RehabilitationSNGNCT05154695
Precision Medicine for Sng/Pain Control
A study testing LASER, A.therapeutic ultrasound group and B.prolotherapy group in people with Rehabilitation and Pain, Shoulder, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Patients have different response to different treatment modalities, and sore/pain medicine is no exception. In our experience, low-level laser (LLL), ultrasound, and prolotherapy can reduce sore /pain through different genetic pathway. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation, Pain, Shoulder, Pain, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- LASER, A.therapeutic ultrasound group and B.prolotherapy group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2021to 30 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- (1) Age between 20-100 years old.
- (2) Diagnosed as myofascial pain syndrome patients and willing to receive treatment (including LLLT, therapeutic ultrasound, and local dextrose injection therapy).
Who cannot join
- Those having active infection, malignancy, and hematological diseases were excluded. The patients had received local injection at upper trapezius within 3 months are also excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch
Taipei, Taiwan, 802
About this study
Patients have different response to different treatment modalities, and sore/pain medicine is no exception. In our experience, low-level laser (LLL), ultrasound, and prolotherapy can reduce sore /pain through different genetic pathway. Whether the therapeutic effect is controlled by the genetic variants of those sore /pain related genes or not, is still in debate. The aims of this study are (1) To find genetic SNPs which can determine the response of sore /pain treatment modalities. (2) To find possible metabolomics and proteomic markers of sore /pain. (3) To determine the algorithm of precision medicine for sore /pain control via the genetic markers. Investigators will recruit 80 myofascial pain patients from Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch in 2021 and 2022. The participants will receive LLL, ultrasound, and prolotherapy, and the therapeutic effect will be recorded. The blood and urine samples from the first, the second, and the third visits will be analyzed by next generation sequencing, and mass spectrometry to find the possible biomarker in 2023 and 2024. Investigators expect to develop the individualized treatment plan by means of these biomarkers. Hopefully, the results will be widely applied in the field of sore /pain medicine.
Read the detailed description
Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage" by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). The musculoskeletal disorders are not only the most common cause of chronic sore/pain, but they also result in significant disability in about 50% of sufferers in the US. Furthermore, since these disorders are the most common cause of severe, long-term pain and disability in the elderly over 65 years. In the practice of pain medicine, the doctors predominantly use multi-modal treatment, including medications, physical agents, and injection, to relieve patients' discomfort.
In the past years, our team had some achievements to justify the search of genetic variants for development of a new sore/pain treatment algorithm.
(1) Analgesia of LLLT is through TRPV1. (2) Analgesia by therapeutic ultrasound is through ASIC3. (3) Dextrose injection decreased chronic muscle pain through ASIC1a. (4) Biomarker for sore/pain in fibromyalgia.
According to the clinical outcome, some patients responded to physical agents well, and some preferred injections. The genetic variants of the above-mentioned genes might be the determining factors of differential therapeutic effects. However, it took about 4-8 weeks for a patient to switch from one treatment option to another one. If investigators can determine the optimal treatment modality by genetic biomarkers, the treatment course and total expanse will decrease a lot.
Investigators hypothesize that the genetic variants of the proposed genes (TRPV1, ASIC1a, ASIC3, Tac1, COMT, TCL1A, POMC, RGS4, ASIC2, ASIC4, TRPA1, NK1R, G2A, GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, TASK1, TASK2, TASK3, TREK1, P2X2, P2X3, P2X5, TRPV4, KCNK1, NTSR1, NTSR2) could be the prognostic biomarkers of sore /pain treatments. Our specific Aims are:
- To set up next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach to find genetic variants which can determine the response of sore/pain treatment modalities.
- To find possible metabolomics and proteomic markers of sore/pain.
- To determine the algorithm of precision medicine for sore/pain control via the genetic markers.
Six. study design I Patient eligibility Investigators will recruit patients from National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age between 20-100 years old. (2) Diagnosed as myofascial pain syndrome patients and willing to receive treatment (including LLLT, therapeutic ultrasound, and local dextrose injection therapy). The diagnosis of MPS was confirmed by the Principal Investigator using the criteria of taut band, trigger point, and radiating pain.
Exclusion criteria: Those having active infection, malignancy, and hematological diseases were excluded. The patients had received local injection at upper trapezius within 3 months are also excluded.
II Study design and flow
- After obtaining the informed consent, the basic demographic data, including age, gender, job, education level, and past medical history of eligible patients are collected.
- The eligible patients first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. The pre- and post-treatment VAS-pain and VAS-sng are collected for LLLT phenotype determination, respectively.
- Then, they are randomly assigned into two groups (40 subjects in each group): A. therapeutic ultrasound group; B. prolotherapy group. Group A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle. Group B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution. To ensure that the needle was not in a blood vessel, the needle was aspirated before injection. The same physician (the principal investigator) injects all patients to avoid inter-physician variability. No other medication or physical modality was given to avoid efficacy interference in both groups.
- The recruited patients receive evaluation before and after injection, and 2-week after injection. The primary outcome is VAS-pain and VAS-sore (visual analogue scale) with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain. The secondary outcomes are pain threshold, muscle tone, and SF-36-a questionnaire consists of 36 items and 8 domains addressing the patient's perception of their QoL. Venous blood and urine samples were collected at first visit and 2-week visit, respectively. The blood samples were labeled with an anonymized ID number, centrifuged, and stored at -80 ºC in a locked freezer until the time of future processing. The buffy coat is separated after centrifugation, and stored as well. The urine samples were aliquoted and stored at -80 ºC in a locked freezer for future analysis.
- Rescue therapy (cross-over treatment): If the participant does not satisfy with their first round treatment and the improvement of VAS is less than 1.0, then they are eligible to receive the rescue therapy-the treatment in the other group. And they will return to clinic for another 2 weeks. The outcome variables will be collected in the 3rd visit as well. (1) DNA extraction and NGS-based sequencing and genotyping Genomic DNA will be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the participants using the Gentra Puregene kit following the protocol from the manufacturer, and subjected to agarose gel and O.D. ratio tests to confirm its purity and concentration. DNA will be fragmented using Covaris, aiming at the peak length of 800 bp. Illumina libraries will be generated from gDNA using TruSeq Library Preparation Kit.
DNA capture probes will be custom-designed to target TRPV1, ASIC1a, ASIC3, Tac1, COMT, TCL1A, POMC, RGS4, ASIC2, ASIC4, TRPA1, NK1R, G2A, GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, TASK1, TASK2, TASK3, TREK1, P2X2, P2X3, P2X5, TRPV4, KCNK1, NTSR1, NTSR2 and will be synthesized using the Roche KAPA HyperChoice protocol. All the coding regions and non-coding regions (promoters, introns, 5' and 3' untranslated regions) of these 8 genes will be included.
NGS target region enrichment will be applied to enrich/capture the target region (~148 Kb). The enriched libraries will then be sequenced using Illumina MiSeq to generate paired-end reads of 300 bp. The expected depth of the targeted regions will be 200x on average.
(2) Metabolomic and proteomic analysis
- Briefly, The LC-MS analyses of urine and serum involved using an Agilent 1290 UPLC system (ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column, 2.1×100 mm; 1.8 µm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with the 6540-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight (QTOF) mass system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). MS raw files were converted to the mzXML format using Trapper (ISB) and processed by TIPick, an in-house package. After TIPick processing, the scaling-based normalization was performed according to the total ion abundances from each UHPLC-MS data set.
- The LC-MS lipidomic profiling was performed and described in detail. Concisely, lipidomic profiling was run on a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) for QTOF, as well as mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% aqueous formic acid and 10 mM ammonium acetate and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid and 10 mM ammonium acetate in ACN/isopropyl alcohol (50/50). The autosampler and column oven were maintained at 4°C and 55°C, respectively. The injection volume was 5 μl. MS acquisition was executed in the precursor ion scan (PIS) mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.
- All UPLC-MS raw data were converted to mzXML format by using Trapper (ISB) and normalized by TIPick, an in-house package, as well as peak enhancement and peak chosen for the targeted metabolites. An in-house database of sphingomyelins (SM), lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC), ceramides (Cer), phosphatidylcholines (PCs), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and cerebroside (CB) in the Metabolomics Core Laboratory, Center of Genomic Medicine, National Taiwan University, was used for screening.
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Pain, Shoulder, Pain, Chronic
- Being tested
- LASER, A.therapeutic ultrasound group, B.prolotherapy group
- Keywords
- sng/pain, Low-level Laser Therapy, ultrasound, prolotherapy, next generation sequencing
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LASERDevice
The eligible participants first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.
A.therapeutic ultrasound groupDevice
Also called Group A
Group A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle.
B.prolotherapy groupDrug
Also called Group B
Group B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A.therapeutic ultrasound group | Active comparator | Group A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle. Receives: Device: LASER; Device: A.therapeutic ultrasound group; Drug: B.prolotherapy group |
| B.prolotherapy group | Active comparator | Group B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution. Receives: Device: LASER; Device: A.therapeutic ultrasound group; Drug: B.prolotherapy group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - first
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
Measured: Baseline Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - second
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
Measured: Change from Baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 2 weeks.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - third
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
Measured: Change from Baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 4 weeks (if crossover).
Secondary outcomes (4)
SF-36
Quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey)
Measured: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Pain thresholds
Pain thresholds range from 0 to 800. Low thresholds means higher pain sensitivity (Pain tolerance) or muscle inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Myoton-Muscle tone
Muscle tone means state of muscle tension, which unit is Natural oscillation frequency [Hz]. This higher or lower value meaning is uncertainty. The range was from 10 to 30 Hz.
Measured: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Myoton- Dynamic stiffness
Muscle tone means muscle biomechanical properties, which unit is N/m. This higher or lower value meaning is uncertainty. The range was from 100 to 600 Hz.
Measured: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2021
- Study start28 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Oct 2023
- Study completion30 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The eligible participants first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. They are randomly assigned into two groups (40 subjects in each group): A. therapeutic ultrasound group; B. prolotherapy group. The same physician (the principal investigator) injects all participants to avoid inter-physician variability. No other medication or physical modality was given to avoid efficacy interference in both groups. Rescue therapy (cross-over treatment): If the participant does not satisfy with their first round treatment and the improvement of VAS is less than 1.0, then they are eligible to receive the rescue therapy-the treatment in the other group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Der-Sheng Han, Physician, Study director, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05154695
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202011007RIND
- Acronym
- SNG
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The data doesn't shared with other researchers.
Publications
Avrampou K, Pryce KD, Ramakrishnan A, Sakloth F, Gaspari S, Serafini RA, Mitsi V, Polizu C, Swartz C, Ligas B, Richards A, Shen L, Carr FB, Zachariou V. RGS4 Maintains Chronic Pain Symptoms in Rodent Models. J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8291-8304. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3154-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
PubMed 31308097Chang KV, Wu WT, Han DS, Ozcakar L. Static and Dynamic Shoulder Imaging to Predict Initial Effectiveness and Recurrence After Ultrasound-Guided Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):1984-1994. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
PubMed 28245972Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
PubMed 25635347Genovese TJ, Mao JJ. Genetic Predictors of Response to Acupuncture for Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Pain Med. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):191-194. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny067.
PubMed 29912452Hsu WH, Lee CH, Chao YM, Kuo CH, Ku WC, Chen CC, Lin YL. ASIC3-dependent metabolomics profiling of serum and urine in a mouse model of fibromyalgia. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 20;9(1):12123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48315-w.
PubMed 31431652Hsu WH, Wang SJ, Chao YM, Chen CJ, Wang YF, Fuh JL, Chen SP, Lin YL. Urine metabolomics signatures in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Cephalalgia. 2020 Jun;40(7):735-747. doi: 10.1177/0333102419897621. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
PubMed 31910660Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):259-63. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.259.
PubMed 12646540Liao HW, Kuo CH, Chao HC, Chen GY. Post-column infused internal standard assisted lipidomics profiling strategy and its application on phosphatidylcholine research. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jan 30;178:112956. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112956. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
PubMed 31704131Lin YH, Wu CC, Lin YH, Lu YC, Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen PL, Hsu CJ. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Facilitates Genetic Diagnosis and Provides Novel Pathogenetic Insights into Deafness with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct. J Mol Diagn. 2019 Jan;21(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
PubMed 30268946Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jun 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 18583048Cho CH, Lho YM, Ha E, Hwang I, Song KS, Min BW, Bae KC, Kim DH. Up-regulation of acid-sensing ion channels in the capsule of the joint in frozen shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):824-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35254.
PubMed 26033064Han DS, Lee CH, Shieh YD, Chen CC. Involvement of Substance P in the Analgesic Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy in a Mouse Model of Chronic Widespread Muscle Pain. Pain Med. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1963-1970. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz056.
PubMed 30908578Hsiung YC, Lin PC, Chen CS, Tung YC, Yang WS, Chen PL, Su TC. Identification of a novel LDLR disease-causing variant using capture-based next-generation sequencing screening of familial hypercholesterolemia patients in Taiwan. Atherosclerosis. 2018 Oct;277:440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.08.022.
PubMed 30270083Lin JH, Hung CH, Han DS, Chen ST, Lee CH, Sun WZ, Chen CC. Sensing acidosis: nociception or sngception? J Biomed Sci. 2018 Nov 29;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0486-5.
PubMed 30486810Niculescu AB, Le-Niculescu H, Levey DF, Roseberry K, Soe KC, Rogers J, Khan F, Jones T, Judd S, McCormick MA, Wessel AR, Williams A, Kurian SM, White FA. Towards precision medicine for pain: diagnostic biomarkers and repurposed drugs. Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;24(4):501-522. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0345-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
PubMed 30755720
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Precision Medicine for Sng/Pain Control
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05154695
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SNG / 202011007RIND
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Pain, Shoulder, Pain, Chronic
- Keywords
- sng/pain, Low-level Laser Therapy, ultrasound, prolotherapy, next generation sequencing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients have different response to different treatment modalities, and sore/pain medicine is no exception. In our experience, low-level laser (LLL), ultrasound, and prolotherapy can reduce sore /pain through different genetic pathway. Whether the therapeutic effect is controlled by the genetic variants of those sore /pain related genes or not, is still in debate. The aims of this study are (1) To find genetic SNPs which can determine the response of sore /pain treatment modalities. (2) To find possible metabolomics and proteomic markers of sore /pain. (3) To determine the algorithm of precision medicine for sore /pain control via the genetic markers. Investigators will recruit 80 myofascial pain patients from Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch in 2021 and 2022. The participants will receive LLL, ultrasound, and prolotherapy, and the therapeutic effect will be recorded. The blood and urine samples from the first, the second, and the third visits will be analyzed by next generation sequencing, and mass spectrometry to find the possible biomarker in 2023 and 2024. Investigators expect to develop the individualized treatment plan by means of these biomarkers. Hopefully, the results will be widely applied in the field of sore /pain medicine.
Detailed description
Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage" by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). The musculoskeletal disorders are not only the most common cause of chronic sore/pain, but they also result in significant disability in about 50% of sufferers in the US. Furthermore, since these disorders are the most common cause of severe, long-term pain and disability in the elderly over 65 years. In the practice of pain medicine, the doctors predominantly use multi-modal treatment, including medications, physical agents, and injection, to relieve patients' discomfort.
In the past years, our team had some achievements to justify the search of genetic variants for development of a new sore/pain treatment algorithm.
(1) Analgesia of LLLT is through TRPV1. (2) Analgesia by therapeutic ultrasound is through ASIC3. (3) Dextrose injection decreased chronic muscle pain through ASIC1a. (4) Biomarker for sore/pain in fibromyalgia.
According to the clinical outcome, some patients responded to physical agents well, and some preferred injections. The genetic variants of the above-mentioned genes might be the determining factors of differential therapeutic effects. However, it took about 4-8 weeks for a patient to switch from one treatment option to another one. If investigators can determine the optimal treatment modality by genetic biomarkers, the treatment course and total expanse will decrease a lot.
Investigators hypothesize that the genetic variants of the proposed genes (TRPV1, ASIC1a, ASIC3, Tac1, COMT, TCL1A, POMC, RGS4, ASIC2, ASIC4, TRPA1, NK1R, G2A, GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, TASK1, TASK2, TASK3, TREK1, P2X2, P2X3, P2X5, TRPV4, KCNK1, NTSR1, NTSR2) could be the prognostic biomarkers of sore /pain treatments. Our specific Aims are:
- To set up next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach to find genetic variants which can determine the response of sore/pain treatment modalities.
- To find possible metabolomics and proteomic markers of sore/pain.
- To determine the algorithm of precision medicine for sore/pain control via the genetic markers.
Six. study design I Patient eligibility Investigators will recruit patients from National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age between 20-100 years old. (2) Diagnosed as myofascial pain syndrome patients and willing to receive treatment (including LLLT, therapeutic ultrasound, and local dextrose injection therapy). The diagnosis of MPS was confirmed by the Principal Investigator using the criteria of taut band, trigger point, and radiating pain.
Exclusion criteria: Those having active infection, malignancy, and hematological diseases were excluded. The patients had received local injection at upper trapezius within 3 months are also excluded.
II Study design and flow
- After obtaining the informed consent, the basic demographic data, including age, gender, job, education level, and past medical history of eligible patients are collected.
- The eligible patients first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. The pre- and post-treatment VAS-pain and VAS-sng are collected for LLLT phenotype determination, respectively.
- Then, they are randomly assigned into two groups (40 subjects in each group): A. therapeutic ultrasound group; B. prolotherapy group. Group A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle. Group B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution. To ensure that the needle was not in a blood vessel, the needle was aspirated before injection. The same physician (the principal investigator) injects all patients to avoid inter-physician variability. No other medication or physical modality was given to avoid efficacy interference in both groups.
- The recruited patients receive evaluation before and after injection, and 2-week after injection. The primary outcome is VAS-pain and VAS-sore (visual analogue scale) with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain. The secondary outcomes are pain threshold, muscle tone, and SF-36-a questionnaire consists of 36 items and 8 domains addressing the patient's perception of their QoL. Venous blood and urine samples were collected at first visit and 2-week visit, respectively. The blood samples were labeled with an anonymized ID number, centrifuged, and stored at -80 ºC in a locked freezer until the time of future processing. The buffy coat is separated after centrifugation, and stored as well. The urine samples were aliquoted and stored at -80 ºC in a locked freezer for future analysis.
- Rescue therapy (cross-over treatment): If the participant does not satisfy with their first round treatment and the improvement of VAS is less than 1.0, then they are eligible to receive the rescue therapy-the treatment in the other group. And they will return to clinic for another 2 weeks. The outcome variables will be collected in the 3rd visit as well. (1) DNA extraction and NGS-based sequencing and genotyping Genomic DNA will be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the participants using the Gentra Puregene kit following the protocol from the manufacturer, and subjected to agarose gel and O.D. ratio tests to confirm its purity and concentration. DNA will be fragmented using Covaris, aiming at the peak length of 800 bp. Illumina libraries will be generated from gDNA using TruSeq Library Preparation Kit.
DNA capture probes will be custom-designed to target TRPV1, ASIC1a, ASIC3, Tac1, COMT, TCL1A, POMC, RGS4, ASIC2, ASIC4, TRPA1, NK1R, G2A, GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, TASK1, TASK2, TASK3, TREK1, P2X2, P2X3, P2X5, TRPV4, KCNK1, NTSR1, NTSR2 and will be synthesized using the Roche KAPA HyperChoice protocol. All the coding regions and non-coding regions (promoters, introns, 5' and 3' untranslated regions) of these 8 genes will be included.
NGS target region enrichment will be applied to enrich/capture the target region (~148 Kb). The enriched libraries will then be sequenced using Illumina MiSeq to generate paired-end reads of 300 bp. The expected depth of the targeted regions will be 200x on average.
(2) Metabolomic and proteomic analysis
- Briefly, The LC-MS analyses of urine and serum involved using an Agilent 1290 UPLC system (ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column, 2.1×100 mm; 1.8 µm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with the 6540-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight (QTOF) mass system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). MS raw files were converted to the mzXML format using Trapper (ISB) and processed by TIPick, an in-house package. After TIPick processing, the scaling-based normalization was performed according to the total ion abundances from each UHPLC-MS data set.
- The LC-MS lipidomic profiling was performed and described in detail. Concisely, lipidomic profiling was run on a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) for QTOF, as well as mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% aqueous formic acid and 10 mM ammonium acetate and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid and 10 mM ammonium acetate in ACN/isopropyl alcohol (50/50). The autosampler and column oven were maintained at 4°C and 55°C, respectively. The injection volume was 5 μl. MS acquisition was executed in the precursor ion scan (PIS) mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.
- All UPLC-MS raw data were converted to mzXML format by using Trapper (ISB) and normalized by TIPick, an in-house package, as well as peak enhancement and peak chosen for the targeted metabolites. An in-house database of sphingomyelins (SM), lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC), ceramides (Cer), phosphatidylcholines (PCs), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and cerebroside (CB) in the Metabolomics Core Laboratory, Center of Genomic Medicine, National Taiwan University, was used for screening.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The eligible participants first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. They are randomly assigned into two groups (40 subjects in each group): A. therapeutic ultrasound group; B. prolotherapy group. The same physician (the principal investigator) injects all participants to avoid inter-physician variability. No other medication or physical modality was given to avoid efficacy interference in both groups. Rescue therapy (cross-over treatment): If the participant does not satisfy with their first round treatment and the improvement of VAS is less than 1.0, then they are eligible to receive the rescue therapy-the treatment in the other group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A.therapeutic ultrasound group | Active comparator | Device: LASER, Device: A.therapeutic ultrasound group, Drug: B.prolotherapy groupGroup A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle. |
| B.prolotherapy group | Active comparator | Device: LASER, Device: A.therapeutic ultrasound group, Drug: B.prolotherapy groupGroup B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (1) Age between 20-100 years old.
- (2) Diagnosed as myofascial pain syndrome patients and willing to receive treatment (including LLLT, therapeutic ultrasound, and local dextrose injection therapy).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those having active infection, malignancy, and hematological diseases were excluded. The patients had received local injection at upper trapezius within 3 months are also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LASERThe eligible participants first received LLLT with a 685-nm wavelength and an output of 30 mW at energy densities of 8 J/cm2 at trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. | Device | A.therapeutic ultrasound group, B.prolotherapy group |
| A.therapeutic ultrasound groupAlso: Group AGroup A receives 1 MHz therapeutic ultrasound for 5 min at a frequency of 2-3 times per week at the painful upper trapezius muscle. | Device | A.therapeutic ultrasound group, B.prolotherapy group |
| B.prolotherapy groupAlso: Group BGroup B receives hypertonic prolotherapy at perimysium of upper trapezius muscle. The injectant is 5ml 5% dextrose solution. | Drug | A.therapeutic ultrasound group, B.prolotherapy group |
Primary outcome
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - first
Time frame: Baseline Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - second
Time frame: Change from Baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 2 weeks.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - third
Time frame: Change from Baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 4 weeks (if crossover).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anchor the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'pain worst'. VAS have been recommended: no pain (0 point), mild pain(1-4 point), moderate pain (5-7 point ), and severe pain (8-10 point).
4 secondary outcomes
SF-36
Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Pain thresholds
Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Myoton-Muscle tone
Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Myoton- Dynamic stiffness
Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4 (if crossover)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 31308097Avrampou K, Pryce KD, Ramakrishnan A, Sakloth F, Gaspari S, Serafini RA, Mitsi V, Polizu C, Swartz C, Ligas B, Richards A, Shen L, Carr FB, Zachariou V. RGS4 Maintains Chronic Pain Symptoms in Rodent Models. J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8291-8304. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3154-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 28245972Chang KV, Wu WT, Han DS, Ozcakar L. Static and Dynamic Shoulder Imaging to Predict Initial Effectiveness and Recurrence After Ultrasound-Guided Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):1984-1994. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
- Background: PubMed 25635347Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 29912452Genovese TJ, Mao JJ. Genetic Predictors of Response to Acupuncture for Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Pain Med. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):191-194. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny067.
- Background: PubMed 31431652Hsu WH, Lee CH, Chao YM, Kuo CH, Ku WC, Chen CC, Lin YL. ASIC3-dependent metabolomics profiling of serum and urine in a mouse model of fibromyalgia. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 20;9(1):12123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48315-w.
- Background: PubMed 31910660Hsu WH, Wang SJ, Chao YM, Chen CJ, Wang YF, Fuh JL, Chen SP, Lin YL. Urine metabolomics signatures in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Cephalalgia. 2020 Jun;40(7):735-747. doi: 10.1177/0333102419897621. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 12646540Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):259-63. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.259.
- Background: PubMed 31704131Liao HW, Kuo CH, Chao HC, Chen GY. Post-column infused internal standard assisted lipidomics profiling strategy and its application on phosphatidylcholine research. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jan 30;178:112956. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112956. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 30268946Lin YH, Wu CC, Lin YH, Lu YC, Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen PL, Hsu CJ. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Facilitates Genetic Diagnosis and Provides Novel Pathogenetic Insights into Deafness with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct. J Mol Diagn. 2019 Jan;21(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 18583048Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jun 25. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26033064Cho CH, Lho YM, Ha E, Hwang I, Song KS, Min BW, Bae KC, Kim DH. Up-regulation of acid-sensing ion channels in the capsule of the joint in frozen shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):824-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35254.
- Results publication: PubMed 30908578Han DS, Lee CH, Shieh YD, Chen CC. Involvement of Substance P in the Analgesic Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy in a Mouse Model of Chronic Widespread Muscle Pain. Pain Med. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1963-1970. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz056.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The data doesn't shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Active, not recruiting
PICU Up!: A Pilot Stepped-wedge Trial of a Multicomponent Early Mobility Intervention for Critically Ill Children
Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Usability of the Smart Hallway System in Clinical Setting
Amputation, Gait Disorders, Neurologic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Changes in Land-Based Motor Function After Routine Hydrotherapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Stimulation-based Therapy to Improve Balance in DCM
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Not yet recruiting
Phenotyping Rehabilitation for Improving Frailty, Functional Capacity
Varicose Veins
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Der-Sheng Han, Physician study director
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LASER, A.therapeutic ultrasound group and B.prolotherapy group in people with Rehabilitation and Pain, Shoulder, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - first (time frame: Baseline Visual Analogue Scale). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05154695, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2025.