Acromioclavicular SprainPhase 4NCT05161468
Platelet-rich Plasma, Corticosteroid, or Lidocaine for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine injection, Corticosteroid Injection and Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection in people with Acromioclavicular Sprain, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare three different treatment injections for the management of acromioclavicular joint dysfunction (ACJ Dysfunction). Patients that consent and enroll will be randomized to receive (1) a corticosteroid injection, (2) an injection of Platelet Rich Plasma, or (3) a Lidocaine injection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acromioclavicular Sprain
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine injection, Corticosteroid Injection and Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2021to 12 May 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- TRICARE eligible beneficiaries (active duty, dependents, and military retired) with a primary complaint of AC joint pain.
- Age 18-65 years
- Able to speak and read English well enough to provide informed consent, follow study instructions and independently answer the questionnaires/surveys.
- Tender to palpation over the AC joint that reproduces the specific pain they are seeking care for
- Provocative test (cross-arm test, pain with push-ups, etc) that reproduces the specific pain they are here to seek care for
Who cannot join
- In the last year, the subject received any invasive interventions including injections (corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, lidocaine, PRP, etc.) or surgery for the affected shoulder - specifically to the AC joint.
- Anyone separating from the military within 10 months (other than normal military retirement), pending a medical evaluation board, discharge from the military for medical reasons, or pending or undergoing any litigation for an injury
- AC Joint separation that are with a severity of Grades III-VI (in most cases, these are treated surgically, although 78% of military surgeons recommended preferring conservative care for Grade III separations, and 86% recommending at least 3 months of conservative care before surgical consideration.
- Systemic Disease that could otherwise be responsible for the shoulder pain (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or psoriatic arthritis), non-musculoskeletal conditions causing shoulder pain, personal history of neoplasm, current or recent shoulder joint infection, acute fracture or dislocation of the shoulder related to the current episode of pain, or other more likely primary musculoskeletal shoulder disorders (rotator cuff pathology, bicipital tendonitis, etc.)
- Concurrent adhesive capsulitis of the affected shoulder
- History of intolerance or allergy to corticosteroids
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Brooke Army Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78219
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98391
About this study
Official title: Bayesian Non-inferiority Trial of Injection Therapies for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial
This study will compare three different treatment injections for the management of acromioclavicular joint dysfunction (ACJ Dysfunction). Patients that consent and enroll will be randomized to receive (1) a corticosteroid injection, (2) an injection of Platelet Rich Plasma, or (3) a Lidocaine injection. Follow-up will occur over a 1 year period.
Read the detailed description
Subjects with a diagnosis of AC joint dysfunction will be recruited through the primary care and orthopaedic clinics at participating hospitals and clinics. Patients that consent and enroll will be randomized to receive (1) a corticosteroid injection, (2) an injection of Platelet Rich Plasma, or (3) a Lidocaine injection. The primary outcome will be the change in PROMIS Physical Function Scale at 6 months post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes will include additional time points (viz, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 months post-enrollment) and additional metrics (eg, AUC) as well as the PROMIS Pain Interference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Global Rating of Change, total limited duty days, and perceived recovery. Since the sample size is too small to establish non-inferiority by traditional hypothesis testing, a fully Bayesian approach will be used.
- Conditions
- Acromioclavicular Sprain
- Being tested
- Lidocaine injection, Corticosteroid Injection, Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection
- Keywords
- acromioclavicular joint, shoulder pain, platelet rich plasma, corticosteroid
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lidocaine injectionDrug
Also called xylocaine
2ml of 1% lidocaine will be drawn into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml).
Corticosteroid InjectionDrug
Also called triamcinolone acetonide; glucocorticoid
1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml) will be drawn with 1 ml normal saline into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml).
Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) InjectionDrug
Also called acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD)
30 ml of acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD) will be drawn into a 30 ml syringe to coat the syringe. 3 ml will be left in the syringe and then 27 ml of blood will be drawn via standard venipuncture. The 30 ml mixture of blood and ACD will then be prepared in the Peak PRP system as described in the manufacturer's instruction (PEAK® PRP System). After preparation, PRP will be withdrawn (2 mls) into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Active comparator | 50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a lidocaine injection in their ACJ. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine injection |
| Corticosteroid | Active comparator | 50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a corticosteroid injection in their ACJ. Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid Injection |
| Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) | Active comparator | 50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a PRP injection in their ACJ. Receives: Drug: Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Physical Function Scale Computer Adapted Test (PF-CAT)
The PROMIS PF-CAT uses a 121-item bank to assess current self-reported capabilities related to physical activities. Like all PROMIS measures, the measure is reported on a T score metric, with a score of 50 aligning with the general population mean and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more of the quantity being assessed.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)
We will use the PASS as a global, dichotomized single-item score indicating if patients are satisfied with the current state of their symptoms. This tool has been validated in patients with osteoarthritis. The PASS asks the patient; "Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?" Response options are "yes" or "no"
Measured: 6 months
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
The GROC measures changes in perceived quality of life, in a variety of pain populations. It has a 15-point scale (-7 to +7), with a 0 indicating 'about the same", a -7 indicating 'a very great deal worse', and a +7 indicating a 'a very great deal better'. A score of -2 (a little bit worse) to +2 (a little bit better) indicates a perception of no change in the condition from baseline. A+3 ('somewhat better') or higher demonstrates a clinically significant improvement.
Measured: 6 months
EuroQoL (EQ-5D)
the EQ-5D is a generic quality of life questionnaire that will assess quality of life on a scale that can be referenced to other disease conditions. The EQ-5D covers 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has 3 response categories: level 1, "no problems"; level 2, "some problems"; and level 3, "inability or extreme problems." Responses are combined to give a 5-digit descriptive health state classification (e.g., 11222) The EQ-5D yields a total of 243 possible health states. Valuations for each health state are available. The EQ-5D is commonly used in economic evaluation of interventions and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Measured: Baseline; 6 Months and 1 Year after Enrollment
Shoulder Related Costs
We will use the Military Data Repository (MDR) to identify shoulder-related healthcare costs over the 1-year follow-up period.
Measured: The 1 Year Period After Enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start12 Aug 2021
- Primary completion12 May 2025
- Study completion12 May 2025
Why it stopped: Funding limitation did not allow the trial to run to completion
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acromioclavicular SprainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Bayesian regression model
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- The Geneva Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Madigan Army Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dan Rhon, Brooke Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Daniel Rhon, DSc, Principal investigator, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05161468
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 221073
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 14 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: De-identified research data will be shared with Military Injury Rehabilitation Research for Operational Readiness (MIRROR) and maintained indefinitely for possible use in future research.
Publications
Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2072-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512450162. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
PubMed 22707749Petron DJ, Hanson RW Jr. Acromioclavicular joint disorders. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2007 Oct;6(5):300-6.
PubMed 17883965Park KD, Kim TK, Lee J, Lee WY, Ahn JK, Park Y. Palpation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Acromioclavicular Joint Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections: A Retrospective Comparative Clinical Study. Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):333-41.
PubMed 26218936Krill MK, Rosas S, Kwon K, Dakkak A, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F. A concise evidence-based physical examination for diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pathology: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2018 Feb;46(1):98-104. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1413920. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PubMed 29210329Wu PI, Diaz R, Borg-Stein J. Platelet-Rich Plasma. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;27(4):825-853. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.06.002.
PubMed 27788903Schneider A, Burr R, Garbis N, Salazar D. Platelet-rich plasma and the shoulder: clinical indications and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Dec;11(4):593-597. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9517-9.
PubMed 30196385Chahla J, Cinque ME, Piuzzi NS, Mannava S, Geeslin AG, Murray IR, Dornan GJ, Muschler GF, LaPrade RF. A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 18;99(20):1769-1779. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01374.
PubMed 29040132Nguyen RT, Borg-Stein J, McInnis K. Applications of platelet-rich plasma in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: an evidence-based approach. PM R. 2011 Mar;3(3):226-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.11.007.
PubMed 21402369
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bayesian Non-inferiority Trial of Injection Therapies for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05161468
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 221073
- Conditions
- Acromioclavicular Sprain
- Keywords
- acromioclavicular joint, shoulder pain, platelet rich plasma, corticosteroid
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Funding limitation did not allow the trial to run to completion
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- The Geneva Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Madigan Army Medical Center
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare three different treatment injections for the management of acromioclavicular joint dysfunction (ACJ Dysfunction). Patients that consent and enroll will be randomized to receive (1) a corticosteroid injection, (2) an injection of Platelet Rich Plasma, or (3) a Lidocaine injection. Follow-up will occur over a 1 year period.
Detailed description
Subjects with a diagnosis of AC joint dysfunction will be recruited through the primary care and orthopaedic clinics at participating hospitals and clinics. Patients that consent and enroll will be randomized to receive (1) a corticosteroid injection, (2) an injection of Platelet Rich Plasma, or (3) a Lidocaine injection. The primary outcome will be the change in PROMIS Physical Function Scale at 6 months post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes will include additional time points (viz, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 months post-enrollment) and additional metrics (eg, AUC) as well as the PROMIS Pain Interference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Global Rating of Change, total limited duty days, and perceived recovery. Since the sample size is too small to establish non-inferiority by traditional hypothesis testing, a fully Bayesian approach will be used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Bayesian regression model
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Active comparator | Drug: Lidocaine injection50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a lidocaine injection in their ACJ. |
| Corticosteroid | Active comparator | Drug: Corticosteroid Injection50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a corticosteroid injection in their ACJ. |
| Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) | Active comparator | Drug: Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection50 Subjects will be randomized to this group and will receive a PRP injection in their ACJ. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- TRICARE eligible beneficiaries (active duty, dependents, and military retired) with a primary complaint of AC joint pain.
- Age 18-65 years
- Able to speak and read English well enough to provide informed consent, follow study instructions and independently answer the questionnaires/surveys.
- Tender to palpation over the AC joint that reproduces the specific pain they are seeking care for
- Provocative test (cross-arm test, pain with push-ups, etc) that reproduces the specific pain they are here to seek care for
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- In the last year, the subject received any invasive interventions including injections (corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, lidocaine, PRP, etc.) or surgery for the affected shoulder - specifically to the AC joint.
- Anyone separating from the military within 10 months (other than normal military retirement), pending a medical evaluation board, discharge from the military for medical reasons, or pending or undergoing any litigation for an injury
- AC Joint separation that are with a severity of Grades III-VI (in most cases, these are treated surgically, although 78% of military surgeons recommended preferring conservative care for Grade III separations, and 86% recommending at least 3 months of conservative care before surgical consideration.
- Systemic Disease that could otherwise be responsible for the shoulder pain (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or psoriatic arthritis), non-musculoskeletal conditions causing shoulder pain, personal history of neoplasm, current or recent shoulder joint infection, acute fracture or dislocation of the shoulder related to the current episode of pain, or other more likely primary musculoskeletal shoulder disorders (rotator cuff pathology, bicipital tendonitis, etc.)
- Concurrent adhesive capsulitis of the affected shoulder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine injectionAlso: xylocaine2ml of 1% lidocaine will be drawn into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml). | Drug | Lidocaine |
| Corticosteroid InjectionAlso: triamcinolone acetonide; glucocorticoid1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml) will be drawn with 1 ml normal saline into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml). | Drug | Corticosteroid |
| Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) InjectionAlso: acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD)30 ml of acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD) will be drawn into a 30 ml syringe to coat the syringe. 3 ml will be left in the syringe and then 27 ml of blood will be drawn via standard venipuncture. The 30 ml mixture of blood and ACD will then be prepared in the Peak PRP system as described in the manufacturer's instruction (PEAK® PRP System). After preparation, PRP will be withdrawn (2 mls) into a 3 ml syringe and labeled. It will then be delivered into the AC joint per standard injection procedures (estimated 1-2 ml). | Drug | Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) |
Primary outcome
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Physical Function Scale Computer Adapted Test (PF-CAT)
Time frame: 6 months
The PROMIS PF-CAT uses a 121-item bank to assess current self-reported capabilities related to physical activities. Like all PROMIS measures, the measure is reported on a T score metric, with a score of 50 aligning with the general population mean and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more of the quantity being assessed.
4 secondary outcomes
Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)
Time frame: 6 months
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
Time frame: 6 months
EuroQoL (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Months and 1 Year after Enrollment
Shoulder Related Costs
Time frame: The 1 Year Period After Enrollment
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding limitation did not allow the trial to run to completion). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 22707749Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2072-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512450162. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 17883965Petron DJ, Hanson RW Jr. Acromioclavicular joint disorders. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2007 Oct;6(5):300-6.
- Background: PubMed 26218936Park KD, Kim TK, Lee J, Lee WY, Ahn JK, Park Y. Palpation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Acromioclavicular Joint Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections: A Retrospective Comparative Clinical Study. Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):333-41.
- Background: PubMed 29210329Krill MK, Rosas S, Kwon K, Dakkak A, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F. A concise evidence-based physical examination for diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pathology: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2018 Feb;46(1):98-104. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1413920. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 27788903Wu PI, Diaz R, Borg-Stein J. Platelet-Rich Plasma. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;27(4):825-853. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.06.002.
- Background: PubMed 30196385Schneider A, Burr R, Garbis N, Salazar D. Platelet-rich plasma and the shoulder: clinical indications and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Dec;11(4):593-597. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9517-9.
- Background: PubMed 29040132Chahla J, Cinque ME, Piuzzi NS, Mannava S, Geeslin AG, Murray IR, Dornan GJ, Muschler GF, LaPrade RF. A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 18;99(20):1769-1779. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01374.
- Background: PubMed 21402369Nguyen RT, Borg-Stein J, McInnis K. Applications of platelet-rich plasma in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: an evidence-based approach. PM R. 2011 Mar;3(3):226-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.11.007.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. De-identified research data will be shared with Military Injury Rehabilitation Research for Operational Readiness (MIRROR) and maintained indefinitely for possible use in future research.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Rhon, DSc principal investigator
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine injection, Corticosteroid Injection and Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection in people with Acromioclavicular Sprain, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding limitation did not allow the trial to run to completion). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Physical Function Scale Computer Adapted Test (PF-CAT) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05161468, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2025.