Emergency Service, HospitalNCT05126641
Analysis of Emergency Department Visits According to Incidence of Covid-19
An observational study of Emergency Service, Hospital and Epidemiology, run by Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix at 8 sites in France.
Trial summary
With lockdown, Emergency Departments (ED) visits decrease, principally for visits unrelated with Covid-19. In this study, the investigators aimed to find a correlation between ED visits and incidence rate of Covid-19 in a French metropolis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergency Service, Hospital, Epidemiology
- How many people
- 400,000 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 13 May 2020to 4 May 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients visited one of 9 emergency department.
Who may be able to join
- patients over 18 years old
Who cannot join
- patient who are transferred between centers participating to the study.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
France8 sites
Emergency Department, General Hospital
Armentières, Nord
Emergency Department, General Hospital
Hazebrouck, Nord
Emergency Department, University Hospital
Lille, Nord, 59000
Emergency Department, GHICL Saint-Vincent
Lille
Emergency Department, GHICL Saint-Philibert
Lomme, Nord
Emergency Department, General Hospital
Roubaix, Nord, 59100
Emergency Department, General Hospital
Seclin, Nord
Emergency Department, General Hospital
Tourcoing, Nord
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Emergency Department Visits According to Incidence of Covid-19 in French Metropolis : a One-year Multicenter Observational Retrospective Study.
With lockdown, Emergency Departments (ED) visits decrease, principally for visits unrelated with Covid-19. In this study, the investigators aimed to find a correlation between ED visits and incidence rate of Covid-19 in a French metropolis.
Read the detailed description
All patients older than 18 years were included in 9 ED during 51 weeks. Patients transferred between the centers participating in the study were excluded.
The investigators count the number of visits per weeks, then the number of visits according to :
- reason for consultation Covid-like (cough, fever or dyspnea),
- reason for consultation with accordance to French Emergency Medicine Society (SFMU) reference
- diagnosis with accordance to SFMU reference
- orientation (home, medical unit, chirurgical unit, intensive care unit, psychiatric unit, death)
Pearson's correlation test compare incidence rate per week with this counts and admission rate.
- Conditions
- Emergency Service, Hospital, Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Non-Covid-19 visits, Emergency departments visits, Incidence of Covid-19
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
non-Covid-19 visit
Count of non-Covid-19 visit per week
Measured: 51 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Reason for visits
Count of each reason for visits category according to SFMU reference
Measured: 51 weeks
Admission rate
Admission rate per week
Measured: 51 weeks
Diagnosis
Count of each diagnostic category according to SFMU reference
Measured: 51 weeks
Orientation
Count of each orientation (home, medical unit, chirurgical unit, intensive care unit, death, psychiatric unit, other)
Measured: 51 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2021
- Study start13 May 2020
- Primary completion4 May 2021
- Study completion4 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Emergency Service, HospitalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 400,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Lille
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05126641
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-004
- Other IDs
- 4714175, 921296
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kain T, Fowler R. Preparing intensive care for the next pandemic influenza. Crit Care. 2019 Oct 30;23(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2616-1.
PubMed 31665057Sivey P, McAllister R, Vally H, Burgess A, Kelly AM. Anatomy of a demand shock: Quantitative analysis of crowding in hospital emergency departments in Victoria, Australia during the 2009 influenza pandemic. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222851. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31550288Lum ME, McMillan AJ, Brook CW, Lester R, Piers LS. Impact of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza on critical care capacity in Victoria. Med J Aust. 2009 Nov 2;191(9):502-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02914.x.
PubMed 19883346Schanzer DL, Schwartz B. Impact of seasonal and pandemic influenza on emergency department visits, 2003-2010, Ontario, Canada. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):388-97. doi: 10.1111/acem.12111.
PubMed 23701347Yang L, Chan KH, Suen LK, Chan KP, Wang X, Cao P, He D, Peiris JS, Wong CM. Impact of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic on Age-Specific Epidemic Curves of Other Respiratory Viruses: A Comparison of Pre-Pandemic, Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods in a Subtropical City. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125447. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25928217Kollek D. Response of a community hospital and its emergency department to the H1N1 pandemic influenza. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Nov;142(1):12-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq271.
PubMed 21041239Kuitunen I, Ponkilainen VT, Launonen AP, Reito A, Hevonkorpi TP, Paloneva J, Mattila VM. The effect of national lockdown due to COVID-19 on emergency department visits. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 4;28(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00810-0.
PubMed 33276799Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits and patient safety in the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1732-1736. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
PubMed 32738468Westgard BC, Morgan MW, Vazquez-Benitez G, Erickson LO, Zwank MD. An Analysis of Changes in Emergency Department Visits After a State Declaration During the Time of COVID-19. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;76(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
PubMed 33008651Kim HS, Cruz DS, Conrardy MJ, Gandhi KR, Seltzer JA, Loftus TM, Fant AL, McCarthy DM. Emergency Department Visits for Serious Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):910-913. doi: 10.1111/acem.14099. Epub 2020 Aug 17. No abstract available.
PubMed 32737912Giannouchos TV, Biskupiak J, Moss MJ, Brixner D, Andreyeva E, Ukert B. Trends in outpatient emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large, urban, academic hospital system. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;40:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
PubMed 33338676Baugh JJ, White BA, McEvoy D, Yun BJ, Brown DFM, Raja AS, Dutta S. The cases not seen: Patterns of emergency department visits and procedures in the era of COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.081. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
PubMed 33189517Friedman AB, Barfield D, David G, Diller T, Gunnarson C, Liu M, Vicidomina BV, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Nigam SC. Delayed emergencies: The composition and magnitude of non-respiratory emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jan 14;2(1):e12349. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12349. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PubMed 33490998Casalino E, Choquet C, Bouzid D, Peyrony O, Curac S, Revue E, Fontaine JP, Plaisance P, Chauvin A, Ghazali DA. Analysis of Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Activity during Influenza Season, COVID-19 Epidemic, and Lockdown Periods in View of Managing a Future Disaster Risk: A Multicenter Observational Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8302. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228302.
PubMed 33182696Wongtanasarasin W, Srisawang T, Yothiya W, Phinyo P. Impact of national lockdown towards emergency department visits and admission rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: A hospital-based study. Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Apr;33(2):316-323. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13666. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
PubMed 33070468
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Emergency Department Visits According to Incidence of Covid-19 in French Metropolis : a One-year Multicenter Observational Retrospective Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05126641
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-004
- Conditions
- Emergency Service, Hospital, Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Non-Covid-19 visits, Emergency departments visits, Incidence of Covid-19
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier de RoubaixUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Lille
- Study start
- 13 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With lockdown, Emergency Departments (ED) visits decrease, principally for visits unrelated with Covid-19. In this study, the investigators aimed to find a correlation between ED visits and incidence rate of Covid-19 in a French metropolis.
Detailed description
All patients older than 18 years were included in 9 ED during 51 weeks. Patients transferred between the centers participating in the study were excluded.
The investigators count the number of visits per weeks, then the number of visits according to :
- reason for consultation Covid-like (cough, fever or dyspnea),
- reason for consultation with accordance to French Emergency Medicine Society (SFMU) reference
- diagnosis with accordance to SFMU reference
- orientation (home, medical unit, chirurgical unit, intensive care unit, psychiatric unit, death)
Pearson's correlation test compare incidence rate per week with this counts and admission rate.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients visited one of 9 emergency department.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients over 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patient who are transferred between centers participating to the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
non-Covid-19 visit
Time frame: 51 weeks
Count of non-Covid-19 visit per week
4 secondary outcomes
Reason for visits
Time frame: 51 weeks
Admission rate
Time frame: 51 weeks
Diagnosis
Time frame: 51 weeks
Orientation
Time frame: 51 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31665057Kain T, Fowler R. Preparing intensive care for the next pandemic influenza. Crit Care. 2019 Oct 30;23(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2616-1.
- Background: PubMed 31550288Sivey P, McAllister R, Vally H, Burgess A, Kelly AM. Anatomy of a demand shock: Quantitative analysis of crowding in hospital emergency departments in Victoria, Australia during the 2009 influenza pandemic. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222851. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19883346Lum ME, McMillan AJ, Brook CW, Lester R, Piers LS. Impact of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza on critical care capacity in Victoria. Med J Aust. 2009 Nov 2;191(9):502-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02914.x.
- Background: PubMed 23701347Schanzer DL, Schwartz B. Impact of seasonal and pandemic influenza on emergency department visits, 2003-2010, Ontario, Canada. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):388-97. doi: 10.1111/acem.12111.
- Background: PubMed 25928217Yang L, Chan KH, Suen LK, Chan KP, Wang X, Cao P, He D, Peiris JS, Wong CM. Impact of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic on Age-Specific Epidemic Curves of Other Respiratory Viruses: A Comparison of Pre-Pandemic, Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods in a Subtropical City. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125447. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21041239Kollek D. Response of a community hospital and its emergency department to the H1N1 pandemic influenza. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Nov;142(1):12-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq271.
- Background: PubMed 33276799Kuitunen I, Ponkilainen VT, Launonen AP, Reito A, Hevonkorpi TP, Paloneva J, Mattila VM. The effect of national lockdown due to COVID-19 on emergency department visits. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 4;28(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00810-0.
- Background: PubMed 32738468Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits and patient safety in the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1732-1736. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 33008651Westgard BC, Morgan MW, Vazquez-Benitez G, Erickson LO, Zwank MD. An Analysis of Changes in Emergency Department Visits After a State Declaration During the Time of COVID-19. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;76(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 32737912Kim HS, Cruz DS, Conrardy MJ, Gandhi KR, Seltzer JA, Loftus TM, Fant AL, McCarthy DM. Emergency Department Visits for Serious Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):910-913. doi: 10.1111/acem.14099. Epub 2020 Aug 17. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33338676Giannouchos TV, Biskupiak J, Moss MJ, Brixner D, Andreyeva E, Ukert B. Trends in outpatient emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large, urban, academic hospital system. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;40:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 33189517Baugh JJ, White BA, McEvoy D, Yun BJ, Brown DFM, Raja AS, Dutta S. The cases not seen: Patterns of emergency department visits and procedures in the era of COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.081. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Emergency Service, Hospital
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Emergency Service, Hospital and Epidemiology, run by Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix at 8 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
non-Covid-19 visit (time frame: 51 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05126641, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2021.