Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2NCT05157451
Y-90 Versus SBRT for Inoperable HCC
A Phase 2 study testing Quality of Life, Questionnaire Administration and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, run by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute.
Trial summary
This phase II trial tests whether Y-90 segmentectomy (internal radiation) versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (external radiation) is more optimal in treating inoperable liver cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IA Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
- What is being tested?
- Quality of Life, Questionnaire Administration and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2023to 5 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
- Age >= 18 years at time of informed consent. Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups will be included.
- Patient with non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) including lesion(s) amenable to definitive therapy with either SBRT or Y-90 segmentectomy, limited to =< 2 liver segments, as agreed upon by the multidisciplinary tumor board consensus.
- Patient not otherwise optimal candidates for resection or thermal ablation, as agreed upon by the multidisciplinary tumor board.
- Have a Child-Pugh criteria (CP) score B7 or better.
- Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 1, or Karnofsky performance scale > 70.
- No other prior invasive malignancy is allowed except for the following: adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ breast or cervical cancer. Stage I or II invasive cancer treated with a curative intent without evidence of disease recurrence for at least five years.
Who cannot join
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of trial treatment.
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness, including but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, serious or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirement, substantially increase risk of incurring adverse events (AEs) or compromise the ability of the patient to give written informed consent.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Prospective Two-Arm Feasibility Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Yttrium-90 Segmentectomy in Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
This phase II trial tests whether Y-90 segmentectomy (internal radiation) versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (external radiation) is more optimal in treating inoperable liver cancer. Y-90 segmentectomy consists into very tiny radioactive glass beads that can be injected into the liver through the blood vessels supplying the liver. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver external radiation to tumors with high precision. This study many help doctors determine which treatment, Y-90 segmentectomy or SBRT, works better in treating liver cancer.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- Determine feasibility of trial enrollment (enrollment date).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
- To assess differences in overall survival, local control, time to intrahepatic progression, time to next treatment, rate of liver transplant, toxicity, and patient reported complications and quality of life.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
- Compare cumulative cost of treatment-related medical care at 13 months.
OUTLINE: Patients will be randomized in 1 of 2 arms.
Arm I: Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 days over 2 weeks.
Arm II: Patients receive Y-90 radioembolization via injection on day 1.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 2, 4, and 12 weeks and then every 3 months for 13 months.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IA Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IB Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage II Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Being tested
- Quality of Life, Questionnaire Administration, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quality of LifeOther
Also called QOL, quality of life (QoL), Quality-of-Life
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Undergo SBRT
Yttrium-90 Microsphere RadioembolizationProcedure or surgery
Also called Yttrium Y 90 Microsphere Therapy, Yttrium-90 Radioembolization
Given via injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (SBRT) | Experimental | Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 days over 2 weeks. Receives: Other: Quality of Life; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
| Arm II (Y-90 radioembolization) | Experimental | Patients receive Y-90 radioembolization via injection on day 1. Receives: Other: Quality of Life; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Procedure: Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of enrollment (enrollment rate)
Determine feasibility of trial enrollment for two therapeutic groups.
Measured: Up to 4 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Overall survival
Measured: Death, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy to treated lesion, transplant, lost to follow up, or 13 months post-treatment
Time to progression
Measured: Time of radiographic evidence of treated tumor progression as determined by tumor board review, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy to treated lesion, transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Time to intrahepatic progression
Measured: Time of radiographic intrahepatic progression, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy, transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Rate of liver transplant
Measured: Time of liver transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Rate of non-classic radiation induced liver disease
Defined as a Child-Pugh criteria >= 2 point increase.
Measured: Up to 13 months
Rate of patient reported outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Measured: Baseline up to 13 months
Change in patient reported quality of life
Measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobilliary Cancer compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 13 months
Time to next treatment
Measured: Time to next liver directed or non-adjuvant systemic therapy, transplant, or death, assessed up to 13 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Dec 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion5 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Jan 2026 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Not feasible at this time.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Medical Research Foundation, Oregon, Oregon Health and Science University, Radiation Oncology Institute, Radiological Society of North America
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nima Nabavizadeh, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Nima Nabavizadeh, Principal investigator, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05157451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00022029
- Other IDs
- NCI-2021-11880, STUDY00022029
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Prospective Two-Arm Feasibility Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Yttrium-90 Segmentectomy in Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05157451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00022029
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IA Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IB Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage II Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Not feasible at this time.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Medical Research Foundation, Oregon, Oregon Health and Science University, Radiation Oncology Institute, Radiological Society of North America
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase II trial tests whether Y-90 segmentectomy (internal radiation) versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (external radiation) is more optimal in treating inoperable liver cancer. Y-90 segmentectomy consists into very tiny radioactive glass beads that can be injected into the liver through the blood vessels supplying the liver. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver external radiation to tumors with high precision. This study many help doctors determine which treatment, Y-90 segmentectomy or SBRT, works better in treating liver cancer.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- Determine feasibility of trial enrollment (enrollment date).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
- To assess differences in overall survival, local control, time to intrahepatic progression, time to next treatment, rate of liver transplant, toxicity, and patient reported complications and quality of life.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
- Compare cumulative cost of treatment-related medical care at 13 months.
OUTLINE: Patients will be randomized in 1 of 2 arms.
Arm I: Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 days over 2 weeks.
Arm II: Patients receive Y-90 radioembolization via injection on day 1.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 2, 4, and 12 weeks and then every 3 months for 13 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (SBRT) | Experimental | Other: Quality of Life, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyPatients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 days over 2 weeks. |
| Arm II (Y-90 radioembolization) | Experimental | Other: Quality of Life, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Procedure: Yttrium-90 Microsphere RadioembolizationPatients receive Y-90 radioembolization via injection on day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
- Age >= 18 years at time of informed consent. Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups will be included.
- Patient with non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) including lesion(s) amenable to definitive therapy with either SBRT or Y-90 segmentectomy, limited to =< 2 liver segments, as agreed upon by the multidisciplinary tumor board consensus.
- Patient not otherwise optimal candidates for resection or thermal ablation, as agreed upon by the multidisciplinary tumor board.
- Have a Child-Pugh criteria (CP) score B7 or better.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of trial treatment.
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness, including but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, serious or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirement, substantially increase risk of incurring adverse events (AEs) or compromise the ability of the patient to give written informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of LifeAlso: QOL, quality of life (QoL), Quality-of-LifeAncillary studies | Other | Arm I (SBRT), Arm II (Y-90 radioembolization) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm I (SBRT), Arm II (Y-90 radioembolization) |
| Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyAlso: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation TherapyUndergo SBRT | Radiation | Arm I (SBRT) |
| Yttrium-90 Microsphere RadioembolizationAlso: Yttrium Y 90 Microsphere Therapy, Yttrium-90 RadioembolizationGiven via injection | Procedure or surgery | Arm II (Y-90 radioembolization) |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of enrollment (enrollment rate)
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Determine feasibility of trial enrollment for two therapeutic groups.
8 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: Death, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy to treated lesion, transplant, lost to follow up, or 13 months post-treatment
Time to progression
Time frame: Time of radiographic evidence of treated tumor progression as determined by tumor board review, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy to treated lesion, transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Time to intrahepatic progression
Time frame: Time of radiographic intrahepatic progression, adjuvant systemic therapy or liver directed therapy, transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Rate of liver transplant
Time frame: Time of liver transplant, death, or 13 months post-treatment
Rate of non-classic radiation induced liver disease
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Rate of patient reported outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline up to 13 months
Change in patient reported quality of life
Time frame: Baseline to 13 months
Time to next treatment
Time frame: Time to next liver directed or non-adjuvant systemic therapy, transplant, or death, assessed up to 13 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2023.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Personalized Adaptive Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Not yet recruiting
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-Resectable
RecruitingPhase 2
Cabozantinib Combined With Ipilimumab/Nivolumab and TACE in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, HCC
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Pevonedistat With Chemotherapy for Bile Duct Cancer of the Liver
Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ifinatamab Deruxtecan (I-DXd) in Subjects With Recurrent or Metastatic Solid Tumors (IDeate-PanTumor02)
Recurrent or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nima Nabavizadeh principal investigator
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Quality of Life, Questionnaire Administration and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, run by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of enrollment (enrollment rate) (time frame: Up to 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2023.