Pre-eclampsiaNCT05131282
Maternal Serum Markers Predicting Preeclampsia At Early Gestations
An observational study of Pre-eclampsia and Preterm Birth, run by HBI Solutions Inc. at 6 sites in China.
Trial summary
This observational study aims to assess the effectiveness of a maternal blood test as a prognostic tool for predicting early pregnancy risk of preeclampsia (PE). We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for PE risk prediction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pre-eclampsia, Preterm Birth
- What is being tested?
- Blood test of PE risk and Blood test of Preterm PE risk
- How many people
- 18,000 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 30 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: A multiple-site prospective cohort of women who developed PE (i.e. the PE group) and women who had normal pregnancy (i.e. the Normal group) will be recruited. Maternal serum samples were collected between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA. The two group of women are matched by age, BMI, pregnant history, and other clinical information.
Who may be able to join
- Female participants aged 18 to 40 years.
- Gestational age between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit, as confirmed by ultrasound.
- Control group: Pregnancies with no risk factors for preterm delivery, preeclampsia, or fetal growth restriction, selected during routine prenatal care between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA.
- Informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Multiple pregnancies.
- Pregestational diabetes.
- Chronic hypertension.
- Systemic diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease, autoimmune disorders).
- Any maternal or fetal condition necessitating pregnancy termination.
- Known major fetal anomalies or fetal demise.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Active vaginal bleeding.
- Serious medical illnesses (e.g., renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory insufficiency).
- Asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids.
- Use of anti-platelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
- Active hepatitis.
- Lack of informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
China6 sites
Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Changsha, Hunan
Women's Hospital, of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong
Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong
the Eighth Affiliated Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan
About this study
Official title: An Observational Study of a Maternal Blood Protein Predictor for Case Finding of Pregnancies At Risk of Preeclampsia At Early Gestation
This observational study aims to assess the effectiveness of a maternal blood test as a prognostic tool for predicting early pregnancy risk of preeclampsia (PE).
We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for PE risk prediction. Our PE predictor is a standalone blood test designed for early gestation screening to identify pregnancies at risk. This test measures concentrations of four proteins between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of gestation.
Based on the levels of these analytes, the test generates a risk score to classify patients as either low or high risk for PE.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale:
Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe medical condition that affects 2-4% of pregnant women globally and is characterized by high blood pressure along with organ damage, particularly to the liver and kidneys. It is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and preventative management of PE, including the use of low-dose aspirin, are essential for safeguarding the health of both the mother and the developing fetus. The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) use risk factor-based guidelines to identify women at high risk for PE. These guidelines treat each risk factor independently, leading to additive detection rates but low overall sensitivity. NICE guidelines detect only 40% of preterm PE and 35% of all PE cases with an 11% false positive rate, while ACOG detects just 5% of preterm and 2% of term PE. ACOG recommends low-dose aspirin only for women with a history of preeclampsia in multiple pregnancies or preterm delivery before 34 weeks, covering just 0.3% of all pregnancies, 5% of preterm PE, and 2% of term PE. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) PE test is utilized in several studies for screening and assessing the risk of developing PE during the first trimester. This test measures biochemical markers, such as pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF), in maternal blood to calculate individual risk scores. However, its limitations have highlighted the need for more effective and reliable alternatives. Performance varies across clinical sites, with sensitivity reported as low as 39-40%, and its positive predictive value (PPV) is relatively low, typically around 10-20%. This results in a significant number of false positives and negatives, which can lead to unnecessary anxiety for pregnant women and may result in missed diagnoses for those at risk. Furthermore, the FMF test requires specialized equipment and techniques, such as ultrasound for measuring the uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), making it less accessible in resource-limited settings and inaccuracy due to variance from different operators. These constraints limit its widespread use, underscoring the urgent need for improved blood tests to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false results.
Clinical significance and potential impact of the test:
Advancements in medical research and technology are paving the way for more effective blood tests to improve pre-eclampsia care management. By integrating additional biomarkers and employing cutting-edge diagnostic tools such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, we aim to enhance the precision and reliability of preeclampsia predictions. Our current research showcases the use of four blood serum protein markers to assess the risk of pre-eclampsia in women during early gestation (11-13 weeks), well before clinical symptoms arise.
To further validate the prediction and diagnosis performance of the novel preeclampsia test, we will enroll patients and initiate a large, multi-center observational clinical trial, including four diverse Asia cohorts, to test whether this standalone solution could bypass the need for complex maternal assessments.
Objectives and primary hypothesis of the study:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE), specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, the study aims to examine the test's predictive performance for overall PE, using the same performance metrics. We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for identifying pregnancies at risk for PE.
TRIAL DESIGN:
This trial is a multicenter observational study conducted in real-world clinical settings.
OUTCOMES:
The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol [0.3 mg/mg]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (<34 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).
- Conditions
- Pre-eclampsia, Preterm Birth
- Being tested
- Blood test of PE risk, Blood test of Preterm PE risk
- Keywords
- pre-eclampsia, maternal serum marker, preterm pre-eclampsia
- Medical subject headings
- Pre-Eclampsia, Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood test of PE riskDiagnostic test
A blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE
Blood test of Preterm PE riskDiagnostic test
A blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PE group | Women with a confirmative diagnosis of PE Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE risk | |
| Normal pregnancy group | Normal pregnant women Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE risk; Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE risk | |
| Preterm PE group | Women with a confirmative diagnosis of Preterm PE Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE risk |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
diagnosis of PE during pregnancy
The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol [0.3 mg/mg]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (<34 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).
Measured: an average of up to 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV
This study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE) and all PE, specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Measured: an average of up to 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023
- Study completion30 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pre-eclampsiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 18,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- HBI Solutions Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jianmin Niu, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
- Investigators
- Jianmin Niu, Master, Principal investigator, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05131282
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PE_001
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Study of a Maternal Blood Protein Predictor for Case Finding of Pregnancies At Risk of Preeclampsia At Early Gestation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05131282
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PE_001
- Conditions
- Pre-eclampsia, Preterm Birth
- Keywords
- pre-eclampsia, maternal serum marker, preterm pre-eclampsia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- HBI Solutions Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study aims to assess the effectiveness of a maternal blood test as a prognostic tool for predicting early pregnancy risk of preeclampsia (PE).
We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for PE risk prediction. Our PE predictor is a standalone blood test designed for early gestation screening to identify pregnancies at risk. This test measures concentrations of four proteins between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of gestation.
Based on the levels of these analytes, the test generates a risk score to classify patients as either low or high risk for PE.
Detailed description
Background and rationale:
Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe medical condition that affects 2-4% of pregnant women globally and is characterized by high blood pressure along with organ damage, particularly to the liver and kidneys. It is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and preventative management of PE, including the use of low-dose aspirin, are essential for safeguarding the health of both the mother and the developing fetus. The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) use risk factor-based guidelines to identify women at high risk for PE. These guidelines treat each risk factor independently, leading to additive detection rates but low overall sensitivity. NICE guidelines detect only 40% of preterm PE and 35% of all PE cases with an 11% false positive rate, while ACOG detects just 5% of preterm and 2% of term PE. ACOG recommends low-dose aspirin only for women with a history of preeclampsia in multiple pregnancies or preterm delivery before 34 weeks, covering just 0.3% of all pregnancies, 5% of preterm PE, and 2% of term PE. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) PE test is utilized in several studies for screening and assessing the risk of developing PE during the first trimester. This test measures biochemical markers, such as pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF), in maternal blood to calculate individual risk scores. However, its limitations have highlighted the need for more effective and reliable alternatives. Performance varies across clinical sites, with sensitivity reported as low as 39-40%, and its positive predictive value (PPV) is relatively low, typically around 10-20%. This results in a significant number of false positives and negatives, which can lead to unnecessary anxiety for pregnant women and may result in missed diagnoses for those at risk. Furthermore, the FMF test requires specialized equipment and techniques, such as ultrasound for measuring the uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), making it less accessible in resource-limited settings and inaccuracy due to variance from different operators. These constraints limit its widespread use, underscoring the urgent need for improved blood tests to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false results.
Clinical significance and potential impact of the test:
Advancements in medical research and technology are paving the way for more effective blood tests to improve pre-eclampsia care management. By integrating additional biomarkers and employing cutting-edge diagnostic tools such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, we aim to enhance the precision and reliability of preeclampsia predictions. Our current research showcases the use of four blood serum protein markers to assess the risk of pre-eclampsia in women during early gestation (11-13 weeks), well before clinical symptoms arise.
To further validate the prediction and diagnosis performance of the novel preeclampsia test, we will enroll patients and initiate a large, multi-center observational clinical trial, including four diverse Asia cohorts, to test whether this standalone solution could bypass the need for complex maternal assessments.
Objectives and primary hypothesis of the study:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE), specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, the study aims to examine the test's predictive performance for overall PE, using the same performance metrics. We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for identifying pregnancies at risk for PE.
TRIAL DESIGN:
This trial is a multicenter observational study conducted in real-world clinical settings.
OUTCOMES:
The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol [0.3 mg/mg]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (<34 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PE group | – | Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE riskWomen with a confirmative diagnosis of PE |
| Normal pregnancy group | – | Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE risk, Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE riskNormal pregnant women |
| Preterm PE group | – | Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE riskWomen with a confirmative diagnosis of Preterm PE |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- A multiple-site prospective cohort of women who developed PE (i.e. the PE group) and women who had normal pregnancy (i.e. the Normal group) will be recruited. Maternal serum samples were collected between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA. The two group of women are matched by age, BMI, pregnant history, and other clinical information.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female participants aged 18 to 40 years.
- Gestational age between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit, as confirmed by ultrasound.
- Control group: Pregnancies with no risk factors for preterm delivery, preeclampsia, or fetal growth restriction, selected during routine prenatal care between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA.
- Informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Multiple pregnancies.
- Pregestational diabetes.
- Chronic hypertension.
- Systemic diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease, autoimmune disorders).
- Any maternal or fetal condition necessitating pregnancy termination.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood test of PE riskA blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE | Diagnostic test | Normal pregnancy group, PE group |
| Blood test of Preterm PE riskA blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE | Diagnostic test | Normal pregnancy group, Preterm PE group |
Primary outcome
diagnosis of PE during pregnancy
Time frame: an average of up to 1 year
The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol [0.3 mg/mg]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (<34 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).
1 secondary outcome
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV
Time frame: an average of up to 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pre-eclampsia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Furosemide vs Placebo in Severe Preeclampsia Postpartum
Severe Preeclampsia
RecruitingPhase 3
Preeclampsia Intervention Netherlands
Pre-Eclampsia Onset Less Than 37 Weeks, Pre-Eclampsia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Validation of the MaiRa Preeclampsia Test for Screening Early/Late Preeclampsia in First and Second Trimesters
Preeclampsia (PE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jianmin Niu, Master principal investigator
Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pre-eclampsia and Preterm Birth, run by HBI Solutions Inc. at 6 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
diagnosis of PE during pregnancy (time frame: an average of up to 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.