AzTrials
AzTrials

Distal Radius FractureLIMPER-DRFNCT05150925

Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate

A study testing Cast treatment, Immediate mobilization and Volar plating in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Tampere University Hospital at 5 sites in 2 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to analyze total lenght of the sick leace and functional outcome (PRWE) at 2 months between 2 weeks casting and immediate mobilization following volar plating for a DRF. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Distal Radius Fracture
What is being tested?
Cast treatment, Immediate mobilization and Volar plating
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
5 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 10 Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Intra- or extra articular DRF (Colles, Smith, Volar barton)
  • operative treatment justified

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Open fracture with a severity greater than Gustilo grade 1
  • Patient aged less than 18 or over 65
  • Patient does not understand written or spoken guidance in local languages
  • Pathological fracture
  • Previous fracture in the same wrist or forearm in the last 10 years, that has led to impairment of function
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Ipsilateral fracture in upper extremity
  • Associated fractures of the ulna (except fractures of the PSU)
  • Polytrauma

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 2 countries.

5 sites in 2 countries

Finland3 sites
  • Teemu Karjalainen

    Jyväskylä

  • Kuopio University Hospital

    Kuopio

  • Laura Kärnä

    Tampere

Other trials in Finland

Sweden2 sites
  • Danderyds Sjukhus

    Danderyd

  • Sundsvalls sjukhuset

    Sundsvall

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate - a Study Protocol for a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to analyze total lenght of the sick leace and functional outcome (PRWE) at 2 months between 2 weeks casting and immediate mobilization following volar plating for a DRF.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. The aim of this study will be to compare the early postoperative outcomes of the patients enrolled in the early mobilization with those patients in post-operative 2-week casting following volar plating for a DRF. Co-primary outcome in this study will be the total lenght of sick leave and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 2 months after the operation.

Being tested
Cast treatment, Immediate mobilization, Volar plating
Keywords
distal radius fracture, volar plating, surgery
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cast treatmentOther

    Dorsal cast placed in OR

  • Immediate mobilizationOther

    Immediate mobilization postoperatively without casting

  • Volar platingProcedure or surgery

    Volar plating of distal radius fracture

Study groups in NCT05150925
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate mobilization after distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plateExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Immediate mobilization; Procedure: Volar plating
2 weeks cast immobilization after distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plateActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Cast treatment; Procedure: Volar plating

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire

    The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. It ranges from 100 (worst) to 0 (best). It consists of 2 subscales. Pain subscale contains 5 items. Function subscale contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections: specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Total lenght of the sick leave

    Total number of days of work during the 1 year study period

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (26)
  1. Patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire

    The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. It ranges from 100 (worst) to 0 (best). It consists of 2 subscales. Pain subscale contains 5 items. Function subscale contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections: specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire

    The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. It ranges from 100 (worst) to 0 (best). It consists of 2 subscales. Pain subscale contains 5 items. Function subscale contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections: specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire

    The PRWE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. It ranges from 100 (worst) to 0 (best). It consists of 2 subscales. Pain subscale contains 5 items. Function subscale contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections: specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Return to work

    Patient is asked if he or she has returned to the previous work. If no patient is asked is he or she Still on sick leave, partial sick leave or returned to other work.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Return to work

    Patient is asked if he or she has returned to the previous work. If no patient is asked is he or she Still on sick leave, partial sick leave or returned to other work.

    Measured: 2 months

  6. Return to work

    Patient is asked if he or she has returned to the previous work. If no patient is asked is he or she Still on sick leave, partial sick leave or returned to other work.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Return to work

    Patient is asked if he or she has returned to the previous work. If no patient is asked is he or she Still on sick leave, partial sick leave or returned to other work.

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Complications

    Any surgery related complication: wound dehiscence, deep infection, flexor tendon rupture, nerve injury, mechanical complications, nonunion, malunion, complex regional pain syndrome

    Measured: 4 weeks

  9. Complications

    Any surgery related complication: wound dehiscence, deep infection, flexor tendon rupture, nerve injury, mechanical complications, nonunion, malunion, complex regional pain syndrome

    Measured: 2 months

  10. Complications

    Any surgery related complication: wound dehiscence, deep infection, flexor tendon rupture, nerve injury, mechanical complications, nonunion, malunion, complex regional pain syndrome

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Complications

    Any surgery related complication: wound dehiscence, deep infection, flexor tendon rupture, nerve injury, mechanical complications, nonunion, malunion, complex regional pain syndrome

    Measured: 12 months

  12. Self-perceived working ability

    Patient is asked to rate his os her working ability using two scales: NRS from 0 (fully disabled) to 10 (best capability) and ordinally (fully capable, partially capable, fully disabled).

    Measured: 4 weeks

  13. Self-perceived working ability

    Patient is asked to rate his os her working ability using two scales: NRS from 0 (fully disabled) to 10 (best capability) and ordinally (fully capable, partially capable, fully disabled).

    Measured: 2 months

  14. Self-perceived working ability

    Patient is asked to rate his os her working ability using two scales: NRS from 0 (fully disabled) to 10 (best capability) and ordinally (fully capable, partially capable, fully disabled).

    Measured: 6 months

  15. Self-perceived working ability

    Patient is asked to rate his os her working ability using two scales: NRS from 0 (fully disabled) to 10 (best capability) and ordinally (fully capable, partially capable, fully disabled).

    Measured: 12 months

  16. Visual analogue pain scale

    Overall pain during last 7 days in a scale from 0 to 100 (worst)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  17. Visual analogue pain scale

    Overall pain during last 7 days in a scale from 0 to 100 (worst)

    Measured: 2 months

  18. Visual analogue pain scale

    Overall pain during last 7 days in a scale from 0 to 100 (worst)

    Measured: 6 months

  19. Visual analogue pain scale

    Overall pain during last 7 days in a scale from 0 to 100 (worst)

    Measured: 12 months

  20. Patient-acceptable symptom state

    Patient satisfaction will be measured using the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS).The questionnaires will include the following questions: Would you be willing to take the same treatment again if the treatment result was as it is now? (Yes/No) Considering all the different ways your injury is affecting you, if you would remain in this state, do you feel that your current state is satisfactory (Yes/No)?

    Measured: 2 months

  21. Patient-acceptable symptom state

    Patient satisfaction will be measured using the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS).The questionnaires will include the following questions: Would you be willing to take the same treatment again if the treatment result was as it is now? (Yes/No) Considering all the different ways your injury is affecting you, if you would remain in this state, do you feel that your current state is satisfactory (Yes/No)?

    Measured: 6 months

  22. Patient-acceptable symptom state

    Patient satisfaction will be measured using the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS).The questionnaires will include the following questions: Would you be willing to take the same treatment again if the treatment result was as it is now? (Yes/No) Considering all the different ways your injury is affecting you, if you would remain in this state, do you feel that your current state is satisfactory (Yes/No)?

    Measured: 12 months

  23. Work capacity

    The participants will be asked to rate their working capacity on a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with "0" being not able to work at all and "10" being the ability to work at its best.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  24. Work capacity

    The participants will be asked to rate their working capacity on a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with "0" being not able to work at all and "10" being the ability to work at its best.

    Measured: 2 months

  25. Work capacity

    The participants will be asked to rate their working capacity on a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with "0" being not able to work at all and "10" being the ability to work at its best.

    Measured: 6 months

  26. Work capacity

    The participants will be asked to rate their working capacity on a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with "0" being not able to work at all and "10" being the ability to work at its best.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion10 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion10 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05150925
Sponsor's protocol ID
R21111
Acronym
LIMPER-DRF
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2021
Last updated
11 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data is available on reasonable request.

Publications

  • Karna L, Launonen AP, Karjalainen T, Luokkala T, Ponkilainen V, Halonen L, Helminen M, Mattila VM, Reito A. LIMPER trials: immediate mobilisation versus 2-week cast immobilisation after distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate - a study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 11;12(11):e064440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064440.

    PubMed 36368761

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cast treatment, Immediate mobilization and Volar plating in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Tampere University Hospital at 5 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Finland, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05150925, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in