AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory Tract InfectionsNCT05164692

Effects of Nasal-spraying LiveSpo Navax in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infections in Children

A study testing LiveSpo Navax and 0.9% NaCl physiological saline in people with Acute Respiratory Tract Infections, run by National Children's Hospital, Vietnam at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationals: Infection with the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is one of the most common causes of respiratory tract diseases. However, treatment for pediatric RSV infection remains supportive to prevent co-infection bacteria and respiratory failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 60 months
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Tract Infections
What is being tested?
LiveSpo Navax and 0.9% NaCl physiological saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
29 Aug 2020to 29 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 60 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children (male/female) aged from 4 to 60 months.
  • Admitted hospital due to lower respiratory infection.
  • RSV is positive by rapid test.
  • Parents of the pediatric patient agree to participate in the study, explain and sign the research consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Newborn babies.
  • Have a history of drug allergy.
  • Need oxygen therapy.
  • Discharged before day 3.
  • Lost to follow-up.
  • Withdrawn from the trial.
  • Continuing in the trial but missing data.
  • Meeting the criteria for psychiatric disorders other than depression and/or anxiety.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • International Center, Vietnam National Children's Hospital

    Hanoi, 100000

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Application of LiveSpo Navax in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Disease in Children Infected With Respiratory Syncytial Virus

Rationals: Infection with the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is one of the most common causes of respiratory tract diseases. However, treatment for pediatric RSV infection remains supportive to prevent co-infection bacteria and respiratory failure. In recent years, preventive and supportive probiotic therapies for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) have been increasingly strengthened, however, the use of oral administrative probiotics as functional foods is effective only for mild symptoms and not applicable for Acute RTIs (ARTIs). Here, we propose that direct spraying of probiotics into the nose can be a fast and effective symptomatic treatment for ARTIs.

Objectives: Investigate symptomatic treatment effects of probiotic product LiveSpo Navax, as liquid-suspension form containing Bacillus spores of safe B. subtilis ANA4 and B. clausii ANA39 strains, in children having acute respiratory diseases caused by RSV:

Read more
  • Primary Objective: Evaluation of improved efficacy and reduced treatment time of LiveSpo Navax in children infected with RSV.
  • Secondary Objectives: Measurement of changes in RSV viral load, co-infectious bacterial concentrations, and major cytokine indicators in the nasopharyngeal mucosa before and after 3 days using LiveSpo Navax.

Endpoints:

Primary endpoint: LiveSpo Navax alleviates RSV-infection symptoms about 25% more effectively, as indicated by 90% of patients using LiveSpo Navax (Navax group) are symptom-free at day 3-6 of intervention depending on symptoms, compared to 65% of patients in Control group.

Secondary endpoint: Patients in Navax group had more significant reductions in RSV load (>10 fold) than patients in Control group at day 3 of intervention.

Study Population: Sample size is 100. Description of Sites: The study is carried out at Vietnam National Children's Hospital.

Description of Study Intervention: Totally 100 eligible patients are divided randomly into 2 groups (n = 50/group each): Patients in Control group received the routine treatment and three times per day 0.9% NaCl physiological saline while the and patients in Navax group received three times per day LiveSpo Navax in addition to the same standard of care treatment. The standard treatment regimen is 3-6 days but can be extended further depending on the severity of the patients' respiratory failure.

Study Duration: 12 months

Read the detailed description

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common virus that causes Acute Respiratory Tract Infections (ARTIs) in young children, with a high risk of serious bronchiolitis. RSV infection symptoms range from mild fever, cough, runny nose, and wheezing to severe symptoms such as difficulty breathing and respiratory failure. Cytokines in the airways of children with bronchiolitis, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8, have been shown to increase at a very high level in primary RSV infection, and extreme elevation of IL-6 is associated with sudden death in children with RSV infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 160,000-600,000 children under the age of five die or hospitalize each year as a result of RSV infection. There is currently no vaccine or specific treatment for RSV-infected children because monoclonal antibody palivizumab therapy and antiviral nucleotide drug ribavirin are either too expensive or too dangerous for children and are only recommended for high-risk patients.

In recent years, preventive and supportive therapies for respiratory tract infection have grown in popularity, with probiotics emerging as promising safe candidates for therapeutic support and antibiotic reduction. It is suggested that probiotics can capture viruses through direct interactions, or produce secondary growths that inhibit virus growth or stimulate the immune system to capture virus intrusion. However, the efficacy of oral digested probiotics on children's respiratory tracts has been slow to develop (normally it takes about 3-12 months) and is primarily used for prevention rather than supportive treatment of ARITs. As a result, alternative delivery routes for probiotics in the treatment of ARTIs are required.

The aim of the study about to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal-spraying probiotics containing two bacterial strains, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus clausii in preventing and in supporting the treatment of children having acute respiratory symptoms due to RSV infection.

Methods: A randomized, blind, and controlled clinical trial are conducted. The patient's parents are required to provide the following information of their children: full name, sex, age, obstetric history, vaccination history, antibiotic use history… After informed consent, 100 patients with ARTIs due to RSV will be randomized into 2 groups (n = 50/group): the control group (named "Control" group) use 0.9% NaCl physiological saline and an experimental group (named the "Navax" group) use the probiotics LiveSpo Navax. The patient is given a coded spray in the form of a blind sample to ensure the objectivity of the study. The clinical follow-up will be 6 days, nasopharyngeal samples will be collected at day 0 and day 3 to evaluate potential reductions in viral load and co-infection bacteria, as well as modulation of overreacted cytokine release and the presence of probiotic spores in the patient's nasal mucosa.

Real-time PCR for detection of microorganism in nasopharyngeal samples: semi-quantitative assays for measuring changes in RSV load and co-infection bacterial concentrations is conducted by the real-time RT-PCR/PCR routine protocol which has been standardized under ISO 15189:2012 criteria and used in Vietnam National Children's Hospital. Detection of B. subtilis ANA4 and B. clausii ANA39 are also conducted by real-time PCR SYBR Green that has been standardized under ISO 17025: 2017 standard and routinely in the Key Laboratory of Enzyme and Protein Technology, VNU University of Science.

ELISA assays for cytokine levels: pro-inflammatory cytokines levels (pg/mL) including interleukin (IL-6, IL-8) and TNF-alpha are quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

During treatment, patients are monitored daily for typical clinical symptoms of RSV-induced respiratory tract infections, including runny nose, chest depression, difficulty breathing, dry rales, moist rales, body temperature (oC), oxymetry (SpO2) (%), pulse (beats/min), and breath (beats/min) until discharged. The patients' health conditions are observed by doctors and nurses, and their pieces of information are filled in medical records. During this study, parents' patients are asked to abstain from consumption for their children of other probiotics, either via nasal spray or oral administration and refrain from cleaning nose for their children with other 0.9% NaCl physiological saline sprayers.

Data collection and statistical analysis: individual medical records are collected, and the patient's information is then gathered and systematized in a data set. The efficacy of LiveSpo Navax is evaluated and compared to 0.9% NaCl physiological saline based on the following clinical and sub-clinical criteria obtained in Navax and Control groups: (i) the symptomatic-relieving day; (ii) the reduction levels (2^△Ct) of RSV load and co-infection bacteria concentrations. △Ct for target genes is calculated as Ct (threshold cycle) at day 3 - Ct at day 0 while Ct of internal control is adjusted to be equal among all samples; (iii) the reduction levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha cytokines. The tabular analysis is performed on dichotomous variables using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test when the expected value of any cell is below five. Continuous variables are compared using either the Wilcoxon test, t-test, or the Mann-Whitney test when data are not normally distributed. The correlations among the variables are assessed by Spearman's correlation analysis. Statistical and graphical analyses are performed on GraphPad Prism v8.4.3 software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). The significance level of all analyzes is set at p < 0.05. P-values.

Expected outcomes: (i) LiveSpo Navax alleviates RSV-infection symptoms about 25% more effectively, as indicated by 90% of patients using LiveSpo Navax (Navax group) are symptom-free at day 3-6 of intervention depending on symptoms, compared to 65% of patients in Control group; (ii) Patients in Navax group has more significant reductions in RSV load (>10 fold) than patients in Control group at day 3 of intervention.

Being tested
LiveSpo Navax, 0.9% NaCl physiological saline
Keywords
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Acute Respiratory Tract Infections (ARTIs), Children, Nasal-spraying probiotics, Viral load, Co-infection bacteria, Cytokines, Bacillus spores

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LiveSpo NavaxCombination product

    Also called Registration number: No.210001337/PCBA-HN

    In Vietnam, LiveSpo Navax is manufactured as a Class-A medical device product (Product declaration No.210001337/PCBA-HN) under manufacturing standards approved by Hanoi Health Department, Ministry of Health, Vietnam (Certificate No YT117-19) and ISO 13485:2016.

  • 0.9% NaCl physiological salineDrug

    Also called Registration number: VD-32723-19

    Nasal-spraying 0.9% NaCl physiological saline is prepared by extracting 5 mL from 0.9% NaCl intravenous infusion 500 mL PP bottle (B.Braun, Germany, product declaration No. VD-32732-19), and then pouring it into the same opaque plastic spraying 10 mL-bottle that is used for LiveSpo Navax.

Study groups in NCT05164692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlPlacebo comparatorControl group receives the routine treatment and uses 0.9% NaCl physiological saline: Routine treatment is as follows: * Oral administrative drugs: antipyretic paracetamol (Efferegant®️); anti-inflammatory corticosteroid methylprednisolon; antibiotics e.g. ampicillin and sulbactam complex (Ama-power®️), tobramycin (Medphatobra®️), or cefotaxim (Goldcefo®️), based on the results of antibiotic susceptibility test. * Aerosol therapy: bronchodilator e.g. salbutamol (Ventolin ®️inhaler) or budesonide (Pulmicort ®️Respules).
Receives: Drug: 0.9% NaCl physiological saline
NavaxExperimentalNavax group receives the routine treatment and uses NaCl 0.9% plus B. subtilis and B. clausii at 5 billions CFU/5 mL (LiveSpo®️ Navax): Routine treatment is as follows: * Oral administrative drugs: antipyretic paracetamol (Efferegant®️); anti-inflammatory corticosteroid methylprednisolon; antibiotics e.g. ampicillin and sulbactam complex (Ama-power®️), tobramycin (Medphatobra®️), or cefotaxim (Goldcefo®️), based on the results of antibiotic susceptibility test. * Aerosol therapy: bronchodilator e.g. salbutamol (Ventolin ®️inhaler) or budesonide (Pulmicort ®️Respules).
Receives: Combination Product: LiveSpo Navax

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of patients with free respiratory symptoms

    Percentage (%) of RSV-infected patients with free respiratory symptoms including runny nose, chest depression, difficulty breathing, dry rales, and moist rales

    Measured: Day 0 to day 6

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Patient's breath

    RSV-infected patient's breath (beats/min) before and after nasal-spraying

    Measured: Day 0 to day 6

  2. Patient's pulse

    RSV-infected patient's pulse (beats/min) before and after nasal-spraying

    Measured: Day 0 to day 6

  3. Patient's temperature

    RSV-infected patient's temperature (oC) before and after nasal-spraying

    Measured: Day 0 to day 6

  4. Patient's pulse oxygen (SpO2)

    RSV-infected patient's pulse oxygen-SpO2 (%) before and after nasal-spraying

    Measured: Day 0 to day 6

  5. RSV concentration

    Concentration of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal samples, as indicated by real time PCR threshold cycle (Ct) value

    Measured: Day 0 and day 3

  6. Co-infection bacterial concentrations

    Co-infection bacterial concentrations in nasopharyngeal samples, as indicated by real time PCR threshold cycle (Ct) values

    Measured: Day 0 and day 3

  7. Cytokines levels

    Levels (pg/mL) of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in nasopharyngeal samples

    Measured: Day 0 and day 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2021
  2. Study start29 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion29 Aug 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05164692
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020S-06
Other IDs
4711/QD-BVNTU
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
6 Dec 2021
Last updated
21 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data or samples share that will be coded, with no PHI include. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

Publications

  • Lima SF, Teixeira AG, Higgins CH, Lima FS, Bicalho RC. The upper respiratory tract microbiome and its potential role in bovine respiratory disease and otitis media. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 1;6:29050. doi: 10.1038/srep29050.

    PubMed 27363739
  • Chotirmall SH, Gellatly SL, Budden KF, Mac Aogain M, Shukla SD, Wood DL, Hugenholtz P, Pethe K, Hansbro PM. Microbiomes in respiratory health and disease: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Respirology. 2017 Feb;22(2):240-250. doi: 10.1111/resp.12971.

    PubMed 28102970
  • Principi N, Cozzali R, Farinelli E, Brusaferro A, Esposito S. Gut dysbiosis and irritable bowel syndrome: The potential role of probiotics. J Infect. 2018 Feb;76(2):111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

    PubMed 29291933
  • Sonawane AR, Tian L, Chu CY, Qiu X, Wang L, Holden-Wiltse J, Grier A, Gill SR, Caserta MT, Falsey AR, Topham DJ, Walsh EE, Mariani TJ, Weiss ST, Silverman EK, Glass K, Liu YY. Microbiome-Transcriptome Interactions Related to Severity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50217-w.

    PubMed 31554845
  • Li KJ, Chen ZL, Huang Y, Zhang R, Luan XQ, Lei TT, Chen L. Dysbiosis of lower respiratory tract microbiome are associated with inflammation and microbial function variety. Respir Res. 2019 Dec 3;20(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1246-0.

    PubMed 31796027
  • Valdivieso-Ugarte M, Gomez-Llorente C, Plaza-Diaz J, Gil A. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Immunomodulatory Properties of Essential Oils: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2019 Nov 15;11(11):2786. doi: 10.3390/nu11112786.

    PubMed 31731683
  • Elshaghabee FMF, Rokana N, Gulhane RD, Sharma C, Panwar H. Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 10;8:1490. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28848511
  • Raveendran S, Parameswaran B, Ummalyma SB, Abraham A, Mathew AK, Madhavan A, Rebello S, Pandey A. Applications of Microbial Enzymes in Food Industry. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;56(1):16-30. doi: 10.17113/ftb.56.01.18.5491.

    PubMed 29795993
  • Yang L, Zeng X, Qiao S. Advances in research on solid-state fermented feed and its utilization: The pioneer of private customization for intestinal microorganisms. Anim Nutr. 2021 Dec;7(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

    PubMed 34632121
  • Oggioni MR, Pozzi G, Valensin PE, Galieni P, Bigazzi C. Recurrent septicemia in an immunocompromised patient due to probiotic strains of Bacillus subtilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):325-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.1.325-326.1998. No abstract available.

    PubMed 9431982
  • Cukovic-Cavka S, Likic R, Francetic I, Rustemovic N, Opacic M, Vucelic B. Lactobacillus acidophilus as a cause of liver abscess in a NOD2/CARD15-positive patient with Crohn's disease. Digestion. 2006;73(2-3):107-10. doi: 10.1159/000094041. Epub 2006 Jun 20.

    PubMed 16788305
  • Borriello SP, Hammes WP, Holzapfel W, Marteau P, Schrezenmeir J, Vaara M, Valtonen V. Safety of probiotics that contain lactobacilli or bifidobacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 15;36(6):775-80. doi: 10.1086/368080. Epub 2003 Mar 5.

    PubMed 12627362
  • Song M, Hong HA, Huang JM, Colenutt C, Khang DD, Nguyen TV, Park SM, Shim BS, Song HH, Cheon IS, Jang JE, Choi JA, Choi YK, Stadler K, Cutting SM. Killed Bacillus subtilis spores as a mucosal adjuvant for an H5N1 vaccine. Vaccine. 2012 May 9;30(22):3266-77. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

    PubMed 22446640
  • Hong JE, Kye YC, Park SM, Cheon IS, Chu H, Park BC, Park YM, Chang J, Cho JH, Song MK, Han SH, Yun CH. Alveolar Macrophages Treated With Bacillus subtilis Spore Protect Mice Infected With Respiratory Syncytial Virus A2. Front Microbiol. 2019 Mar 12;10:447. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00447. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30930867
  • Lefevre M, Racedo SM, Ripert G, Housez B, Cazaubiel M, Maudet C, Justen P, Marteau P, Urdaci MC. Probiotic strain Bacillus subtilis CU1 stimulates immune system of elderly during common infectious disease period: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Immun Ageing. 2015 Dec 3;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12979-015-0051-y. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26640504

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing LiveSpo Navax and 0.9% NaCl physiological saline in people with Acute Respiratory Tract Infections, run by National Children's Hospital, Vietnam at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of patients with free respiratory symptoms (time frame: Day 0 to day 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05164692, which also lists 34 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in