Cystic FibrosisNCT05135156
Lung Transplant READY Pilot Study
A study testing Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention) in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cystic Fibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Dec 2021to 1 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
- FEV1 less than or equal to 50% predicted (unless referred per MD recommendation)
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to provide informed consent
- Patients who are lung transplant recipients
- Unable to read or understand English to complete surveys or access the websites (currently only available in English)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Lung Transplant Resources for Education and Decision-making for Your Cystic Fibrosis (READY): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral. Increasing awareness of lung transplant among people with CF, and promoting understanding of the risks and benefits of transplant, can potentially reduce the number of people with CF who die without a lung transplant.
The CF Foundation (CFF) lung transplant referral guidelines were developed to optimize the timing of referral for lung transplant. These guidelines recommend annual conversations with CF patients once their forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is <50% predicted. Considering lung transplant as a treatment option ahead of when it is medically needed will allow more time to learn about lung transplant and address any barriers to lung transplant that may exist.
Read more
Investigators are interested in understanding how people with CF use lung transplant educational resources and how one prepares for having discussions and/or making decisions about lung transplant as a treatment option for advanced CF. The purpose of this study is to test whether a research website improves patient preparedness for discussions about lung transplant.
Study involvement will span 4 weeks and study procedures will involve the following:
- Three Zoom interview sessions (30-60 minutes each)
- Survey assessments
- Access to a research website that contains educational resources about lung transplant (goal of 4 hours of use over the 4 week study period)
Read the detailed description
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the United States, more CF patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 30% of predicted die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of people with CF who die without lung transplant were never referred for consideration, with patients of lower socioeconomic status disproportionately impacted by limited access to lung transplant. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral. The CF Foundation established lung transplant referral guidelines that recommend individuals with CF have annual conversations about lung transplant with their CF doctor once their FEV1 is less than 50% of predicted. Considering lung transplant as a treatment option ahead of when it is medically needed will allow more time to learn about lung transplant and address any barriers to lung transplant that may exist. By introducing an educational resource that can increase awareness of lung transplant among patients, and promote understanding of the risks and benefits of lung transplant, investigators aim to empower people with CF to take part in shared decision-making with their CF providers which could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant.
Based on prior research, investigators have developed a novel lung transplant decision support tool that addresses patient-identified knowledge gaps and provides personalized educational content to help people with CF prepare for lung transplant discussions and decisions. The decision support tool couples real-life CF patient experiences of lung transplant in the form of personal narratives with up-to-date, CF-specific, and guideline-based medical information about lung transplant.
The overall research objectives for this pilot study are to test the efficacy of the decision support tool to improve patient preparedness for shared decision making about lung transplant and knowledge about lung transplant, and to evaluate the impact on mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety). The new website will be compared against an attention control website (UNOS.org) to better understand how people with CF use and rank different educational resources' utility. The central hypothesis is that use of the new decision support tool that incorporates disease severity data (FEV1 % predicted, supplemental oxygen use, exacerbations) to identify relevant personal narratives and guideline-based educational content will increase a patient's preparedness to engage in discussions about lung transplant beyond the standard information presented on UNOS.org.
The pilot study will be a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to one of two educational resources, described above, stratified by FEV1 category (FEV1 30-50% or FEV1 <30% of predicted). Baseline surveys will evaluate knowledge about lung transplant, a Likert scale rating of preparedness for lung transplant discussions, decisional conflict about lung transplant, and mental health. Baseline interviews will address perspectives on lung transplant as a treatment option for CF and the role of newer CF therapies in the decision making process about lung transplant. For two weeks, participants will have access to one of two educational resources via a login to a secure research website. At 2 weeks, there will be a study visit that includes repeated surveys from baseline and the Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale, along with a second brief interview. After the 2-week study visit, participants will have access to both educational resources via individual login to the secure research website. At 4 weeks, there will be a study visit to repeat the surveys and interview. Throughout the 4 weeks, web analytics will be captured at the individual level to determine usage patterns for both educational resources.
- Conditions
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Being tested
- Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention), Publicly available transplant education resource (Attention Control)
- Keywords
- Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Transplantation, Lung Disease, Decision Support Tool
- Medical subject headings
- Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention)Behavioural
Participants will access the investigator-designed educational resource via their login to a secure website. After two weeks, participants will gain access to the publicly available website (attention control) and will have an additional two weeks of access to both of these resources.
Publicly available transplant education resource (Attention Control)Behavioural
Participants will access the publicly available education resource via their login to a secure website. After two weeks, participants will gain access to the investigator-designed educational resource (research intervention) and will have an additional two weeks of access to both of these resources.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Access to an investigator-designed web-based educational resource with information about lung transplant for two weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention) |
| Control | Active comparator | Access to a publicly available web-based educational resource with information about transplant for two weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Publicly available transplant education resource (Attention Control) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of Participants Completing 2-week Study Visit
The co-primary endpoint is feasibility, which will be defined as successful if 90% of enrolled participants complete the 2-week study visit (regardless of study arm).
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale
The co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of the difference in mean Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale in the intervention versus control arms of the study at the 2-week study visit. Scores range on a scale from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Secondary outcomes (7)
Confidence-weighted True False Knowledge About Lung Transplant (14-question Investigator-designed Survey)
Difference in mean confidence-weighted true false (CTF) knowledge score will be measured in the intervention versus control arms of the study. CTF scoring adds points for certainty in correct responses and deducts points for certainty in incorrect responses. Participants receive +2 points when "sure" about a correct response, +1 if unsure about a correct response, -1 if unsure about an incorrect response and -2 if sure about an incorrect response. For a 14-item knowledge test, the maximum score is +28 and the minimum score is -28, with higher scores indicating more knowledge about lung transplant.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Decisional Conflict Scale
Decisional Conflict Scale change will be measured from the baseline study visit to the 2-week study visit. The intention-to-treat analysis will compare mean change in the Decisional Conflict Scale between the intervention and control arms of the study. Scores range from 0 [no decisional conflict] to 100 [extremely high decisional conflict].
Measured: Baseline to 2-week study visit
Likert-scale Rating of Preparedness to Discuss Lung Transplant (0-4)
Likert rating of preparedness will be measured at the 2-week study visit (0=Don't know, 1= Not at all prepared, 2 = A little prepared, 3 = Moderately prepared, 4 = Very prepared). The intention-to-treat analysis will compare mean Likert-scale rating between the intervention and control arms of the study.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 is a scale that measures symptoms of depression in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-27 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening depression and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of depression. Investigators will assess the difference in mean PHQ-9 score in the intervention versus control arms of the study at the 2-week study visit.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 is a scale that measures symptoms of depression in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-27 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening depression and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of depression. Investigators will determine the proportion with new PHQ-9 score greater than or equal to 10 in each arm.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
GAD-7 is a scale that measures symptoms of anxiety in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-21 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening anxiety and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. Investigators will assess the difference in mean GAD-7 score in the intervention versus control arms of the study at the 2-week study visit.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
GAD-7 is a scale that measures symptoms of anxiety in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-21 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening anxiety and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. Investigators will determine the proportion with new GAD-7 score greater than or equal to 10 in each arm.
Measured: Measured at 2-week study visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2021
- Study start6 Dec 2021
- Primary completion1 Nov 2022
- Study completion1 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cystic FibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathleen Ramos, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Kathleen Ramos, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05135156
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00011578
- Other IDs
- 1R03HL158728-01
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers for secondary analyses with the approval of the appropriate Human Subjects Division(s) and the study's principal investigator (PI).
Publications
Ramos KJ, Smith PJ, McKone EF, Pilewski JM, Lucy A, Hempstead SE, Tallarico E, Faro A, Rosenbluth DB, Gray AL, Dunitz JM; CF Lung Transplant Referral Guidelines Committee. Lung transplant referral for individuals with cystic fibrosis: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):321-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PubMed 30926322Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, Glanville AR, Attawar S, Aversa M, Campos SV, Christon LM, Cypel M, Dellgren G, Hartwig MG, Kapnadak SG, Kolaitis NA, Kotloff RM, Patterson CM, Shlobin OA, Smith PJ, Sole A, Solomon M, Weill D, Wijsenbeek MS, Willemse BWM, Arcasoy SM, Ramos KJ. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Nov;40(11):1349-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
PubMed 34419372Ramos KJ, Hobler MR, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Zander MI, Howard SS, Goss CH, Aitken ML. Addressing lung transplant with adults with cystic fibrosis: A qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives and experiences. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):416-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 31003953
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lung Transplant Resources for Education and Decision-making for Your Cystic Fibrosis (READY): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05135156
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00011578
- Conditions
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Keywords
- Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Transplantation, Lung Disease, Decision Support Tool
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Study start
- 6 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Dec 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral. Increasing awareness of lung transplant among people with CF, and promoting understanding of the risks and benefits of transplant, can potentially reduce the number of people with CF who die without a lung transplant.
The CF Foundation (CFF) lung transplant referral guidelines were developed to optimize the timing of referral for lung transplant. These guidelines recommend annual conversations with CF patients once their forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is <50% predicted. Considering lung transplant as a treatment option ahead of when it is medically needed will allow more time to learn about lung transplant and address any barriers to lung transplant that may exist.
Investigators are interested in understanding how people with CF use lung transplant educational resources and how one prepares for having discussions and/or making decisions about lung transplant as a treatment option for advanced CF. The purpose of this study is to test whether a research website improves patient preparedness for discussions about lung transplant.
Study involvement will span 4 weeks and study procedures will involve the following:
- Three Zoom interview sessions (30-60 minutes each)
- Survey assessments
- Access to a research website that contains educational resources about lung transplant (goal of 4 hours of use over the 4 week study period)
Detailed description
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the United States, more CF patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 30% of predicted die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of people with CF who die without lung transplant were never referred for consideration, with patients of lower socioeconomic status disproportionately impacted by limited access to lung transplant. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral. The CF Foundation established lung transplant referral guidelines that recommend individuals with CF have annual conversations about lung transplant with their CF doctor once their FEV1 is less than 50% of predicted. Considering lung transplant as a treatment option ahead of when it is medically needed will allow more time to learn about lung transplant and address any barriers to lung transplant that may exist. By introducing an educational resource that can increase awareness of lung transplant among patients, and promote understanding of the risks and benefits of lung transplant, investigators aim to empower people with CF to take part in shared decision-making with their CF providers which could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant.
Based on prior research, investigators have developed a novel lung transplant decision support tool that addresses patient-identified knowledge gaps and provides personalized educational content to help people with CF prepare for lung transplant discussions and decisions. The decision support tool couples real-life CF patient experiences of lung transplant in the form of personal narratives with up-to-date, CF-specific, and guideline-based medical information about lung transplant.
The overall research objectives for this pilot study are to test the efficacy of the decision support tool to improve patient preparedness for shared decision making about lung transplant and knowledge about lung transplant, and to evaluate the impact on mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety). The new website will be compared against an attention control website (UNOS.org) to better understand how people with CF use and rank different educational resources' utility. The central hypothesis is that use of the new decision support tool that incorporates disease severity data (FEV1 % predicted, supplemental oxygen use, exacerbations) to identify relevant personal narratives and guideline-based educational content will increase a patient's preparedness to engage in discussions about lung transplant beyond the standard information presented on UNOS.org.
The pilot study will be a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to one of two educational resources, described above, stratified by FEV1 category (FEV1 30-50% or FEV1 <30% of predicted). Baseline surveys will evaluate knowledge about lung transplant, a Likert scale rating of preparedness for lung transplant discussions, decisional conflict about lung transplant, and mental health. Baseline interviews will address perspectives on lung transplant as a treatment option for CF and the role of newer CF therapies in the decision making process about lung transplant. For two weeks, participants will have access to one of two educational resources via a login to a secure research website. At 2 weeks, there will be a study visit that includes repeated surveys from baseline and the Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale, along with a second brief interview. After the 2-week study visit, participants will have access to both educational resources via individual login to the secure research website. At 4 weeks, there will be a study visit to repeat the surveys and interview. Throughout the 4 weeks, web analytics will be captured at the individual level to determine usage patterns for both educational resources.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention)Access to an investigator-designed web-based educational resource with information about lung transplant for two weeks. |
| Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Publicly available transplant education resource (Attention Control)Access to a publicly available web-based educational resource with information about transplant for two weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
- FEV1 less than or equal to 50% predicted (unless referred per MD recommendation)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients unable to provide informed consent
- Patients who are lung transplant recipients
- Unable to read or understand English to complete surveys or access the websites (currently only available in English)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention)Participants will access the investigator-designed educational resource via their login to a secure website. After two weeks, participants will gain access to the publicly available website (attention control) and will have an additional two weeks of access to both of these resources. | Behavioural | Intervention |
| Publicly available transplant education resource (Attention Control)Participants will access the publicly available education resource via their login to a secure website. After two weeks, participants will gain access to the investigator-designed educational resource (research intervention) and will have an additional two weeks of access to both of these resources. | Behavioural | Control |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of Participants Completing 2-week Study Visit
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
The co-primary endpoint is feasibility, which will be defined as successful if 90% of enrolled participants complete the 2-week study visit (regardless of study arm).
Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
The co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of the difference in mean Preparedness for Shared Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale in the intervention versus control arms of the study at the 2-week study visit. Scores range on a scale from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
7 secondary outcomes
Confidence-weighted True False Knowledge About Lung Transplant (14-question Investigator-designed Survey)
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Decisional Conflict Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week study visit
Likert-scale Rating of Preparedness to Discuss Lung Transplant (0-4)
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30926322Ramos KJ, Smith PJ, McKone EF, Pilewski JM, Lucy A, Hempstead SE, Tallarico E, Faro A, Rosenbluth DB, Gray AL, Dunitz JM; CF Lung Transplant Referral Guidelines Committee. Lung transplant referral for individuals with cystic fibrosis: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):321-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 34419372Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, Glanville AR, Attawar S, Aversa M, Campos SV, Christon LM, Cypel M, Dellgren G, Hartwig MG, Kapnadak SG, Kolaitis NA, Kotloff RM, Patterson CM, Shlobin OA, Smith PJ, Sole A, Solomon M, Weill D, Wijsenbeek MS, Willemse BWM, Arcasoy SM, Ramos KJ. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Nov;40(11):1349-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 31003953Ramos KJ, Hobler MR, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Zander MI, Howard SS, Goss CH, Aitken ML. Addressing lung transplant with adults with cystic fibrosis: A qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives and experiences. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):416-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers for secondary analyses with the approval of the appropriate Human Subjects Division(s) and the study's principal investigator (PI).
Related trials for Cystic Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of 24 to 52 Weeks Treatment to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Galvokimig in Adult Study Participants With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Not yet recruiting
Novel Point-of-care Sweat Chloride Testing Device for Monitoring CFTR Function
Cystic Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) Long-term Safety and Efficacy in Subjects Without F508del
Cystic Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase II Study of Ensifentrine in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Relative Bioavailability Study of a VX-581 Tablet Formulation
Cystic Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kathleen Ramos, MD, MS principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Investigator-designed lung transplant education resource (Research Intervention) in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of Participants Completing 2-week Study Visit (time frame: Measured at 2-week study visit). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05135156, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2023.