Frozen ShoulderPhase 4NCT05131269
Prolotherapy Intervention in Patient With Frozen Shoulder
A Phase 4 study testing Dextrose 15 % in Water and Normal Saline 20 mL Injection in people with Frozen Shoulder, run by Bumi Herman at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
Introduction : Prolotherapy is regenerative tissue therapy that is considered to be efficacious in reducing symptoms and morbidity of frozen shoulder, but only a few studies demonstrate the effect of prolotherapy at the biomolecular level, particularly the level of Matrix Metalloproteinase- I (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Frozen Shoulder
- What is being tested?
- Dextrose 15 % in Water and Normal Saline 20 mL Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 30 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
- Inclusion Criteria
- Age 35-70
- Diagnosed with frozen shoulder
- At least showing symptoms more than 3 months
- Exclusion Criteria
- Receiving other intraarticular injection
- Taking Nonsteroid Antiinflammation drugs 1 week prior to intervention
- Skin disorder around the injection site
- Septic arthritis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site
Hasanuddin University, Faculty of Medicine
Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90245
About this study
Official title: The Level of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) After Prolotherapy Intervention and The Functional Outcome in Patient With Frozen Shoulder
Introduction :
Prolotherapy is regenerative tissue therapy that is considered to be efficacious in reducing symptoms and morbidity of frozen shoulder, but only a few studies demonstrate the effect of prolotherapy at the biomolecular level, particularly the level of Matrix Metalloproteinase- I (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor Matrix Metalloproteinase (TIMP-1), as the biomarkers of cartilage repair.
Read more
Objective:
To determine the effect of prolotherapy on MMP-1, TIMP-1, and functional outcomes in frozen shoulder patients
Method:
a double-blind randomized controlled trial study involving participants who had been diagnosed with Frozen Shoulder. History taking, functional outcome assessment, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 were measured. The prolotherapy via intraarticular and extraarticular was performed four times, followed by the evaluation of functional outcome, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 at week 12
Alternative Hypothesis :
Prolotherapy will increase the MMP-1, TIMP-1 levels, and improve functional outcome among Frozen Shoulder patients
Read the detailed description
Design :
Double-blind randomized trial
Randomization :
Simple Randomization generated by an online randomizer
Sample Size :
Difference between two means of primary outcome where
- mean difference (μ 1 - μ 2 ) = 0.47
- pool variance = 0.09
- Z 1-α/2 = 1.95 with type 1 error 5%
- 1-β = 1.282 with power 90%. Yielding 16 patients for each arm
Detailed Intervention
- Intervention group: Prolotherapy is given four times (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6)
- Comparison group: Normal Saline is given four times with a timeframe similar to the intervention group
Injection location
- Rotator Cuff muscles
- Intraarticular glenohumeral joint
- Subacromial bursa
- long-heap of the biceps tendon
- Acromioclavicular joint
Statistical analysis :
- Descriptive statistic to elaborate baseline characteristic
- Assuming the baseline characteristic between groups are similar, the independent t-test will be conducted to see the differences between group, whereas Mann Whitney will be performed for nonparametric data
- Difference within-group (baseline and last day) will be measured by paired-t-test or Wilcoxon for non parametric scenario
- Conditions
- Frozen Shoulder
- Being tested
- Dextrose 15 % in Water, Normal Saline 20 mL Injection
- Keywords
- MMP-1, TIMP-1, Prolotherapy, Functional Outcome, Frozen Shoulder
- Medical subject headings
- Bursitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dextrose 15 % in WaterDrug
Also called Prolotherapy
A 15% dextrose solution is given to shoulder segments four times with 2 weeks interval (week 0,2,4, and 6)
Normal Saline 20 mL InjectionDrug
Also called Comparator
A Normal Saline 0.9% is given to shoulder segments four times with 2 weeks interval (week 0,2,4, and 6)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prolotherapy | Experimental | A solution of 7.5 ml of 15% dextrose with 2 ml of 40% lidocaine and 10.5 water is given to these shoulder segments as follows.
1. Supraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml
2. Infraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml
3. Teres minor muscle 2-3 ml,
4. Subscapularis muscle 2-3 ml.
5. Intraarticular glenohumeral joint 5 ml
6. Bursa sub acromial 1-2 ml,
7. Long head tendon biceps 1-2 ml
8. Acromioclavicular joint 1 ml Receives: Drug: Dextrose 15 % in Water |
| Normal Saline 0.9% | Placebo comparator | A solution of 20 ml normal saline 0.9% is given to these shoulder segments as follows.
1. Supraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml
2. Infraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml
3. Teres minor muscle 2-3 ml,
4. Subscapularis muscle 2-3 ml.
5. Intraarticular glenohumeral joint 5 ml
6. Bursa sub acromial 1-2 ml,
7. Long head tendon biceps 1-2 ml
8. Acromioclavicular joint 1 ml Receives: Drug: Normal Saline 20 mL Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 in Blood
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 from whole blood measured using Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA). Mean difference between group will be assessed
Measured: changes of Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 value from baseline to week 6
Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 in Blood
Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 from whole blood measured using Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA). Mean difference between group will be assessed
Measured: changes of Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 value from baseline to week 6
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Functional Outcome of the Shoulder
The functional outcome is measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire where the patient were asked to do simple task involving the arm, shoulder and hand and also the assessment of additional symptoms and impact to daily life. Higher score indicates disabilities
Measured: changes of Functional Outcome value from baseline to week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion31 May 2022
- Study completion30 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Frozen ShoulderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study involves two arms assigned randomly for receiving different treatments. One arm for Prolotherapy and Normal Saline in the comparison group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bumi Herman
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Bumi Herman, Hasanuddin University
- Investigators
- Nuralam Sarif, MD, Principal investigator, Hasanuddin UniversityIrawan Yusuf, PhD, Study chair, Hasanuddin UniversityEndy Adnan, PhD, Study chair, Hasanuddin UniversityIrfan Idris, PhD, Study chair, Hasanuddin University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05131269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0411211741
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: De-identified data will be shared accordingly
Publications
Akcay S, Gurel Kandemir N, Kaya T, Dogan N, Eren M. Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Normal Saline Injection for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1159-1168. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0286. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
PubMed 32990454Cho CH, Song KS, Kim BS, Kim DH, Lho YM. Biological Aspect of Pathophysiology for Frozen Shoulder. Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 24;2018:7274517. doi: 10.1155/2018/7274517. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29992159Distel LM, Best TM. Prolotherapy: a clinical review of its role in treating chronic musculoskeletal pain. PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6 Suppl 1):S78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.003.
PubMed 21703585Lubis AM, Lubis VK. Matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase and transforming growth factor-beta 1 in frozen shoulder, and their changes as response to intensive stretching and supervised neglect exercise. J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jul;18(4):519-27. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0387-0. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
PubMed 23604641Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Meyer MA, Basques BA, Chahal J, Bach BR Jr, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. The Therapeutic Effect of Intra-articular Normal Saline Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Evidence Level 1 Studies. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2647-2653. doi: 10.1177/0363546516680607. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
PubMed 28027657
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Level of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) After Prolotherapy Intervention and The Functional Outcome in Patient With Frozen Shoulder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05131269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0411211741
- Conditions
- Frozen Shoulder
- Keywords
- MMP-1, TIMP-1, Prolotherapy, Functional Outcome, Frozen Shoulder
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bumi HermanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction :
Prolotherapy is regenerative tissue therapy that is considered to be efficacious in reducing symptoms and morbidity of frozen shoulder, but only a few studies demonstrate the effect of prolotherapy at the biomolecular level, particularly the level of Matrix Metalloproteinase- I (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor Matrix Metalloproteinase (TIMP-1), as the biomarkers of cartilage repair.
Objective:
To determine the effect of prolotherapy on MMP-1, TIMP-1, and functional outcomes in frozen shoulder patients
Method:
a double-blind randomized controlled trial study involving participants who had been diagnosed with Frozen Shoulder. History taking, functional outcome assessment, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 were measured. The prolotherapy via intraarticular and extraarticular was performed four times, followed by the evaluation of functional outcome, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 at week 12
Alternative Hypothesis :
Prolotherapy will increase the MMP-1, TIMP-1 levels, and improve functional outcome among Frozen Shoulder patients
Detailed description
Design :
Double-blind randomized trial
Randomization :
Simple Randomization generated by an online randomizer
Sample Size :
Difference between two means of primary outcome where
- mean difference (μ 1 - μ 2 ) = 0.47
- pool variance = 0.09
- Z 1-α/2 = 1.95 with type 1 error 5%
- 1-β = 1.282 with power 90%. Yielding 16 patients for each arm
Detailed Intervention
- Intervention group: Prolotherapy is given four times (Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6)
- Comparison group: Normal Saline is given four times with a timeframe similar to the intervention group
Injection location
- Rotator Cuff muscles
- Intraarticular glenohumeral joint
- Subacromial bursa
- long-heap of the biceps tendon
- Acromioclavicular joint
Statistical analysis :
- Descriptive statistic to elaborate baseline characteristic
- Assuming the baseline characteristic between groups are similar, the independent t-test will be conducted to see the differences between group, whereas Mann Whitney will be performed for nonparametric data
- Difference within-group (baseline and last day) will be measured by paired-t-test or Wilcoxon for non parametric scenario
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study involves two arms assigned randomly for receiving different treatments. One arm for Prolotherapy and Normal Saline in the comparison group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prolotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Dextrose 15 % in WaterA solution of 7.5 ml of 15% dextrose with 2 ml of 40% lidocaine and 10.5 water is given to these shoulder segments as follows. 1. Supraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml 2. Infraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml 3. Teres minor muscle 2-3 ml, 4. Subscapularis muscle 2-3 ml. 5. Intraarticular glenohumeral joint 5 ml 6. Bursa sub acromial 1-2 ml, 7. Long head tendon biceps 1-2 ml 8. Acromioclavicular joint 1 ml |
| Normal Saline 0.9% | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal Saline 20 mL InjectionA solution of 20 ml normal saline 0.9% is given to these shoulder segments as follows. 1. Supraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml 2. Infraspinatus muscle 2-4 ml 3. Teres minor muscle 2-3 ml, 4. Subscapularis muscle 2-3 ml. 5. Intraarticular glenohumeral joint 5 ml 6. Bursa sub acromial 1-2 ml, 7. Long head tendon biceps 1-2 ml 8. Acromioclavicular joint 1 ml |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dextrose 15 % in WaterAlso: ProlotherapyA 15% dextrose solution is given to shoulder segments four times with 2 weeks interval (week 0,2,4, and 6) | Drug | Prolotherapy |
| Normal Saline 20 mL InjectionAlso: ComparatorA Normal Saline 0.9% is given to shoulder segments four times with 2 weeks interval (week 0,2,4, and 6) | Drug | Normal Saline 0.9% |
Primary outcome
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 in Blood
Time frame: changes of Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 value from baseline to week 6
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 from whole blood measured using Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA). Mean difference between group will be assessed
Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 in Blood
Time frame: changes of Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 value from baseline to week 6
Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase 1 from whole blood measured using Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA). Mean difference between group will be assessed
1 secondary outcome
The Functional Outcome of the Shoulder
Time frame: changes of Functional Outcome value from baseline to week 6
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 32990454Akcay S, Gurel Kandemir N, Kaya T, Dogan N, Eren M. Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Normal Saline Injection for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1159-1168. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0286. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 29992159Cho CH, Song KS, Kim BS, Kim DH, Lho YM. Biological Aspect of Pathophysiology for Frozen Shoulder. Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 24;2018:7274517. doi: 10.1155/2018/7274517. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21703585Distel LM, Best TM. Prolotherapy: a clinical review of its role in treating chronic musculoskeletal pain. PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6 Suppl 1):S78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.003.
- Background: PubMed 23604641Lubis AM, Lubis VK. Matrix metalloproteinase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase and transforming growth factor-beta 1 in frozen shoulder, and their changes as response to intensive stretching and supervised neglect exercise. J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jul;18(4):519-27. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0387-0. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
- Background: PubMed 28027657Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Meyer MA, Basques BA, Chahal J, Bach BR Jr, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. The Therapeutic Effect of Intra-articular Normal Saline Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Evidence Level 1 Studies. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2647-2653. doi: 10.1177/0363546516680607. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. De-identified data will be shared accordingly
Related trials for Frozen Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Clinic Versus mHealth Application-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Injection Combined With Spencer Technique on Painful Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Posterior Capsular Stretching With and Without Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
RecruitingPhase 4
Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular vs Gluteal Intramuscular Corticosteroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nuralam Sarif, MD principal investigator
Hasanuddin University
Irawan Yusuf, PhD study chair
Hasanuddin University
Endy Adnan, PhD study chair
Hasanuddin University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dextrose 15 % in Water and Normal Saline 20 mL Injection in people with Frozen Shoulder, run by Bumi Herman at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 in Blood (time frame: changes of Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 value from baseline to week 6). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05131269, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2022.