AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health IssueNCT05123261

Effects of Mindfulness Based Elder Care (MBEC) on Psychological and Spiritual Well Being

A study testing the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy in people with Mental Health Issue, run by Mackay Medical College at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to verify the effectiveness of the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy developed by McBee (2008) in improving the psychological and spiritual well-being of seniors with disabilities living in residential long-term care institutions in Taiwan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 110 years
Conditions the study is for
Mental Health Issue
What is being tested?
the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Jul 2016to 15 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult
  • The inclusion criteria were the seniors with disabilities who (1) lived in a care institution for over 3 months; (2) were aged 65 years or above; (3) failed to obtain a full score for Barthel Index; (4) were able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese; and (5) had no history of mental illness.
  • The exclusive criteria were residents have the diagnosis of psychotic disorders, infectious diseases, or been hospitalized.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Department of Nursing

    New Taipei City

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Mindfulness Based Elder Care (MBEC) on Psychological and Spiritual Well Being of Institutional Seniors With Disability

This study aims to verify the effectiveness of the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy developed by McBee (2008) in improving the psychological and spiritual well-being of seniors with disabilities living in residential long-term care institutions in Taiwan.

Read the detailed description

Background: Existing literature indicates that seniors with disabilities living in long-term care institutions are confronted with such issues as changes in their living environment, institutionalized living schedules, and reduced social interaction, which may affect their mental health and cause spiritual disturbances. In recent years, mindfulness therapy has been increasingly proven to effectively improve individuals' mental health and spiritual well-being. However, the effectiveness of the therapy for seniors with disabilities admitted to residential institutions needs to be further verified by empirical studies.

Purpose: This study aims to verify the effectiveness of the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy developed by McBee (2008) in improving the psychological and spiritual well-being of seniors with disabilities living in residential long-term care institutions in Taiwan.

Methods: A Randomized control trial was used. The subjects enrolled in this study were the seniors with disability in the residential long-term care institutions in the northern and central part of Taiwan. The inclusion criteria were the seniors with disabilities who (1) lived in a care institution for over 3 months; (2) were aged 65 years or above; (3) failed to obtain a full score for Barthel Index; (4) were able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese; and (5) had no history of mental illness. According to the intervention scheme, the experimental group was offered eight 50-minute courses once a week, while the control group maintained routine activities. In terms of the evaluation of intervention effectiveness, basic data collection tables, and the Barthel Index were used to collect the information of the included seniors with disabilities on basic demography, and ability to perform daily activities. The Geriatric Depression Scale-Short-Short Form (GDS-SF), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) were also adopted to understand the included seniors with disabilities depression, anxiety, and spiritual well-being. The data were collected four times: before the intervention, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week). The collected data was analyzed by SPSS 22.0. Descriptive statistics and the independent samples t-test were used to identify the homogeneity of the two groups, and the linear mixed model was used to compare the improvement results of the experimental group alone and the two groups at different time points.

Being tested
the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy
Keywords
long term care institutions, seniors with disability, mindfulness-based elder care, spiritual well-being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapyBehavioural

    According to the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy developed by McBee (2008), the experimental group was offered eight 50-minute courses once a week.

Study groups in NCT05123261
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapyExperimentalThe experimental group was offered eight 50-minute courses once a week.
Receives: Behavioral: the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy
the routine activitiesNo interventionThe control group maintained routine activities. And each CG participant had a weekly visit from the research team.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in depression summary scores before intervention to 4-week post intervention.

    Depression was measured using the Chinese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short-Short Form (GDS-SF). The Geriatric Depression Scale-Short-Short Form scores range from 0 to 15. Higher scores represent an increased level of depressive symptoms and a cut-off value of 5 is commonly indicative of depression.

    Measured: The data were collected before the intervention to week 12: baseline, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week).

  2. Change in Anxiety summary scores before intervention to 4-week post intervention.

    Anxiety was measured using the Chinese version of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The State Trait Anxiety Inventory measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event. The total scores range from 40-160 and higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.

    Measured: The data were collected before the intervention to week 12: baseline, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week).

  3. Change in Spiritual well-being summary scores before intervention to 4-week post intervention.

    Spiritual well-being was measured using the Chinese version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS). The Spiritual Well-Being Scale scores range from 20 to 120. Higher scores represent an increased level of spiritual well-being.

    Measured: The data were collected before the intervention to week 12: baseline, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week).

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in Meaning in life summary scores before intervention to 4-week post intervention.

    Meaning in life was measured using the Purpose in Life Test (PIL). The Purpose in Life Test scores range from 20-140 and higher scores are represent an higher level of meaning and purpose in respondents' lives.

    Measured: The data were collected before the intervention to week 12: baseline, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05123261
Sponsor's protocol ID
MOST-103-2314-B-715-002-MY3
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
7 Apr 2021
Last updated
1 May 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hsiung Y, Chen YH, Lin LC, Wang YH. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Elder Care (MBEC) on symptoms of depression and anxiety and spiritual well-being of institutionalized seniors with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04220-6.

    PubMed 37596549

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing the mindfulness-based elder care (MBEC) therapy in people with Mental Health Issue, run by Mackay Medical College at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in depression summary scores before intervention to 4-week post intervention. (time frame: The data were collected before the intervention to week 12: baseline, in the middle of the intervention (the fourth week), at the end of the intervention (the eighth week), and the follow-up four weeks after the intervention (the twelfth week).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05123261, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in