AzTrials
AzTrials

Extensively Decayed Primary MolarsPhase 4NCT05149651

Efficacy of Totalfill® and ProRoot MTA® as Pulpotomy Agent in Primary Molars

A Phase 4 study testing Totalfill and MTA in people with Extensively Decayed Primary Molars, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design. To evaluate the outcome of using 2 pulpotomy agents: Totalfill® as study group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA®) as a control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 9 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Extensively Decayed Primary Molars
What is being tested?
Totalfill and MTA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patient inclusion criteria
  • ASA 1 patient, Patient is a completely healthy \& fit. No allergy or medical conditions.
  • Patient is indicated for treatment under General Anesthesia: young age, uncooperative and extensive treatment plan.
  • Parent agreed to participate in the study, and signed the written consent.
  • Patient attended the out-patients pediatric dental clinic in UZ Gent.
  • Tooth inclusion criteria 2.1. Clinical inclusion criteria:
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Vital primary molars (first or second) with deep caries cavity with pulpal exposure.
  • Only mandibular primary molar were included
  • No spontaneous pain
  • No history of swelling
  • No sinus tract/ fistula
  • Absent of tenderness in percussion
  • No pathological mobility
  • Restorable tooth (stainless steel crown can be placed)
  • Hemostasis can be achieved with a dry cotton pellet after removal of Coronal pulp.
  • 2.2. Radiographical inclusion criteria:
  • At least 2/3rd of root is present
  • Absence of internal or external root resorption
  • Absence of pathologic root resorption
  • Absence of periapical or furcation radiolucency

Who cannot join

  • If one or more of the criteria mentioned above is not fulfilled, the teeth were excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Ghent University hospital

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Pulpotomy of Primary Molars Using Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty, and ProRoot White MTA®. A Randomized Controlled Trial

An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design. To evaluate the outcome of using 2 pulpotomy agents: Totalfill® as study group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA®) as a control.

Read the detailed description

When a tooth decay is too deep and extended into the tooth pulp, then the tooth is not indicated to be treated with a filling. Therefore, removing the diseased pulp and then cover the rest with a suitable material is required. The Purpose of this study is to check the success of pulp treatment on deciduous molars with deep caries using 2 pulp treatment agents: (Totalfill® and MTA®). The use between the materials is randomly assigned. However, the use of the materials has no side effect or complications as it is a routine dental procedure.

The participants are healthy children aged between 3 and 9 years old, and the study is taking place in Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, and it is planned to be conducted in duration of 4 years, which include 20 months for participants recruitment.

After placing the material, the tooth is restored with stainless steel crowns, and the participant was asked for follow up to check the tooth and to take dental x-ray every 6 months.

Being tested
Totalfill, MTA
Keywords
Totalfill, MTA, Bioactive, calcium silicate cement, Pulpotomy, Primary molars, Bioceramics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TotalfillDrug

    Also called Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty

    Totalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty is a pre-mixed, bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.

  • MTADrug

    Also called ProRoot White MTA®

    ProRoot White MTA® is a bioactive calcium silicate cement which used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy.

Study groups in NCT05149651
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TotalfillExperimentalTotalfill® Bioceramic Root Repair Material -Fast Set Putty used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
Receives: Drug: Totalfill
MTAActive comparatorProRoot White MTA® used as pulpotomy agent to treat extensive decayed tooth indicated for pulpotomy
Receives: Drug: MTA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  2. Clinical evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Clinical scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

  3. Radiographic evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  4. Radiographic evaluation

    Success or failure of the pulpotomy treated teeth is scored based on the Radiographic scoring criteria adapted from Zurn \& Seale (2008). Score 1 and 2 was estimated as success, while 3 and 4 was estimated as failure.

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time needed to place the material

    To measure the time consumed to place each material and then to compare them if there is a significant difference. After removing the coronal pulp and achieving the hemostasis . The operator start the timer when he places the material till restoring the tooth with GIC.

    Measured: Immediately after each intervention for a maximum of the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
An experimental prospective double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) with parallel design.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05149651
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC UZG 2016/0723 - 2016/0724
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
11 May 2018
Last updated
22 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data will be available in the literature in the manuscript after publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Totalfill and MTA in people with Extensively Decayed Primary Molars, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical evaluation (time frame: 6 months follow-up). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in