Lymphedema of LimbPhase 3LYMbRNCT05136079
Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction (LYMbR) to Prevent Lymphedema After Node Dissection for Cutaneous Malignancies
A Phase 3 study testing Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis in people with Lymphedema of Limb and Malignant Skin Neoplasm, run by Alberta Health Services, Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Background: Lymphedema following lymph node dissection is a chronic condition that can limit physical, occupational, and social participation, impact self-image, and result in financial burden. Studies have reported lymphedema incidence rates of 39% to 73% following node dissection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphedema of Limb, Malignant Skin Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2022to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult persons (>18 years of age) undergoing axilla or groin lymphadenectomy as part of cutaneous malignancy management.
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving a sentinel lymph node biopsy alone
- Patients with untreated in-transit disease on the upper or lower extremities
- Patients with established preoperative lymphedema
- Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with a previous history of radiation therapy to the affected nodal basin or extremity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Carmen Webb, MA, 403-521-3012, carmen.webb@ahs.ca
About this study
Official title: Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction (LYMbR) to Prevent Lymphedema
Background: Lymphedema following lymph node dissection is a chronic condition that can limit physical, occupational, and social participation, impact self-image, and result in financial burden. Studies have reported lymphedema incidence rates of 39% to 73% following node dissection.
Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been previously used to treat established lymphedema. More recently, with imaging capabilities guided by blue dye and indocyanine green dye, the possibility of prophylactic LVA has become feasible. A 2018 systematic review of 12 studies utilizing prophylactic LVA during lymphadenectomy indicated a 2/3 reduction in the risk of lymphedema. The literature yet lacks any phase III studies with stringent controls and long term follow-up.
Read more
Objectives: To assess (primary endpoint) the impact of prophylactic LVA on presence or absence of lymphedema post axillary or groin lymphadenectomy and participant quality of life. To assess (secondary endpoint) the incidence of complications related to nodal dissection.
Methods: This is a phase III RCT, block randomized for upper and lower extremities, recruiting adult patients planned for an axillary or groin node dissection as a result of cutaneous malignancy. Analysis of rates of lymphedema and quality of life reports will be done.
Significance: Lymphedema is a feared outcome of surgical cancer care. Its impact on patients' daily lives is profound. A reduction of incidence of this debilitating condition by 2/3 would have significant impact on numerous lives and could also reduce the health system resources needed for its management.
Read the detailed description
Trial Objective: To ascertain the efficacy and impact of prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis for prevention of lymphedema in cutaneous malignancy patients undergoing axillary or groin node dissection as part of cancer treatment. To determine quality of life impact, if any, for patients who receive this treatment. To determine incidence of complications related to nodal dissection are reduced with LVA.
Cancer-related lymphedema (CRLE) is a complex and lifelong implication of cancer treatment. Centres have reported rates of lymphedema following axillary node dissection of 39% (53% following adjuvant radiotherapy), and exceeding 73% following groin node dissection. Lymphedema can have significant quality of life (QoL) implications. Treatment, though helpful, is often burdensome, can require a second party to accomplish, and can be financially draining. Further, lymphedema is a chronic condition that cannot be eliminated once established. Many everyday activities, including self-care, employment, and social participation, as well as self-image, can be negatively impacted.
Given the high prevalence of CRLE, there is an urgency to investigate prophylaxis where possible. Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis offers this opportunity.
Although lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been used for decades to treat existing lymphedema, more recently prophylactic LVA has been explored. Jørgensen et al's 2018 systematic review of 12 studies utilizing prophylactic LVA in cancer patients undergoing axilla or groin lymphadenectomy indicated a 2/3 reduction of CRLE in those treated prophylactically compared to those who did not receive prophylactic treatment.
More recently, Cakmakoglu et al reported on an immediate prophylactic approach whereby the LVA is performed at the time of nodal dissection utilizing fluorescing indocynanine green (ICG) and an operating microscope. This approach aided identification and assessment of the viability of lymphatic vessels in 96% of study cases, thereby augmenting the surgeon's ability to identify and choose the most appropriate vessels. Cakmakoglu's team performed the technique successfully on 22 patients. Of this 22, a single patient developed CRLE during the follow-up period (3 patients died of disease during the follow-up period but showed no sign of CRLE at their demise).
The outlook for LVA in combination with ICG looks promising but, to date, there has not been a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) on this prophylactic LVA technique. Thus, there is a need for robust RCTs utilizing a control group, having clearly defined outcome measures, investing in a significant follow-up period, and integrating blinded assessment in order to objectively demonstrate the impact of prophylactic LVA for patients.
Jørgensen et al's 2018 systematic review of prophylactic LVA case series and studies noted that, while the results were remarkable, the studies collected for the review did not have adequate control for bias and were quite heterogeneous in their cancer type, lymphadenectomy location, lymphedema classification, and assessment measures. QoL measures were not regularly integrated into assessment. Follow-up times varied from 6 months to 69 months with only 3 studies following for a minimum of 24 months.
Trial description:
Study participants will be comprised of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy. The participants will be block (axilla, groin) randomized using 2 equal groups (control/intervention) of 20 participants each. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will undergo prophylactic LVA as an addendum to their lymph node dissection. This will take place at time of lymphadenectomy surgery. Control participants will not have prophylactic LVA. Both groups will be blinded to treatment.
All participants will have limb volume measurements and photographs taken and the LYMQOL lymphedema-specific quality of life questionnaire administered at baseline (date of surgery) and at 6 month intervals for 24 months. Their recovery and surgical complications will be monitored as per the surgeon's usual followup schedule. At 24 months each participant will undergo a radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy to assess function and health of their lymphatic system. Unblinding will taken place at this juncture except in cases where necessary to unblind earlier to provide exceptional care.
- Conditions
- Lymphedema of Limb, Malignant Skin Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis
- Medical subject headings
- Skin Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosisProcedure or surgery
Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis is an immediate prophylactic approach whereby the lymphaticovenous anastomosis is performed at the time of nodal dissection utilizing fluorescing indocynanine green (ICG) and an operating microscope.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis | Experimental | Intervention participants will undergo prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis as an addendum to axillary or ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for treatment of cutaneous malignancy. Receives: Procedure: Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis |
| Lymphadenectomy without lymphaticovenous anastomosis | No intervention | Control participants will undergo axillary or ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy without lymphaticovenous anastomosis for treatment of cutaneous malignancy . |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence or absence of lymphedema at 24 months post axillary or groin lymphadenectomy as assessed by limb volume over time.
Using a non-stretch measuring tape, circumferential measurements at 4cm intervals along the length of the contralateral limbs will be taken pre-surgery (baseline) and at 24 months. Limb volumes will be calculated. In the limb impacted by surgery, a 10% increase in volume from baseline to 24 months will be indicative of the development of lymphedema. In the case of significant weight gain or loss, comparison with the volume of the contralateral limb will also be used to evaluate presence of lymphedema in the surgical limb.
Measured: 24 months
Quality of life impact as measured by LYMQOL PROM
A lymphedema quality of life patient reported outcome measure with specific arm and leg questionnaires called the LYMQOL will be used to measure quality of life. The scale uses a 4 point system for the majority of questions wherein a higher score indicates that lymphedema is having a greater negative impact on quality of life. A single final question uses a 10 point scale (poor to excellent) to rate one's quality of life overall with a higher score indicating greater quality of life. Comparison of quality of life scoring from baseline (pre-surgery) with scoring at 24 months post-surgery.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of evidence of acute post-operative surgical complications
Diagnosis of complications such as cellulitis, dehiscence, lymphocele, and/or prolonged need for drain over 30days
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2021
- Study startJan 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lymphedema of LimbStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A total of 40 study participants will be block (axilla, groin) randomized using 2 equal groups (control/intervention) of 20 participants each.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claire Temple-Oberle, Alberta Health Services, Calgary
- Investigators
- Claire Temple-Oberle, MD, MSc, FRCSC, MMEd, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PLVA-2021
- Acronym
- LYMbR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cakmakoglu C, Kwiecien GJ, Schwarz GS, Gastman B. Lymphaticovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Locoregional Advanced Melanoma Patients. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 May;36(4):247-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401829. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
PubMed 31891946Rockson SG. Causes and consequences of lymphatic disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1207 Suppl 1:E2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05804.x.
PubMed 20961302Campanholi LL, Duprat JP, Fregnani JHTG. Incidence of le due to treating cutaneous melanoma. J Lymphoedema. 2011; 16(1): 30-34.
Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 20;30(30):3726-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8574. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
PubMed 23008299Loprinzi PD, Cardinal BJ, Winters-Stone K, Smit E, Loprinzi CL. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 May 1;39(3):269-74. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.269-274.
PubMed 22543385Baibergenova A, Drucker AM, Shear NH. Hospitalizations for cellulitis in Canada: a database study. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):33-7. doi: 10.2310/7750.2013.13075.
PubMed 24377471Tiwari P, Coriddi M, Salani R, Povoski SP. Breast and gynecologic cancer-related extremity lymphedema: a review of diagnostic modalities and management options. World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep 22;11:237. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-237.
PubMed 24053624Dunberger G, Lindquist H, Waldenstrom AC, Nyberg T, Steineck G, Avall-Lundqvist E. Lower limb lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors--effect on daily life functioning. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3063-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1879-3. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
PubMed 23812496Brayton KM, Hirsch AT, O Brien PJ, Cheville A, Karaca-Mandic P, Rockson SG. Lymphedema prevalence and treatment benefits in cancer: impact of a therapeutic intervention on health outcomes and costs. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114597. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25470383Gebruers N, Verbelen H, De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Tjalma W. Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
PubMed 25637862Hormes JM, Bryan C, Lytle LA, Gross CR, Ahmed RL, Troxel AB, Schmitz KH. Impact of lymphedema and arm symptoms on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Lymphology. 2010 Mar;43(1):1-13.
PubMed 20552814Jorgensen MG, Toyserkani NM, Sorensen JA. The effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis and shunts for preventing cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2018 Jul;38(5):576-585. doi: 10.1002/micr.30180. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PubMed 28370317Garza RM, Chang DW. Lymphovenous bypass for the treatment of lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;118(5):743-749. doi: 10.1002/jso.25166. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
PubMed 30098298Hanson SE, Chang EI, Schaverien MV, Chu C, Selber JC, Hanasono MM. Controversies in Surgical Management of Lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e2671. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002671. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PubMed 32537335Jonsson EL, Wu A, Onysyk T, Bains I, Temple-Oberle C. Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction (LYMbR) to prevent lymphedema after node dissection for cutaneous malignancies: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Feb 26;27(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09518-5.
PubMed 41749241
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction (LYMbR) to Prevent Lymphedema
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LYMbR / PLVA-2021
- Conditions
- Lymphedema of Limb, Malignant Skin Neoplasm
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Alberta Health Services, CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre
- Study start
- Jan 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Lymphedema following lymph node dissection is a chronic condition that can limit physical, occupational, and social participation, impact self-image, and result in financial burden. Studies have reported lymphedema incidence rates of 39% to 73% following node dissection.
Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been previously used to treat established lymphedema. More recently, with imaging capabilities guided by blue dye and indocyanine green dye, the possibility of prophylactic LVA has become feasible. A 2018 systematic review of 12 studies utilizing prophylactic LVA during lymphadenectomy indicated a 2/3 reduction in the risk of lymphedema. The literature yet lacks any phase III studies with stringent controls and long term follow-up.
Objectives: To assess (primary endpoint) the impact of prophylactic LVA on presence or absence of lymphedema post axillary or groin lymphadenectomy and participant quality of life. To assess (secondary endpoint) the incidence of complications related to nodal dissection.
Methods: This is a phase III RCT, block randomized for upper and lower extremities, recruiting adult patients planned for an axillary or groin node dissection as a result of cutaneous malignancy. Analysis of rates of lymphedema and quality of life reports will be done.
Significance: Lymphedema is a feared outcome of surgical cancer care. Its impact on patients' daily lives is profound. A reduction of incidence of this debilitating condition by 2/3 would have significant impact on numerous lives and could also reduce the health system resources needed for its management.
Detailed description
Trial Objective: To ascertain the efficacy and impact of prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis for prevention of lymphedema in cutaneous malignancy patients undergoing axillary or groin node dissection as part of cancer treatment. To determine quality of life impact, if any, for patients who receive this treatment. To determine incidence of complications related to nodal dissection are reduced with LVA.
Cancer-related lymphedema (CRLE) is a complex and lifelong implication of cancer treatment. Centres have reported rates of lymphedema following axillary node dissection of 39% (53% following adjuvant radiotherapy), and exceeding 73% following groin node dissection. Lymphedema can have significant quality of life (QoL) implications. Treatment, though helpful, is often burdensome, can require a second party to accomplish, and can be financially draining. Further, lymphedema is a chronic condition that cannot be eliminated once established. Many everyday activities, including self-care, employment, and social participation, as well as self-image, can be negatively impacted.
Given the high prevalence of CRLE, there is an urgency to investigate prophylaxis where possible. Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis offers this opportunity.
Although lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been used for decades to treat existing lymphedema, more recently prophylactic LVA has been explored. Jørgensen et al's 2018 systematic review of 12 studies utilizing prophylactic LVA in cancer patients undergoing axilla or groin lymphadenectomy indicated a 2/3 reduction of CRLE in those treated prophylactically compared to those who did not receive prophylactic treatment.
More recently, Cakmakoglu et al reported on an immediate prophylactic approach whereby the LVA is performed at the time of nodal dissection utilizing fluorescing indocynanine green (ICG) and an operating microscope. This approach aided identification and assessment of the viability of lymphatic vessels in 96% of study cases, thereby augmenting the surgeon's ability to identify and choose the most appropriate vessels. Cakmakoglu's team performed the technique successfully on 22 patients. Of this 22, a single patient developed CRLE during the follow-up period (3 patients died of disease during the follow-up period but showed no sign of CRLE at their demise).
The outlook for LVA in combination with ICG looks promising but, to date, there has not been a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) on this prophylactic LVA technique. Thus, there is a need for robust RCTs utilizing a control group, having clearly defined outcome measures, investing in a significant follow-up period, and integrating blinded assessment in order to objectively demonstrate the impact of prophylactic LVA for patients.
Jørgensen et al's 2018 systematic review of prophylactic LVA case series and studies noted that, while the results were remarkable, the studies collected for the review did not have adequate control for bias and were quite heterogeneous in their cancer type, lymphadenectomy location, lymphedema classification, and assessment measures. QoL measures were not regularly integrated into assessment. Follow-up times varied from 6 months to 69 months with only 3 studies following for a minimum of 24 months.
Trial description:
Study participants will be comprised of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy. The participants will be block (axilla, groin) randomized using 2 equal groups (control/intervention) of 20 participants each. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will undergo prophylactic LVA as an addendum to their lymph node dissection. This will take place at time of lymphadenectomy surgery. Control participants will not have prophylactic LVA. Both groups will be blinded to treatment.
All participants will have limb volume measurements and photographs taken and the LYMQOL lymphedema-specific quality of life questionnaire administered at baseline (date of surgery) and at 6 month intervals for 24 months. Their recovery and surgical complications will be monitored as per the surgeon's usual followup schedule. At 24 months each participant will undergo a radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy to assess function and health of their lymphatic system. Unblinding will taken place at this juncture except in cases where necessary to unblind earlier to provide exceptional care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A total of 40 study participants will be block (axilla, groin) randomized using 2 equal groups (control/intervention) of 20 participants each.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis | Experimental | Procedure: Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosisIntervention participants will undergo prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis as an addendum to axillary or ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for treatment of cutaneous malignancy. |
| Lymphadenectomy without lymphaticovenous anastomosis | No intervention | –Control participants will undergo axillary or ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy without lymphaticovenous anastomosis for treatment of cutaneous malignancy . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult persons (>18 years of age) undergoing axilla or groin lymphadenectomy as part of cutaneous malignancy management.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients receiving a sentinel lymph node biopsy alone
- Patients with untreated in-transit disease on the upper or lower extremities
- Patients with established preoperative lymphedema
- Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome
- Pregnant patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosisProphylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis is an immediate prophylactic approach whereby the lymphaticovenous anastomosis is performed at the time of nodal dissection utilizing fluorescing indocynanine green (ICG) and an operating microscope. | Procedure or surgery | Prophylactic lymphaticovenous anastomosis |
Primary outcome
Presence or absence of lymphedema at 24 months post axillary or groin lymphadenectomy as assessed by limb volume over time.
Time frame: 24 months
Using a non-stretch measuring tape, circumferential measurements at 4cm intervals along the length of the contralateral limbs will be taken pre-surgery (baseline) and at 24 months. Limb volumes will be calculated. In the limb impacted by surgery, a 10% increase in volume from baseline to 24 months will be indicative of the development of lymphedema. In the case of significant weight gain or loss, comparison with the volume of the contralateral limb will also be used to evaluate presence of lymphedema in the surgical limb.
Quality of life impact as measured by LYMQOL PROM
Time frame: 24 months
A lymphedema quality of life patient reported outcome measure with specific arm and leg questionnaires called the LYMQOL will be used to measure quality of life. The scale uses a 4 point system for the majority of questions wherein a higher score indicates that lymphedema is having a greater negative impact on quality of life. A single final question uses a 10 point scale (poor to excellent) to rate one's quality of life overall with a higher score indicating greater quality of life. Comparison of quality of life scoring from baseline (pre-surgery) with scoring at 24 months post-surgery.
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of evidence of acute post-operative surgical complications
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31891946Cakmakoglu C, Kwiecien GJ, Schwarz GS, Gastman B. Lymphaticovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Locoregional Advanced Melanoma Patients. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 May;36(4):247-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401829. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
- Background: PubMed 20961302Rockson SG. Causes and consequences of lymphatic disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1207 Suppl 1:E2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05804.x.
- BackgroundCampanholi LL, Duprat JP, Fregnani JHTG. Incidence of le due to treating cutaneous melanoma. J Lymphoedema. 2011; 16(1): 30-34.
- Background: PubMed 23008299Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 20;30(30):3726-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8574. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 22543385Loprinzi PD, Cardinal BJ, Winters-Stone K, Smit E, Loprinzi CL. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 May 1;39(3):269-74. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.269-274.
- Background: PubMed 24377471Baibergenova A, Drucker AM, Shear NH. Hospitalizations for cellulitis in Canada: a database study. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):33-7. doi: 10.2310/7750.2013.13075.
- Background: PubMed 24053624Tiwari P, Coriddi M, Salani R, Povoski SP. Breast and gynecologic cancer-related extremity lymphedema: a review of diagnostic modalities and management options. World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep 22;11:237. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-237.
- Background: PubMed 23812496Dunberger G, Lindquist H, Waldenstrom AC, Nyberg T, Steineck G, Avall-Lundqvist E. Lower limb lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors--effect on daily life functioning. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3063-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1879-3. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
- Background: PubMed 25470383Brayton KM, Hirsch AT, O Brien PJ, Cheville A, Karaca-Mandic P, Rockson SG. Lymphedema prevalence and treatment benefits in cancer: impact of a therapeutic intervention on health outcomes and costs. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114597. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25637862Gebruers N, Verbelen H, De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Tjalma W. Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 20552814Hormes JM, Bryan C, Lytle LA, Gross CR, Ahmed RL, Troxel AB, Schmitz KH. Impact of lymphedema and arm symptoms on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Lymphology. 2010 Mar;43(1):1-13.
- Background: PubMed 28370317Jorgensen MG, Toyserkani NM, Sorensen JA. The effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis and shunts for preventing cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2018 Jul;38(5):576-585. doi: 10.1002/micr.30180. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lymphedema of Limb
Recruiting
The Effect of Resistance Exercise in Patients With Lower Limb Lymphedema (the LymphEx Study)
Lymphedema
Recruiting
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Lower Extremity Lymphedema
Lymphedema, Lower Limb, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Compliance of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Comparing Indocyanine-Green (ICG) Guided vs. Traditional Guided in Patients Undergoing Axillary Node Dissection for the Treatment of Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Gut Microbiota in Patients With Limb Lymphedema and Recurrent Lymphangitis
Lymphedema, Microbiota
Not yet recruiting
Aerobic Exercise Effects in Lower Extremity Lymphedema
Lower Extremity Lymphedema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claire Temple-Oberle, MD, MSc, FRCSC, MMEd principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Prophylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis in people with Lymphedema of Limb and Malignant Skin Neoplasm, run by Alberta Health Services, Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carmen Webb, MA (403-521-3012, carmen.webb@ahs.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence or absence of lymphedema at 24 months post axillary or groin lymphadenectomy as assessed by limb volume over time. (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05136079, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2021.