AzTrials
AzTrials

Periodontal Bone LossNCT05170932

The Use of Chlorhexidine Gel Following EDTA Root Surface Etching as an Adjunctive to Open Flap Debridement in Treating Intra-Bony Defects

A study testing CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTA in people with Periodontal Bone Loss, run by Ain Shams University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

SUMMARY Chronic periodontitis is regarded as an inflammatory disease that affects the supporting tissues of teeth which could lead to bone destruction. According to the pattern of bone destruction, vertical infrabony defect could occur. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 32 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Periodontal Bone Loss
What is being tested?
CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTA
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2017to May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 32 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age from 32 to 60 years old.
  • Females and males.
  • Healthy adult patients.
  • Selected patient with a single site of defect in single tooth:
  • Two walled or three walled infra-bony defect. The bone defect should be at least 3 mm in depth from the crest of the alveolar bone to the base of the defect.
  • Pocket depth of more than or equal to 5 mm. Clinical attachment loss equal or more than 3mm.

Who cannot join

  • Smokers.
  • Breast feeding and pregnant females.
  • Vulnerable group of patients (handicapped and prisoners).
  • Patients who have received any periodontal therapy or antibiotics in the last 6 months.
  • The study protocol explained in details to all patients. Then a signed informed consent obtained from the patients. The data obtained from patients as well as the results of the follow up will be kept confidential.

About this study

Official title: The Use of Chlorhexidine Gel Following EDTA Root Surface Etching as an Adjunctive to Open Flap Debridement in Treating Intra-Bony Defects.

SUMMARY Chronic periodontitis is regarded as an inflammatory disease that affects the supporting tissues of teeth which could lead to bone destruction. According to the pattern of bone destruction, vertical infrabony defect could occur. Several biomaterials have been used to treat infrabony defects including bone grafts, membranes, anti-microbials, growth factor \& Enamel matrix proteins. CHX gel which has been widely used in the treatment of infra-bony defects.

Chemical treatment of root surfaces of teeth have been used as an adjunct with mechanical instrumentation. Among these chemical agents is EDTA which was found to be able to remove the smear layer and expose the collagen fibers on the root surface which would make the root surface biocompatible favoring fibroblast attachment and increase substantivity of CHX gel. However, studies have found that there was no clinical significance of EDTA with chlorhexidine gel .

Read more

Recent studies revealed that significant improvements could be obtained for deep intrabony defects after EDTA root surface etching and CHX gel application after non-surgical therapy compared to control non etched treated sites. This could be attributed to the associated prolonged and higher values of CHX levels for the CHX-EDTA-treated group. However, the main target of that work is to quantify levels of CHX during the early stages of healing to determine if such clinical improvement could be attributed to prolonged and increased CHX levels after EDTA root surface preconditioning.

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically the use of Chlorhexidine gel following root surface EDTA after open flap debridement in treating Intra-bony defects and to study the effect of EDTA bone etching on Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) in gingival crevicular fluid.

Read the detailed description

SUBJECTS AND METHODS A total of 20 patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of Oral Medicine, Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University. The proposal reviewed by the research ethics committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain-shams University.

Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into one of two groups using a randomizing program (Randomization.com):

Group 1:

This group included 10 patients with localized periodontitis stage 2 or 3, grade A infra-bony defect sites (Caton, 2018) that had undergone proper curettage ensuring complete removal of all granulation tissue present within the defect by sub-mechanical debridement then open flap debridement only.

Group 2:

This group included 10 patients with localized periodontitis stage 2 or 3, grade A infra-bony defect sites (Caton, 2018) that had undergone proper curettage ensuring complete removal of all granulation tissue present within the defect by sub-mechanical debridement then open flap debridement before treating root and bony walls of the pocket surfaces by application of 24% EDTA etching and washing with saline, then application of 2% chlorhexidine gel on root surface.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age from 32 to 60 years old.
  2. Females and males.
  3. Healthy adult patients.
  4. Selected patient with a single site of defect:

Two walled defect or three walled infra-bony defect. The bone defect should be at least 3 mm in depth from the crest of the alveolar bone to the base of the defect.

Pocket depth of more than or equal to 5 mm. Clinical attachment loss equal or more than 3mm.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Smokers.
  2. Breast feeding and pregnant females.
  3. Vulnerable group of patients (handicapped and prisoners).
  4. Patients who have received any periodontal therapy or antibiotics in the last 6 months.

The study protocol explained in details to all patients. Then a signed informed consent obtained from the patients. The data obtained from patients as well as the results of the follow up will be kept confidential.

Measurements and indices:

Clinical Assessment were done using Universal Dental Williams Michigan Probe.

The following clinical parameters were measured in every patient before the surgery and after 3 months of the surgery:

Initial therapy by full mouth supra and sub-gingival mechanical debridement using ultrasonic scaler and hand instruments have been done on all patients. The patients were given instructions for self-performed plaque control measures with soft dental brush and interdental cleaning using dental floss or interdental brush to achieve good oral hygiene. All groups were subjected to the previous procedure. All groups received open flap debridement after one month of scaling and root planning.

Open flap debridement initiated by giving infiltration local anesthesia (Articaine Hydrochloride 4% and Epinephrine 1:100,000) to the affected area. Then a reverse bevel incision and full thickness flaps were elevated. This helped to gain access for deep scaling, root planning and removal of granulation tissues and tissue tags and irrigation into the pockets.

Baseline samples from the gingival crevicular fluid were collected from all selected sites using filter paper inserted into the deepest part of each periodontal pocket and left in situ for 30 seconds for assessment of BMP-2 concentrations.

In both groups, the area of selected pocket were completely dried using oil free air syringe, and then the site was isolated with cotton rolls to prevent contamination from saliva.

The local drug delivery gel (24% of EDTA gel on root and bone surface and then application of 2% of chlorhexidine gel on root surface) were placed for group 2 in the periodontal pockets using a dedicated syringe until the gel flowed out from the gingival margin for 1 minute. Filter paper were inserted into the orifice of the pocket for 1 minute. This was done in the day of surgery then after 3 days, 7 days, 14 days and 21 days after the local drug delivery to measure the gel release profile. (Ahmed Y. Gamal and Jason M. Mailhot, 2007).

The flaps were replaced as close as possible to their original position and sutured by polypropylene (4-0) suture with interrupted interproximal sutures to achieve as complete coverage of the inter-dental areas as possible.

  • Poste-operative care: All patients received amoxicillin antibiotic three times per day. Patients were also prescribed 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash (Hexitol antiseptic mouthwash, Arab Drug Company, Egypt) to be used twice per day for one week and were instructed to avoid brushing at the site of surgery for the first ten days. Sutures were removed after 1 week and then application of perio- pack for another 1 week and follow up after 3 months.
  1. Biochemical assessment: i. EDTA and Chlorhexidine gel release profile: The collected samples were labeled and carried in a dark container until High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) evaluation. ii. Concentration of BMP-2: In both groups, assessment was done at baseline and one month after local drug delivery.

BMP-2 concentrations were determined using a commercial human BMP-2 ELISA Kit. Measurements were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Measurement of BMP-2 in GCF by ELISA:

GCF was extracted from the filter paper after addition of 100ul of PBS (pH 7) and centrifugation at 5000xg. The supernatant was used for measurement of the BMP-2. The kit was provided by Chongqing Biospes Co., Ltd, China (Catalog No.: BEK1014)

Being tested
CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTA
Medical subject headings
Alveolar Bone Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTAProcedure or surgery

    The local drug delivery gel (24% of EDTA gel on root and bone surface and then application of 2% of chlorhexidine gel on root surface) were placed for group 2 in the periodontal pockets Filter paper were inserted into the orifice of the pocket for 1 minute. This was done in the day of surgery then after 3 days, 7 days, 14 days and 21 days after the local drug delivery to measure the gel release profile.

Study groups in NCT05170932
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
open flap + mechanical debridementNo interventionThis group included 10 patients with periodontitis stage 2 or 3, grade A infra-bony defect sites (Caton, 2018) that had undergone proper curettage ensuring complete removal of all granulation tissue present within the defect by scaling and root planning then open flap debridement only.
open flap +CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTAExperimentalThis group included 10 patients with periodontitis stage 2 or 3, grade A infra-bony defect sites (Caton, 2018) that had undergone proper curettage ensuring complete removal of all granulation tissue present within the defect by scaling and root planning then open flap debridement before treating root and bony walls of the pocket surfaces by application of 24% EDTA etching and washing with saline, then application of 2% chlorhexidine gel on root surface.
Receives: Procedure: CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. bleeding on probing

    Williams graduated periodontal probe using bleeding index

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2)

    by Elissa kit release profile in gingival crevicular fluid.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Dec 2021
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completionJan 2018
  4. Study completionMay 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
chlorhexidine gel, Biological drug
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05170932
Sponsor's protocol ID
2731
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
16 Aug 2021
Last updated
28 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gamal AY, Mailhot JM. Effects of EDTA gel preconditioning of periodontally affected human root surfaces on chlorhexidine substantivity - an SEM study. J Periodontol. 2007 Sep;78(9):1759-66. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070124.

    PubMed 17760546
  • Gamal AY, Aziz M, Salama MH, Iacono VJ. Gingival crevicular fluid bone morphogenetic protein-2 release profile following the use of modified perforated membrane barriers in localized intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2014 Apr;16(2):55-63.

    PubMed 24844029

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CHX gel 2 % + 24% EDTA in people with Periodontal Bone Loss, run by Ain Shams University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

bleeding on probing (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05170932, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in