenesis of Pseudophakic cystoid edema. Optical coherence tomography angiography represents a novel and non-invasive diagnostic technique that allows a detailed analysis of retinal vascular features. The study evaluates retrospectively the changes in optical coherence tomography angiography parameters at baseline and after three monthly after surgery.

Being tested
OCTA and pseudophakin cystoid edema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OCTA and pseudophakin cystoid edemaDiagnostic test

    Patients underwent OCT angiografia after cataract surgery

Study groups in NCT05117411
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients groupSubjects over 18 years that after cataract surgery, showed pseudophakic cystoid macula edema.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: OCTA and pseudophakin cystoid edema
Control GroupNormal subjects over 18 years that did not show pseudophakic cystoid macula edema.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: OCTA and pseudophakin cystoid edema

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. OCTA and pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema

    The parameters analyzed by OCTA three months after surgery are:

    Vessel density (%) of superficial capillary plexus, deep capillary plexus, coriocapillary plexus in macular region Vessel density (%) of radial peripapillary capillary plexus in papilllary region

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05117411
Sponsor's protocol ID
09/21
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
27 Sep 2021
Last updated
11 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema, run by Federico II University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

OCTA and pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in