MelanomaNCT05119829
Melanoma: Genomic Profiles, Molecular Markers and Therapeutic Implications
An observational study of Melanoma, run by Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate the genomic profiles and investigate the prevalence of germ line and pathogenic mutations in Greek population with early and metastatic melanoma and their correlation with the treatment and prognosis of the disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 1998to Feb 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with histologically confirmed melanoma skin cancer. Patients are treated in Hellenic Cooperative oncology Group affiliated departments of oncology.
Who may be able to join
- Melanoma skin cancer patients
- the ability to achieve FFPE
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The goal of this study is to evaluate the genomic profiles and investigate the prevalence of germ line and pathogenic mutations in Greek population with early and metastatic melanoma and their correlation with the treatment and prognosis of the disease.
Read the detailed description
In this context, it is aimed to utilize tissue biopsy tests that will focus on specific areas of clinical applications, namely, diagnosis, prognosis and identification of mutations for targeted therapy and assessment of acquiring treatment resistance. Thus, the tissue biopsy Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels in development by NIPD Genetics will be used in clinical practice as complementary diagnostics.
For tumor genotyping of the 200 patients with melanoma skin cancer in the present study it will be used the comprehensive tissue biopsy melanoma cancer panel from NIPD Genetics These panels are designed to target clinically actionable and clinically significant mutations that will provide physicians with genetic information regarding a) prediction of the patient's response to targeted therapy, b) prognosis, that is, prediction of clinical outcome, c) diagnosis and molecular classification of melanoma cancer. The panel allows for the detection of single nucleotide (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs), as well as gene fusions and indels; it necessitates at least 400ng of appropriate quality DNA template that is achievable from FFPE samples and is validated with molecular standards and controls for the exclusion of artefacts.
Thorough histological evaluation of the Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue blocks will be done by an experienced pathologist to evaluate H\&E sections for confirmation of diagnosis, histologic type, grade and tumor cell content (TCC%). DNA isolation will be performed from 10 μm whole sections following manual macro-dissection to enrich samples for tumor DNA, whereby TCC will be assessed as an approximate metric for tumor DNA in the extracted samples, corresponding to tumor nuclei vs. all nuclei in the areas marked for macro-dissection.
A total of 200 patients with melanoma skin cancer are expected to be included in the analysis based on the number of patients registered in the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group's (HeCOG's) database along with the ability to achieve precision around the primary and secondary endpoints. Primary endpoint will be the evaluation of the prevalence of mutations, while the secondary endpoint will be the assessment of prognostic significance of mutations with respect to overall survival (OS).
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of prevalence mutation
Evaluation of prevalence mutation
Measured: January 2022 to September 2022
Secondary outcomes (1)
ognostic significance of mutations with respect to overall survival
assessment of prognostic significance of mutations with respect to overall survival
Measured: January 2022 to September 2022
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Feb 1998
- Primary completion15 Dec 2025
- Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05119829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Gen_Melanoma_HeCOG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Forsea AM, Del Marmol V, Stratigos A, Geller AC. Melanoma prognosis in Europe: far from equal. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jul;171(1):179-82. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12923. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
PubMed 24588115Khair DO, Bax HJ, Mele S, Crescioli S, Pellizzari G, Khiabany A, Nakamura M, Harris RJ, French E, Hoffmann RM, Williams IP, Cheung A, Thair B, Beales CT, Touizer E, Signell AW, Tasnova NL, Spicer JF, Josephs DH, Geh JL, MacKenzie Ross A, Healy C, Papa S, Lacy KE, Karagiannis SN. Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Established and Emerging Targets and Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Melanoma. Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 19;10:453. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00453. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30941125Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, Ferrucci PF, Hill A, Wagstaff J, Carlino MS, Haanen JB, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, McArthur GA, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Grossmann K, Sznol M, Dreno B, Bastholt L, Yang A, Rollin LM, Horak C, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. Epub 2015 May 31.
PubMed 26027431Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Dummer R, Ferrucci PF, Smylie M, Hill A, Hogg D, Marquez-Rodas I, Jiang J, Rizzo J, Larkin J, Wolchok JD. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
PubMed 30361170Hayward NK, Wilmott JS, Waddell N, Johansson PA, Field MA, Nones K, Patch AM, Kakavand H, Alexandrov LB, Burke H, Jakrot V, Kazakoff S, Holmes O, Leonard C, Sabarinathan R, Mularoni L, Wood S, Xu Q, Waddell N, Tembe V, Pupo GM, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Vilain RE, Shang P, Lau LMS, Dagg RA, Schramm SJ, Pritchard A, Dutton-Regester K, Newell F, Fitzgerald A, Shang CA, Grimmond SM, Pickett HA, Yang JY, Stretch JR, Behren A, Kefford RF, Hersey P, Long GV, Cebon J, Shackleton M, Spillane AJ, Saw RPM, Lopez-Bigas N, Pearson JV, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Mann GJ. Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes. Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):175-180. doi: 10.1038/nature22071. Epub 2017 May 3.
PubMed 28467829Shain AH, Joseph NM, Yu R, Benhamida J, Liu S, Prow T, Ruben B, North J, Pincus L, Yeh I, Judson R, Bastian BC. Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Incremental Disruption of Key Signaling Pathways during Melanoma Evolution. Cancer Cell. 2018 Jul 9;34(1):45-55.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.005.
PubMed 29990500Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, Haydu LE, Hamilton AL, Mann GJ, Hughes TM, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1239-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
PubMed 21343559Carlino MS, Haydu LE, Kakavand H, Menzies AM, Hamilton AL, Yu B, Ng CC, Cooper WA, Thompson JF, Kefford RF, O'Toole SA, Scolyer RA, Long GV. Correlation of BRAF and NRAS mutation status with outcome, site of distant metastasis and response to chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;111(2):292-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.287. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
PubMed 24918823Shain AH, Bastian BC. From melanocytes to melanomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Jun;16(6):345-58. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.37. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PubMed 27125352Long GV, Weber JS, Infante JR, Kim KB, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Sosman JA, Hamid O, Schuchter L, Cebon J, Kefford RF, Lawrence D, Kudchadkar R, Burris HA 3rd, Falchook GS, Algazi A, Lewis K, Puzanov I, Ibrahim N, Sun P, Cunningham E, Kline AS, Del Buono H, McDowell DO, Patel K, Flaherty KT. Overall Survival and Durable Responses in Patients With BRAF V600-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Dabrafenib Combined With Trametinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):871-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9345. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PubMed 26811525Catalanotti F, Cheng DT, Shoushtari AN, Johnson DB, Panageas KS, Momtaz P, Higham C, Won HH, Harding JJ, Merghoub T, Rosen N, Sosman JA, Berger MF, Chapman PB, Solit DB. PTEN Loss-of-Function Alterations Are Associated With Intrinsic Resistance to BRAF Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jun 23;1:PO.16.00054. doi: 10.1200/PO.16.00054. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 32913971Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK, Lu S, Kemberling H, Wilt C, Luber BS, Wong F, Azad NS, Rucki AA, Laheru D, Donehower R, Zaheer A, Fisher GA, Crocenzi TS, Lee JJ, Greten TF, Duffy AG, Ciombor KK, Eyring AD, Lam BH, Joe A, Kang SP, Holdhoff M, Danilova L, Cope L, Meyer C, Zhou S, Goldberg RM, Armstrong DK, Bever KM, Fader AN, Taube J, Housseau F, Spetzler D, Xiao N, Pardoll DM, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Eshleman JR, Vogelstein B, Anders RA, Diaz LA Jr. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6733. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PubMed 28596308Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Lomeli S, Kong X, Kelley MC, Sosman JA, Johnson DB, Ribas A, Lo RS. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
PubMed 26997480Whiteman DC, Baade PD, Olsen CM. More people die from thin melanomas (⩽1 mm) than from thick melanomas (>4 mm) in Queensland, Australia. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Apr;135(4):1190-1193. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.452. Epub 2014 Oct 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 25330295D'Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbe C, Brady B, Neyns B, Schmidt H, Hassel JC, Hodi FS, Lorigan P, Savage KJ, Miller WH Jr, Mohr P, Marquez-Rodas I, Charles J, Kaatz M, Sznol M, Weber JS, Shoushtari AN, Ruisi M, Jiang J, Wolchok JD. Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):226-235. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.9258. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
PubMed 28056206
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Melanoma: Genomic Profiles, Molecular Markers and Therapeutic Implications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05119829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Gen_Melanoma_HeCOG
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 1998 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the genomic profiles and investigate the prevalence of germ line and pathogenic mutations in Greek population with early and metastatic melanoma and their correlation with the treatment and prognosis of the disease.
Detailed description
In this context, it is aimed to utilize tissue biopsy tests that will focus on specific areas of clinical applications, namely, diagnosis, prognosis and identification of mutations for targeted therapy and assessment of acquiring treatment resistance. Thus, the tissue biopsy Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels in development by NIPD Genetics will be used in clinical practice as complementary diagnostics.
For tumor genotyping of the 200 patients with melanoma skin cancer in the present study it will be used the comprehensive tissue biopsy melanoma cancer panel from NIPD Genetics These panels are designed to target clinically actionable and clinically significant mutations that will provide physicians with genetic information regarding a) prediction of the patient's response to targeted therapy, b) prognosis, that is, prediction of clinical outcome, c) diagnosis and molecular classification of melanoma cancer. The panel allows for the detection of single nucleotide (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs), as well as gene fusions and indels; it necessitates at least 400ng of appropriate quality DNA template that is achievable from FFPE samples and is validated with molecular standards and controls for the exclusion of artefacts.
Thorough histological evaluation of the Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue blocks will be done by an experienced pathologist to evaluate H\&E sections for confirmation of diagnosis, histologic type, grade and tumor cell content (TCC%). DNA isolation will be performed from 10 μm whole sections following manual macro-dissection to enrich samples for tumor DNA, whereby TCC will be assessed as an approximate metric for tumor DNA in the extracted samples, corresponding to tumor nuclei vs. all nuclei in the areas marked for macro-dissection.
A total of 200 patients with melanoma skin cancer are expected to be included in the analysis based on the number of patients registered in the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group's (HeCOG's) database along with the ability to achieve precision around the primary and secondary endpoints. Primary endpoint will be the evaluation of the prevalence of mutations, while the secondary endpoint will be the assessment of prognostic significance of mutations with respect to overall survival (OS).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with histologically confirmed melanoma skin cancer. Patients are treated in Hellenic Cooperative oncology Group affiliated departments of oncology.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Melanoma skin cancer patients
- the ability to achieve FFPE
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evaluation of prevalence mutation
Time frame: January 2022 to September 2022
Evaluation of prevalence mutation
1 secondary outcome
ognostic significance of mutations with respect to overall survival
Time frame: January 2022 to September 2022
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24588115Forsea AM, Del Marmol V, Stratigos A, Geller AC. Melanoma prognosis in Europe: far from equal. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jul;171(1):179-82. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12923. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 30941125Khair DO, Bax HJ, Mele S, Crescioli S, Pellizzari G, Khiabany A, Nakamura M, Harris RJ, French E, Hoffmann RM, Williams IP, Cheung A, Thair B, Beales CT, Touizer E, Signell AW, Tasnova NL, Spicer JF, Josephs DH, Geh JL, MacKenzie Ross A, Healy C, Papa S, Lacy KE, Karagiannis SN. Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Established and Emerging Targets and Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Melanoma. Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 19;10:453. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00453. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 26027431Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, Ferrucci PF, Hill A, Wagstaff J, Carlino MS, Haanen JB, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, McArthur GA, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Grossmann K, Sznol M, Dreno B, Bastholt L, Yang A, Rollin LM, Horak C, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. Epub 2015 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 30361170Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Dummer R, Ferrucci PF, Smylie M, Hill A, Hogg D, Marquez-Rodas I, Jiang J, Rizzo J, Larkin J, Wolchok JD. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 28467829Hayward NK, Wilmott JS, Waddell N, Johansson PA, Field MA, Nones K, Patch AM, Kakavand H, Alexandrov LB, Burke H, Jakrot V, Kazakoff S, Holmes O, Leonard C, Sabarinathan R, Mularoni L, Wood S, Xu Q, Waddell N, Tembe V, Pupo GM, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Vilain RE, Shang P, Lau LMS, Dagg RA, Schramm SJ, Pritchard A, Dutton-Regester K, Newell F, Fitzgerald A, Shang CA, Grimmond SM, Pickett HA, Yang JY, Stretch JR, Behren A, Kefford RF, Hersey P, Long GV, Cebon J, Shackleton M, Spillane AJ, Saw RPM, Lopez-Bigas N, Pearson JV, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Mann GJ. Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes. Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):175-180. doi: 10.1038/nature22071. Epub 2017 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 29990500Shain AH, Joseph NM, Yu R, Benhamida J, Liu S, Prow T, Ruben B, North J, Pincus L, Yeh I, Judson R, Bastian BC. Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Incremental Disruption of Key Signaling Pathways during Melanoma Evolution. Cancer Cell. 2018 Jul 9;34(1):45-55.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.005.
- Background: PubMed 21343559Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, Haydu LE, Hamilton AL, Mann GJ, Hughes TM, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1239-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 24918823Carlino MS, Haydu LE, Kakavand H, Menzies AM, Hamilton AL, Yu B, Ng CC, Cooper WA, Thompson JF, Kefford RF, O'Toole SA, Scolyer RA, Long GV. Correlation of BRAF and NRAS mutation status with outcome, site of distant metastasis and response to chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;111(2):292-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.287. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 27125352Shain AH, Bastian BC. From melanocytes to melanomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Jun;16(6):345-58. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.37. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 26811525Long GV, Weber JS, Infante JR, Kim KB, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Sosman JA, Hamid O, Schuchter L, Cebon J, Kefford RF, Lawrence D, Kudchadkar R, Burris HA 3rd, Falchook GS, Algazi A, Lewis K, Puzanov I, Ibrahim N, Sun P, Cunningham E, Kline AS, Del Buono H, McDowell DO, Patel K, Flaherty KT. Overall Survival and Durable Responses in Patients With BRAF V600-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Dabrafenib Combined With Trametinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):871-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9345. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 32913971Catalanotti F, Cheng DT, Shoushtari AN, Johnson DB, Panageas KS, Momtaz P, Higham C, Won HH, Harding JJ, Merghoub T, Rosen N, Sosman JA, Berger MF, Chapman PB, Solit DB. PTEN Loss-of-Function Alterations Are Associated With Intrinsic Resistance to BRAF Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jun 23;1:PO.16.00054. doi: 10.1200/PO.16.00054. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 28596308Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK, Lu S, Kemberling H, Wilt C, Luber BS, Wong F, Azad NS, Rucki AA, Laheru D, Donehower R, Zaheer A, Fisher GA, Crocenzi TS, Lee JJ, Greten TF, Duffy AG, Ciombor KK, Eyring AD, Lam BH, Joe A, Kang SP, Holdhoff M, Danilova L, Cope L, Meyer C, Zhou S, Goldberg RM, Armstrong DK, Bever KM, Fader AN, Taube J, Housseau F, Spetzler D, Xiao N, Pardoll DM, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Eshleman JR, Vogelstein B, Anders RA, Diaz LA Jr. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6733. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Melanoma, run by Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of prevalence mutation (time frame: January 2022 to September 2022). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05119829, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026.