Chronic Low-back PainNCT05162924
Mechanisms of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Chronic Low Back Pain
A study testing Spinal Manipulation in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Real Centro Universitario Maria Cristina at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This is a mechanistic randomized controlled trial on the effects of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy on patients with chronic low back pain. It is designed as a mechanistic trial, in which the main objective is to identify which variables related to central sensitization can help predict the response to spinal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Manipulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 147 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2021to 15 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of primary chronic low back pain (performed in the initial evaluation or previously received by a healthcare professional), with or without leg pain
- minimum of three months of duration
Who cannot join
- diagnosis of neuropathic pain in the lower extremity
- evidence of specific pathology affecting the lumbar spine
- diagnosis of psychiatric disorder or pain disorder affecting the hand/thumb or in the vicinity of the lumbar area
- intake corticosteroids, opioids or anticytokine medications
- pregnancy
- having been treated with spinal manipulation in the previous 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Patients With Primary Chronic Low Back Pain: a Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial
This is a mechanistic randomized controlled trial on the effects of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy on patients with chronic low back pain. It is designed as a mechanistic trial, in which the main objective is to identify which variables related to central sensitization can help predict the response to spinal manipulation, and the evolution of which of these variables can help explain clinical changes in chronic low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.
Read the detailed description
The study is a mechanistic randomized controlled trials on the effects of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy on patients with chronic low back pain. 100 chronic low back pain patients will be randomly allocated to receive 12 sessions over 4 weeks of spinal manipulative therapy or placebo spinal manipulation. The main objective is to identify variables related to a central sensitization or nociplastic pain phenotype can help predict the response to spinal manipulation. Additionally, changes in these variables during the treatment period will be used to identify potential pain mechanisms involved in pain relief by spinal manipulation. An additional group of 50 healthy volunteers will be used to measure the same variables and their evolution during 4 weeks in a healthy control population. Response to treatment will be measured according to changes in pain intensity and disability.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Being tested
- Spinal Manipulation, Placebo
- Keywords
- Chronic low back pain, Spinal manipulation, Central sensitization, Pressure pain thresholds, Cytokines, Chiropractic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal ManipulationOther
Manual therapy technique applied by a chiropractor in the form of a high-velocity low-amplitude force to the lumbopelvic spine
PlaceboOther
Placebo spinal manipulation consisting in the application by a chiropractor of a lower-velocity lower-amplitude force to gluteal muscles in a non-intentional direction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal manipulation | Experimental | Group receiving 12 sessions of spinal manipulative therapy in the lumbar area Receives: Other: Spinal Manipulation |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Group receiving 12 sessions of placebo spinal manipulative therapy in the lumbar area Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Healthy controls | No intervention | A healthy control population will receive no treatment during the same time period (4 weeks) to measure the same physiological variables and their evolution. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
Pain intensity will be measured by showing patients a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain at all) to 100 (maximum possible pain), and patients will rate with a number their current pain, highest, lowest and average during the 7 previous days (baseline) or the days following the previous session.
Measured: 4 weeks
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire provides the level of self-reported disability in activities of daily living (ADL) related to low back pain. It includes 10 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-5. The total range of possible scores is from 0-50, where 0 means no disability at all, and 50 is the maximal disability.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) provides the level of catastrophizing beliefs and emotions that a person has with regards to his/her own pain experience, in this case, low back pain. It includes 13 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-4. The total range of possible scores is from 0-52, where 0 is the lowest possible level of catastrophizing and 52 the highest. This scale will also be used in healthy participants.
Measured: 4 weeks
Central Sensitization Inventory
The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) identifies key symptoms associated with central sensitization and provides a quantification for the degree of these symptoms, which help to identify a central sensitization phenotype patients with chronic pain. It includes 25 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-4. The total range of possible scores is from 0-100, where 0 is the lowest possible level of central sensitization symptoms and 100 the highest. Additionally, the CSI asks one more question related to the previous diagnosis of either one of 10 conditions that have been related to central sensitization. this part is informative and is not used for scoring purposes. This scale will also be used in healthy participants.
Measured: 4 weeks
Pressure pain thresholds
Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) are part of quantitative sensory testing. The aim is to identify the threshold and the sensitivity to suprathreshold pressure stimulation in different areas of the patients' bodies. A digital algometer will be used (Wagner Force Dial FPX, Greenwich, CT, USA) to measure PPTs in the lumbar segment of greatest pain for each patient (2cm lateral to the spinous process or the posterosuperior iliac spine if applicable) locally, in the dermatome of this segment in the lower limbs, at the regional level four segments cranial from the segment of greatest pain, and remotely at the level of the thenar eminences. Measures will always be taken bilaterally two times, and averaged. At that time, the patient will rate in a numerical rating scale from 0 to 100 the intensity of the first painful stimulation (suprathreshold sensitivity). For healthy participants, pressure pain thresholds will be measured at every segment of the lumbar spine and in the thenar eminences.
Measured: 4 weeks
Urinary levels of cytokine Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-a) is a pro-inflammatory cytokines that have been involved with different stages of low back pain. First morning urine samples will be taken from patients and healthy participants at the beginning and the end of the trial period. Samples will be stored at -20ºC and concentrations will be measured with a sandwich ELISA. TNF-a will be the only cytokine used for before and after changes.
Measured: 4 weeks
Beck Depression Inventory II
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) identifies key symptoms associated with clinical depression and provides a quantification for the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. It includes 21 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-3. The total range of possible scores is from 0-63, where 0 is the lowest possible level of depressive symptoms and 63 the highest.This scale will also be used in healthy participants.
Measured: 4 weeks
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) identifies key symptoms associated with generalized anxiety disorder and provides a quantification for the presence and severity of these symptoms. It includes 7 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-3. The total range of possible scores is from 0-63, where 0 is the lowest possible level of depressive symptoms and 21 the highest. The threshold of 10/21 is used to diagnose generalized anxiety disorder. This scale will also be used in healthy participants.
Measured: 4 weeks
Expectations of pain relief
Participants will rate in a numerical rating scale their expectations of pain relief at the end of the trial. It will consist on a scale from -100 (maximum reduction in current pain) to 0 (no change) to +100 (maximum imaginable pain increase).
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2021
- Study start17 Dec 2021
- Primary completion30 Dec 2022
- Study completion15 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Low-back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized placebo-controlled trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 147 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Real Centro Universitario Maria Cristina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, University of Alcala
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arantxa Ortega-De Mues, PhD, Principal investigator, Real Centro Universitario María CristinaMathieu Piché, PhD, Principal investigator, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162924
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMTCLBP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared
Publications
Smart KM, Blake C, Staines A, Thacker M, Doody C. Mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain: part 1 of 3: symptoms and signs of central sensitisation in patients with low back (+/- leg) pain. Man Ther. 2012 Aug;17(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PubMed 22534654Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A, Girbes EL, De Kooning M, Ickmans K. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E333-46.
PubMed 26000680Shraim MA, Masse-Alarie H, Hodges PW. Methods to discriminate between mechanism-based categories of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system: a systematic review. Pain. 2021 Apr 1;162(4):1007-1037. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002113.
PubMed 33136983Gevers-Montoro C, Romero-Santiago B, Medina-Garcia I, Larranaga-Arzamendi B, Alvarez-Galovich L, Ortega-De Mues A, Piche M. Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial. J Pain. 2024 Aug;25(8):104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.014. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
PubMed 38369221Gevers-Montoro C, Ortega-De Mues A, Piche M. Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e065999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065999.
PubMed 36764718
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Patients With Primary Chronic Low Back Pain: a Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05162924
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMTCLBP
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Keywords
- Chronic low back pain, Spinal manipulation, Central sensitization, Pressure pain thresholds, Cytokines, Chiropractic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 147 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Real Centro Universitario Maria CristinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, University of Alcala
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a mechanistic randomized controlled trial on the effects of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy on patients with chronic low back pain. It is designed as a mechanistic trial, in which the main objective is to identify which variables related to central sensitization can help predict the response to spinal manipulation, and the evolution of which of these variables can help explain clinical changes in chronic low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.
Detailed description
The study is a mechanistic randomized controlled trials on the effects of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy on patients with chronic low back pain. 100 chronic low back pain patients will be randomly allocated to receive 12 sessions over 4 weeks of spinal manipulative therapy or placebo spinal manipulation. The main objective is to identify variables related to a central sensitization or nociplastic pain phenotype can help predict the response to spinal manipulation. Additionally, changes in these variables during the treatment period will be used to identify potential pain mechanisms involved in pain relief by spinal manipulation. An additional group of 50 healthy volunteers will be used to measure the same variables and their evolution during 4 weeks in a healthy control population. Response to treatment will be measured according to changes in pain intensity and disability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Randomized placebo-controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal manipulation | Experimental | Other: Spinal ManipulationGroup receiving 12 sessions of spinal manipulative therapy in the lumbar area |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboGroup receiving 12 sessions of placebo spinal manipulative therapy in the lumbar area |
| Healthy controls | No intervention | –A healthy control population will receive no treatment during the same time period (4 weeks) to measure the same physiological variables and their evolution. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- diagnosis of primary chronic low back pain (performed in the initial evaluation or previously received by a healthcare professional), with or without leg pain
- minimum of three months of duration
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- diagnosis of neuropathic pain in the lower extremity
- evidence of specific pathology affecting the lumbar spine
- diagnosis of psychiatric disorder or pain disorder affecting the hand/thumb or in the vicinity of the lumbar area
- intake corticosteroids, opioids or anticytokine medications
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal ManipulationManual therapy technique applied by a chiropractor in the form of a high-velocity low-amplitude force to the lumbopelvic spine | Other | Spinal manipulation |
| PlaceboPlacebo spinal manipulation consisting in the application by a chiropractor of a lower-velocity lower-amplitude force to gluteal muscles in a non-intentional direction | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: 4 weeks
Pain intensity will be measured by showing patients a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain at all) to 100 (maximum possible pain), and patients will rate with a number their current pain, highest, lowest and average during the 7 previous days (baseline) or the days following the previous session.
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index
Time frame: 4 weeks
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire provides the level of self-reported disability in activities of daily living (ADL) related to low back pain. It includes 10 items rated on a Likert scale from 0-5. The total range of possible scores is from 0-50, where 0 means no disability at all, and 50 is the maximal disability.
7 secondary outcomes
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
Central Sensitization Inventory
Time frame: 4 weeks
Pressure pain thresholds
Time frame: 4 weeks
Urinary levels of cytokine Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha
Time frame: 4 weeks
Beck Depression Inventory II
Time frame: 4 weeks
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
Expectations of pain relief
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22534654Smart KM, Blake C, Staines A, Thacker M, Doody C. Mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain: part 1 of 3: symptoms and signs of central sensitisation in patients with low back (+/- leg) pain. Man Ther. 2012 Aug;17(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 26000680Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A, Girbes EL, De Kooning M, Ickmans K. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E333-46.
- Background: PubMed 33136983Shraim MA, Masse-Alarie H, Hodges PW. Methods to discriminate between mechanism-based categories of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system: a systematic review. Pain. 2021 Apr 1;162(4):1007-1037. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002113.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38369221Gevers-Montoro C, Romero-Santiago B, Medina-Garcia I, Larranaga-Arzamendi B, Alvarez-Galovich L, Ortega-De Mues A, Piche M. Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial. J Pain. 2024 Aug;25(8):104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.014. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36764718Gevers-Montoro C, Ortega-De Mues A, Piche M. Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e065999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065999.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared
Related trials for Chronic Low-back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arantxa Ortega-De Mues, PhD principal investigator
Real Centro Universitario María Cristina
Mathieu Piché, PhD principal investigator
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Manipulation in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Real Centro Universitario Maria Cristina at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05162924, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2023.