AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisNCT05137093

Scratching Validation Study

An observational study of Atopic Dermatitis, run by Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Single center, analyst-blinded, study comparing the scratching events identified via an actigraphy scoring algorithm versus manual scoring of an overnight video recording, undertaken in a sample of 40 adult patients with atopic dermatitis and controls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Actigraphy Device
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Dec 2021to 1 Feb 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Healthy \& Atopic dermatitis subjects

Who may be able to join

  • Be aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive
  • Be willing and able to undergo a single night of actigraphy and video monitoring overnight in a laboratory
  • Be willing and able to provide informed consent
  • (patients only): Diagnosed with atopic dermatitis by a clinician, following the criteria listed in Table 1.
  • (patients only): IGA score ≥ 2.
  • (patients only): Willing and able to use only non-medicated topical therapy (i.e., bland emollient/moisturizer) for 7 days before the overnight visit.
  • Participants should be in bed a minimum of 4 hours

Who cannot join

  • Any acute and/or unstable illness or medical complication which, in the opinion of a clinician, could compromise data collection and/or interpretation
  • Use of any over-the-counter, prescription, or recreational drugs that may induce sleep or pruritus within 24 hours prior to overnight monitoring
  • Use of any over-the-counter or prescription treatment (systemic, or topical) that could affect the course of atopic dermatitis during the study period. Key medications are listed below:
  • From 3 Months prior to overnight visit: Biological products that might have significantly affected the evaluation of atopic dermatitis condition (e.g., tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, antiimmunoglobulin IgE antibodies, anti-CD20 antibodies, anti-interleukin-4 receptor)
  • Has used systemic treatments that could affect AD within 30 days or 5 half- lives before the overnight visit. (i.e. retinoids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea), azathioprine and systemic corticosteroids)
  • Phototherapy treatment, laser therapy, bleach baths, tanning booths or extended sun exposure that could affect disease severity or interfere with disease assessments within 30 days before the overnight visit.
Show all 27Show fewer
  • Use within 21 days before the overnight visit: Topical corticosteroids that were classified as super-high potency (clobetasol propionate).
  • Use within 14 days before the overnight visit: any other topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor; Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus cream and/or ointment; Topical corticosteroids that were classified as low, medium, or high potency (e.g., fluocinonide, triamcinolone acetonide, desonide, hydrocortisone).
  • From 7 days before the overnight visit:
  • antibiotics
  • antifungal or antivirus medications
  • Antihistamines/anti-allergics: diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine maleate, hydroxyzine)
  • Topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor
  • Topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus cream and/or ointment)
  • Topical corticosteroids that were classified as low, medium, or high potency (e.g., fluocinonide, triamcinolone acetonide, desonide, hydrocortisone)
  • Any other topical therapy with active ingredients to treat AD or with additives that could affect AD (e.g., hyaluronic acid, urea, ceramide or filaggrin degradation products).
  • Individuals clinically diagnosed with a sleep disorder who are NOT on a controlled treatment regime
  • An Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of ≥11, indicating daytime hypersomnolence
  • Previous diagnosis of a movement disorder, including but not limited to, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder, Tourette's syndrome, tremor, or dystonia
  • Commercial driver's license and/or high-risk occupation that could be impacted by the occurrence of daytime sleepiness
  • Self-reported habitual sleep duration of <6 hours per night on average
  • Shift worker, advanced/delayed circadian phase, and/or any other condition suggesting that the participant would be unable to sleep during overnight monitoring
  • Self-reported pregnancy current or planned during the study
  • Employee or spouse of an employee of company that designs, sells, or manufactures sleep related products and/or wearable devices (including Philips).
  • (patients only): Any significant dermatological condition, other than atopic dermatitis, as determined by a clinician.
  • (controls only): Any significant dermatological condition as determined by a clinician.
  • Currently using medication for any skin disease/condition and could not, in the opinion of the investigator, tolerate restriction or discontinuation of the medication as required by the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Clayton Sleep Institute

    Maplewood, Missouri, 63143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Independent Validation Study of Nighttime Scratching Quantification With Actigraphy in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

Single center, analyst-blinded, study comparing the scratching events identified via an actigraphy scoring algorithm versus manual scoring of an overnight video recording, undertaken in a sample of 40 adult patients with atopic dermatitis and controls.

Read the detailed description

The Philips scratching algorithm has been cross-validated against the gold-standard assessment of scratching. The algorithm has been used in many drug development trials, occasionally as a means of generating secondary endpoints, but most often as a means of generating exploratory endpoints. The purpose of the proposed study is therefore to validate the data generated by the scratching study compared to the gold-standard video-assessment of scratching, in an independent sample of adults with atopic dermatitis and age- and sex-matched controls

Being tested
Actigraphy Device
Keywords
Scratching
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Actigraphy DeviceDevice

    Patients will wear actigraphy device which detects scratching events.

Study groups in NCT05137093
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy subjectsHealthy subjects
Receives: Device: Actigraphy Device
Atopic dermatitisAtopic dermatitis
Receives: Device: Actigraphy Device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and precision of the scratching algorithm with reference to the gold standard.

    Assessment of the performance of the scratching algorithm as detected by actigraphy compared to infra red video monitoring.

    Measured: Through study completion, analyst review following each patient's overnight intervention/session

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Agreement via additional performance metrics between the scratching algorithm and the gold standard.

    Overall agreement of algorithm-determined scratching events and total duration compared to video scoring of scratching events; Other performance metrics such as Cohen's kappa and correlation between the number and duration of scratching events detected by the scratching algorithm versus video scoring

    Measured: Through study completion, analyst review following each patient's overnight intervention/session

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2021
  2. Study start10 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05137093
Sponsor's protocol ID
SRC_NBS_GENEActiv_2019_10763
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
5 Nov 2021
Last updated
9 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atopic Dermatitis, run by Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and precision of the scratching algorithm with reference to the gold standard. (time frame: Through study completion, analyst review following each patient's overnight intervention/session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in