CancerNCT05162404
Video Education to Improve Rural Cancer Care Delivery
A study testing Video Education Program in people with Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to understand if a video-based education program delivered on a tablet device will improve care coordination experiences for patients with cancer living in rural areas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Video Education Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2022to 1 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have a newly diagnosed Stage I, II, or III disease at the time of enrollment.
- Patients to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or recent initiation of (within 1 month of starting) adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Patients with a history of previous malignancy treated with chemotherapy within the last 3 years are not eligible, as their perceptions of care coordination may be impacted by their previous treatment.
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patients must be able to read, write, and speak English. Study materials and telephone calls are only available in English.
- Patients must be residents of Hawaii, Kauai, or Maui counties
- Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and must sign and give written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
About this study
Official title: Patient-Centered Video Education Intervention to Improve Rural Cancer Care Delivery
The purpose of this study is to understand if a video-based education program delivered on a tablet device will improve care coordination experiences for patients with cancer living in rural areas.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Video Education Program
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video Education ProgramBehavioural
The following topics are addressed in each module of the videos:
- Understanding cancer and cancer treatment - including an understanding of stage, site of origin, metastases, treatment options, toxicities and anticipated outcomes.
- Care coordination basics (CC: Communication) - including navigating care related to appointments, how to handle issues after-hours, and the expected roles of other healthcare providers (e.g., PCPs).
- How to be a self-advocate (CC: Navigation and Operational) - including how to ask questions, being empowered to talk to your doctor, when a second opinion is needed, when to explore clinical trials, and how to best incorporate a caregiver into your treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video Intervention | Experimental | The intervention in this study is a TED-talk style video series designed to provide patient education on cancer, care coordination, and self-advocacy. The content is designed to provide both a background about cancer disease and to address each of the specific domains in care coordination (CCI). The development of video contents was informed by our prior/current research in rural care coordination and components of evidence-based interventions including the patient navigator training by the George Washington University Cancer Institute, Imi Hale (the Native Hawaiian Cancer Network), and a supportive care intervention by Mokuau et al. As the target population of this intervention is rural patients, videos include some rural-specific considerations related to care coordination. Receives: Behavioral: Video Education Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in rural patients' perceptions of cancer care coordination as assessed by the Care Coordination Instrument at 4-6 months post-intervention.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rural patient satisfaction with video education materials as assessed by semi-structured telephone interview.
Measured: 6 months
To examine patient demographic and clinical information collected from the background questionnaire as potential correlates of patients' perceptions of cancer care coordination at post-intervention
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start5 Jan 2022
- Primary completion28 Feb 2023
- Study completion1 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Hawaii
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162404
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Okado 2021-1
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Okado I, Braun-Inglis C, Matsumoto K, Elhajj C, Cassel K, Berenberg J, Holcombe RF. Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients. J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug;40(4):594-599. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02550-6. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
PubMed 39636502
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient-Centered Video Education Intervention to Improve Rural Cancer Care Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162404
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Okado 2021-1
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of HawaiiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to understand if a video-based education program delivered on a tablet device will improve care coordination experiences for patients with cancer living in rural areas.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Video Education ProgramThe intervention in this study is a TED-talk style video series designed to provide patient education on cancer, care coordination, and self-advocacy. The content is designed to provide both a background about cancer disease and to address each of the specific domains in care coordination (CCI). The development of video contents was informed by our prior/current research in rural care coordination and components of evidence-based interventions including the patient navigator training by the George Washington University Cancer Institute, Imi Hale (the Native Hawaiian Cancer Network), and a supportive care intervention by Mokuau et al. As the target population of this intervention is rural patients, videos include some rural-specific considerations related to care coordination. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients must have a newly diagnosed Stage I, II, or III disease at the time of enrollment.
- Patients to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or recent initiation of (within 1 month of starting) adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Patients with a history of previous malignancy treated with chemotherapy within the last 3 years are not eligible, as their perceptions of care coordination may be impacted by their previous treatment.
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patients must be able to read, write, and speak English. Study materials and telephone calls are only available in English.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video Education ProgramThe following topics are addressed in each module of the videos: 1. Understanding cancer and cancer treatment - including an understanding of stage, site of origin, metastases, treatment options, toxicities and anticipated outcomes. 2. Care coordination basics (CC: Communication) - including navigating care related to appointments, how to handle issues after-hours, and the expected roles of other healthcare providers (e.g., PCPs). 3. How to be a self-advocate (CC: Navigation and Operational) - including how to ask questions, being empowered to talk to your doctor, when a second opinion is needed, when to explore clinical trials, and how to best incorporate a caregiver into your treatment. | Behavioural | Video Intervention |
Primary outcome
Changes in rural patients' perceptions of cancer care coordination as assessed by the Care Coordination Instrument at 4-6 months post-intervention.
Time frame: 6 months
2 secondary outcomes
Rural patient satisfaction with video education materials as assessed by semi-structured telephone interview.
Time frame: 6 months
To examine patient demographic and clinical information collected from the background questionnaire as potential correlates of patients' perceptions of cancer care coordination at post-intervention
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39636502Okado I, Braun-Inglis C, Matsumoto K, Elhajj C, Cassel K, Berenberg J, Holcombe RF. Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients. J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug;40(4):594-599. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02550-6. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video Education Program in people with Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in rural patients' perceptions of cancer care coordination as assessed by the Care Coordination Instrument at 4-6 months post-intervention. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162404, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2023.