AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 3SRSvsWBRTNCT05144867

Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer With Brain Oligometastasis

A Phase 3 study testing Stereotactic Radiosurgery in people with Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases, Adult, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial aims to assess the impact of SRS on overall survival, PFS, radiation toxicity and quality of life as compared to WBRT in oligometastatic brain disease in breast cancer patients. Total 98 patients with breast cancer with brain oligo-metastases will be included. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
31 Aug 2021to 31 Mar 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >=18 years
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Histologically confirmed malignancy with metastatic disease detected on imaging.
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • 1 to 3 brain metastases, each with a maximum diameter of no more than 3 cm on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) scans

Who cannot join

  • Serious medical comorbidities
  • ECOG >= 2
  • Prior Brain Radiotherapy
  • >3 brain metastasis
  • Maximum diameter >4cm on MRI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Budhi Singh Yadav, MD contact

drbudhi@gmail.com

Budhi Singh Yadav, MD contact

0172275 ext. 6390

drbudhi@gmail.com

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Budhi Singh Yadav

    Chandigarh, 160012

    BUDHI SINGH S YADAV, MD, 9815981176, drbudhi@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer With Brain Oligometastasis- A Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Trial

This trial aims to assess the impact of SRS on overall survival, PFS, radiation toxicity and quality of life as compared to WBRT in oligometastatic brain disease in breast cancer patients. Total 98 patients with breast cancer with brain oligo-metastases will be included. The WBRT dosage schedule will be 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. For tumors with 2cm, SRS dose of 22 to 25 Gy will be delivered and tumor larger than 2 cm will be treated with doses of 18 to 20 Gy.

Read the detailed description

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of SRS on overall survival, brain tumour recurrence and radiation toxicity with oligometastatic brain metastasis as compared to patients who receive WBRT.

Primary End Point: Overall Survival (OS) Secondary End Points: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Toxic Effects of Radiation Quality of Life DETAILED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Study Setting: Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Study Design: Prospective hospital based study

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age >=18 years
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Histologically confirmed malignancy with metastatic disease detected on imaging.
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • 1 to 5 brain metastases, each with a maximum diameter of no more than 3.5 cm on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) scans.

Exclusion criteria

  • Serious medical comorbidities
  • ECOG >= 2
  • Prior Brain Radiotherapy
  • >5 brain metastasis
  • Maximum diameter >4cm on MRI

Randomisation and Treatment:

Prior to randomization, a complete history and physical examination by the treating radiation oncologist will be done. Histologically confirmation of malignancy is required, with metastatic disease detected on imaging. Prior to randomization, the patients will be stratified based on number of brain metastases (single vs 2-3), extent of extracranial disease (active vs stable). Extracranial disease will be considered to be stable when the tumor had been clinically controlled for 6 months or longer prior to the detection of brain metastases. After informed consent, eligible patients will be randomised in two arms.

Arm 1:

The WBRT dosage schedule will be 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. For Arm 1, Treatment planning is to be done using CT simulation or conventional simulation (fluoroscopy). Simple beam arrangements, such as parallel opposed beams, will be favoured wherever possible.

Arm 2:

All patients in Arm 2 will undergo planning CT simulation with 1mm slice thickness. For all lesions, the gross tumor volume (GTV) will be defined as the visible tumor on CT and/or MRI imaging. A Planning Target Volume (PTV) margin of 2-5 mm will be added. Organs at risk visible in the planning CT scan will be contoured. The doses will be prescribed to approximately 100% isodose level and 95% of the PTV should receive 95% of the prescription dose. Metastases with a maximum diameter of up to 2 cm will be treated with doses of 22 to 25 Gy and those larger than 2 cm will be treated with doses of 18 to 20 Gy.

Follow up:

Clinical evaluations and MRI scans will be done 1 and 3 months after treatment and every 3 months thereafter. In cases in which a recurrence will be detected, further treatment can be administered. The size of the treated lesions will be measured in 3 dimensions, and this size, the development of new brain metastases, and the development of leukoencephalopathy associated with radiological findings (according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.0319) will be scored based on serial MRI scans. Overall survival will be measured as time until death from any cause, and progression-free survival as time to either progression or death, whichever occurs first. Lesion response will be evaluated in this study using the international criteria proposed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Committee20. At each visit, functional status and neurologic toxic effects will be scored. Systemic functional status will be evaluated by using the KPS score. Neurologic function will be evaluated according to the criteria listed21.

Statistical analysis:

This study will aim to detect an improvement in overall survival. The study will therefore be designed with 80% power. It is estimated that the median survival of the control group after randomization in this study will be 9 months. In order to detect a 6-month improvement in median survival from 9 months to 15 months with SRS, a total of 93 patients will be needed. Assuming a 5% rate of loss to follow up, a total of 98 patients will be accrued. The study projects accrual over 48 months with 12 months of additional follow-up. Survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with differences compared using the stratified log-rank test. A Cox multivariable regression analysis will be used to determine baseline factors predictive of survival. Differences in rates of grade 2 or higher toxicity between groups will be tested using the Fisher's Exact Test. Differences in progression free survival will be tested using the stratified log-rank test.

Novelty of study: This trial aims to assess the impact of SRS on overall survival, PFS, radiation toxicity and quality of life as compared to WBRT in oligometastatic brain disease in breast cancer patients. It may lead to better understanding of role of SRS in oligometastatic paradigm.

Being tested
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stereotactic RadiosurgeryRadiation

    All patients to undergo planning CT simulation with 1mm slice thickness. For all lesions, the gross tumor volume (GTV) will be defined as the visible tumor on CT and/or MRI imaging. A Planning Target Volume (PTV) margin of 2-5 mm will be added. Organs at risk visible in the planning CT scan will be contoured. The doses will be prescribed to approximately 100% isodose level and 95% of the PTV should receive 95% of the prescription dose. Metastases with a maximum diameter of up to 2 cm will be treated with doses of 22 to 25 Gy and those larger than 2 cm will be treated with doses of 18 to 20 Gy.

Study groups in NCT05144867
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1Active comparatorThe WBRT dosage schedule will be 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. For Arm 1, Treatment planning is to be done using CT simulation or conventional simulation (fluoroscopy). Simple beam arrangements, such as parallel opposed beams, will be favoured wherever possible.
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Arm 2ExperimentalMetastases with a maximum diameter of up to 2 cm will be treated with doses of 22 to 25 Gy and those larger than 2 cm will be treated with doses of 18 to 20 Gy.
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

    From date of randomization till death due to breast cancer

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    From completion of radiotherapy treatment to intracranial progression of disease on MRI/CT scan as per the RECIST criteria which is >20% increase(>5mm absolute increase) in the the sum of the longest diameters in comparison with the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment started.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Quality of Life - KPS

    At each visit, functional status and neurologic toxic effects will be scored. Systemic functional status will be evaluated by using the KPS score. KPS will be scored 80-100 if the patient is able to carry on normal activity and to work without special care. A score of 50-70 will indicate patient is unable to work; live at home and care for most personnel needs; varying amount of assistance required. A score of 10-30 indicate that unable to care for self; requires equivalent of hospital or institutional care; disease may be progressing rapidly. A score of 0 means patient is dead. Neurologic function will be evaluated according to the MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION. Patients will be scored for each question from 0-30. Degree of impairment will be graded as severe if the score is 0-10, moderate if the score is 10-20, mild between 20-25 and questionable significant if the score is 25-30.

    Measured: Base line and 6 months

  3. Quality of life - MINI MENTAL STATE

    Neurologic function will be evaluated according to the MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION. Patients will be asked a set of questions( for example what is the year? season? date? day? month?; where are we now? state? county? town? city? hospital?; spell WORLD back word or count D-L-R-O-W or count back word from 100 by seven- 93, 86, 79, 72, 65). Score 1 point for each correct response with in each question will be given so that a score from 0-30 is recorded. Degree of impairment will be graded as severe if the score is 0-10, moderate if the score is 10-20, mild between 20-25 and questionable significant if the score is 25-30.

    Measured: Base line and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2021
  2. Study start31 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05144867
Sponsor's protocol ID
NK/7784/Study/249
Acronym
SRSvsWBRT
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
2 Nov 2021
Last updated
17 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gupta A, Yadav BS, Ballari N, et al. LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with breast cancer. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 351 - 359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396921000029[Opens in a new window]

  • Yadav BS, Vias P, Robert N, Gade VKV, Kajla A. Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Breast Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases-A Phase 3 Open Label Randomized Study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2026 Jun;22(3):435-446. doi: 10.1111/ajco.70029. Epub 2025 Sep 22.

    PubMed 40983872

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Stereotactic Radiosurgery in people with Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases, Adult, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Budhi Singh Yadav, MD (drbudhi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05144867, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in