AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmbolismVQPENCT05133713

Ventilation and Perfusion Scan in Pulmonary Embolism Following Catheter Directed Thrombectomy Versus Anticoagulation Alone

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Pulmonary Hypertension, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is complex and varied and not uncommonly involves respiratory failure with dyspnea or hypoxia. Patients with persisting signs of respiratory failure despite anticoagulation, may benefit from catheter directed thrombectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Catheter directed therapy and Systemic anticoagulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Apr 2022to 1 Jan 2024
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients requiring treatment for acute pulmonary embolism.

Who may be able to join

  • Age >18 years
  • Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE
  • Echocardiogram, CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) or pulmonary angiographic evidence of proximal filling defect in at least one main or lobar pulmonary artery
  • Scheduled for PE treatment with catheter directed therapy and systemic anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone per the investigator's discretion
  • Signs of respiratory failure including a. arterial blood saturation <90%, or b. partial arterial oxygen pressure <60 mmHg, or c. persistent tachypnea with respiratory rates > 20/min

Who cannot join

  • Unable to be anticoagulated with heparin or alternative therapy
  • Diagnosis with a minor PE without signs of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction
  • Known sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents that, in the Investigator's opinion, cannot be adequately pre-treated
  • Imaging evidence or other evidence that suggests, in opinion of the Investigator, the patient is not appropriate for mechanical thrombectomy intervention (e.g., inability to navigate to target location or predominately chronic clot)
  • Life expectancy <6 months, as determined by the Investigator

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Banner University Medical Center

    Tucson, Arizona, 85721

    Michael Kendall, MD

    Abdul Khan, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Ventilation and Perfusion Imaging in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Following Catheter Directed Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Conservative Therapy Alone: A Pilot Study

Clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is complex and varied and not uncommonly involves respiratory failure with dyspnea or hypoxia. Patients with persisting signs of respiratory failure despite anticoagulation, may benefit from catheter directed thrombectomy. Additionally, patient who receive thrombectomy are likely to have a lower residual thrombus burden measurable by ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan, and thereby less likely to develop chronic sequela, including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post PE syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with variable presentation and clinical outcomes. Chronic sequelae including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post-PE syndrome are common pathologies for patient who survive the already significant inpatient mortality, and have a significant impact on both quality of life and life expectancy. To date, the ELOPE trial is the only study to prospectively compare quality of life (QoL) and dyspnea measures and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) to cardiopulmonary exercise test, revealing worse post-PE syndrome in select populations, however this study is limited to a single arm that received anticoagulation alone. New catheter directed therapies, developed in response to such poor outcomes, provide treatment options for acute PE patients when first line therapies including anticoagulation are contraindicated or have failed.

Long term studies utilizing imaging have shown a majority of patients diagnosed with PE have residual pulmonary thrombi after 6 months, which is likely to be a large contributor to the development of CTEPH. Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans remain the gold standard for detection of both acute and chronic pulmonary embolism and will serve as a primary outcome measure at 6 months post initial treatment. Clinical measures including 6MWD, QoL and dyspnea questionaries will be assessed prior to discharge, and at 1 and 6 months, in order to characterize the development of chronic symptomatology.

Being tested
Catheter directed therapy, Systemic anticoagulation
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism, Hypertension, Pulmonary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Catheter directed therapyDevice

    Thrombectomy

  • Systemic anticoagulationDrug

    Conservative therapy

Study groups in NCT05133713
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Catheter directed thrombectomyNot described
Receives: Device: Catheter directed therapy; Drug: Systemic anticoagulation
Systemic anticoagulationNot described
Receives: Drug: Systemic anticoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ventilation-perfusion mismatch

    Mismatch on ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy per Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) criteria

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. 6-minute walk distance

    Measured: 30 days

  2. 6-minute walk distance

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Hospital length of stay

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  4. Dyspnea questionnaire

    Measured: up to 72 hours

  5. Dyspnea questionnaire

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Dyspnea questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05133713
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00000091
Acronym
VQPE
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
1 Nov 2021
Last updated
23 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1386-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07534-5.

    PubMed 10227218
  • Casazza F, Becattini C, Bongarzoni A, Cuccia C, Roncon L, Favretto G, Zonzin P, Pignataro L, Agnelli G. Clinical features and short term outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. The Italian Pulmonary Embolism Registry (IPER). Thromb Res. 2012 Dec;130(6):847-52. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.08.292. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

    PubMed 22921592
  • Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 27;364(4):351-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0910203. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21268727
  • Kahn SR, Akaberi A, Granton JT, Anderson DR, Wells PS, Rodger MA, Solymoss S, Kovacs MJ, Rudski L, Shimony A, Dennie C, Rush C, Hernandez P, Aaron SD, Hirsch AM. Quality of Life, Dyspnea, and Functional Exercise Capacity Following a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the ELOPE Cohort Study. Am J Med. 2017 Aug;130(8):990.e9-990.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

    PubMed 28400247
  • Nijkeuter M, Hovens MM, Davidson BL, Huisman MV. Resolution of thromboemboli in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1):192-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1.192.

    PubMed 16424432
  • Kahn SR, Hirsch AM, Akaberi A, Hernandez P, Anderson DR, Wells PS, Rodger MA, Solymoss S, Kovacs MJ, Rudski L, Shimony A, Dennie C, Rush C, Geerts WH, Aaron SD, Granton JT. Functional and Exercise Limitations After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the ELOPE Prospective Cohort Study. Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1058-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

    PubMed 27932051

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Pulmonary Hypertension, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Carol Stuehm (520-626-8318, carols@email.arizona.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ventilation-perfusion mismatch (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05133713, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in