ExercisePhase 1/2NCT05156424
A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise to Counteract Treatment Side Effects in Men With Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing Exercise in people with Exercise and Prostate Cancer, run by Kira Murphy at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Those in the intermediate/high-risk categories typically receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy. ADT greatly reduces androgen production as prostate cancer is dependent on testosterone and dihydrotestosterone for its growth.The side effects… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Exercise, Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2021to 1 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years of age with a histologically diagnosed prostate cancer
- Prescribed ADT (Androgen deprivation Therapy)
- Self-reported not to be partaking in regular exercise (structured aerobic or resistance training ≥ 2 sessions/week) in the past 3 months.
- Medically cleared to exercise by their oncologist
Who cannot join
- Prior exposure to ADT >12 months
- Prior hypogonadism
- Established metastatic bone disease
- Established Osteoporosis
- Musculoskeletal/Cardiovascular and/or Neurological disease that could put them at risk from exercise as judged by the attending physician.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Kira Ms Murphy, BSc (Hons) contact
Ireland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
WIT Sports Arena
Waterford, Munster
Kira Ms Murphy, BSc, +353 51 376827, murphyk@upmc.ie
Michael Dr Harrison, PhD, +353 51 302161, mharrison@wit.ie
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise for Counteracting the Adverse Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Those in the intermediate/high-risk categories typically receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy. ADT greatly reduces androgen production as prostate cancer is dependent on testosterone and dihydrotestosterone for its growth.The side effects of ADT therapy are extensive and include changes in body composition (muscle loss, bone loss and fat gain), strength, mood, physical function, sexual function and increased cardiovascular risk and fatigue. Many of these side effects can be influenced by exercise training, both resistance training and aerobic training. However, the most appropriate exercise regime for men undergoing ADT has received little research attention.
Read the detailed description
Although many interventions for prostate survivors emphasise resistance exercise to maintain muscle mass and strength. Arguments could equally be made for programmes emphasising aerobic exercise for fatigue, anxiety, cardiovascular risk reduction and indeed overall survival.
Comparisons of programmes that emphasise each exercise mode are clearly required.
Therefore the overall purpose of this feasibility and pilot randomised control trial is to determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an aerobic emphasised exercise program (AE) verses a resistance emphasise exercise program (RE) in a rehabilitation setting, over 6 months, for prostate cancer men undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).
- Conditions
- Exercise, Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Exercise
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Physical Fitness, Androgen Deprivation Therapy, Exercise, Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExerciseOther
An individualised, progressive and autoregulated exercise programme, supervised by a trained professional.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic Emphasised Exercise Intervention | Experimental | The intervention will comprise of 24 weeks of twice weekly supervised exercise sessions, emphasising aerobic exercise. To reflect a real-world setting, each group will experience both aerobic and resistance exercise, but there will be a 75%:25% predominant: subsidiary mode emphasis based on exercise duration within each session. Receives: Other: Exercise |
| Resistance Emphasised Exercise Intervention | Experimental | The intervention will comprise of 24 weeks of twice weekly supervised exercise sessions, emphasising resistance exercise. To reflect a real-world setting, each group will experience both aerobic and resistance exercise, but there will be a 75%:25% predominant: subsidiary mode emphasis based on exercise duration of exercise within each session. Receives: Other: Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility- recruitment rate (%)
The recruitment rate will be established by comparing the number of potential participants approached and how many agreed to participate in the trial. This will be reported in percentage format.
Measured: At study conclusion
Feasibility- retention rate (%)
Percentage of participants that completed the 24 week intervention compared to the number of participants randomised. This will be reported in percentage format.
Measured: Intervention conclusion 24 weeks
Feasibility- exercise program adherence through attendance %.
The research team will report adherence to the exercise program through attendance of supervised classes. Attendance will be reported as a percentage.
Measured: Throughout 24 week intervention
Feasibility- exercise prescription adherence (% of modified sessions compared to attended exercise sessions)
The research team will report adherence to the exercise prescription by reporting the number of modified sessions compared to attended exercise sessions. This will be reported as a percentage.
Measured: Throughout 24 week intervention
Feasibility- Adverse Event using CTCAE v4.0 grading system.
The research team will report any adverse events in general or in relation to the exercise program using CTCAE v4.0 grading system.
Measured: At study conclusion
Feasibility- Patient satisfaction/acceptability through qualitative evaluation.
Determined by qualitative evaluation, using semi structured interviews and exit surveys to evaluate the acceptability, experiences and feasibility of the intervention.
Measured: Following intervention conclusion at 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (27)
General quality of life by questionnaire
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey comprises of 36 questions and assesses eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. Scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a high quality of life and a favourable health status.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Cancer Specific quality of life by questionnaire
The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) comprises of 30 questions, categorised into five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms.
Scores range from 0-100. A higher score for the functional scales and global health status indicates better functioning and quality of life. A higher score on the symptom and single-item scales denotes a high level of symptoms (i.e. a poor quality of life).
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Prostate cancer specific quality of life by questionnaire
The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-PR25) is a prostate cancer supplementary questionnaire module to be employed in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-C30. It comprises of five multi-item scales to assess sexual activity, sexual functioning, urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms and hormonal treatment-related symptoms and one single item assessing incontinence. Scores range from 0-100. A high score for the sexual activity and sexual functioning scales represents a high level of functioning. A high score for urinary, bowel and hormonal treatment related symptoms scales and incontinence aid item represents a high level of symptomatology.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Fatigue by questionnaire
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) questionnaire will be used to measure fatigue. Patients will score 13 fatigue items over the past 7 days on a scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much), generating a total (0 - 52). A higher score indicates lower levels of fatigue.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Physical Activity (subjective) by questionnaire
The Godin Leisure Time Exercise questionnaire will be used to calculate the average amount of strenuous, moderate and light exercise a participant performs in a typical 7 day period. A score of 24 units or more indicates the participant is active, 14-23 units indicates moderately active and less than 14 units suggests the participant is insufficiently active/sedentary.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Anthropometric assessment.
Height will be measured in cm and body weight in kg, which will be combined to report BMI in kg/m(squared).
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Waist and Hip circumference analysis (cms)
Waist circumference and hip circumference will be measured in centimetres. These two measurements will be used to calculate the participants waist: hip ratio. All measurements will be taken in duplication and averaged before data entry. If there is a substantial difference between the two measures, a third measurement will be taken.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Body composition (fat mass) analysis using Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry (Dexa)
Fat mass (grams and percentage) will be assessed using DEXA (Horizon W, Hologic, 304492M). Participants will be scanned after an overnight fast and will be instructed to regulate their water/fluid intake in the days leading up to the scan, so they are adequately hydrated. All scans will be completed at the same time as much as possible to account for physiological changes in body composition throughout the day.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Body composition (fat and lean mass) analysis using Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry (Dexa)
Lean mass (grams and percentage) will be assessed using DEXA (Horizon W, Hologic, 304492M). Participants will be scanned after an overnight fast and will be instructed to regulate their water/fluid intake in the days leading up to the scan, so they are adequately hydrated. All scans will be completed at the same time as much as possible to account for physiological changes in body composition throughout the day.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Bone density (BMD) measurement
Whole body bone Density will be measured using DEXA (Horizon W, Hologic, 304492M). BMD will be measured in g/cm(squared) and used to calculate a T-score (SD). A T-score shows how much a participant's BMD is higher or lower than the BMD of a healthy 30 year old adult and is the score most commonly used to diagnose low BMD.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Visceral fat area (VAT Area) in cm(squared)
Visceral fat area will be assessed using DEXA (Horizon W, Hologic, 304492M). It will be measured in cm(squared). Participants will be scanned after an overnight fast and will be instructed to regulate their water/fluid intake in the days leading up to the scan, so they are adequately hydrated. All scans will be completed at the same time as much as possible to account for physiological changes in body composition throughout the day
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Atrial stiffness measured by a Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment (m/s)
A carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity test will be performed to assess arterial stiffness. It will be measured in meters per seconds (m/s). This will be performed as per manufactural instructions using a Complior, Alam medical device. Measurements will be taken in duplicate and the mean recorded, with a third measurement taken if difference between the two measurements is more than 0.5 m/s and median recorded.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
Blood pressure (diastolic and systolic) measured at rest. Blood pressure will be taken according to the American Heart Association's (AHA) guidelines. At least two readings and the average recorded. Additional readings will be taken if the difference between the two reading exceeds 5mm Hg.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Cardiovascular Fitness
Cardiovascular fitness will be determined by a submaximal incremental treadmill test using a modified Bruce protocol. The test will be scored by the time (minutes and seconds) taken to test completion. A longer time to completion means superior cardiovascular fitness.
Measured: 0(baseline), 8 weeks and 6 months (end of intervention)
Peak torque/power for knee extension and flexion
An isokinetic dynamometry for knee extension and flexion will also be performed on a Biodex (Advantage BX™ Software Update v5.3.00) to measure peak torque (n.M) and power, using a similar protocol as previously used in cancer patients.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Lower limb strength [Leg Press]
Leg press 1 repetition maximum will be measured in kilograms (kg). A 1 repetition maximum is defined as the highest load that can be lifted through full range of movement for one time.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Upper limb strength [Chest Press]
Chest press 1 repetition maximum will be measured in kilograms (kg). A 1 repetition maximum is defined as the highest load that can be lifted through full range of movement for one time.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Timed up and go)
The timed up and go assess the time (in seconds) it takes for a person to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees. It assesses mobility, balance, walking ability and falls risk in older adults. A lower score indicates better physical function.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Sit to stand)
Sit to stand assesses the maximal repetitions a participant can stand up from a chair in 30 seconds. A higher score indicates better physical function.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Grip test)
A hand-held dynamometry will be used to measure grip strength for each arm. this is a measure of upper body strength and a higher score suggests better upper body strength
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Bess Balance test)
The Balance Error Scoring System is an objective measure of assessing static postural stability. A lower score= better balance and reduced falls risk.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (6 minute walk test)
A 6-min walk test measured the maximal meters walked in six minutes. A higher score indicated superior aerobic endurance and capacity.
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Sit and reach)
The sit and reach test measures linear flexibility. The score is the most distant point (cm) reached with the fingertips. A higher score indicates better flexibility
Measured: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Blood lipids (mmol/L)
Blood lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDH and HDL) will be analysed Fasting blood will be taken from all participants using a standard venipuncture technique. All bloods will be analyzed in a certified clinical lab.
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Glucose (mmol/L)
Fasted blood will be used to measure blood glucose (mmol/L),
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Insulin (mIU/L)
Fasted blood will be used to measure blood insulin (mIU/L)
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Fasted blood will be used to measure C-reactive protein (mg/dL).
Measured: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Dec 2021
- Study start9 Sep 2021
- Primary completion1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ExerciseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pilot randomised control trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kira Murphy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Irish Research Council, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, South East Technological University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Kira Murphy, South East Technological University
- Investigators
- Michael Dr Harrison, PhD, Principal investigator, Waterford Institute of Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05156424
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EBPPG/2020/103
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cancer statistics. Viewed 21st February 2020. https://www.cancer.ie/cancer-information-and-support/cancer-information/about-cancer/cancer-statistics
Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Viewed on the 20th January 2020 https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/treating/hormone-therapy.html
Bylow K, Mohile SG, Stadler WM, Dale W. Does androgen-deprivation therapy accelerate the development of frailty in older men with prostate cancer?: a conceptual review. Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2604-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23084.
PubMed 17960609Norris MK, Bell GJ, North S, Courneya KS. Effects of resistance training frequency on physical functioning and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Sep;18(3):281-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.28. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PubMed 26078203Fairman CM, Kendall KL, Hart NH, Taaffe DR, Galvao DA, Newton RU. The potential therapeutic effects of creatine supplementation on body composition and muscle function in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Jan;133:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PubMed 30661658Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Dobek J, Dieckmann NF, Bennett JA, Nail L, Beer TM. Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses: results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
PubMed 26715587Nilsen TS, Raastad T, Skovlund E, Courneya KS, Langberg CW, Lilleby W, Fossa SD, Thorsen L. Effects of strength training on body composition, physical functioning, and quality of life in prostate cancer patients during androgen deprivation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2015 Nov;54(10):1805-13. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1037008. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
PubMed 25927504Newton RU, Kenfield SA, Hart NH, Chan JM, Courneya KS, Catto J, Finn SP, Greenwood R, Hughes DC, Mucci L, Plymate SR, Praet SFE, Guinan EM, Van Blarigan EL, Casey O, Buzza M, Gledhill S, Zhang L, Galvao DA, Ryan CJ, Saad F. Intense Exercise for Survival among Men with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (INTERVAL-GAP4): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase III study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e022899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022899.
PubMed 29764892Kilgour RD, Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, Hornby L, Lucar E, Bacon SL, Morais JA. Cancer-related fatigue: the impact of skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with advanced cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010 Dec;1(2):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s13539-010-0016-0. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
PubMed 21475694Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, Filipovsky J, Huybrechts S, Mattace-Raso FU, Protogerou AD, Schillaci G, Segers P, Vermeersch S, Weber T; Artery Society; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function; European Network for Noninvasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012 Mar;30(3):445-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fa8b0.
PubMed 22278144Flack JM, Adekola B. Blood pressure and the new ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Apr;30(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 15.
PubMed 31521481Murphy K, Kehoe B, Denieffe S, Hacking D, Fairman CM, Harrison M. Comparing aerobic and resistance exercise emphasis during androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for prostate cancer: A randomised feasibility trial. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 20;33(7):601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09650-z.
PubMed 40540036Murphy K, Kehoe B, Denieffe S, McGrath A, Hacking D, Fairman CM, Harrison M. 'Just because I have prostate cancer doesn't mean that I can't do things' - men's experiences of the acceptability of an exercise intervention for prostate cancer during treatment. BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):949. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12687-8.
PubMed 39095735
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise for Counteracting the Adverse Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05156424
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EBPPG/2020/103
- Conditions
- Exercise, Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Physical Fitness, Androgen Deprivation Therapy, Exercise, Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kira MurphyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Irish Research Council, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, South East Technological University
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Those in the intermediate/high-risk categories typically receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy. ADT greatly reduces androgen production as prostate cancer is dependent on testosterone and dihydrotestosterone for its growth.The side effects of ADT therapy are extensive and include changes in body composition (muscle loss, bone loss and fat gain), strength, mood, physical function, sexual function and increased cardiovascular risk and fatigue. Many of these side effects can be influenced by exercise training, both resistance training and aerobic training. However, the most appropriate exercise regime for men undergoing ADT has received little research attention.
Detailed description
Although many interventions for prostate survivors emphasise resistance exercise to maintain muscle mass and strength. Arguments could equally be made for programmes emphasising aerobic exercise for fatigue, anxiety, cardiovascular risk reduction and indeed overall survival.
Comparisons of programmes that emphasise each exercise mode are clearly required.
Therefore the overall purpose of this feasibility and pilot randomised control trial is to determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an aerobic emphasised exercise program (AE) verses a resistance emphasise exercise program (RE) in a rehabilitation setting, over 6 months, for prostate cancer men undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pilot randomised control trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic Emphasised Exercise Intervention | Experimental | Other: ExerciseThe intervention will comprise of 24 weeks of twice weekly supervised exercise sessions, emphasising aerobic exercise. To reflect a real-world setting, each group will experience both aerobic and resistance exercise, but there will be a 75%:25% predominant: subsidiary mode emphasis based on exercise duration within each session. |
| Resistance Emphasised Exercise Intervention | Experimental | Other: ExerciseThe intervention will comprise of 24 weeks of twice weekly supervised exercise sessions, emphasising resistance exercise. To reflect a real-world setting, each group will experience both aerobic and resistance exercise, but there will be a 75%:25% predominant: subsidiary mode emphasis based on exercise duration of exercise within each session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- >18 years of age with a histologically diagnosed prostate cancer
- Prescribed ADT (Androgen deprivation Therapy)
- Self-reported not to be partaking in regular exercise (structured aerobic or resistance training ≥ 2 sessions/week) in the past 3 months.
- Medically cleared to exercise by their oncologist
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Prior exposure to ADT >12 months
- Prior hypogonadism
- Established metastatic bone disease
- Established Osteoporosis
- Musculoskeletal/Cardiovascular and/or Neurological disease that could put them at risk from exercise as judged by the attending physician.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExerciseAn individualised, progressive and autoregulated exercise programme, supervised by a trained professional. | Other | Aerobic Emphasised Exercise Intervention, Resistance Emphasised Exercise Intervention |
Primary outcome
Feasibility- recruitment rate (%)
Time frame: At study conclusion
The recruitment rate will be established by comparing the number of potential participants approached and how many agreed to participate in the trial. This will be reported in percentage format.
Feasibility- retention rate (%)
Time frame: Intervention conclusion 24 weeks
Percentage of participants that completed the 24 week intervention compared to the number of participants randomised. This will be reported in percentage format.
Feasibility- exercise program adherence through attendance %.
Time frame: Throughout 24 week intervention
The research team will report adherence to the exercise program through attendance of supervised classes. Attendance will be reported as a percentage.
Feasibility- exercise prescription adherence (% of modified sessions compared to attended exercise sessions)
Time frame: Throughout 24 week intervention
The research team will report adherence to the exercise prescription by reporting the number of modified sessions compared to attended exercise sessions. This will be reported as a percentage.
Feasibility- Adverse Event using CTCAE v4.0 grading system.
Time frame: At study conclusion
The research team will report any adverse events in general or in relation to the exercise program using CTCAE v4.0 grading system.
Feasibility- Patient satisfaction/acceptability through qualitative evaluation.
Time frame: Following intervention conclusion at 24 weeks
Determined by qualitative evaluation, using semi structured interviews and exit surveys to evaluate the acceptability, experiences and feasibility of the intervention.
27 secondary outcomes
General quality of life by questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Cancer Specific quality of life by questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Prostate cancer specific quality of life by questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Fatigue by questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Physical Activity (subjective) by questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Anthropometric assessment.
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Waist and Hip circumference analysis (cms)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Body composition (fat mass) analysis using Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry (Dexa)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Body composition (fat and lean mass) analysis using Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry (Dexa)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Bone density (BMD) measurement
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Visceral fat area (VAT Area) in cm(squared)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Atrial stiffness measured by a Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment (m/s)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Cardiovascular Fitness
Time frame: 0(baseline), 8 weeks and 6 months (end of intervention)
Peak torque/power for knee extension and flexion
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Lower limb strength [Leg Press]
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Upper limb strength [Chest Press]
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Timed up and go)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Sit to stand)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Grip test)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Bess Balance test)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (6 minute walk test)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Functional Ability Assessment (Sit and reach)
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Blood lipids (mmol/L)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Glucose (mmol/L)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: Insulin (mIU/L)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Biomarker Analysis: C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: At baseline and 24 weeks (end of intervention)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Dec 2021.
- BackgroundCancer statistics. Viewed 21st February 2020. https://www.cancer.ie/cancer-information-and-support/cancer-information/about-cancer/cancer-statistics
- BackgroundHormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Viewed on the 20th January 2020 https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/treating/hormone-therapy.html
- Background: PubMed 17960609Bylow K, Mohile SG, Stadler WM, Dale W. Does androgen-deprivation therapy accelerate the development of frailty in older men with prostate cancer?: a conceptual review. Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2604-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23084.
- Background: PubMed 26078203Norris MK, Bell GJ, North S, Courneya KS. Effects of resistance training frequency on physical functioning and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Sep;18(3):281-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.28. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
- Background: PubMed 30661658Fairman CM, Kendall KL, Hart NH, Taaffe DR, Galvao DA, Newton RU. The potential therapeutic effects of creatine supplementation on body composition and muscle function in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Jan;133:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 26715587Winters-Stone KM, Lyons KS, Dobek J, Dieckmann NF, Bennett JA, Nail L, Beer TM. Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses: results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 25927504Nilsen TS, Raastad T, Skovlund E, Courneya KS, Langberg CW, Lilleby W, Fossa SD, Thorsen L. Effects of strength training on body composition, physical functioning, and quality of life in prostate cancer patients during androgen deprivation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2015 Nov;54(10):1805-13. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1037008. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 29764892Newton RU, Kenfield SA, Hart NH, Chan JM, Courneya KS, Catto J, Finn SP, Greenwood R, Hughes DC, Mucci L, Plymate SR, Praet SFE, Guinan EM, Van Blarigan EL, Casey O, Buzza M, Gledhill S, Zhang L, Galvao DA, Ryan CJ, Saad F. Intense Exercise for Survival among Men with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (INTERVAL-GAP4): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase III study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e022899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022899.
- Background: PubMed 21475694Kilgour RD, Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, Hornby L, Lucar E, Bacon SL, Morais JA. Cancer-related fatigue: the impact of skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with advanced cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010 Dec;1(2):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s13539-010-0016-0. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 22278144Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, Filipovsky J, Huybrechts S, Mattace-Raso FU, Protogerou AD, Schillaci G, Segers P, Vermeersch S, Weber T; Artery Society; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function; European Network for Noninvasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012 Mar;30(3):445-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fa8b0.
- Background: PubMed 31521481Flack JM, Adekola B. Blood pressure and the new ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Apr;30(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40540036Murphy K, Kehoe B, Denieffe S, Hacking D, Fairman CM, Harrison M. Comparing aerobic and resistance exercise emphasis during androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for prostate cancer: A randomised feasibility trial. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 20;33(7):601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09650-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Exercise
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kira Ms Murphy, BSc (Hons) contact
Michael Dr Harrison, PhD principal investigator
Waterford Institute of Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Exercise in people with Exercise and Prostate Cancer, run by Kira Murphy at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michael Dr Harrison, PhD (51302161 ext. +353, mharrison@wit.ie), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility- recruitment rate (%) (time frame: At study conclusion). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05156424, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2021.