Sports Physical TherapyNCT05136469
Comparison of Sciatic Nerve Gliding and Lower Extremity Dynamic Stretch on Hamstring Flexibility of Athletes
A study testing NEURAL GLIDING and DYNAMIC STRETCH in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
In this research, the main purpose is to determine the comparison of acute effect of sciatic nerve gliding and lower extremity dynamic stretching exercises on hamstring flexibility and athletic performance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Sports Physical Therapy
- What is being tested?
- NEURAL GLIDING and DYNAMIC STRETCH
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 14 Oct 2020to 15 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 to 40 year
- Footballers players
- Male gender
- Hamstring tightness of one or both legs,
- Unable to achieve greater than 160 degree of knee extension with hip at 90 degree of flexion
- Able to reach <70 degree hip flexion in SLR
Who cannot join
- Individuals who had sustained injury in the prior six months to the lumbar region,
- Limited activity level for more than 3 days,
- Low back problems (disc bulge etc.)
- Individual with a history of fracture or trauma were excluded from the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In this research, the main purpose is to determine the comparison of acute effect of sciatic nerve gliding and lower extremity dynamic stretching exercises on hamstring flexibility and athletic performance. The participants will be begin with warm-up sessions for 3-5 minutes then baseline data (pre-test): hamstring flexibility will be measured. The order of pre-test will be randomized and same order will be used for post-test. This is a community service addition, added so that everyone in the society can get to know the effects of nerve gliding and lower extremity dynamic stretches on hamstring flexibility, will be cost effective, and will reduce their visits to the therapist.
Randomized controlled trial with 1 month follow-up. The sample size is 40. subjects will be divided in two groups, 20 athletes will be given a session of sciatic nerve gliding while lower extremity stretch will be given to remaining 20 athletes. Study duration is of 6 months.Sampling technique employed will be convenient with random assignment. Individuals of age group 18-40 years having male gender regularly exercise at least once a week for 30 minutes. Tools used in the study are Universal inclinometer and Active knee extension test and SLR TEST. Data will be analyzed through IBM SPSS 23
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
- Being tested
- NEURAL GLIDING, DYNAMIC STRETCH
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NEURAL GLIDINGOther
with Sciatic nerve gliding which is done by applying force on the proximal point and releasing the force distally and then reversing the process. This process was achieved for 30 seconds, 6 times on each leg for a total time of 3 minutes (360 seconds).
DYNAMIC STRETCHOther
The stretch force was applied on the ankle in downward direction which was held for 30 seconds and was repeated 5 times total of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Stretch was given on both legs one at a time. Treatment was given for 3 weeks with 2 sessions per week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NEURAL GLIDING | Experimental | with Sciatic nerve gliding which is done by applying force on the proximal point and releasing the force distally and then reversing the process. This process was achieved for 30 seconds, 6 times on each leg for a total time of 3 minutes (360 seconds). Receives: Other: NEURAL GLIDING |
| DYNAMIC STRETCH | Active comparator | The stretch force was applied on the ankle in downward direction which was held for 30 seconds and was repeated 5 times total of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Stretch was given on both legs one at a time. Treatment was given for 3 weeks with 2 sessions per week Receives: Other: DYNAMIC STRETCH |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Range of Hamstrings (Universal Goniometer)
Participants were asked to do SLR and active knee extensions and then measure range of hamstrings and then note the range by goniometer .
Measured: 3 WEEKS
SLR test
Participants were asked to lie down in a supine position and were asked to raise their both leg one by one. In order to measure hamstring flexibility center of the goniometer was placed at the greater trochanter level its proximal arm at midline of pelvis and distal arm along the shaft of the femur referring lateral epicondyle. After which scoring were noted in which >110 showed excellent scoring, 80 to 110 showed good scoring and 60 to 79 showed fair scoring of the hamstring muscle flexibility
Measured: 3 WEEKS
Knee Extension test
For active knee extension test participant one leg is vertically extended and the other leg was flexed on the level of hip joint and then the participants was asked to extend the knee. The point where the vertical leg starts to move is recorded. The angle between the thighs is measured, if the knee was fully extended it was noted as 0 and if it shows slight flexion that was noted as positive number like 20 or 30 degree. By following the same protocol both right and left legs were recorded. Normal knee extension ranges from 130_140 to 0 degree knee extension less than the range was written as negative number
Measured: 3 WEEKS
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2021
- Study start14 Oct 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion15 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sports Physical TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- sidra shafique, tDPT, Study chair, RIU lahore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136469
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/Lhr/20/0401 Nasrullah
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Baxter C, Mc Naughton LR, Sparks A, Norton L, Bentley D. Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Res Sports Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;25(1):78-90. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1258640. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
PubMed 27912252Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Martin-Martin L, Cabrera-Martos I, Puentedura EJ, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Aug;14(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23142014Lumbroso D, Ziv E, Vered E, Kalichman L. The effect of kinesio tape application on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy young adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Jan;18(1):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
PubMed 24411161Bonser RJ, Hancock CL, Hansberger BL, Loutsch RA, Stanford EK, Zeigel AK, Baker RT, May J, Nasypany A, Cheatham S. Changes in Hamstring Range of Motion After Neurodynamic Sciatic Sliders: A Critically Appraised Topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jul;26(4):311-315. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0166. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PubMed 27632844Kulendran T, Rajesh D, Kumar S. The Effect of One-Time Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Flexibility Sustenance between Healthy Males and Females. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018;9(10).
Fransson P, Johansson R, Hafstrom A, Magnusson M. Methods for evaluation of postural control adaptation. Gait Posture. 2000 Sep;12(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00052-7.
PubMed 10996293
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Sciatic Nerve Gliding and Lower Extremity Dynamic Stretch on Hamstring Flexibility of Athletes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136469
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/Lhr/20/0401 Nasrullah
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this research, the main purpose is to determine the comparison of acute effect of sciatic nerve gliding and lower extremity dynamic stretching exercises on hamstring flexibility and athletic performance. The participants will be begin with warm-up sessions for 3-5 minutes then baseline data (pre-test): hamstring flexibility will be measured. The order of pre-test will be randomized and same order will be used for post-test. This is a community service addition, added so that everyone in the society can get to know the effects of nerve gliding and lower extremity dynamic stretches on hamstring flexibility, will be cost effective, and will reduce their visits to the therapist.
Randomized controlled trial with 1 month follow-up. The sample size is 40. subjects will be divided in two groups, 20 athletes will be given a session of sciatic nerve gliding while lower extremity stretch will be given to remaining 20 athletes. Study duration is of 6 months.Sampling technique employed will be convenient with random assignment. Individuals of age group 18-40 years having male gender regularly exercise at least once a week for 30 minutes. Tools used in the study are Universal inclinometer and Active knee extension test and SLR TEST. Data will be analyzed through IBM SPSS 23
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NEURAL GLIDING | Experimental | Other: NEURAL GLIDINGwith Sciatic nerve gliding which is done by applying force on the proximal point and releasing the force distally and then reversing the process. This process was achieved for 30 seconds, 6 times on each leg for a total time of 3 minutes (360 seconds). |
| DYNAMIC STRETCH | Active comparator | Other: DYNAMIC STRETCHThe stretch force was applied on the ankle in downward direction which was held for 30 seconds and was repeated 5 times total of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Stretch was given on both legs one at a time. Treatment was given for 3 weeks with 2 sessions per week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 18 to 40 year
- Footballers players
- Male gender
- Hamstring tightness of one or both legs,
- Unable to achieve greater than 160 degree of knee extension with hip at 90 degree of flexion
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Individuals who had sustained injury in the prior six months to the lumbar region,
- Limited activity level for more than 3 days,
- Low back problems (disc bulge etc.)
- Individual with a history of fracture or trauma were excluded from the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NEURAL GLIDINGwith Sciatic nerve gliding which is done by applying force on the proximal point and releasing the force distally and then reversing the process. This process was achieved for 30 seconds, 6 times on each leg for a total time of 3 minutes (360 seconds). | Other | NEURAL GLIDING |
| DYNAMIC STRETCHThe stretch force was applied on the ankle in downward direction which was held for 30 seconds and was repeated 5 times total of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Stretch was given on both legs one at a time. Treatment was given for 3 weeks with 2 sessions per week | Other | DYNAMIC STRETCH |
Primary outcome
Range of Hamstrings (Universal Goniometer)
Time frame: 3 WEEKS
Participants were asked to do SLR and active knee extensions and then measure range of hamstrings and then note the range by goniometer .
SLR test
Time frame: 3 WEEKS
Participants were asked to lie down in a supine position and were asked to raise their both leg one by one. In order to measure hamstring flexibility center of the goniometer was placed at the greater trochanter level its proximal arm at midline of pelvis and distal arm along the shaft of the femur referring lateral epicondyle. After which scoring were noted in which >110 showed excellent scoring, 80 to 110 showed good scoring and 60 to 79 showed fair scoring of the hamstring muscle flexibility
Knee Extension test
Time frame: 3 WEEKS
For active knee extension test participant one leg is vertically extended and the other leg was flexed on the level of hip joint and then the participants was asked to extend the knee. The point where the vertical leg starts to move is recorded. The angle between the thighs is measured, if the knee was fully extended it was noted as 0 and if it shows slight flexion that was noted as positive number like 20 or 30 degree. By following the same protocol both right and left legs were recorded. Normal knee extension ranges from 130_140 to 0 degree knee extension less than the range was written as negative number
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 27912252Baxter C, Mc Naughton LR, Sparks A, Norton L, Bentley D. Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Res Sports Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;25(1):78-90. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1258640. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 23142014Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Martin-Martin L, Cabrera-Martos I, Puentedura EJ, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Aug;14(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 24411161Lumbroso D, Ziv E, Vered E, Kalichman L. The effect of kinesio tape application on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy young adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Jan;18(1):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 27632844Bonser RJ, Hancock CL, Hansberger BL, Loutsch RA, Stanford EK, Zeigel AK, Baker RT, May J, Nasypany A, Cheatham S. Changes in Hamstring Range of Motion After Neurodynamic Sciatic Sliders: A Critically Appraised Topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jul;26(4):311-315. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0166. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
- BackgroundKulendran T, Rajesh D, Kumar S. The Effect of One-Time Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Flexibility Sustenance between Healthy Males and Females. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018;9(10).
- Background: PubMed 10996293Fransson P, Johansson R, Hafstrom A, Magnusson M. Methods for evaluation of postural control adaptation. Gait Posture. 2000 Sep;12(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00052-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Individualized Rehabilitation for Osgood-Schlatter or Sever Pain in Youth Athletes
Osgood-Schlatter Disease, Sever's Disease
Recruiting
French Contrast Versus Oregon Circuit Training in Competitive Football Players
No Disease or Condition is Being Studied
Recruiting
Diaphragmatic Facilitation and Upper Extremity Performance in Volleyball Players
Volleyball Players
Recruiting
Comparative Effects of Dolphin Kick Streamline Training Versus Flutter Kick Training in Competitive Swimmers
Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Evaluation of Collagen-based Medical Device Treatment Combined With Physiotherapy in Subjects With Achilles Tendinopathy.
Tendinopathy, Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
sidra shafique, tDPT study chair
RIU lahore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NEURAL GLIDING and DYNAMIC STRETCH in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Range of Hamstrings (Universal Goniometer) (time frame: 3 WEEKS). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05136469, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2021.