AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseCHART-OPTIMIZENCT05125107

PrOgnostic imPlicaTIons of 2-diMensIonal Patterns for Residual Disease After Stenting CharacteriZEd by Quantitative Flow Ratio Pullback Curve Analysis

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic values of 2-dimensional residual disease patterns determined by quantitative flow ratio (QFR) pullbacks after stent implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,607 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Nov 2021to 30 Mar 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All vessels with measurable post-PCI QFR and with available post-PCI QFR virtual pullback curves were included

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with at least one vessel with measurable post-PCI QFR
  • PPG index can be calculated from virtual QFR pullback curve
  • dQFR/ds can be calculated from virtual QFR pullback curve
  • The patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations;
  • Patients who agree to accept the follow-up visits.

Who cannot join

  • Culprit vessels for ACS myocardial infarction;
  • Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure;
  • Patient has other medical illness (e.g., cancer, known malignancy, congestive heart failure, organ transplant recipient or candidate) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (i.e., less than 1 year);
  • Patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, stainless steel alloy, cobalt chromium, rapamycin, styrene-butylenes-styrene or poly-lactic acid (PLA) polymer, and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated;
  • Any significant medical condition which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study;
  • Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study or patient in inclusion in another investigational drug or device study during follow-up.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic values of 2-dimensional residual disease patterns determined by quantitative flow ratio (QFR) pullbacks after stent implantation.

Read the detailed description

Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiology assessment has been confirmed. The rationale for measuring post-PCI physiologic outcome is that it could implicate the residual risk of suboptimal stenting in addition to residual diffuse coronary artery disease after PCI Nevertheless, it should be noted that both post-PCI physiologic indices such as ,fractional flow reserve (FFR) and QFR, are measured at the distal of the interrogated vessel and reflect the cumulative residual disease burdens, defining the residual disease patterns might have additional role in exploring the underlying mechanisms for suboptimal post-PCI physiologic results, thus providing the opportunities for functional optimization with subsequent interventions accordingly to improve immediate functional results, long-term outcomes may be positively affected.

Concept of physiologic 2-dimensional disease patterns according to both physiologic distribution (predominant focal versus diffuse disease) and local severity (presence versus absence of major gradient) of coronary atherosclerosis before PCI was proposed and could be derived from virtual QFR pullback curve. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of the 2-dimensional residual disease patterns after PCI has not been studied yet.

The CHART-OPTIMIZE study aims to investigate the clinical implications of physiologic 2-dimensional residual disease patterns after stenting.

Being tested
Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/dsDevice

    From coronary angiographic images, QFR will be calculated and virtual pullback curve will be abstracted and PPG index will be calculated as:

    PPG index={MaxPPG20mm/△QFRvessel+(1-length with functional disease/Total vessel length) }/2

    Physiologic local severity of coronary atherosclerosis was assessed by instantaneous QFR gradient per unit length (dQFR/ds)

Study groups in NCT05125107
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Predominant focal residual disease without major gradient
Receives: Device: Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds
Group 2Predominant focal residual disease with major gradient
Receives: Device: Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds
Group 3Predominant diffuse residual disease without major gradient
Receives: Device: Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds
Group 4Predominant diffuse residual disease with major gradient
Receives: Device: Quantitative Flow Ratio derived PPG and dQFR/ds

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vessel-oriented composite outcome

    Vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO) including vessel related ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death.

    Measured: at 2 years from index procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cardiac death or vessel-related MI

    Cardiac death or vessel-related MI

    Measured: at 2 years from index procedure

  2. Vessel-related MI

    Vessel-related MI

    Measured: at 2 years from index procedure

  3. Cardiac death

    Cardiac death

    Measured: at 2 years from index procedure

  4. Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization

    Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization

    Measured: at 2 years from index procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2021
  2. Study start15 Nov 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,607 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05125107
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZS-20211112
Acronym
CHART-OPTIMIZE
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
17 Nov 2021
Last updated
18 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Xu B, Gao R, Yang Y, Cao X, Qin L, Li Y, Li Z, Li X, Lin H, Guo Y, Ma Y, Wang J, Nie S, Xu L, Cao E, Guan C, Stone GW; PANDA III Investigators. Biodegradable Polymer-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Differing Elution and Absorption Kinetics: The PANDA III Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 17;67(19):2249-2258. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.475.

    PubMed 27173037
  • Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, Zhang J, Jeon KH, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Koo BK, Ge J. Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio-Derived Pullback Pressure Gradient Index and Its Impact on Diagnostic Performance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 8;14(3):353-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.036. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33541549
  • Dai N, Zhang R, Hu N, Guan C, Zou T, Qiao Z, Zhang M, Duan S, Xie L, Dou K, Zhang Y, Xu B, Ge J. Integrated coronary disease burden and patterns to discriminate vessels benefiting from percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):E12-E21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29983. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

    PubMed 34652068

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Neng Dai, MD (+8613701997266, niceday1987@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vessel-oriented composite outcome (time frame: at 2 years from index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05125107, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in