Pediatric AnesthesiaNCT05166291
The Effect of Needle-free Injection System During Palatal Anesthesia
A study testing Comfort-in injection system and traditional anesthesia in people with Pediatric Anesthesia and Local Anesthesia, run by Okan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Needle-free injection systems can contribute to the prevention of needle-related pain during palatal infiltration anesthesia (PIA) in children. Research with this topic on children is required.The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the needle-free system versus traditional anesthesia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Comfort-in injection system and traditional anesthesia
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 25 Aug 2021to 5 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- In need of treatment of right and left primary molar teeth of maxilla,
- Does not have any systemic disorder,
- High level of communication that can provide logical answers to the questions we ask
- With parental consent,
- Volunteers who want to participate in the research
- 6-12 years old patients who are compatible with routine dental treatments in the pediatric clinic
Who cannot join
- No need for treatment of right and left primary molar teeth of maxilla,
- Has a systemic condition
- Low level of communication that cannot provide reasonable answers to the questions we ask
- Without parental consent
- Do not want to participate voluntarily in the research
- Do not attend a check-in
- Patients not in the 6-12 age group
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Needle-free Injection System Versus Traditional Anesthesia on Pain Perception During Palatal Infiltration Anesthesia in Children: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Needle-free injection systems can contribute to the prevention of needle-related pain during palatal infiltration anesthesia (PIA) in children. Research with this topic on children is required.The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the needle-free system versus traditional anesthesia on pain perception during PIA in children.The study was designed as a randomized, controlled cross-over clinical study with 48 children aged 6 to 12 years requiring dental treatment with PIA in bilateral maxillary primary molars. It has been revealed that the application of a needle-free system during PIA ensured a decrease in pain perception in children.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Comfort-in injection system, traditional anesthesia
- Keywords
- needle-free injection system, pain perception
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Comfort-in injection systemDevice
Also called dental syringe
local anesthesia applyed with comfort-in injection system
traditional anesthesiaOther
local anesthesia applyed with dental syringe
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| traditional anesthesia (TA) | Experimental | traditional anesthesia Receives: Other: traditional anesthesia |
| comfort-in injection system (CIS) | Experimental | comfort-in injection system (CIS) Receives: Device: Comfort-in injection system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS)
The PRS measures the unpleasantness or affective dimension of a child's pain experience and is used in children aged 3-17 years old. The PRS consists of a set of cartoon faces with varying facial expressions ranging from a smile/laughter to tears, and each child is asked to select the facial expression that best represents his/her experience of discomfort. Each face has a numerical value ranging from 0 (smiling face, "no hurt") to 5 (crying/screaming face, "hurts worst").
Measured: 3 months
Face, Legg, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC)
The scale comprised the following parameters: (1) Face, (2) Legs, (3) Activity, (4) Cry, and (5) Consolability. Each of the five categories is scored from 0-2, which results in a minimum total score of 0 and maximumof 10. According to this scale: 0=Relaxed and comfortable (no pain); 1-3=Mild discomfort; 4-6=Moderate pain; and 7-10=Severe discomfort or pain [Willis et al., 2003]. Behavioural parameters were recorded.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2021
- Study start25 Aug 2021
- Primary completion30 Nov 2021
- Study completion5 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pediatric AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Okan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emine Kaya, Okan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05166291
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E.617498811-000-1065232
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Needle-free Injection System Versus Traditional Anesthesia on Pain Perception During Palatal Infiltration Anesthesia in Children: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05166291
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E.617498811-000-1065232
- Conditions
- Pediatric Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia
- Keywords
- needle-free injection system, pain perception
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Okan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Needle-free injection systems can contribute to the prevention of needle-related pain during palatal infiltration anesthesia (PIA) in children. Research with this topic on children is required.The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the needle-free system versus traditional anesthesia on pain perception during PIA in children.The study was designed as a randomized, controlled cross-over clinical study with 48 children aged 6 to 12 years requiring dental treatment with PIA in bilateral maxillary primary molars. It has been revealed that the application of a needle-free system during PIA ensured a decrease in pain perception in children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| traditional anesthesia (TA) | Experimental | Other: traditional anesthesiatraditional anesthesia |
| comfort-in injection system (CIS) | Experimental | Device: Comfort-in injection systemcomfort-in injection system (CIS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- In need of treatment of right and left primary molar teeth of maxilla,
- Does not have any systemic disorder,
- High level of communication that can provide logical answers to the questions we ask
- With parental consent,
- Volunteers who want to participate in the research
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- No need for treatment of right and left primary molar teeth of maxilla,
- Has a systemic condition
- Low level of communication that cannot provide reasonable answers to the questions we ask
- Without parental consent
- Do not want to participate voluntarily in the research
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort-in injection systemAlso: dental syringelocal anesthesia applyed with comfort-in injection system | Device | comfort-in injection system (CIS) |
| traditional anesthesialocal anesthesia applyed with dental syringe | Other | traditional anesthesia (TA) |
Primary outcome
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS)
Time frame: 3 months
The PRS measures the unpleasantness or affective dimension of a child's pain experience and is used in children aged 3-17 years old. The PRS consists of a set of cartoon faces with varying facial expressions ranging from a smile/laughter to tears, and each child is asked to select the facial expression that best represents his/her experience of discomfort. Each face has a numerical value ranging from 0 (smiling face, "no hurt") to 5 (crying/screaming face, "hurts worst").
Face, Legg, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC)
Time frame: 3 months
The scale comprised the following parameters: (1) Face, (2) Legs, (3) Activity, (4) Cry, and (5) Consolability. Each of the five categories is scored from 0-2, which results in a minimum total score of 0 and maximumof 10. According to this scale: 0=Relaxed and comfortable (no pain); 1-3=Mild discomfort; 4-6=Moderate pain; and 7-10=Severe discomfort or pain [Willis et al., 2003]. Behavioural parameters were recorded.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pediatric Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of IV Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine Versus no Alpha 2 Agonist on Emergency Delirium, PACU Length of Stay and Time to Hospital Discharge in Children Undergoing (Adeno)Tonsillectomy: a Prospective Observational Study
Emergency Delirium, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Volume and PONV in Pediatric Appendectomy Cases
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Comfort-in injection system and traditional anesthesia in people with Pediatric Anesthesia and Local Anesthesia, run by Okan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS) (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2022.