AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerCHURCHNCT05174286

Community Health Workers United to Reduce Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Among People at Higher Risk

A study testing SBIRT and Referral as Usual (RAU) in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall goal of this study is to develop a comprehensive, culturally tailored community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention model with a dual emphasis on reducing CRC risk along with its CVD risk factors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
SBIRT and Referral as Usual (RAU)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
880 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Mar 2023to 31 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking
  • Aged 45 years and older
  • Not up-to-date with CRC
  • Working telephone
  • Can provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Non-English speaking
  • <45 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Lisa Matthews, EdD, MPH contact

212-853-1150

lam2160@cumc.columbia.edu

Olajide A. Williams, MD, MS contact

212-342-3668

ow11@columbia.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

    Olajide A. Williams, MD, MS, 212-342-3668, ow11@columbia.edu

    Lisa Matthews, MPH, EdD, 212-853-1150, lam2160@cumc.columbia.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The overall goal of this study is to develop a comprehensive, culturally tailored community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention model with a dual emphasis on reducing CRC risk along with its CVD risk factors. The study intervention has two components: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to address CRC screening and a web-based lifestyle program called "Alive!" to address CVD risk factors linked to CRC. The C.H.U.R.C.H. Trial (Community Health workers (CHW) United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk) has four specific aims: (1) to compare the effect of a CHW-Led SBIRT (Intervention) to Referral As Usual (RAU) (Usual Care) on guideline-concordant CRC screening uptake; (2) to evaluate the effect of a Culturally Adapted CHW-linked Alive! (CACA) program incorporated into the intervention arm on dietary inflammatory score (DIS); (3) to evaluate the effect of CACA on changes in Life Simple-7 (LS7) scores; and (4) to examine the multi-level contextual mechanisms and factors influencing CHW effectiveness, reach, and implementation of CRC screening uptake and CACA activities through a mixed-methods process evaluation. Given the broad reach and influence of churches, results from this study can be used to inform future scale up of this multi-pronged intervention.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer in the U.S with the highest incidence and mortality rates among African Americans (AAs) compared to other racial groups. Despite these disparities, which includes premature mortality, AAs are the least likely to undergo CRC screening, have precancerous colorectal polys removed, and have CRC detected at stages early enough for curative excision. Lower screening rates are linked to the downstream effects of structural inequities such as access to care, knowledge of screening options and benefits, health system mistrust, fear and anxiety. Although reducing the burden of CRC is best accomplished by screening, compelling evidence links inflammatory diets and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors to increased CRC risk. This proposal aims to develop a community-based prevention model to reduce CRC and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among AAs.

Being tested
SBIRT, Referral as Usual (RAU)
Keywords
Community Health Workers, Colorectal Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Screening, Prevention
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SBIRTBehavioural

    Also called Culturally-adapted ALIVE! Program (CAP)

    SBIRT is an evidence-based approach originally designed for people at risk of developing mental disorders. SBIRT is composed of three components: Screening with a validated instrument, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an empirically tested, person-centered, behavior change intervention designed to guide, elicit, and strengthen motivation for change. It decreases ambivalence and increases motivation for treatment.

    The investigators will utilize the Culturally-adapted Alive! Program - a cost-effective, lifestyle coaching web-based automated platform that includes step-by-step individualized tailoring, feedback, and weekly guidance through interactive emails focused on increasing physical activity, improving eating habits, and weight control.

  • Referral as Usual (RAU)Behavioural

    Referral as Usual will involve distributing CRC health educational materials (e.g. NCI or CDC brochures that include new guidelines) and contact information for screening service providers in our target community.

Study groups in NCT05174286
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)ExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm will receive: 1. SBIRT is an evidence-based approach originally designed for people at risk of developing mental disorders. SBIRT is composed of three components: Screening with a validated instrument, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an empirically tested, person-centered, behavior change intervention designed to guide, elicit, and strengthen motivation for change. It decreases ambivalence and increases motivation for treatment. 2. Culturally-adapted Alive! Program, which is a cost-effective, lifestyle coaching web-based automated platform that includes step-by-step individualized tailoring, feedback, and weekly guidance through interactive emails focused on increasing physical activity, improving eating habits, and weight control.
Receives: Behavioral: SBIRT
Referral as Usual (RAU)Active comparatorParticipants randomized to this arm will receive Referral as Usual (RAU), which will involve distributing CRC health educational materials (e.g. NCI or Centers For Disease Control brochures that include new guidelines) and contact information for screening service providers in our target community.
Receives: Behavioral: Referral as Usual (RAU)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. CRC Screening Uptake

    Screening uptake (clinic-based colonoscopy or home-based stool test) (Primary Outcome) is the subject's self-report of completing a CRC screening test plus the research team's verification of this completion from medical records.

    Measured: 6 months post-screening

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Dietary Inflammatory Score (Dietary Screening Measure)

    Assessment of participant eating habits via the culturally-adapted ALIVE! program will be captured by the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) that generates the dietary inflammatory score (DIS) which can be used to examine associations between inflammatory diets, cardiovascular diseases and colorectal cancer.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months post-screening

  2. Change in Life's Simple 7 Score (CVD Risk Screening Measure)

    Evaluation of CVD risk factors using the Life Simple-7 (LS7) measure. LS7 scores range from 0 to 14 and are calculated from the composite of the factor scores. CVD health is then classified as inadequate (0-4), average (5-9), or optimum (10-14). Achieving a greater number of ideal LS7 metrics is associated with lower risk of dying after stroke and all cause cardiovascular mortality in a dose dependent manner.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-screening and 1 year post-screening

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2021
  2. Study start19 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
880 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05174286
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAT9307
Other IDs
1P50MD017341
Acronym
CHURCH
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
5 Nov 2021
Last updated
16 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified data will be shared through submission of study findings to peer-reviewed journals. De-identified data will also be shared at community forums and academic conferences.

Publications

  • Jackson CS, Oman M, Patel AM, Vega KJ. Health disparities in colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S32-43. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.039.

    PubMed 27034811
  • De Jesus M, Puleo E, Shelton RC, McNeill LH, Emmons KM. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among a low-income, multiethnic, highly insured population: does provider's understanding of the patient's social context matter? J Urban Health. 2010 Mar;87(2):236-243. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9420-1. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

    PubMed 20043214
  • Sly JR, Edwards T, Shelton RC, Jandorf L. Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2013 Aug;40(4):449-57. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459514. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

    PubMed 23086556
  • Lumpkins CY, Coffey CR, Daley CM, Greiner KA. Employing the church as a marketer of cancer prevention: a look at a health promotion project aimed to reduce colorectal cancer among African Americans in the Midwest. Fam Community Health. 2013 Jul-Sep;36(3):215-23. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e31829159ed.

    PubMed 23718957
  • Maxwell AE, Lucas-Wright A, Santifer RE, Vargas C, Gatson J, Chang LC. Promoting Cancer Screening in Partnership With Health Ministries in 9 African American Churches in South Los Angeles: An Implementation Pilot Study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Sep 19;16:E128. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190135.

    PubMed 31538568
  • Shelton RC, Thompson HS, Jandorf L, Varela A, Oliveri B, Villagra C, Valdimarsdottir HB, Redd WH. Training experiences of lay and professional patient navigators for colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Jun;26(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0185-8.

    PubMed 21287311
  • Williams O, Ting T, Matthews L, Block G, Block T, Teresi J, Eimicke J, Kong J, Silver S, Ravenell J, Mallaiah J, Jammalamadaka S, Nelson LM, Karmally W, Hankerson S. Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Apr 26;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08110-z.

    PubMed 38671470
  • Williams O, Ting T, Matthews L, Block G, Block T, Teresi J, Eimicke J, Kong J, Silver S, Ravenell J, Mallaiah J, Jammalamadaka S, Nelson LM, Karmally W, Hankerson S. Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 9:rs.3.rs-3797889. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3797889/v1.

    PubMed 38659874

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SBIRT and Referral as Usual (RAU) in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Lisa Matthews, EdD, MPH (212-853-1150, lam2160@cumc.columbia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

CRC Screening Uptake (time frame: 6 months post-screening). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05174286, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in