AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT05162586

The WILLOW Study With M5049 in SLE and CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) (WILLOW)

A Phase 2 study testing Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 153 sites in 22 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus [SCLE] and/or discoid lupus… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
456 participants
Where
153 sitesin 22 countries
Study dates
31 Mar 2022to 20 Nov 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Active CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) with a CLE disease area and activity index (CLASI-A) >= 8
  • Active SLE with presence of: CLASI-A >= 8 and BILAG 2004 1B, C, D (that is [i.e.], No BILAG 2004 A and No BILAG 2004 >= 2B) or BILAG 2004 >= 1A or 2B and 1 or 2 of the following: Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI >= 6 at Screening Visit and confirmed clinical hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI >= 4 (excluding laboratory parameters) at Day 1 Visit and/or CLASI-A >= 8
  • Receiving a stable dose of at least one of the following standards of care therapies for lupus: Immunomodulator/immunosuppressant, oral corticosteroids, and/or topical corticosteroids
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Who cannot join

  • Autoimmune or rheumatic disease other than SLE or CLE
  • Dermatological diseases other than cutaneous manifestations of SLE or CLE
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions including significant cardiovascular events, active lupus nephritis, and active neurological disorder
  • Ongoing or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection
  • History of uncontrolled seizures or other neurological disorder
  • History of or positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus
  • History of malignancy
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Trial locations and contacts

153 sites in 22 countries.

153 sites in 22 countries

China20 sites
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College

    Baotou

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital - Beijing Union Medical College Hospital

    Beijing

  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun

  • The 2nd Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    Changsha

  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University

    Chengdu

  • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital - Oncology

    Guangzhou

  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou

  • Hainan General Hospital

    Haikou

  • The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University

    Hohhot

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology

    Luoyang

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

    Nanchang

  • Hospital for Skin Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    Nanjing

  • The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University

    Nanjing

  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai

  • Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine - West Branch

    Shanghai

  • Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai

  • Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital

    Shanghai

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

    Suzhou

  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

    Tianjin

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

    Xi'an

Other trials in China

United States14 sites
  • Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • Ohio State University - CTMO Parent

    Columbus, Ohio, 43215

  • AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center

    Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439

  • Dawes Fretzin Dermatology Group, LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256

  • Ramesh C Gupta, MD - Memphis, TN

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Advance Medical Research Center

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • New Horizon Research Center, Inc

    Miami, Florida, 33165

  • Charisma Medical and Research Center

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • HMD Research, LLC

    Orlando, Florida, 32819

  • Across the Life Span

    Smithfield, North Carolina, 27577

  • RNA America Health Sciences

    Sugar Hill, Georgia, 30518

  • D&H Tamarac Research Center, LLC

    Tamarac, Florida, 33321

  • The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90509

Other trials in United States

Argentina12 sites
  • CINME - Centro De Investigaciones Metabolicas

    Buenos Aires

  • Buenos Aires Skin

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Centro Dermatologico Schejtman

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Hospital Militar Central Dr. Cosme Argerich

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires

  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar del Plata - CIM

    Mar del Plata

  • Instituto de Reumatologia

    Mendoza

  • Instituto Medico de la Fundacion Estudios Clinicos

    Rosario

  • Instituto Medico de alta Complejidad San Isidro S.A (IMAC)

    San Fernando

  • CER San Juan Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica

    San Juan

  • PSORIAHUE-Medicina Interdisciplinar

    San Miguel

  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman

    San Miguel de Tucumán

  • Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman

    San Miguel de Tucumán

Other trials in Argentina

Japan12 sites
  • NHO Asahikawa Medical Center - Dept of Gastroenterology

    Asahikawa-shi

  • NHO Chibahigashi National Hospital - Dept of Allergy/Rheumatology

    Chiba

  • St. Luke's International Hospital - Dept of Immunology/Allergy

    Chūōku

  • Hiroshima University Hospital - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology

    Hiroshima

  • Eiraku Clinic - Dept of Rheumatology

    Kagoshima

  • Kanazawa University Hospital - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology

    Kanazawa

  • Saitama Medical Center - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology

    Kawagoe-shi

  • Kagawa University Hospital - Dept of Immunology/ Rheumatology

    Kita-gun

  • Toho University Ohashi Medical Center - Dept of Immunology/Rheumatology

    Meguro-ku

  • Hokkaido University Hospital - Dept of Internal Medicine 2(Rheumatology/Immunolog

    Sapporo

  • Tohoku University Hospital - Dept of Hematology/Immunology

    Sendai

  • Ehime University Hospital - Dept of Immunology/Rheumatology

    Toon-shi

Other trials in Japan

Brazil11 sites
  • Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte

    Belo Horizonte

  • Oncovida - Centro de Onco-Hematologia de Mato Grosso

    Cuiabá

  • CETI - Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras Ltda.

    Curitiba

  • HUWC - UFC - Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio - Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Fortaleza

  • CMiP - Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa

    Juiz de Fora

  • Hospital Bruno Born

    Lajeado

  • Hospital Moinhos de Vento

    Porto Alegre

  • Clínica SER da Bahia

    Salvador

  • Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto - CIP - Centro Integrado de Pesquisa

    São José do Rio Preto

  • CEPIC - Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica e Serviços Médicos

    São Paulo

  • CPCLIN - Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas Ltda.

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Mexico11 sites
  • Consultorio Particular del Dr. Miguel Cortes Hernandez - (dentro del Centro de Especialidades Medicas Vista

    Cuernavaca

  • Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica y Clinica SC

    Guadalajara

  • Centro Medico del Angel

    Mexicali

  • Centro de Investigacion Clínica GRAMEL S.C

    México

  • Citer, Centro de Investigación Y Tratamiento de Las Enfermedades Reumaticas Sa de Cv

    México

  • Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.

    México

  • Consultorio de Reumatologia - Hospital Angeles Lindavista Cons. 445B

    México

  • Grupo Medico Camino S.C.

    México

  • CAIMED Investigacion en salud S.A de C.V.

    Mexico City

  • CIMAB S.A. de C.V. - Centro de Investigacion Medica Alberto Bazzoni

    Torreón

  • Medical Care & Research SA de CV

    Yucatán

Other trials in Mexico

Poland8 sites
  • Nova Reuma Spolka Partnerska

    Bialystok

  • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska prof Pawel Hrycaj

    Kościan

  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady

    Krakow

  • Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii Dobry Lekarz

    Krakow

  • Twoja Przychodnia Opolskie Centrum Medyczne

    Opole

  • Twoja Przychodnia PCM

    Poznan

  • Twoja Przychodnia-Szczecinskie Centrum Medyczne

    Szczecin

  • Clinical Best Solutions - Warszawa

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Spain8 sites
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña - Servicio de Reumatologia

    A Coruña

  • Hospital General de Castellon - Servicio de Reumatologia

    Castelló

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre - Servicio de Reumatologia

    Madrid

  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga - Reumatology Dept

    Málaga

  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla - Servicio de Reumatologia

    Santander

  • Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazon - Reumatologia

    Seville

  • Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset - Servicio de Reumatologia

    Valencia

  • Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega - Servicio de Medicina Interna

    Valladolid

Other trials in Spain

Philippines7 sites
  • Perpetual Succour Hospital

    Cebu City

  • Davao Doctors Hospital - Medicine

    Davao City

  • Iloilo Doctors Hospital

    Iloilo City

  • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center

    Lipa City

  • Chinese General Hospital & Medical Center

    Manila

  • Far Eastern University - Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation - Department of Child Health

    Quezon City

  • Ospital Ng Makati

    Quezon City

Other trials in Philippines

Bulgaria6 sites
  • DCC 'Sveti Georgi' EOOD - Cardiology Office

    Haskovo

  • MC Artmed OOD

    Plovdiv

  • Medical Center-1-Sevlievo EOOD

    Sevlievo

  • DCC "Alexandrovska", EOOD

    Sofia

  • Military Medical Academy - MHAT - Sofia - Department of Rheumatology

    Sofia

  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD - Clinic of Rheumatology

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Chile6 sites
  • Clínica Alemana de Osorno

    Osorno

  • BioMedica Research Group - Psicomedica Clinical and Research Group

    Santiago

  • CeCim Biocinetic

    Santiago

  • Centro Medico Prosalud

    Santiago

  • CIEC - Centro Internacional de Estudios Clínicos - Valenzuela Y Compania Ltda

    Santiago

  • Dermacross

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Greece6 sites
  • "Andreas Syggros" Hospital - Department of Dermatology

    Athens

  • General Hospital of Athens Laiko

    Athens

  • University Hospital of Patra

    Pátrai

  • General Hospital of Thessaloniki "Hippokration"

    Thessaloniki

  • General Hospital Papageorgiou

    Thessaloniki

  • Skin and Venereal Diseases' Hospital

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

Romania6 sites
  • Centrul Medical Monza SRL - Arensia Exploratory Medicine

    Bucharest

  • S.C Delta Health Care S.R.L - Ponderas Academic Hospital

    Bucharest

  • Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria" - Clinica de Medicina Interna si Reumatologie

    Bucharest

  • Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria" - parent

    Bucharest

  • Spitalul Clinic Colentina - parent

    Bucharest

  • Sc Medaudio-Optica SRL

    Râmnicu Vâlcea

Other trials in Romania

Colombia5 sites
  • Centro de Investigacion Medico Asistencial S.A.S

    Barranquilla

  • Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas CIREEM S.A.S.

    Bogotá

  • Servimed S.A.S.

    Bucaramanga

  • Centro Integral de Reumatologia del Caribe SAS CIRCARIBE SAS

    Medellín

  • Healthy Medical Center

    Zipaquirá

Other trials in Colombia

Serbia5 sites
  • Institute of Rheumatology- 1

    Belgrade

  • Institute of Rheumatology-1

    Belgrade

  • Institute of Rheumatology

    Belgrade

  • University Clinical Center of Serbia - Clinic of Alergology and Imunology

    Belgrade

  • University Clinical Center Kragujevac

    Kragujevac

Other trials in Serbia

South Korea4 sites
  • Pusan National University Hospital

    Busan

  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center

    Incheon

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

  • Ajou University Hospital

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

Australia3 sites
  • Monash Medical Centre Clayton

    Clayton

  • Westmead Hospital - SUPERSEDED

    Westmead

  • Veracity Clinical Research

    Woolloongabba

Other trials in Australia

South Africa3 sites
  • Arthritis Clinical Research Trial Unit - Dr CE Spargo and Dr RB Bhorat

    Cape Town

  • University of Pretoria Clinical Research Unit - Parent

    Pretoria

  • Naidoo, A - Netcare Umhlanga Hospital

    Umhlanga

Other trials in South Africa

Taiwan3 sites
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City

  • Cheng Hsin General Hospital

    Taipei

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

Israel1 site
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center - pt

    Ramat Gan

Other trials in Israel

Mauritius1 site
  • CAP Research Ltd

    Quatre Bornes

Other trials in Mauritius

Moldova1 site
  • ICS ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine SRL - Republican Clinical Hospital "Timofei Mosneaga"

    Chisinau

Other trials in Moldova

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging, Parallel and Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enpatoran in SLE and in CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) Participants Receiving Standard of Care (WILLOW)

The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus [SCLE] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus [DLE]) participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, adaptive and dose-ranging setting. Study Duration: 33 weeks Visit Frequency: every 2 or 4 weeks Enpatoran is not available through an expanded access program.

Being tested
Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose, Enpatoran high dose, Placebo
Keywords
Toll-like Receptor 7, Toll-like Receptor 8, WILLOW, Adults, SLE, CLE, Lupus, Discoid lupus erythematosus, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, M5049, Enpatoran
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid, Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enpatoran low doseDrug

    Also called M5049

    Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a low dose orally, twice daily (BID) up to 24 weeks.

  • Enpatoran medium doseDrug

    Also called M5049

    Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a medium dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.

  • Enpatoran high doseDrug

    Also called M5049

    Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a high dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants will receive placebo matched to Enpatoran up to 24 weeks.

Study groups in NCT05162586
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort A: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index [CLASI-A] greater than or equal to [>=] 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Cohort A: Enpatoran low doseExperimentalParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive low dose of Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran low dose
Cohort A: Enpatoran medium doseExperimentalParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive medium dose of Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran medium dose
Cohort A: Enpatoran high doseExperimentalParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive high dose of Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran high dose
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG A/2B]) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran .
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran high doseExperimentalParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive high dose of Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran high dose
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran low doseExperimentalParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive low dose of M5049.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran low dose
Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran medium doseExperimentalParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive medium dose of Enpatoran.
Receives: Drug: Enpatoran medium dose

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16

    The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.

    Measured: Baseline, week 16

  2. Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24

    BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.

    Measured: At Week 24

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

    Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

  2. Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.

    Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

  3. Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)

    12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported.

    Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)

  4. Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24

    The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates "clear" skin and 4 represents "severe" disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24

  5. Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24

    The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24

  6. Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction

    BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity.

    Measured: At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)

  7. Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction

    CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from >= 10 mg at Day 1 to <= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported.

    Measured: Day 1 up to Week 24

  8. Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24

    The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates "clear" skin and 4 represents "severe" disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported.

    Measured: At Week 16 and Week 24

  9. Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24

    SRI-4 response was defined as >= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).

    Measured: At Week 24

  10. Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24

    Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported.

    Measured: At Week 24

  11. Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24

    Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus <0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported.

    Measured: At Week 24

  12. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24

    The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be "absent", "present", "replaced" or "unable to evaluate".Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported.

    Measured: At Week 24

  13. Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare

    Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24

  14. Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare

    Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose >0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24

  15. Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24

    The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and at week 24

  16. Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24

    The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "never" to 5 = "all the time") and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

  17. Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24

    The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

  18. Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24

    The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

  19. Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much". Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2021
  2. Study start31 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion20 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
456 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05162586
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS200569_0003
Other IDs
2021-004648-27, 2024-510872-18-00
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
8 Dec 2021
Last updated
1 Dec 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21

Publications

  • Morand EF, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Furie R, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Roy S, Goodson SG, Moreau F, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Pearson DR. Efficacy and safety of enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in patients with skin manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus or systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort A of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2026 Jul;8(7):e513-e527. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00337-6. Epub 2026 May 7.

    PubMed 42107375
  • Morand EF, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Pearson DR, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Roy S, Kleinmond C, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Moreau F, Fernandez-Ruiz R, Furie R. Enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort B of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2026 May 9;407(10541):1809-1824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00463-0.

    PubMed 42107374

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 153 sites in 22 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 153 sites in China, United States, Argentina, Japan, Brazil and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162586, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in