AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute StrokeEMIASNCT05153642

Emergent Microsurgical Intervention in Acute Stroke Patients After Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure Trial

A study testing Microsurgical intervention in people with Acute Stroke and Surgical Procedure, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 2 sites in Czechia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With all of the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) portends a catastrophic outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Stroke, Surgical Procedure
What is being tested?
Microsurgical intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesCzechia
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age of ≥ 18 years;
  • indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
  • modified Rankin score (mRS) of ≤ 2 before stroke onset;
  • baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of ≥ 6;
  • MCA occlusion in M1 or M2 segment with or without intracranial ICA occlusion;
  • estimated onset-to-skin cut time of ≤6 h or core/penumbra mismatch in cases with wake-up stroke or stroke with unknown onset;
  • MT failure with TICI score of 0-1 declared by an interventional neuroradiologist and expectation to achieve recanalization within 24 h from stroke onset.

Who cannot join

  • indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
  • thrombocyte count of ≤ 100,000/µL;
  • contraindication for general anesthesia

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Martin Roubec, MD, PhD contact

martin.roubec@fno.cz

David Školoudík, Prof MD PhD contact

skoloudik@hotmail.com

Czechia2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • České Budějovice Hospital

    České Budějovice, 37001

    Jiří Fiedler, MD, PhD

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Ostrava

    Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic, 708 52

    Martin Roubec, MD, Ph.D., martin.roubec@fno.cz

    David Školoudík, Prof MD PhD, skoloudik@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

With all of the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) portends a catastrophic outcome. Study aims to test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in acute ischemic stroke patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy.

Read the detailed description

Randomization: Patients after mechanical thrombectomy failure at the first Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 1) will be randomly allocated to the microsurgery group (MSIG) or standard of care Control group 1 (CG1) with 1 : 1 randomization ratio. All consecutive patients with standard stroke care and recanalization failure after mechanical thrombectomy without any subsequent surgical interventions at the second Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 2) will be included in the Control group 2 (CG2) to support reproducibility and eliminate bias in patient selection for MSI - case-control.

Demographics (age, sex) and medical history (arterial hypertension; diabetes mellitus; hyperlipidemia; body mass index; previous stroke or transient ischemic attack; ischemic heart disease; atrial fibrillation; smoking; alcohol abuse; previous use of antithrombotics, anticoagulants, and statins; glucose and cholesterol level at admission; and blood pressure at admission) data will be collected in all patients at admission.

The neurological status will be assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission and 24 h and seven days after stroke onset.

Collected data for clinical outcomes include modified Rankin score (mRS) 24 h and 90 days after stroke onset, 7- and 90-day mortality, and incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH).

SICH is defined as type 2 parenchymal hematoma and clinical worsening with an NIHSS score of ≥ 4.

Favorable clinical outcome is defined as an mRS score of 0-2 on day 90 after stroke onset.

IVT and MT treatment Both Comprehensive Stroke centers have at least 15 years of experience in acute stroke treatment with a high number of IVT (more than 100 per year) and MT (more than 80 per year) cases complying with local or European stroke organization certification regulations. The IVT and MT treatment protocols at both centers followed the current recommendations by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, European Stroke Organization, and/or national guidelines throughout the study duration. All patients will be examined using computed tomography and computed tomography angiography at admission. Patients with wake-up stroke or unknown stroke onset will be also examined using CT perfusion mismatch scans or magnetic resonance diffusion weighted images/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch to evaluate ischemic core and penumbra for treatment indication according to the above-mentioned guidelines.

The following stroke data and logistical information will be collected in all patients: occlusion location, occlusion side, stroke etiology, early ischemic changes evaluated using ASPECTS, onset-to-admission time, onset-to-needle time for IVT, onset-to-groin time for MT, and final TICI score.

MT failure declaration The MT procedure will be always indicated by a stroke physician and performed by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist with expertise in cerebral vessel evaluation and treatment techniques. MT recanalization success will be assessed using the TICI scale. Cases with TICI scores of 0 and 1 are evaluated as recanalization failure. Recanalization failure will be declared after at least three unsuccessful attempts to retrieve the thrombi using a retrieval or aspiration tool, or after failure to reach the site of occlusion using the guiding wire. The declaration of onset-to-failure time will be assessed in all cases.

Microsurgical intervention A protocol for emergent microsurgical treatment as a rescue therapy for cases with mechanical thrombectomy failure as a third-tier option was established and approved by the local ethical committee. The revascularization is always indicated by a stroke physician after MT failure declaration by an interventional neuroradiologist.

The request for MSI will reported to the surgeon immediately after encountering the first difficulties in reaching the occlusion site or a failure to resolve vessel obturation

Microsurgery technique and its prerequisites

All of the microsurgical interventions will be performed by vascular neurosurgeon with experience of more than 200 EC-IC bypasses. Surgical technique will be chosen according to the classification of MT failure with the following scenarios:

The EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in A) patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and B) subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. The M2 with longitudinal arteriotomy can be used as the recipient artery for a superior temporal artery to M2 artery anastomosis. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli.

  1. In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass will be performed.

General anesthesia will be administered by a dedicated anesthetist. Any hypotension episodes will be carefully avoided after the introduction of general anesthesia.

Fibrinogen levels will be checked at least 1 h after IVT administration to predict early fibrinogen degradation coagulopathy and to decrease procedural and post procedural risk of bleeding. Fibrinogen will be supplemented with Haemocomplettan P® (CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany) in cases with levels of < 1 g/L. The fibrinogen level will be checked again upon skin closure and then the following day 24 h after IVT. In patients with no antiplatelet drug history prior to stroke, 500 mg of an intravenous acetylsalicylic acid will be administered during the revascularization procedure.

Being tested
Microsurgical intervention
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microsurgical interventionProcedure or surgery

    The EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will be performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli. In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass was performed.

Study groups in NCT05153642
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microsurgical interventionExperimentalMicrosurgical intervention will be used for treatment of acute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment
Receives: Procedure: Microsurgical intervention
Standard treatmentNo interventionAcute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment - intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical status at 3 month measured using modified Rankin score

    modified Rankin score range: 0-6; favourable clinical outcome: modified Rankin score 0-2; percentage of patients with favourable clinical outcome

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Clinical status at 24 hours measured using modified Rankin score

    modified Rankin score range: 0-6; favourable clinical outcome: modified Rankin score 0-2; percentage of patients with favourable clinical outcome

    Measured: 24 hours after randomization

  2. Percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage

    Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage detected on control CT 24 hours after randomization

    Measured: 24 hours after randomization

  3. Mortality

    Death within 3 month after randomization

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
case-control
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05153642
Sponsor's protocol ID
109/17
Acronym
EMIAS
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
28 Nov 2021
Last updated
3 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Free online access to the individual participant data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microsurgical intervention in people with Acute Stroke and Surgical Procedure, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 2 sites in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Martin Roubec, MD, PhD (martin.roubec@fno.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical status at 3 month measured using modified Rankin score (time frame: 90 days after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in