Deficits, NeurologicNCT05134116
SafeBoosC III Two-year Follow-up
An observational study of Deficits, Neurologic and Extreme Prematurity, run by Gorm Greisen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The SafeBoosC-III 2 year follow up study will follow up on all patients randomised in the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial (NCT03770741). The investigators will collect data when the patients are two years of corrected age from routine standardised follow up assessments, parental questionnaires as well as informal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 30 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Deficits, Neurologic, Extreme Prematurity, Brain Damage
- What is being tested?
- Treatment as usual + cerebral oximetry monitoring the first 72 hours of life
- How many people
- 1,601 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2021to 19 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 30 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Infants born below 28 weeks of gestation and randomised in the SafeBoosC-III trial
Who may be able to join
- Participation in the SafeBoosC-III trial and enrollment in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) taking part in the follow-up study, with parental consent according to local regulations.
Who cannot join
- Parental objection to the use of their child's data in the follow-up study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cerebral Near-infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring Versus Treatment as Usual for Extremely Preterm Infants: a Protocol for the Follow-up Study for the SafeBoosC-III Trial
The SafeBoosC-III 2 year follow up study will follow up on all patients randomised in the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial (NCT03770741). The investigators will collect data when the patients are two years of corrected age from routine standardised follow up assessments, parental questionnaires as well as informal assessments. The study will commence in September 2021, and will expect to include all 72 sites across 18 countries, which take part of the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
In the SafeBoosC-III trial, the objective is to investigate the effect of treatment based on cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring of brain oxygenation compared with treatment as usual in extremely preterm infants. The primary outcome of the trial is death or survival with severe brain injury at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Despite an association between severe brain injury diagnosed in the neonatal period and later neurodevelopmental disability, this relationship is not always strong. Therefore, if treatment based on cerebral NIRS monitoring decreases the risks of death or survival with severe brain injury, it is important to document if the beneficial effect persists into early childhood, in the form of better neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, it is also important to identify evidence of unexpected harms. It would be unfortunate if cerebral NIRS monitoring became standard practice without good evidence that long-term patient-relevant benefits outweigh possible harms. As the SafeBoosC-III trial intends to randomise 1600 infants, there is potential to achieve sufficient power for a meaningful assessment of the experimental intervention's effect on long-term neurodevelopment, as well as an evaluation of unexpected harms. The objective of the SafeBoosC III follow-up study is to investigate the benefits and harms of treatment guided by cerebral NIRS monitoring of brain oxygenation in extremely preterm infants during the first 72 hours of life, assessed at two years' corrected age. The hypothesis is that the intervention will decrease a composite of death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability at two years' corrected age, and/or increase cognitive function in survivors assessed by the Bayley III/IV test, with insignificant harms. The investigators aim to collect data on as many children as possible and will do this by collecting clinical data from health care records as well as answers from parental questionnaires.
- Conditions
- Deficits, Neurologic, Extreme Prematurity, Brain Damage
- Being tested
- Treatment as usual + cerebral oximetry monitoring the first 72 hours of life
- Keywords
- Neurodevelopmental disability, Cerebral palsy, Neurosensory deficits, Cognitive disability, Follow up study, Extremely preterm birth, Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), Cerebral oximetry
- Medical subject headings
- Neurologic Manifestations, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment as usual + cerebral oximetry monitoring the first 72 hours of lifeOther
SafeBoosC - Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children - an Investigator-initiated Randomised, Blinded, Multinational, Phase II Feasibility Clinical Trial on Near-infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring Combined With Defined Treatment Guidelines Versus Standard Monitoring and Treatment as Usual in Premature Infants
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability
A child will be classified with moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability if they have been diagnosed with cerebral palsy, a cognitive function score below -2 standard deviations from the norm, hearing impairment, or vision impairment or from data from a parental questionnaire.
Measured: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Mean Bayley III/IV cognitive score
The cognitive scores from the Bayley III/IV assessment will constitute a single continuous outcome measure (higher scores meaning better outcomes)
Measured: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2021
- Study start23 Sep 2021
- Primary completion19 Oct 2024
- Study completion19 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deficits, NeurologicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 1,601 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gorm Greisen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Gorm Greisen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05134116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SafeBoosC-IIIfu
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rasmussen MIS, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Ergenekon E, Szczapa T, Hagmann C, Naulaers G, Mintzer J, Fumagalli M, Dimitriou G, Dempsey E, Tkaczyk J, Fredly S, Heuchan AM, Pichler G, Fuchs H, Nesargi S, Hahn GH, Piris-Borregas S, Sirc J, Alsina-Casanova M, Stocker M, Ozkan H, Sarafidis K, Kraus NJ, Karen T, Rzepecka-Weglarz B, Oguz SS, Thewissen L, Arruza L, Memisoglu AC, Del Rio Florentino R, Baserga M, Maton P, Schneider J, de Las Cuevas MI, Hedegaard SS, Zafra P, Bender L, Farquharson S, Ochoda-Mazur A, Lecart C, El-Khuffash A, Chathasaigh CN, Miletin J, Papathoma E, Vesoulis Z, Serrao F; SafeBoosC-III Follow-Up Writing Group for the SafeBoosC-III Follow-Up Collaborator Group; Cornette L, Yasa B, Klamer A, Barcos-Munoz F, Boetti T, Cetinkaya M, Montasser M, Hatzidaki E, Bokiniec R, Marciniak S, Chalak L, Rao SA, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Serrano-Vinuales I, Krolak-Olejnik B, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Olsen MH, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral Oximetry in Extremely Preterm Infants: 2-Year Follow-Up of the SafeBoosC-III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2026 Jun 1;180(6):619-627. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1066.
PubMed 42008246Rasmussen MIS, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Tkaczyk J, Fuchs H, Fumagalli M, Nesargi S, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Olsen MH, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a detailed statistical analysis plan for the 2-year follow-up of the participants of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2026 Jan 5;27(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09392-7.
PubMed 41491571Rasmussen MI, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Cheng G, Tkaczyk J, Fuchs H, Fumagalli M, Nesargi S, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a study protocol for the 2-year follow-up of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07653-x.
PubMed 37805539
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cerebral Near-infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring Versus Treatment as Usual for Extremely Preterm Infants: a Protocol for the Follow-up Study for the SafeBoosC-III Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05134116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SafeBoosC-IIIfu
- Conditions
- Deficits, Neurologic, Extreme Prematurity, Brain Damage
- Keywords
- Neurodevelopmental disability, Cerebral palsy, Neurosensory deficits, Cognitive disability, Follow up study, Extremely preterm birth, Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), Cerebral oximetry
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,601 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gorm GreisenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The SafeBoosC-III 2 year follow up study will follow up on all patients randomised in the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial (NCT03770741). The investigators will collect data when the patients are two years of corrected age from routine standardised follow up assessments, parental questionnaires as well as informal assessments. The study will commence in September 2021, and will expect to include all 72 sites across 18 countries, which take part of the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial.
Detailed description
In the SafeBoosC-III trial, the objective is to investigate the effect of treatment based on cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring of brain oxygenation compared with treatment as usual in extremely preterm infants. The primary outcome of the trial is death or survival with severe brain injury at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Despite an association between severe brain injury diagnosed in the neonatal period and later neurodevelopmental disability, this relationship is not always strong. Therefore, if treatment based on cerebral NIRS monitoring decreases the risks of death or survival with severe brain injury, it is important to document if the beneficial effect persists into early childhood, in the form of better neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, it is also important to identify evidence of unexpected harms. It would be unfortunate if cerebral NIRS monitoring became standard practice without good evidence that long-term patient-relevant benefits outweigh possible harms. As the SafeBoosC-III trial intends to randomise 1600 infants, there is potential to achieve sufficient power for a meaningful assessment of the experimental intervention's effect on long-term neurodevelopment, as well as an evaluation of unexpected harms. The objective of the SafeBoosC III follow-up study is to investigate the benefits and harms of treatment guided by cerebral NIRS monitoring of brain oxygenation in extremely preterm infants during the first 72 hours of life, assessed at two years' corrected age. The hypothesis is that the intervention will decrease a composite of death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability at two years' corrected age, and/or increase cognitive function in survivors assessed by the Bayley III/IV test, with insignificant harms. The investigators aim to collect data on as many children as possible and will do this by collecting clinical data from health care records as well as answers from parental questionnaires.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 30 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Infants born below 28 weeks of gestation and randomised in the SafeBoosC-III trial
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participation in the SafeBoosC-III trial and enrollment in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) taking part in the follow-up study, with parental consent according to local regulations.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parental objection to the use of their child's data in the follow-up study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment as usual + cerebral oximetry monitoring the first 72 hours of lifeSafeBoosC - Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children - an Investigator-initiated Randomised, Blinded, Multinational, Phase II Feasibility Clinical Trial on Near-infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring Combined With Defined Treatment Guidelines Versus Standard Monitoring and Treatment as Usual in Premature Infants | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability
Time frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
A child will be classified with moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability if they have been diagnosed with cerebral palsy, a cognitive function score below -2 standard deviations from the norm, hearing impairment, or vision impairment or from data from a parental questionnaire.
Mean Bayley III/IV cognitive score
Time frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
The cognitive scores from the Bayley III/IV assessment will constitute a single continuous outcome measure (higher scores meaning better outcomes)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42008246Rasmussen MIS, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Ergenekon E, Szczapa T, Hagmann C, Naulaers G, Mintzer J, Fumagalli M, Dimitriou G, Dempsey E, Tkaczyk J, Fredly S, Heuchan AM, Pichler G, Fuchs H, Nesargi S, Hahn GH, Piris-Borregas S, Sirc J, Alsina-Casanova M, Stocker M, Ozkan H, Sarafidis K, Kraus NJ, Karen T, Rzepecka-Weglarz B, Oguz SS, Thewissen L, Arruza L, Memisoglu AC, Del Rio Florentino R, Baserga M, Maton P, Schneider J, de Las Cuevas MI, Hedegaard SS, Zafra P, Bender L, Farquharson S, Ochoda-Mazur A, Lecart C, El-Khuffash A, Chathasaigh CN, Miletin J, Papathoma E, Vesoulis Z, Serrao F; SafeBoosC-III Follow-Up Writing Group for the SafeBoosC-III Follow-Up Collaborator Group; Cornette L, Yasa B, Klamer A, Barcos-Munoz F, Boetti T, Cetinkaya M, Montasser M, Hatzidaki E, Bokiniec R, Marciniak S, Chalak L, Rao SA, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Serrano-Vinuales I, Krolak-Olejnik B, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Olsen MH, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral Oximetry in Extremely Preterm Infants: 2-Year Follow-Up of the SafeBoosC-III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2026 Jun 1;180(6):619-627. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1066.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41491571Rasmussen MIS, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Tkaczyk J, Fuchs H, Fumagalli M, Nesargi S, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Olsen MH, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a detailed statistical analysis plan for the 2-year follow-up of the participants of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2026 Jan 5;27(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09392-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37805539Rasmussen MI, Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Cheng G, Tkaczyk J, Fuchs H, Fumagalli M, Nesargi S, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Plomgaard AM, Hansen BM, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a study protocol for the 2-year follow-up of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07653-x.
- Trial and Follow up websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Deficits, Neurologic
RecruitingObservational study
Prevalence of Gastric Motor Dysfunction and Upper GI Symptoms in Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasias
Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia, Cirrhosis
Recruiting
SAINT® Therapy for Memory Problems in Older Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, Memory Deficits
Recruiting
Mapping of Vestibular Centers Activation Using fMRI in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma
Vestibular Schwannoma, Unilateral Vestibular Deficit
Recruiting
Telemonitoring of Activities of Daily Living in Home Care Services of Older Adults With Cognitive Deficits
Dementia
Active, not recruiting
Pai.ACT: AI-Driven ACT Chatbot for Mental Health Triage and Service Evaluation
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Deficits, Neurologic and Extreme Prematurity, run by Gorm Greisen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability (time frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05134116, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2024.