AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 1 DiabetesNCT05163002

Effectiveness of Nutrition Education in Carbohydrate Counting in People With Type 1 Diabetic

A study testing Nutritional education & carbohydrate counting in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Universidade Nova de Lisboa at 1 site in Portugal.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Carbohydrates are the nutrient in the diet with the greatest impact on blood glucose. Inadequate carbohydrate counts are associated with higher A1c and greater variations in postprandial blood glucose. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Type 1 Diabetes
What is being tested?
Nutritional education & carbohydrate counting
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
10 May 2021to 30 Apr 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged ≥18 years old who have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes or parents of children and adolescents (< 18 years old) who have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes;
  • To be under intensive insulin therapy (basal/bolus system);
  • To regularly use a continuous glucose monitoring system as primary method for glycaemic control;
  • To be able to read and write.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • Nova Medical School

    Lisbon, 1169-056

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Nutrition Education in Carbohydrate Counting, in a Group Context, on Glycemic Control in People With Type 1 Diabetic

Carbohydrates are the nutrient in the diet with the greatest impact on blood glucose. Inadequate carbohydrate counts are associated with higher A1c and greater variations in postprandial blood glucose. Clinical guidelines for the nutritional treatment of diabetes recommend that patients with DM1 learn carbohydrate counting or some similar systematic strategy that allows for better metabolic control. However, despite the recommendations, this is still not a reality for most healthcare services treating individuals diagnosed with DM1.

Read the detailed description

The study aims to assess the impact of a structured nutrition education programme for nutritional education and carbohydrate counting, in group sessions, on glycemic control and nutritional literacy in people with DM1. This will be achieved by evaluating the glycaemic control through A1c and daily glycaemic variability (time on target, mean glycaemia), as well as the level of knowledge before and after the intervention.

Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes
Being tested
Nutritional education & carbohydrate counting
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nutritional education & carbohydrate countingBehavioural

    Nutrition Education with a multidisciplinary team

Study groups in NCT05163002
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalIntervention arm, uncontrolled
Receives: Behavioral: Nutritional education & carbohydrate counting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences between baseline A1c (%) and 90 days after the last educational session.

    The outcome will be assessed through blood exams

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Difference in the level of nutritional knowledge assessed through a questionnaire "Nutrition knowledge" collected at baseline and in the last educational session (scale 0 to 23, where 23 is the highest).

    The level of knowledge will be measure in a likert scale from 0 (minimum) to 23 (maximum), where a higher score is better than a lower one

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Difference in time in range (%) between baseline and 90 days following the last educational session

    The outcome will be assessed through data from participants' continuous glucose monitoring system

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Difference in the glucose coefficient of variation (%) between baseline and 90 days following the last educational session

    The outcome will be assessed through data from participants' continuous glucose monitoring system

    Measured: 90 days

  4. Difference in mean glycaemia (mg /dL) between baseline and 90 days following the last educational session

    The outcome will be assessed through data from participants' continuous glucose monitoring system

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2021
  2. Study start10 May 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Recruitment difficulties

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05163002
Sponsor's protocol ID
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
6 Dec 2021
Last updated
12 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nutritional education & carbohydrate counting in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Universidade Nova de Lisboa at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences between baseline A1c (%) and 90 days after the last educational session. (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in