Breast CancerMiGHTNCT05162846
Michigan Genetic Hereditary Testing (MiGHT)
A study testing Publicly available genetic testing resources, Virtual genetics navigator and Motivational interviewing (MI) in people with Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare three interventions, two experimental and one standard of care (usual care), to see if the experimental interventions will increase the likelihood of a participant obtaining guideline-concordant genetic testing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Publicly available genetic testing resources, Virtual genetics navigator and Motivational interviewing (MI)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 793 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Apr 2022to 21 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to speak and read English
- Access to the internet
- Completed the Family Health History Tool (FHHT)
- Meeting clinical criteria for genetic evaluation due to any of the below:
- Personal history of Breast cancer either:
- i. Diagnosed under 50
Show all 29Show fewer
- ii. Personal or family history of triple negative breast cancer
- iii. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry
- iv. Male proband
- v. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer diagnosed under 50, or male breast cancer
- Personal history of prostate cancer either:
- i. Diagnosed under 50
- ii. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry
- iii. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer diagnosed under 50, or male breast cancer
- Personal history of any cancer or no personal history of cancer with either:
- i. PREMM score ≥ 2.5%
- ii. 1st degree relative with pancreatic, or male breast cancer
- iii. 1st or 2nd degree relative with ovarian cancer
- iv. 1st degree relative with any of these cancers diagnosed under 50: colon, endometrial, or breast
- v. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry and 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast cancer
- Personal history of endometrial cancer diagnosed under 50
- Personal history of colorectal cancer diagnosed under 50
- Personal history of renal cancer diagnosed under 46
- Personal history of sarcoma diagnosed under 46 and a 1st or 2nd degree relative with sarcoma, breast cancer, or brain cancer diagnosed under 56
- Personal history of brain cancer diagnosed under 46 and a 1st or 2nd degree relative with sarcoma, breast cancer, or brain cancer diagnosed under 56
- Personal history of any two of the following cancers with at least one of them diagnosed under 46: breast, sarcoma, or brain
- Personal history of ovarian cancer
- Personal history of pancreatic cancer
- Personal history of adrenal cortical carcinoma
Who cannot join
- Prior clinical germline genetic testing for cancer or already have an upcoming appointment scheduled with a genetics provider
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
About this study
Official title: Methods for Increasing Genetic Testing Uptake in Michigan
The primary purpose of this study is to compare three interventions, two experimental and one standard of care (usual care), to see if the experimental interventions will increase the likelihood of a participant obtaining guideline-concordant genetic testing. Eligible participants will be randomized (assigned) to one of the following interventions: 1) Virtual genetics navigator, a mobile-optimized website, designed by the investigators, that delivers tailored messages and content; 2) two motivational interviewing (MI) telephone calls delivered by trained genetics health coaches; or 3) usual care.
Read the detailed description
This trial will be conducted in partnership with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) and a network of oncology practices in Michigan, the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC).
As of April 2023 we were approved by our IRB to expand our inclusion criteria and recruitment cohort. This expansion will enhance our reach to individuals who are not in the acute stages of clinical care as well as individuals who are not in oncology care currently yet still qualify for genetic testing based on their family history of cancer alone or in combination with any personal cancer history. These expansions will also support the unburdening of oncology practices - who continue to face downstream, resource-limiting affects from the COVID-19 pandemic - across the state. The goal and aims of the study remain the same.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Endometrial Cancer
- Being tested
- Publicly available genetic testing resources, Virtual genetics navigator, Motivational interviewing (MI)
- Keywords
- Genetic testing, Genetic susceptibility to malignant neoplasm
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Publicly available genetic testing resourcesOther
Participants may view the publicly available Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) website as they wish.
Virtual genetics navigatorBehavioural
A mobile-optimized website/online genetic tool developed by investigators from the University of Michigan's Center for Health Communications Research (CHCR).
Motivational interviewing (MI)Behavioural
At least 2 phone calls delivered by trained genetic health coaches using motivational interviewing and providing genetic testing information.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Usual care (UC) | Active comparator | Participants are provided with a link to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) informational website and are instructed to follow up with their oncology provider about genetic testing. Receives: Other: Publicly available genetic testing resources |
| Arm 2 - Virtual genetics navigator | Experimental | Participants receive access to an online genetics tool, the virtual genetics navigator, to help learn why and how to seek out genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. Receives: Behavioral: Virtual genetics navigator |
| Arm 3 - Motivational interviewing (MI) | Experimental | Participants receive up to 2 phone calls from trained genetics health coaches who provide information about genetic testing and use motivational interviewing to encourage participants to seek out clinical genetic testing. Receives: Behavioral: Motivational interviewing (MI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Complete Clinical Genetic Testing at Six Months After Randomization
The primary outcome is completion of genetic testing (yes/no) at 6 months after randomization by patient self-report.
Measured: 6 months after enrollment/randomization
Secondary outcomes (4)
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing
Participants who have completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 7-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific barriers that were identified in a previous, observational study. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all; 5=extremely). The mean score for each question, across all participants who completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the barriers in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific barrier.
Measured: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing
Participants who have not yet completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 23-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific barriers that were identified in a previous, observational study. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all, 5=strongly agree). The mean score for each question, across all participants who have not yet completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the barriers in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific barrier.
Measured: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing
Participants who have completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 5-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific motivators for future testing. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all; 5=extremely). The mean score for each question, across all participants who completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the motivators in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific motivator.
Measured: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing
Participants who have not yet completed genetic testing (before the 6- or 12-month time point for this survey) will be asked to respond to this 5-item, study-specific survey, developed by the investigators to assess the importance of specific motivators for future testing. Each item is scored on a scale from 1-5 (1=not at all, 5=strongly agree). The mean score for each question, across all participants who have not yet completed genetic testing, will be calculated in order to rank the motivators in importance. A higher mean score indicates greater importance of that specific motivator.
Measured: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start21 Apr 2022
- Primary completion13 Jul 2025
- Study completion21 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 793 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elena Stoffel, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMCC 2021.076
- Other IDs
- U01CA232827, HUM00192898
- Acronym
- MiGHT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Austin S, Delacroix E, Rice JD, Koeppe E, Rizzo E, Hanson EN, Arida-Moody L, Weiner S, Hawley ST, Uhlmann WR, Roberts JS, Pleasant V, Ellis KR, Griggs JJ, Resnicow K, Stoffel EM. Digital and Coaching Interventions for Uptake of Cancer Genetic Testing: The MiGHT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Oct 1;9(10):e2638274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.38274.
PubMed 42867866Gerido LH, Griggs JJ, Resnicow K, Kidwell KM, Delacroix E, Austin S, Hanson EN, Bacon E, Koeppe E, Goodall S, Demerath M, Rizzo EA, Weiner S, Hawley ST, Uhlmann WR, Roberts JS, Stoffel EM. The Michigan Genetic Hereditary Testing (MiGHT) study's innovative approaches to promote uptake of clinical genetic testing among cancer patients: a study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Feb 10;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07125-2.
PubMed 36765432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Methods for Increasing Genetic Testing Uptake in Michigan
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MiGHT / UMCC 2021.076
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Endometrial Cancer
- Keywords
- Genetic testing, Genetic susceptibility to malignant neoplasm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 793 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 21 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Aug 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare three interventions, two experimental and one standard of care (usual care), to see if the experimental interventions will increase the likelihood of a participant obtaining guideline-concordant genetic testing. Eligible participants will be randomized (assigned) to one of the following interventions: 1) Virtual genetics navigator, a mobile-optimized website, designed by the investigators, that delivers tailored messages and content; 2) two motivational interviewing (MI) telephone calls delivered by trained genetics health coaches; or 3) usual care.
Detailed description
This trial will be conducted in partnership with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) and a network of oncology practices in Michigan, the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC).
As of April 2023 we were approved by our IRB to expand our inclusion criteria and recruitment cohort. This expansion will enhance our reach to individuals who are not in the acute stages of clinical care as well as individuals who are not in oncology care currently yet still qualify for genetic testing based on their family history of cancer alone or in combination with any personal cancer history. These expansions will also support the unburdening of oncology practices - who continue to face downstream, resource-limiting affects from the COVID-19 pandemic - across the state. The goal and aims of the study remain the same.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Usual care (UC) | Active comparator | Other: Publicly available genetic testing resourcesParticipants are provided with a link to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) informational website and are instructed to follow up with their oncology provider about genetic testing. |
| Arm 2 - Virtual genetics navigator | Experimental | Behavioral: Virtual genetics navigatorParticipants receive access to an online genetics tool, the virtual genetics navigator, to help learn why and how to seek out genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. |
| Arm 3 - Motivational interviewing (MI) | Experimental | Behavioral: Motivational interviewing (MI)Participants receive up to 2 phone calls from trained genetics health coaches who provide information about genetic testing and use motivational interviewing to encourage participants to seek out clinical genetic testing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Able to speak and read English
- Access to the internet
- Completed the Family Health History Tool (FHHT)
- Meeting clinical criteria for genetic evaluation due to any of the below:
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Prior clinical germline genetic testing for cancer or already have an upcoming appointment scheduled with a genetics provider
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Publicly available genetic testing resourcesParticipants may view the publicly available Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) website as they wish. | Other | Arm 1 - Usual care (UC) |
| Virtual genetics navigatorA mobile-optimized website/online genetic tool developed by investigators from the University of Michigan's Center for Health Communications Research (CHCR). | Behavioural | Arm 2 - Virtual genetics navigator |
| Motivational interviewing (MI)At least 2 phone calls delivered by trained genetic health coaches using motivational interviewing and providing genetic testing information. | Behavioural | Arm 3 - Motivational interviewing (MI) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Complete Clinical Genetic Testing at Six Months After Randomization
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment/randomization
The primary outcome is completion of genetic testing (yes/no) at 6 months after randomization by patient self-report.
4 secondary outcomes
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Barriers to Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Completed Genetic Testing
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Motivators of Genetic Testing, for Participants Who Did Not Yet Complete Genetic Testing
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months after enrollment/randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42867866Austin S, Delacroix E, Rice JD, Koeppe E, Rizzo E, Hanson EN, Arida-Moody L, Weiner S, Hawley ST, Uhlmann WR, Roberts JS, Pleasant V, Ellis KR, Griggs JJ, Resnicow K, Stoffel EM. Digital and Coaching Interventions for Uptake of Cancer Genetic Testing: The MiGHT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Oct 1;9(10):e2638274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.38274.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36765432Gerido LH, Griggs JJ, Resnicow K, Kidwell KM, Delacroix E, Austin S, Hanson EN, Bacon E, Koeppe E, Goodall S, Demerath M, Rizzo EA, Weiner S, Hawley ST, Uhlmann WR, Roberts JS, Stoffel EM. The Michigan Genetic Hereditary Testing (MiGHT) study's innovative approaches to promote uptake of clinical genetic testing among cancer patients: a study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Feb 10;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07125-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Avera Cancer Sequencing and Analytics Protocol (ASAP)
Cancer, Cancer Diagnosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes Irradiation in High-risk Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Opportunistic Breast Cancer Screening Using Non-Contrast Chest CT
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elena Stoffel, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Publicly available genetic testing resources, Virtual genetics navigator and Motivational interviewing (MI) in people with Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Aug 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Complete Clinical Genetic Testing at Six Months After Randomization (time frame: 6 months after enrollment/randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162846, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026.