Acute StrokeEMIASNCT05153642
Emergent Microsurgical Intervention in Acute Stroke Patients After Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure Trial
A study testing Microsurgical intervention in people with Acute Stroke and Surgical Procedure, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 2 sites in Czechia.
Trial summary
With all of the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) portends a catastrophic outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Stroke, Surgical Procedure
- What is being tested?
- Microsurgical intervention
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2016to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age of ≥ 18 years;
- indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
- modified Rankin score (mRS) of ≤ 2 before stroke onset;
- baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of ≥ 6;
- MCA occlusion in M1 or M2 segment with or without intracranial ICA occlusion;
- estimated onset-to-skin cut time of ≤6 h or core/penumbra mismatch in cases with wake-up stroke or stroke with unknown onset;
- MT failure with TICI score of 0-1 declared by an interventional neuroradiologist and expectation to achieve recanalization within 24 h from stroke onset.
Who cannot join
- indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
- thrombocyte count of ≤ 100,000/µL;
- contraindication for general anesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Martin Roubec, MD, PhD contact
David Školoudík, Prof MD PhD contact
Czechia2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
České Budějovice Hospital
České Budějovice, 37001
Jiří Fiedler, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic, 708 52
Martin Roubec, MD, Ph.D., martin.roubec@fno.cz
David Školoudík, Prof MD PhD, skoloudik@hotmail.com
About this study
With all of the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) portends a catastrophic outcome. Study aims to test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in acute ischemic stroke patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy.
Read the detailed description
Randomization: Patients after mechanical thrombectomy failure at the first Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 1) will be randomly allocated to the microsurgery group (MSIG) or standard of care Control group 1 (CG1) with 1 : 1 randomization ratio. All consecutive patients with standard stroke care and recanalization failure after mechanical thrombectomy without any subsequent surgical interventions at the second Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 2) will be included in the Control group 2 (CG2) to support reproducibility and eliminate bias in patient selection for MSI - case-control.
Demographics (age, sex) and medical history (arterial hypertension; diabetes mellitus; hyperlipidemia; body mass index; previous stroke or transient ischemic attack; ischemic heart disease; atrial fibrillation; smoking; alcohol abuse; previous use of antithrombotics, anticoagulants, and statins; glucose and cholesterol level at admission; and blood pressure at admission) data will be collected in all patients at admission.
The neurological status will be assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission and 24 h and seven days after stroke onset.
Collected data for clinical outcomes include modified Rankin score (mRS) 24 h and 90 days after stroke onset, 7- and 90-day mortality, and incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH).
SICH is defined as type 2 parenchymal hematoma and clinical worsening with an NIHSS score of ≥ 4.
Favorable clinical outcome is defined as an mRS score of 0-2 on day 90 after stroke onset.
IVT and MT treatment Both Comprehensive Stroke centers have at least 15 years of experience in acute stroke treatment with a high number of IVT (more than 100 per year) and MT (more than 80 per year) cases complying with local or European stroke organization certification regulations. The IVT and MT treatment protocols at both centers followed the current recommendations by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, European Stroke Organization, and/or national guidelines throughout the study duration. All patients will be examined using computed tomography and computed tomography angiography at admission. Patients with wake-up stroke or unknown stroke onset will be also examined using CT perfusion mismatch scans or magnetic resonance diffusion weighted images/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch to evaluate ischemic core and penumbra for treatment indication according to the above-mentioned guidelines.
The following stroke data and logistical information will be collected in all patients: occlusion location, occlusion side, stroke etiology, early ischemic changes evaluated using ASPECTS, onset-to-admission time, onset-to-needle time for IVT, onset-to-groin time for MT, and final TICI score.
MT failure declaration The MT procedure will be always indicated by a stroke physician and performed by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist with expertise in cerebral vessel evaluation and treatment techniques. MT recanalization success will be assessed using the TICI scale. Cases with TICI scores of 0 and 1 are evaluated as recanalization failure. Recanalization failure will be declared after at least three unsuccessful attempts to retrieve the thrombi using a retrieval or aspiration tool, or after failure to reach the site of occlusion using the guiding wire. The declaration of onset-to-failure time will be assessed in all cases.
Microsurgical intervention A protocol for emergent microsurgical treatment as a rescue therapy for cases with mechanical thrombectomy failure as a third-tier option was established and approved by the local ethical committee. The revascularization is always indicated by a stroke physician after MT failure declaration by an interventional neuroradiologist.
The request for MSI will reported to the surgeon immediately after encountering the first difficulties in reaching the occlusion site or a failure to resolve vessel obturation
Microsurgery technique and its prerequisites
All of the microsurgical interventions will be performed by vascular neurosurgeon with experience of more than 200 EC-IC bypasses. Surgical technique will be chosen according to the classification of MT failure with the following scenarios:
The EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in A) patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and B) subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. The M2 with longitudinal arteriotomy can be used as the recipient artery for a superior temporal artery to M2 artery anastomosis. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli.
- In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass will be performed.
General anesthesia will be administered by a dedicated anesthetist. Any hypotension episodes will be carefully avoided after the introduction of general anesthesia.
Fibrinogen levels will be checked at least 1 h after IVT administration to predict early fibrinogen degradation coagulopathy and to decrease procedural and post procedural risk of bleeding. Fibrinogen will be supplemented with Haemocomplettan P® (CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany) in cases with levels of < 1 g/L. The fibrinogen level will be checked again upon skin closure and then the following day 24 h after IVT. In patients with no antiplatelet drug history prior to stroke, 500 mg of an intravenous acetylsalicylic acid will be administered during the revascularization procedure.
- Conditions
- Acute Stroke, Surgical Procedure
- Being tested
- Microsurgical intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Microsurgical interventionProcedure or surgery
The EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will be performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli. In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass was performed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Microsurgical intervention | Experimental | Microsurgical intervention will be used for treatment of acute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment Receives: Procedure: Microsurgical intervention |
| Standard treatment | No intervention | Acute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment - intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical status at 3 month measured using modified Rankin score
modified Rankin score range: 0-6; favourable clinical outcome: modified Rankin score 0-2; percentage of patients with favourable clinical outcome
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Secondary outcomes (3)
Clinical status at 24 hours measured using modified Rankin score
modified Rankin score range: 0-6; favourable clinical outcome: modified Rankin score 0-2; percentage of patients with favourable clinical outcome
Measured: 24 hours after randomization
Percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage detected on control CT 24 hours after randomization
Measured: 24 hours after randomization
Mortality
Death within 3 month after randomization
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2016
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- case-control
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Ostrava
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- České Budějovice Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jiří Fiedler, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, České Budějovice Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05153642
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 109/17
- Acronym
- EMIAS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Free online access to the individual participant data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Emergent Microsurgical Intervention in Acute Stroke Patients After Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05153642
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMIAS / 109/17
- Conditions
- Acute Stroke, Surgical Procedure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital OstravaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- České Budějovice Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With all of the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) portends a catastrophic outcome. Study aims to test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in acute ischemic stroke patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy.
Detailed description
Randomization: Patients after mechanical thrombectomy failure at the first Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 1) will be randomly allocated to the microsurgery group (MSIG) or standard of care Control group 1 (CG1) with 1 : 1 randomization ratio. All consecutive patients with standard stroke care and recanalization failure after mechanical thrombectomy without any subsequent surgical interventions at the second Comprehensive Stroke center (Center 2) will be included in the Control group 2 (CG2) to support reproducibility and eliminate bias in patient selection for MSI - case-control.
Demographics (age, sex) and medical history (arterial hypertension; diabetes mellitus; hyperlipidemia; body mass index; previous stroke or transient ischemic attack; ischemic heart disease; atrial fibrillation; smoking; alcohol abuse; previous use of antithrombotics, anticoagulants, and statins; glucose and cholesterol level at admission; and blood pressure at admission) data will be collected in all patients at admission.
The neurological status will be assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission and 24 h and seven days after stroke onset.
Collected data for clinical outcomes include modified Rankin score (mRS) 24 h and 90 days after stroke onset, 7- and 90-day mortality, and incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH).
SICH is defined as type 2 parenchymal hematoma and clinical worsening with an NIHSS score of ≥ 4.
Favorable clinical outcome is defined as an mRS score of 0-2 on day 90 after stroke onset.
IVT and MT treatment Both Comprehensive Stroke centers have at least 15 years of experience in acute stroke treatment with a high number of IVT (more than 100 per year) and MT (more than 80 per year) cases complying with local or European stroke organization certification regulations. The IVT and MT treatment protocols at both centers followed the current recommendations by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, European Stroke Organization, and/or national guidelines throughout the study duration. All patients will be examined using computed tomography and computed tomography angiography at admission. Patients with wake-up stroke or unknown stroke onset will be also examined using CT perfusion mismatch scans or magnetic resonance diffusion weighted images/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch to evaluate ischemic core and penumbra for treatment indication according to the above-mentioned guidelines.
The following stroke data and logistical information will be collected in all patients: occlusion location, occlusion side, stroke etiology, early ischemic changes evaluated using ASPECTS, onset-to-admission time, onset-to-needle time for IVT, onset-to-groin time for MT, and final TICI score.
MT failure declaration The MT procedure will be always indicated by a stroke physician and performed by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist with expertise in cerebral vessel evaluation and treatment techniques. MT recanalization success will be assessed using the TICI scale. Cases with TICI scores of 0 and 1 are evaluated as recanalization failure. Recanalization failure will be declared after at least three unsuccessful attempts to retrieve the thrombi using a retrieval or aspiration tool, or after failure to reach the site of occlusion using the guiding wire. The declaration of onset-to-failure time will be assessed in all cases.
Microsurgical intervention A protocol for emergent microsurgical treatment as a rescue therapy for cases with mechanical thrombectomy failure as a third-tier option was established and approved by the local ethical committee. The revascularization is always indicated by a stroke physician after MT failure declaration by an interventional neuroradiologist.
The request for MSI will reported to the surgeon immediately after encountering the first difficulties in reaching the occlusion site or a failure to resolve vessel obturation
Microsurgery technique and its prerequisites
All of the microsurgical interventions will be performed by vascular neurosurgeon with experience of more than 200 EC-IC bypasses. Surgical technique will be chosen according to the classification of MT failure with the following scenarios:
The EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in A) patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and B) subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. The M2 with longitudinal arteriotomy can be used as the recipient artery for a superior temporal artery to M2 artery anastomosis. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli.
- In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass will be performed.
General anesthesia will be administered by a dedicated anesthetist. Any hypotension episodes will be carefully avoided after the introduction of general anesthesia.
Fibrinogen levels will be checked at least 1 h after IVT administration to predict early fibrinogen degradation coagulopathy and to decrease procedural and post procedural risk of bleeding. Fibrinogen will be supplemented with Haemocomplettan P® (CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany) in cases with levels of < 1 g/L. The fibrinogen level will be checked again upon skin closure and then the following day 24 h after IVT. In patients with no antiplatelet drug history prior to stroke, 500 mg of an intravenous acetylsalicylic acid will be administered during the revascularization procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- case-control
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Microsurgical intervention | Experimental | Procedure: Microsurgical interventionMicrosurgical intervention will be used for treatment of acute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment |
| Standard treatment | No intervention | –Acute symptomatic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (in M1 or M2 segment) with or without intracranial ICA occlusion in patients who failed to reach recanalization using standard treatment - intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- age of ≥ 18 years;
- indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
- modified Rankin score (mRS) of ≤ 2 before stroke onset;
- baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of ≥ 6;
- MCA occlusion in M1 or M2 segment with or without intracranial ICA occlusion;
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- indication for MT according to valid guidelines;
- thrombocyte count of ≤ 100,000/µL;
- contraindication for general anesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microsurgical interventionThe EC-IC bypass distal to the occlusion will be prepared in patients with a failure to pass the lesion using microwire and subjects with a failure to reach the occlusion. Middle cerebral artery exploration and eventual embolectomy will be performed before the bypass. A transverse arteriotomy will be used in the M1 segment occlusion, while a longitudinal arteriotomy with optional subsequent lesion retrieval using a Fogarty catheter will be used in the upper or lower M2 trunk occlusions. Minimally invasive and rapid surgical embolectomy technique will be used in cases with atrial fibrillation as the suspected source of emboli. In cases with successful passage using a microwire or catheter, but with failure of thrombus retrieval, a calcified cerebral embolus can be an example of failure. In cases with suspected occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis, the superior temporal artery will be always dissected and EC-IC bypass was performed. | Procedure or surgery | Microsurgical intervention |
Primary outcome
Clinical status at 3 month measured using modified Rankin score
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
modified Rankin score range: 0-6; favourable clinical outcome: modified Rankin score 0-2; percentage of patients with favourable clinical outcome
3 secondary outcomes
Clinical status at 24 hours measured using modified Rankin score
Time frame: 24 hours after randomization
Percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
Time frame: 24 hours after randomization
Mortality
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Free online access to the individual participant data
Related trials for Acute Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin Roubec, MD, PhD contact
David Školoudík, Prof MD PhD contact
Jiří Fiedler, MD, PhD principal investigator
České Budějovice Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Microsurgical intervention in people with Acute Stroke and Surgical Procedure, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 2 sites in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Martin Roubec, MD, PhD (martin.roubec@fno.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical status at 3 month measured using modified Rankin score (time frame: 90 days after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2022.