Post-operativeNCT05123092
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
A study testing Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection in people with Post-operative and Analgesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study. The patients will be included in the study shoud be in the following category: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II Age range from 18 and 70 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-operative, Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2021to 20 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels. • Age range from 18 and 70 years.
Who cannot join
- patient refusal.
- significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
- History of allergy to one of the study drugs.
- Pregnancy.
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
- Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
- Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients: A DOUBLE - BLINDED RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY.
The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study.
The patients will be included in the study shoud be in the following category:
Read more
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II
- Age range from 18 and 70 years.
The patients will be discarded from the study shoud be in the following:
- patient refusal.
- significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
- Pregnancy.
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
- Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
- Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score as primary outcome measure. demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), time to the first rescue analgesic (min) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(microgram),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( BP ,H R and oxgen saturation %) and complications as 2ry outcome measures.
Read the detailed description
This study will be performed in the in the FAYOUM University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study. A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible patients before recruitment and randomization.
Inclusion criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels.
- Age range from 18 and 70 years.
Exclusion criteria:
- patient refusal.
- significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
- History of allergy to one of the study drugs.
- Pregnancy.
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
- Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
- Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Randomization will be done via computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate closed envelopes and will be opened by study investigators just after induction of general anesthesia. Neither the patients, the study investigators, the attending clinicians nor the data collectors will be aware of the allocation of groups till the study ends.
The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups:
group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).
Anesthesia procedure:
All patients will receive 150 mg ranitidine oral tablet at the night and on the morning of the operation as a premedication. Upon arrival to the operating room, standard monitors (Electrocardiogram, Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring) will be applied and continued all over the operation. An intravenous (IV) access will be established. General anesthesia will be performed as follows: induction will be made using IV propofol (2mg/kg), atracurium (0.5mg/kg), and fentanyl
(1microgram/kg). A cuffed endotracheal tube (7-8.5) size will be placed to secure the airway .The patients will be placed in the prone position. Maintenance of anesthesia will be made using inhalational anesthesia (isoflurane) and IV atracurium according to the patients' requirements.
Block procedure:
The same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM. The same procedure will be performed on the contralateral side. In the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline . Anesthesia will be discontinued at the end of the surgery and the patients will be extubated after return of spontaneous respiration .All patients will be followed for 1 hour in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) then discharged to the ward. In the postoperative period we will give the patients multimodal analgesic regimen as following : a) paracetamol 1000 mg IV 3 times/day, b) dexketoprofen 50 mg IV once/day, c) IV pethidine 0.5mg/kg as a rescue analgesic on demand. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS 0: no pain, 10: worst pain ever) at 0 hours postoperative in PACU, then at postoperative 2., 6.,12.,24., and 48 hours at the ward by a research assistant who will be blinded to the study groups. Pethidine IV 0.5 mg/kg will be given as a rescue analgesic when the VAS score will be more than 3. The amount of pethidine consumption will be recorded between 0-12., 12-24., and 24-48 hours. The following criteria will be recorded and compared between the two groups : demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), VAS scores , time to the first rescue analgesic (h) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(mg),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure ,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia , intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression , nausea and vomiting, urine retension, hypotension , bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness ).9
Primary outcome measures:
The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.
Secondary outcome measures:
The secondary outcome will include the following : demographic data ( Age, Weight, height, body mass index) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (minutes), time to first rescue analgesic (minutes) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(micrograme),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure
,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia, intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness).
Statistical analysis and sample size estimation :
Sample size was calculated using G*power version 3.1.9.4. Previous similar studies indicated that a minimal sample size of 37 patients in each group will be needed to achieve a power level of 0.80 , alpha level of 0.05(two tailed) , will a medium effect size of 0.66 for the VAS score at 24 hours. Estimating that 10% of patients may drop out of the study due to different reasons , sample size was increased to 82 patients (41 in each group).10 Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM,Armonk,NY,USA).Data are presented as mean (SD) , median [interquartile range (IQR) ], or number of patients (%) . Distribution normality will be assessed using the Kolmogorov_Smirnov test. Comparisons between groups will be made using independent t_test or Mann_Whitney U test , as appropriate. Categorical variables will be analyzed using chi_square test or Fisher exact test. A p_value less 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Post-operative, Analgesia
- Being tested
- Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block, Intrathecal Morphine injection
- Keywords
- Ultrsound, Intrathecal, Morphine, Erectae spinae
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae blockOther
One group by using ultrasound for making erectae spinae block
Intrathecal Morphine injectionOther
Injecting intrathecal morphine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group ( ultrasound guided erectae spinae block) | Active comparator | The same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM. Receives: Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block; Other: Intrathecal Morphine injection |
| Group (Intrathecal morphine) | Active comparator | In the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline . Receives: Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block; Other: Intrathecal Morphine injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VAS score
The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.
Measured: Every 4 bours for 48 hours post operative
Secondary outcomes (12)
Age
Age messured by (years)
Measured: Day 1
Gender
Male or female
Measured: Day 1
Height
Height measured by (meter)
Measured: Day 1
Weight
Weight measured by kilogram (kg)
Measured: Day 1
Body Mass Index
BMI measured by kilogram divided by square meter (kg/m^2)
Measured: Day 1
Mean operative time
Sum of operative time divided by number
Measured: during surgery
Intra and post-operative opoid injected
Sum of opoid injected intra and post
Measured: up to 48 hours
Hemodynamics intra operative
MABP, HR, SPO2,
Measured: Every half hour during surgery
Hemodynamics post-operative
MABP, HR, SPO2,
Measured: Every 4 hours for 24 hours
Time for 1ST analgesic request
after what time IV analgesia reequired
Measured: up to 48 hours
Complications
complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia, intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness). Grades from 1
Measured: up to 48 hours
Ramsy sedation score
Ramsay Sedation Scale
1 Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both 3 Patient responds to commands only 4 Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 5 Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 6 Patient exhibits no response
Measured: Every 4 hours for 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2021
- Study start20 Jan 2021
- Primary completion20 Jan 2022
- Study completion20 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-operativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups: group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Atef Mohamed Sayed mahmoud, Fayoum University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05123092
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M520
- Other IDs
- M520
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Upon finishing my study and publishing an article, I will share my data upon resonable rquest.
Publications
Mahmoud AM, Ragab SG, Shawky MA, Masry DH, Botros JM. The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared With Intrathecal Morphine in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Double-blind Prospective Comparative Study. Pain Physician. 2023 Mar;26(2):149-159.
PubMed 36988361
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients: A DOUBLE - BLINDED RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05123092
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M520
- Conditions
- Post-operative, Analgesia
- Keywords
- Ultrsound, Intrathecal, Morphine, Erectae spinae
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study.
The patients will be included in the study shoud be in the following category:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II
- Age range from 18 and 70 years.
The patients will be discarded from the study shoud be in the following:
- patient refusal.
- significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
- Pregnancy.
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
- Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
- Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score as primary outcome measure. demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), time to the first rescue analgesic (min) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(microgram),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( BP ,H R and oxgen saturation %) and complications as 2ry outcome measures.
Detailed description
This study will be performed in the in the FAYOUM University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study. A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible patients before recruitment and randomization.
Inclusion criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels.
- Age range from 18 and 70 years.
Exclusion criteria:
- patient refusal.
- significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
- History of allergy to one of the study drugs.
- Pregnancy.
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
- Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
- Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Randomization will be done via computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate closed envelopes and will be opened by study investigators just after induction of general anesthesia. Neither the patients, the study investigators, the attending clinicians nor the data collectors will be aware of the allocation of groups till the study ends.
The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups:
group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).
Anesthesia procedure:
All patients will receive 150 mg ranitidine oral tablet at the night and on the morning of the operation as a premedication. Upon arrival to the operating room, standard monitors (Electrocardiogram, Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring) will be applied and continued all over the operation. An intravenous (IV) access will be established. General anesthesia will be performed as follows: induction will be made using IV propofol (2mg/kg), atracurium (0.5mg/kg), and fentanyl
(1microgram/kg). A cuffed endotracheal tube (7-8.5) size will be placed to secure the airway .The patients will be placed in the prone position. Maintenance of anesthesia will be made using inhalational anesthesia (isoflurane) and IV atracurium according to the patients' requirements.
Block procedure:
The same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM. The same procedure will be performed on the contralateral side. In the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline . Anesthesia will be discontinued at the end of the surgery and the patients will be extubated after return of spontaneous respiration .All patients will be followed for 1 hour in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) then discharged to the ward. In the postoperative period we will give the patients multimodal analgesic regimen as following : a) paracetamol 1000 mg IV 3 times/day, b) dexketoprofen 50 mg IV once/day, c) IV pethidine 0.5mg/kg as a rescue analgesic on demand. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS 0: no pain, 10: worst pain ever) at 0 hours postoperative in PACU, then at postoperative 2., 6.,12.,24., and 48 hours at the ward by a research assistant who will be blinded to the study groups. Pethidine IV 0.5 mg/kg will be given as a rescue analgesic when the VAS score will be more than 3. The amount of pethidine consumption will be recorded between 0-12., 12-24., and 24-48 hours. The following criteria will be recorded and compared between the two groups : demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), VAS scores , time to the first rescue analgesic (h) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(mg),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure ,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia , intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression , nausea and vomiting, urine retension, hypotension , bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness ).9
Primary outcome measures:
The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.
Secondary outcome measures:
The secondary outcome will include the following : demographic data ( Age, Weight, height, body mass index) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (minutes), time to first rescue analgesic (minutes) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(micrograme),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure
,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia, intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness).
Statistical analysis and sample size estimation :
Sample size was calculated using G*power version 3.1.9.4. Previous similar studies indicated that a minimal sample size of 37 patients in each group will be needed to achieve a power level of 0.80 , alpha level of 0.05(two tailed) , will a medium effect size of 0.66 for the VAS score at 24 hours. Estimating that 10% of patients may drop out of the study due to different reasons , sample size was increased to 82 patients (41 in each group).10 Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM,Armonk,NY,USA).Data are presented as mean (SD) , median [interquartile range (IQR) ], or number of patients (%) . Distribution normality will be assessed using the Kolmogorov_Smirnov test. Comparisons between groups will be made using independent t_test or Mann_Whitney U test , as appropriate. Categorical variables will be analyzed using chi_square test or Fisher exact test. A p_value less 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups: group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group ( ultrasound guided erectae spinae block) | Active comparator | Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block, Other: Intrathecal Morphine injectionThe same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM. |
| Group (Intrathecal morphine) | Active comparator | Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block, Other: Intrathecal Morphine injectionIn the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels. • Age range from 18 and 70 years.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patient refusal.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae blockOne group by using ultrasound for making erectae spinae block | Other | Group ( ultrasound guided erectae spinae block), Group (Intrathecal morphine) |
| Intrathecal Morphine injectionInjecting intrathecal morphine | Other | Group ( ultrasound guided erectae spinae block), Group (Intrathecal morphine) |
Primary outcome
VAS score
Time frame: Every 4 bours for 48 hours post operative
The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.
12 secondary outcomes
Age
Time frame: Day 1
Gender
Time frame: Day 1
Height
Time frame: Day 1
Weight
Time frame: Day 1
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Day 1
Mean operative time
Time frame: during surgery
Intra and post-operative opoid injected
Time frame: up to 48 hours
Hemodynamics intra operative
Time frame: Every half hour during surgery
Hemodynamics post-operative
Time frame: Every 4 hours for 24 hours
Time for 1ST analgesic request
Time frame: up to 48 hours
Complications
Time frame: up to 48 hours
Ramsy sedation score
Time frame: Every 4 hours for 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jun 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36988361Mahmoud AM, Ragab SG, Shawky MA, Masry DH, Botros JM. The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared With Intrathecal Morphine in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Double-blind Prospective Comparative Study. Pain Physician. 2023 Mar;26(2):149-159.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Upon finishing my study and publishing an article, I will share my data upon resonable rquest.
Related trials for Post-operative
Recruiting
Endo-SPONGE for Treatment of Anastomotic or Hartmann's Stump Leakages in Lower Pelvic Area
Anastomotic Leaks, Hartmanns Stump Leakage
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection in people with Post-operative and Analgesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VAS score (time frame: Every 4 bours for 48 hours post operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05123092, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jun 2022.