Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT05162586
The WILLOW Study With M5049 in SLE and CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) (WILLOW)
A Phase 2 study testing Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 153 sites in 22 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus [SCLE] and/or discoid lupus… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 456 participants
- Where
- 153 sitesin 22 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2022to 20 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Active CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) with a CLE disease area and activity index (CLASI-A) >= 8
- Active SLE with presence of: CLASI-A >= 8 and BILAG 2004 1B, C, D (that is [i.e.], No BILAG 2004 A and No BILAG 2004 >= 2B) or BILAG 2004 >= 1A or 2B and 1 or 2 of the following: Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI >= 6 at Screening Visit and confirmed clinical hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI >= 4 (excluding laboratory parameters) at Day 1 Visit and/or CLASI-A >= 8
- Receiving a stable dose of at least one of the following standards of care therapies for lupus: Immunomodulator/immunosuppressant, oral corticosteroids, and/or topical corticosteroids
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Who cannot join
- Autoimmune or rheumatic disease other than SLE or CLE
- Dermatological diseases other than cutaneous manifestations of SLE or CLE
- Uncontrolled medical conditions including significant cardiovascular events, active lupus nephritis, and active neurological disorder
- Ongoing or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection
- History of uncontrolled seizures or other neurological disorder
- History of or positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B virus
- History of malignancy
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Trial locations and contacts
153 sites in 22 countries.
153 sites in 22 countries
China20 sites
The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College
Baotou
Peking Union Medical College Hospital - Beijing Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun
The 2nd Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital - Oncology
Guangzhou
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou
Hainan General Hospital
Haikou
The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University
Hohhot
The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology
Luoyang
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang
Hospital for Skin Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Nanjing
The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University
Nanjing
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai
Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine - West Branch
Shanghai
Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
Shanghai
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an
United States14 sites
Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Ohio State University - CTMO Parent
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439
Dawes Fretzin Dermatology Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Ramesh C Gupta, MD - Memphis, TN
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Advance Medical Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33135
New Horizon Research Center, Inc
Miami, Florida, 33165
Charisma Medical and Research Center
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
HMD Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Across the Life Span
Smithfield, North Carolina, 27577
RNA America Health Sciences
Sugar Hill, Georgia, 30518
D&H Tamarac Research Center, LLC
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90509
Argentina12 sites
CINME - Centro De Investigaciones Metabolicas
Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires Skin
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Centro Dermatologico Schejtman
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Hospital Militar Central Dr. Cosme Argerich
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar del Plata - CIM
Mar del Plata
Instituto de Reumatologia
Mendoza
Instituto Medico de la Fundacion Estudios Clinicos
Rosario
Instituto Medico de alta Complejidad San Isidro S.A (IMAC)
San Fernando
CER San Juan Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica
San Juan
PSORIAHUE-Medicina Interdisciplinar
San Miguel
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán
Investigaciones Clinicas Tucuman
San Miguel de Tucumán
Japan12 sites
NHO Asahikawa Medical Center - Dept of Gastroenterology
Asahikawa-shi
NHO Chibahigashi National Hospital - Dept of Allergy/Rheumatology
Chiba
St. Luke's International Hospital - Dept of Immunology/Allergy
Chūōku
Hiroshima University Hospital - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology
Hiroshima
Eiraku Clinic - Dept of Rheumatology
Kagoshima
Kanazawa University Hospital - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology
Kanazawa
Saitama Medical Center - Dept of Rheumatology/Immunology
Kawagoe-shi
Kagawa University Hospital - Dept of Immunology/ Rheumatology
Kita-gun
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center - Dept of Immunology/Rheumatology
Meguro-ku
Hokkaido University Hospital - Dept of Internal Medicine 2(Rheumatology/Immunolog
Sapporo
Tohoku University Hospital - Dept of Hematology/Immunology
Sendai
Ehime University Hospital - Dept of Immunology/Rheumatology
Toon-shi
Brazil11 sites
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte
Belo Horizonte
Oncovida - Centro de Onco-Hematologia de Mato Grosso
Cuiabá
CETI - Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras Ltda.
Curitiba
HUWC - UFC - Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio - Universidade Federal do Ceará
Fortaleza
CMiP - Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa
Juiz de Fora
Hospital Bruno Born
Lajeado
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Porto Alegre
Clínica SER da Bahia
Salvador
Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto - CIP - Centro Integrado de Pesquisa
São José do Rio Preto
CEPIC - Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica e Serviços Médicos
São Paulo
CPCLIN - Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas Ltda.
São Paulo
Mexico11 sites
Consultorio Particular del Dr. Miguel Cortes Hernandez - (dentro del Centro de Especialidades Medicas Vista
Cuernavaca
Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica y Clinica SC
Guadalajara
Centro Medico del Angel
Mexicali
Centro de Investigacion Clínica GRAMEL S.C
México
Citer, Centro de Investigación Y Tratamiento de Las Enfermedades Reumaticas Sa de Cv
México
Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.
México
Consultorio de Reumatologia - Hospital Angeles Lindavista Cons. 445B
México
Grupo Medico Camino S.C.
México
CAIMED Investigacion en salud S.A de C.V.
Mexico City
CIMAB S.A. de C.V. - Centro de Investigacion Medica Alberto Bazzoni
Torreón
Medical Care & Research SA de CV
Yucatán
Poland8 sites
Nova Reuma Spolka Partnerska
Bialystok
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska prof Pawel Hrycaj
Kościan
Centrum Medyczne Plejady
Krakow
Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii Dobry Lekarz
Krakow
Twoja Przychodnia Opolskie Centrum Medyczne
Opole
Twoja Przychodnia PCM
Poznan
Twoja Przychodnia-Szczecinskie Centrum Medyczne
Szczecin
Clinical Best Solutions - Warszawa
Warsaw
Spain8 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña - Servicio de Reumatologia
A Coruña
Hospital General de Castellon - Servicio de Reumatologia
Castelló
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre - Servicio de Reumatologia
Madrid
Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga - Reumatology Dept
Málaga
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla - Servicio de Reumatologia
Santander
Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazon - Reumatologia
Seville
Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset - Servicio de Reumatologia
Valencia
Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega - Servicio de Medicina Interna
Valladolid
Philippines7 sites
Perpetual Succour Hospital
Cebu City
Davao Doctors Hospital - Medicine
Davao City
Iloilo Doctors Hospital
Iloilo City
Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
Lipa City
Chinese General Hospital & Medical Center
Manila
Far Eastern University - Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation - Department of Child Health
Quezon City
Ospital Ng Makati
Quezon City
Bulgaria6 sites
DCC 'Sveti Georgi' EOOD - Cardiology Office
Haskovo
MC Artmed OOD
Plovdiv
Medical Center-1-Sevlievo EOOD
Sevlievo
DCC "Alexandrovska", EOOD
Sofia
Military Medical Academy - MHAT - Sofia - Department of Rheumatology
Sofia
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD - Clinic of Rheumatology
Sofia
Chile6 sites
Clínica Alemana de Osorno
Osorno
BioMedica Research Group - Psicomedica Clinical and Research Group
Santiago
CeCim Biocinetic
Santiago
Centro Medico Prosalud
Santiago
CIEC - Centro Internacional de Estudios Clínicos - Valenzuela Y Compania Ltda
Santiago
Dermacross
Santiago
Greece6 sites
"Andreas Syggros" Hospital - Department of Dermatology
Athens
General Hospital of Athens Laiko
Athens
University Hospital of Patra
Pátrai
General Hospital of Thessaloniki "Hippokration"
Thessaloniki
General Hospital Papageorgiou
Thessaloniki
Skin and Venereal Diseases' Hospital
Thessaloniki
Romania6 sites
Centrul Medical Monza SRL - Arensia Exploratory Medicine
Bucharest
S.C Delta Health Care S.R.L - Ponderas Academic Hospital
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria" - Clinica de Medicina Interna si Reumatologie
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic "Sf. Maria" - parent
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic Colentina - parent
Bucharest
Sc Medaudio-Optica SRL
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Colombia5 sites
Centro de Investigacion Medico Asistencial S.A.S
Barranquilla
Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas CIREEM S.A.S.
Bogotá
Servimed S.A.S.
Bucaramanga
Centro Integral de Reumatologia del Caribe SAS CIRCARIBE SAS
Medellín
Healthy Medical Center
Zipaquirá
Serbia5 sites
Institute of Rheumatology- 1
Belgrade
Institute of Rheumatology-1
Belgrade
Institute of Rheumatology
Belgrade
University Clinical Center of Serbia - Clinic of Alergology and Imunology
Belgrade
University Clinical Center Kragujevac
Kragujevac
South Korea4 sites
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon
Australia3 sites
Monash Medical Centre Clayton
Clayton
Westmead Hospital - SUPERSEDED
Westmead
Veracity Clinical Research
Woolloongabba
South Africa3 sites
Arthritis Clinical Research Trial Unit - Dr CE Spargo and Dr RB Bhorat
Cape Town
University of Pretoria Clinical Research Unit - Parent
Pretoria
Naidoo, A - Netcare Umhlanga Hospital
Umhlanga
Taiwan3 sites
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
Cheng Hsin General Hospital
Taipei
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei
Moldova1 site
ICS ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine SRL - Republican Clinical Hospital "Timofei Mosneaga"
Chisinau
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging, Parallel and Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enpatoran in SLE and in CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) Participants Receiving Standard of Care (WILLOW)
The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus [SCLE] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus [DLE]) participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, adaptive and dose-ranging setting. Study Duration: 33 weeks Visit Frequency: every 2 or 4 weeks Enpatoran is not available through an expanded access program.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose, Enpatoran high dose, Placebo
- Keywords
- Toll-like Receptor 7, Toll-like Receptor 8, WILLOW, Adults, SLE, CLE, Lupus, Discoid lupus erythematosus, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, M5049, Enpatoran
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid, Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enpatoran low doseDrug
Also called M5049
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a low dose orally, twice daily (BID) up to 24 weeks.
Enpatoran medium doseDrug
Also called M5049
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a medium dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.
Enpatoran high doseDrug
Also called M5049
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a high dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive placebo matched to Enpatoran up to 24 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index [CLASI-A] greater than or equal to [>=] 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran low dose | Experimental | Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive low dose of Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran low dose |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran medium dose | Experimental | Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive medium dose of Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran medium dose |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran high dose | Experimental | Participants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive high dose of Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran high dose |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG A/2B]) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran . Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran high dose | Experimental | Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive high dose of Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran high dose |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran low dose | Experimental | Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive low dose of M5049. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran low dose |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran medium dose | Experimental | Participants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive medium dose of Enpatoran. Receives: Drug: Enpatoran medium dose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16
The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.
Measured: Baseline, week 16
Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24
BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.
Measured: At Week 24
Secondary outcomes (19)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.
Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, Urinalysis, Renal Toxicity and Hepatotoxicity. Number of Participants with Abnormal laboratory parameters (severity of grade greater or equal to 3) were reported. Severity of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.
Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical importance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically important increases in QTCF findings were reported.
Measured: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24
The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates "clear" skin and 4 represents "severe" disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe).
Measured: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The score reflects the clinician's integrated judgment based on clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory findings, and patient-reported outcomes. PGA is used to quantify disease severity and monitor treatment response over time. Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
BICLA (BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment) defines response as improvement in all baseline BILAG A scores to B, C, or D and all B scores to C or D, with no new A scores and no more than one new B score. Responders must also show no worsening in SLEDAI-2K or Physician's Global Assessment (defined as ≥0.3-point increase). Corticosteroid (CS) reduction is defined as a decrease in daily prednisone-equivalent dose from ≥10 mg at Day 1 to ≤5 mg by Week 12, sustained through Week 24. BILAG grades reflect disease severity: A = severe disease requiring high-dose therapy; B = moderate disease requiring moderate therapy; C = mild stable disease; D = no current activity.
Measured: At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
CS reduction is defined as the reduction of daily prednisone-equivalent dose from >= 10 mg at Day 1 to <= 5 mg by the Week 12 visit and sustained through Week 24. The number of participants with Clinically Meaningful CS Reduction were reported.
Measured: Day 1 up to Week 24
Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24
The Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) is a validated clinician-reported outcome measure used to assess disease severity in participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is based on a 5-point ordinal scale that evaluates overall lesion characteristics, where 0 indicates "clear" skin and 4 represents "severe" disease. The scale includes the following categories: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The number of participants with CLA-IGA score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24 were reported.
Measured: At Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24
SRI-4 response was defined as >= 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor).
Measured: At Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24
Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24 is defined as meeting all of the following criteria at the specified time point: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems, no new disease activity compared to the previous assessment, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1, current prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day, and standard maintenance dosing of immunosuppressive therapies. The number of participants with LLDAS Attainment at Week 24 were reported.
Measured: At Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24
Remission attainment was defined as a Clinical Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score of 0, Physician's Global Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus <0.5 (0-3 scale), daily prednisolone-equivalent dose ≤5 mg, and stable use of immunosuppressive therapies including biologics. Number of participants who attained remission was reported.
Measured: At Week 24
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24
The 28-joint count questionnaire assesses 14 joints on each side (28 joints overall) for both tenderness and swelling. The outcome for the assessment of each joint can be "absent", "present", "replaced" or "unable to evaluate".Tender 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are tender. Swollen 28-joint count will be derived as the count of joints which are swollen. The number of tender and swollen joints will be calculated as the count of joints which are both tender and swollen. Percentage of Participants with 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24 was reported.
Measured: At Week 24
Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare
Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of moderate or severe disease activity, as measured by the BILAG Index. The BILAG Index assesses clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) across 9 organ systems. Each organ system is scored alphabetically: A (severe disease), B (moderate disease), C (mild stable disease), D (inactive but previously active), and E (inactive and never affected). A moderate/severe flare is defined as the presence of at least one new or worsening BILAG A score (severe disease activity) or two or more new or worsening BILAG B scores (moderate disease activity) in any organ system, compared to the previous visit. Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare
Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare is defined as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of a severe flare, as measured by the SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI). A severe flare is characterized by a ≥12-point increase in the SLEDAI score from the previous visit, accompanied by a ≥2.5-point increase in the physician's global assessment (on a 0-3 visual analogue scale), and a change in treatment such as initiation of corticosteroids at a dose >0.5 mg/kg/day and/or the addition of a new immunosuppressive agent. Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The symptoms domain includes items measuring physical sensations such as itching, burning, stinging, and pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and at week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The functioning domain assesses the impact of skin disease on daily activities, social interactions, and work. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "never" to 5 = "all the time") and transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater impairment in functioning.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex 29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations, and includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific for lupus. Subscale scores are generated for each of the 3 original domains of the Skindex-29 i.e., symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscale scores, higher scores indicate lower functioning/worse symptoms. The emotion domain of the Skindex-29+3 assesses the psychological impact of skin disease in individuals with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It includes items that measure feelings such as embarrassment, frustration, anger, sadness, and worry related to skin symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24
The Skindex-29+3 is a self-reported measure of skin-specific symptoms and functioning for CLE populations. It includes items from the Skindex-29, designed for use across dermatologic conditions, and 3 additional items specific to lupus. Subscale scores are generated for the 3 original domains: symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. For all subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms or lower functioning. The lupus-specific domain captures symptoms and concerns unique to cutaneous lupus, including sensitivity to sunlight, flares from environmental exposure, and emotional impact of lupus-related skin changes. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("never") to 5 ("all the time"), and scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater symptom burden and disease impact.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item, self-reported questionnaire designed to assess fatigue and its impact on daily activities and functioning in individuals with chronic illness, including systemic lupus erythematosus. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much". Items are scored to ensure that 0 represents the worst and 4 the best possible outcome. The score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start31 Mar 2022
- Primary completion20 Nov 2024
- Study completion20 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 456 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162586
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS200569_0003
- Other IDs
- 2021-004648-27, 2024-510872-18-00
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
Publications
Morand EF, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Furie R, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Roy S, Goodson SG, Moreau F, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Pearson DR. Efficacy and safety of enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in patients with skin manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus or systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort A of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2026 Jul;8(7):e513-e527. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00337-6. Epub 2026 May 7.
PubMed 42107375Morand EF, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Pearson DR, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Roy S, Kleinmond C, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Moreau F, Fernandez-Ruiz R, Furie R. Enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort B of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2026 May 9;407(10541):1809-1824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00463-0.
PubMed 42107374
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging, Parallel and Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enpatoran in SLE and in CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) Participants Receiving Standard of Care (WILLOW)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162586
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS200569_0003
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- Toll-like Receptor 7, Toll-like Receptor 8, WILLOW, Adults, SLE, CLE, Lupus, Discoid lupus erythematosus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 456 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this Proof of Concept (PoC) and Dose-finding (DF) basket study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Enpatoran over 24 weeks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE; subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus [SCLE] and/or discoid lupus erythematosus [DLE]) participants in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, adaptive and dose-ranging setting. Study Duration: 33 weeks Visit Frequency: every 2 or 4 weeks Enpatoran is not available through an expanded access program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index [CLASI-A] greater than or equal to [>=] 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran. |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran low dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran low doseParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive low dose of Enpatoran. |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran medium dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran medium doseParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive medium dose of Enpatoran. |
| Cohort A: Enpatoran high dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran high doseParticipants with CLE (active SCLE and/or DLE) or SLE with predominantly active lupus rash (CLASI-A >= 8) will be enrolled in Cohort A to receive high dose of Enpatoran. |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG A/2B]) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive placebo matched to Enpatoran . |
| Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran high dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran high doseParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive high dose of Enpatoran. |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran low dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran low doseParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive low dose of M5049. |
| Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran medium dose | Experimental | Drug: Enpatoran medium doseParticipants with active SLE who have moderate to high systemic disease activity (BILAG A/2B) with 1 or 2 of the following: CLASI-A >= 8 and/or SLEDAI >= 6 will be enrolled in Cohort B to receive medium dose of Enpatoran. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Active CLE (SCLE and/or DLE) with a CLE disease area and activity index (CLASI-A) >= 8
- Active SLE with presence of: CLASI-A >= 8 and BILAG 2004 1B, C, D (that is [i.e.], No BILAG 2004 A and No BILAG 2004 >= 2B) or BILAG 2004 >= 1A or 2B and 1 or 2 of the following: Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI >= 6 at Screening Visit and confirmed clinical hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI >= 4 (excluding laboratory parameters) at Day 1 Visit and/or CLASI-A >= 8
- Receiving a stable dose of at least one of the following standards of care therapies for lupus: Immunomodulator/immunosuppressant, oral corticosteroids, and/or topical corticosteroids
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Autoimmune or rheumatic disease other than SLE or CLE
- Dermatological diseases other than cutaneous manifestations of SLE or CLE
- Uncontrolled medical conditions including significant cardiovascular events, active lupus nephritis, and active neurological disorder
- Ongoing or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection
- History of uncontrolled seizures or other neurological disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enpatoran low doseAlso: M5049Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a low dose orally, twice daily (BID) up to 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort A: Enpatoran low dose, Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran low dose |
| Enpatoran medium doseAlso: M5049Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a medium dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort A: Enpatoran medium dose, Cohort B (Part 2): Enpatoran medium dose |
| Enpatoran high doseAlso: M5049Participants will receive film-coated tablets of Enpatoran at a high dose, orally, BID up to 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort A: Enpatoran high dose, Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Enpatoran high dose |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo matched to Enpatoran up to 24 weeks. | Drug | Cohort A: Placebo, Cohort B (Part 1 + Part 2): Placebo |
Primary outcome
Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, week 16
The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index) was a validated instrument used to assess disease activity (CLASI-A) and damage in lupus erythematosus. The activity scale included erythema, scale/hypertrophy, active alopecia, recent hair loss, and mucous membrane disease, while the damage scale measured dyspigmentation, atrophy, and scarring. CLASI-A scores ranged from 0 to 70, with mild, moderate, and severe disease corresponding to scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70, respectively. Erythema and scale/hypertrophy sub-scores were computed across 13 body areas, with maximum scores of 39 and 26, respectively. The remaining 5 points reflected contributions from active alopecia (0-3), recent hair loss (0-1), and mucous membrane involvement (0-1), completing the total CLASI-A activity score. Directionality reflected worsening with higher scores and improvement with lower scores.
Cohort B: Number of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
BILAG-based BICLA response is defined as participants meeting all of the following criteria: 1. Improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all organ systems with moderate or severe disease activity-i.e., all grade A scores (severe disease requiring high-dose therapy) must improve to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity); all grade B scores (moderate disease requiring moderate therapy) must improve to C or D; 2. No new BILAG A scores and no more than one new BILAG B score; 3. No worsening in total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; 4. No significant deterioration (≤10%) in physician's global assessment; and 5. No treatment failure, defined as initiation of non-protocol therapy. Directionality is toward clinical improvement and disease stabilization.
19 secondary outcomes
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Important Increases in QT Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF)
Time frame: From screening upto safety follow up period (up to approximately 33 weeks)
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator's Global Assessment (CLA-IGA) Scale Score at Week 16 and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort A and Cohort B: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Cutaneous Lupus Disease Activity Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Both BICLA Response and With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
Time frame: At week 24 (BICLA Response) and Day 1 upto Week 24 (CS Reductions)
Cohort A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Corticosteroids (CS) Reduction
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24
Cohort A: Number of Participants With CLA-IGA Score 0 or 1 at Week 16 and Week 24
Time frame: At Week 16 and Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Attainment at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Cohort B: Number of Participants With Remission Attainment at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Baseline Tender and Swollen Count at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Cohort B: Time to First Moderate/Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flare
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Cohort B: Time to First Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Flare Index (SFI) Severe Flare
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Skindex 29+3 Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Functioning Domain Scores at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Emotion Domain Scores at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in the Skindex 29+3 Lupus-Specific Domain Scores at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Cohort A and B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scores at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42107375Morand EF, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Furie R, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Roy S, Goodson SG, Moreau F, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Pearson DR. Efficacy and safety of enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in patients with skin manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus or systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort A of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2026 Jul;8(7):e513-e527. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00337-6. Epub 2026 May 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42107374Morand EF, Dall'Era M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Pearson DR, Werth VP, Wenzel J, Roy S, Kleinmond C, Guhring H, Sgouroudi E, Klopp-Schulze L, Moreau F, Fernandez-Ruiz R, Furie R. Enpatoran, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from Cohort B of a multicentre, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2026 May 9;407(10541):1809-1824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00463-0.
- Trial Awareness and Transparency websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- US Medical Information website, Medical ResourcesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruiting
Lupus Education Alliance Program
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, COVID-19
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) in Ovarian Preservation in SLE Subjects Receiving Cyclophosphamide as Determined by Questionnaires
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Sle), Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (Poi)
Active, not recruiting
Fatigue in Lupus Intervention Programmes (FLIP)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CLN-978, a Subcutaneously Administered CD19-directed T Cell Engager, in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLE, SLE (Systemic Lupus)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
153 sites in 22 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Enpatoran low dose, Enpatoran medium dose and Enpatoran high dose in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 153 sites in 22 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 153 sites in China, United States, Argentina, Japan, Brazil and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cohort A: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) Total Score at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162586, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.