AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseNCT05169827

Cerebral Contributions to Symptom Progression in PD

An observational study of Parkinson Disease, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Motor symptom progression in early-stage Parkinson's disease varies substantially between individual patients. This progression correlates poorly with striatal dopamine depletion, which is largely complete four years post-diagnosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
How many people
115 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
1 Dec 2019to 28 Nov 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Any person with, or without, Parkinson's disease who meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet the exclusion criteria

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is included in the Personalized Parkinson Project and has already participated in all baseline measurements (this means that inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Personalized Parkinson Project have already been fulfilled)
  • Subject has completed the Informed Consent Form, as approved by the Ethics Committee
  • Subject is at least 40 years old
  • Subject can read and understand Dutch
  • Subject has completed the Informed Consent Form, as approved by the Ethics Committee
  • Subject is willing, competent, and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol, including follow-up schedule.

Who cannot join

  • Subject is not taking dopaminergic medication
  • Subject has no co-morbidities that would negatively influence the interpretability of results from a comparison with PD patients (e.g. other neurodegenerative diseases or mental health disorders)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Donders institute for brain, cognition and behaviour

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: How Cerebral Plasticity Shapes Symptom Progression in Parkinson's Disease: a Longitudinal Neuroimaging Study

Motor symptom progression in early-stage Parkinson's disease varies substantially between individual patients. This progression correlates poorly with striatal dopamine depletion, which is largely complete four years post-diagnosis. Identification of alternative mechanisms, such as cortical compensatory processes, may enable more accurate predictions of individual motor progression.

Read the detailed description

Striatal dopamine depletion leads to dysfunction in the cortico-striatal motor circuit and is an important contributor to motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, dopamine depletion in striatal motor regions is already severe at symptom onset and tends to correlate poorly with progressive worsening. This indicates that the severity of motor symptoms in PD may not be solely dependent on basal ganglia dysfunction. In PD, the deleterious effect of basal ganglia dysfunction on motor control may be partially counteracted by neuroplasticity and the compensatory recruitment of parieto-premotor areas of cortex that drive movement based on sensory cueing and goal-directed cognitive control. The efficacy of cortical compensation could therefore be a core determinant of motor impairment in PD.

This study utilizes longitudinal clinical and brain imaging data from early-stage PD patients included in the Personalized Parkinson Project (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03364894) to test whether motor symptom severity and progression can be predicted by action selection-related brain activity in parieto-premotor cortex, basal ganglia, or a combination of both.

Additional control analyses will be performed to investigate the effects of disease and medication on action selection-related brain activity. Action selection-related brain activity will be compared between PD patients and a cohort of healthy controls to assess the effect of disease (PD vs Healthy). Effects of medication (on vs. off) on action selection-related brain activity will be investigated through within-subject comparisons in subset of PD patients who underwent functional brain imaging in both on- and off-medicated states.

Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging, motor assessment, symptom progression, action selection, compensation, basal ganglia
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05169827
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PD-OFFPatients with PD who have previously been included in the Personalized Parkinson Project return for fMRI measurements in an off-medicated state (12h withdrawal). N = 60. The PD-OFF group undergoes a single testing session.
Healthy controlsHealthy individuals who are matched on age and sex with respect to the PD-OFF group. N = 60. The healthy group undergoes baseline and two year follow-up testing sessions.
PD-ONPatients with PD who are included in the Personalized Parkinson Project. N = 360. Available data will be used. There will be no further data collection in this group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mid-term disease progression in terms of overall motor symptoms

    Change in Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III score, measured in off state. This scale assesses 18 motor symptoms (33 items) that are specific for Parkinson's disease. Item scores range from 0 to 4 and are summed, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 132, with higher scores representing worse outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline and 2 years

  2. Mid-term disease progression in terms of bradykinesia and rigidity

    Change in Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III score, measured in off state. This scale assesses 18 motor symptoms (33 items) that are specific for Parkinson's disease. Item scores range from 0 to 4. 17 items assessing bradykinesia and rigidity and are summed, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 68, with higher scores representing worse outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline and 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Dec 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion28 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion28 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
115 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05169827
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL67597.091.18
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
30 Mar 2021
Last updated
21 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: See plan description for the Personalized Parkinson Project. In addition to these steps, we will make our statistical analysis plan and analytic code available to researchers that specifically focus on data related to the action selection task.

Publications

  • Buhmann C, Binkofski F, Klein C, Buchel C, van Eimeren T, Erdmann C, Hedrich K, Kasten M, Hagenah J, Deuschl G, Pramstaller PP, Siebner HR. Motor reorganization in asymptomatic carriers of a single mutant Parkin allele: a human model for presymptomatic parkinsonism. Brain. 2005 Oct;128(Pt 10):2281-90. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh572. Epub 2005 Jun 9.

    PubMed 15947065
  • Helmich RC, de Lange FP, Bloem BR, Toni I. Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2201-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Mar 7.

    PubMed 17448507
  • Herz DM, Eickhoff SB, Lokkegaard A, Siebner HR. Functional neuroimaging of motor control in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jul;35(7):3227-37. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22397. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

    PubMed 24123553
  • Herz DM, Meder D, Camilleri JA, Eickhoff SB, Siebner HR. Brain Motor Network Changes in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from Meta-Analytic Modeling. Mov Disord. 2021 May;36(5):1180-1190. doi: 10.1002/mds.28468. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

    PubMed 33427336
  • Kordower JH, Olanow CW, Dodiya HB, Chu Y, Beach TG, Adler CH, Halliday GM, Bartus RT. Disease duration and the integrity of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2013 Aug;136(Pt 8):2419-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt192.

    PubMed 23884810
  • Michely J, Volz LJ, Barbe MT, Hoffstaedter F, Viswanathan S, Timmermann L, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR, Grefkes C. Dopaminergic modulation of motor network dynamics in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2015 Mar;138(Pt 3):664-78. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu381. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

    PubMed 25567321
  • van Nuenen BF, Helmich RC, Buenen N, van de Warrenburg BP, Bloem BR, Toni I. Compensatory activity in the extrastriate body area of Parkinson's disease patients. J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;32(28):9546-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0335-12.2012.

    PubMed 22787040
  • van Nuenen BF, van Eimeren T, van der Vegt JP, Buhmann C, Klein C, Bloem BR, Siebner HR. Mapping preclinical compensation in Parkinson's disease: an imaging genomics approach. Mov Disord. 2009;24 Suppl 2:S703-10. doi: 10.1002/mds.22635.

    PubMed 19877238
  • Obeso JA, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Rodriguez M, Lanciego JL, Artieda J, Gonzalo N, Olanow CW. Pathophysiology of the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(10 Suppl):S8-19. doi: 10.1016/s1471-1931(00)00028-8.

    PubMed 11052215
  • Palop JJ, Chin J, Mucke L. A network dysfunction perspective on neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):768-73. doi: 10.1038/nature05289.

    PubMed 17051202
  • Pirker W, Holler I, Gerschlager W, Asenbaum S, Zettinig G, Brucke T. Measuring the rate of progression of Parkinson's disease over a 5-year period with beta-CIT SPECT. Mov Disord. 2003 Nov;18(11):1266-72. doi: 10.1002/mds.10531.

    PubMed 14639666
  • Redgrave P, Rodriguez M, Smith Y, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Lehericy S, Bergman H, Agid Y, DeLong MR, Obeso JA. Goal-directed and habitual control in the basal ganglia: implications for Parkinson's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):760-72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2915. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

    PubMed 20944662

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Parkinson Disease, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mid-term disease progression in terms of overall motor symptoms (time frame: Baseline and 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05169827, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in