TumorNCT05165147
Analysis the Positive Rate of Tumor Markers Among Physical Examination Population
An observational study of Tumor, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To analyze the positive rate of tumor markers (TM) among health examination population in a tertiary grade A class hospital, compare the differences between different age and sex groups, and explore the possible influencing factors of TM positive. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Tumor
- How many people
- 26,891 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: rom January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Those who have taken a physical examination and performed at least one TM test
Who cannot join
- Basic information is missing and cannot be retrieved
- The patient was diagnosed with malignant tumor before examination
- Those who have not done any TM tests
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Analysis the Positive Status of Tumor Markers Among Physical Examination Population in a Tertiary Grade A Class Hospital
To analyze the positive rate of tumor markers (TM) among health examination population in a tertiary grade A class hospital, compare the differences between different age and sex groups, and explore the possible influencing factors of TM positive.
Read the detailed description
From January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study. The expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),α-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125), carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA 72-4), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 242(CA 242), squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC), CYFRA21-1, total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA ) , free prostate-specific antigen(FPSA), neuron specific enolase(NSE) were detected by Electro chemistry luminescence method. The positive rates of TM were analyzed by descriptive statistical method Explore. The differences between different age and sex groups and the influencing factors were explored by statistic by Inferential statistical method.
- Conditions
- Tumor
- Being tested
- no intervention
- Keywords
- physical examination population, tumor marker, TM
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no interventionOther
no intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| physical examination population | From January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study. Receives: Other: no intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)
The proportion of abnormal CEA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CEA≤5 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of α-fetoprotein(AFP)
The proportion of abnormal AFP in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : AFP≤20 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9)
The proportion of abnormal CA 19-9 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 19-9≤39 U/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 125(CA 125)
The proportion of abnormal CA 125 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 125≤35 U/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA 72-4)
The proportion of abnormal CA 72-4 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 72-4≤8.2 U/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 15-3(CA 15-3)
The proportion of abnormal CA 15-3 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 15-3≤25 IU/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 242(CA 242)
The proportion of abnormal CA 242 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CA 242≤20 U/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC)
The proportion of abnormal SCC in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :SCC≤1.5 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of Cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1(CYFRA21-1)
The proportion of abnormal CYFRA21-1 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CYFRA21-1≤3.3 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of total prostate-specific antigen( TPSA)
The proportion of abnormal TPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :TPSA≤4 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of free prostate-specific antigen( FPSA)
The proportion of abnormal FPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :FPSA≤1 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of neuron specific enolase( NSE)
The proportion of abnormal NSE in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :NSE≤17 ng/mL.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Secondary outcomes (11)
age
the age of physical examination population.
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of systolic blood pressure (SBP)
SBP measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmHg
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
DBP measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmHg
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of fasting bood glucose (FBG)
FBG measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmol/L
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of total cholesterol (TC)
TC measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmol/L
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of Triglyceride (TG)
TG measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmol/L
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)
HDL-C measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmol/L
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)
LDL-C measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:mmol/L
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of height
height measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:cm
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of weight
height measured on the day of physical examination.Unit of measure:kg
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Body Mass Index (BMI)
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Measured: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TumorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Third HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 26,891 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wei Zhao, doctorate, Study director, Peking University Third Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05165147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00006761-M2021321
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: no share
Publications
Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1914228. No abstract available.
PubMed 32294352
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis the Positive Status of Tumor Markers Among Physical Examination Population in a Tertiary Grade A Class Hospital
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05165147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00006761-M2021321
- Conditions
- Tumor
- Keywords
- physical examination population, tumor marker, TM
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26,891 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To analyze the positive rate of tumor markers (TM) among health examination population in a tertiary grade A class hospital, compare the differences between different age and sex groups, and explore the possible influencing factors of TM positive.
Detailed description
From January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study. The expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),α-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125), carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA 72-4), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 242(CA 242), squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC), CYFRA21-1, total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA ) , free prostate-specific antigen(FPSA), neuron specific enolase(NSE) were detected by Electro chemistry luminescence method. The positive rates of TM were analyzed by descriptive statistical method Explore. The differences between different age and sex groups and the influencing factors were explored by statistic by Inferential statistical method.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| physical examination population | – | Other: no interventionFrom January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- rom January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those who have taken a physical examination and performed at least one TM test
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Basic information is missing and cannot be retrieved
- The patient was diagnosed with malignant tumor before examination
- Those who have not done any TM tests
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no interventionno intervention | Other | physical examination population |
Primary outcome
the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CEA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CEA≤5 ng/mL.
the positive rate of α-fetoprotein(AFP)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal AFP in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : AFP≤20 ng/mL.
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CA 19-9 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 19-9≤39 U/mL.
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 125(CA 125)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CA 125 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 125≤35 U/mL.
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA 72-4)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CA 72-4 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 72-4≤8.2 U/mL.
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 15-3(CA 15-3)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CA 15-3 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 15-3≤25 IU/mL.
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 242(CA 242)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CA 242 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CA 242≤20 U/mL.
the positive rate of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal SCC in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :SCC≤1.5 ng/mL.
the positive rate of Cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1(CYFRA21-1)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal CYFRA21-1 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CYFRA21-1≤3.3 ng/mL.
the positive rate of total prostate-specific antigen( TPSA)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal TPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :TPSA≤4 ng/mL.
the positive rate of free prostate-specific antigen( FPSA)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal FPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :FPSA≤1 ng/mL.
the positive rate of neuron specific enolase( NSE)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
The proportion of abnormal NSE in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :NSE≤17 ng/mL.
11 secondary outcomes
age
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of fasting bood glucose (FBG)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of total cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of Triglyceride (TG)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of height
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of weight
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 32294352Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1914228. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. no share
Related trials for Tumor
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wei Zhao, doctorate study director
Peking University Third Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Tumor, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) (time frame: 2019.01.01-2019.12.31). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05165147, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2021.