AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT05148728

Active Surveillance vs in Office Fulguration for Low Grade Bladder Cancer Tumors

A study testing Endoscopic fulguration in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Vall Hebron Insitut Recerca at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Biological behabiour of low grade bladder cancer tumors is well known. They have a very high rate of recurrences during their follow up but very low (less than 1%) risk of progression. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
Endoscopic fulguration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
15 Dec 2021to 15 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recurrent Ta-T1a (above muscularis mucosa) LOW GRADE bladder tumor
  • Accept cystoscopy surveillance
  • Main lession less than 10mm
  • Less than 7 lesions
  • Negative or low grade cytology
  • No solid aspect

Who cannot join

  • previous High grade bladder cancer tumors
  • previous Cis
  • previous Upper Urinary Tract tumor
  • previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • hematuria
  • meatal localisation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Fernando Lozano Palacio

    Barcelona, 08035

    Fernando FL Lozano, MD, +34636244960, flozano@vhebron.net

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Prospective Randomized Trial in Low Grade Bladder Tumors: Active Surveillance vs Endoscopic Fulguration.

Biological behabiour of low grade bladder cancer tumors is well known. They have a very high rate of recurrences during their follow up but very low (less than 1%) risk of progression.

Until now, the gold standard of any bladder recurrence for this patients is performing an immediate transurethral ressection of the tumor.

This surgery has risk of complications and, due to the low risk of these subgroup of tumors, sometimes it becomes an overtreatment for the patients.

This is the reason why new conservative or less invasive surgeries are proposed to follow up and treat these patients.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
Endoscopic fulguration
Keywords
active surveillance, fulguration, bladder cancer
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic fulgurationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Active surveillance

    already included. WE will use Storz monopolar device for fulguration

Study groups in NCT05148728
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active surveillanceNo interventionAfter a recurrence in patient with previous low grade bladder cancer tumor, strict follow up with cystoscopy and cytology, avoiding immediate surgery
endoscopic fulgurationActive comparatorAfter a recurrence in patient with previous low grade bladder cancer tumor, fulguration under local anesthesia and sedation will be performed using a flexible cystoscope and a monopolar electrode
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic fulguration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression rate

    Number of patients that progress during the follow up

    Measured: two years

  2. Complications rate

    Number and grade of complications in both arms. Clavien Dindo Scale will be used

    Measured: two years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. recurrence rate

    number of recurrences

    Measured: two years

  2. quality of life measured with CAVICAVENMI questionnaire

    quality of life of the patients in both subgroups. CAVICAVENMI questionnaire will be used

    Measured: two years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2021
  2. Study start15 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05148728
Sponsor's protocol ID
PR(AG)401/2021
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
26 Nov 2021
Last updated
8 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: codified information (anonymous information)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endoscopic fulguration in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Vall Hebron Insitut Recerca at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression rate (time frame: two years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in