AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff RepairNCT05176028

Acute Effects of Fascial Release Technique in Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair

A study testing conventional physiotherapy and fascial release in people with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was planned to investigate the acute effects of fascia technique on pain, range of motion, upper extremity functional level, and kinesiophobia in individuals with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Thirty volunteers with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included to study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
What is being tested?
conventional physiotherapy and fascial release
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
3 Jan 2018to 23 Jul 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Minimum 18 years old
  • patients undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair after least six weeks surgery

Who cannot join

  • cervical discopathy
  • shoulder osteoarthritis
  • fracture or tumor of upper extremity
  • adhesive capsulitis
  • shoulder instability
  • thoracic outlet syndrome
  • neurologic or mental problems

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

    Ankara, Dumlupınar, Çubuk, 06760

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Investigation of Acute Effects of Fascia Technique in Patients With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study was planned to investigate the acute effects of fascia technique on pain, range of motion, upper extremity functional level, and kinesiophobia in individuals with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Thirty volunteers with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included to study. The individuals were randomly divided into two groups. While hot pack, interferential current and exercise program were applied to the classical physiotherapy group, the fascial release technique was applied to the treatment group in addition to the classical physiotherapy program for 2 weeks with 2 sessions per week. Individuals were assessed for pain severity by using Visual Analog Scale, range of motion by goniometer, functional level by SPADI, kinesiophobia by Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale before and after treatment and satisfaction level by using Visual Analogue Scale after treatment.

Read the detailed description

Rotator cuff (RC) rupture is cause of shoulder pain, muscle weakness, decrease of shoulder range of motion (ROM), and function.The initial treatment of RC rupture is conservative treatment. The surgical option is preferred when conservative treatment is insufficient. Open, mini-open, and arthroscopic repair may be used in surgery. In the last years, mostly arthroscopic repair has preffered because of less pain, hospitalisation period, and complications than other surgical options. Postoperative rehabilitation program is important component of surgical success. The aim of this program is to decrease pain, increase ROM, and to improve function level and daily living activities of patients.Fascia is a unit connective tissue structure surrounding whole body and divided into three groups as visceral fascia, superficial fascia, and deep fascia.Fascial tissue is affected diversely due to several reasons like emotional state, injury, and surgical interventions. Inflammation because of surgery may restricts fascial tissue. Inflammation changes mechanical properties of connective tissue, cause adhesions, and finally leads to stiffness. Thereby slidings between fascial surfaces diminish, and ROM and function decrease. To release the restricted fascial tissue, several myofascial techniques are used. One of these techniques is the fascial relase technique. Myofascial techniques have effects on reducing pain, increasing ROM, and functional level. As is known, there is no study in literature for investigating the effects of fascial relase technique on pain, ROM, and function in individuals with arthroscopic RC repair. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the acute effects of fascial release technique on pain, ROM, functional level, and kinesiophobia in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Being tested
conventional physiotherapy, fascial release
Keywords
Pain, Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Range of Motion, Fascial Release Technique
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • conventional physiotherapyOther

    For individuals of control group, hot pack applied for 20 minutes in the sitting position, Interferential Current was applied for the analgesic effect at a constant 100 Hz frequency on the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior part of the operated shoulder. By increasing the current slowly, the dosage of the current was adjusted to such a degree that the patient could tolerate it.

  • fascial releaseOther

    Fascial release technique was applied to the patients in the treatment group besides the control group program. The technique was applied to the cervical, thoracolumbar and upper extremity areas until tissue loosening and releasing were felt.

Study groups in NCT05176028
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupExperimentalconventional physiotherapy
Receives: Other: conventional physiotherapy
Intervention groupExperimentalconventional physiotherapy and fascial release
Receives: Other: conventional physiotherapy; Other: fascial release

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain severity

    Pain is an unpleasant sensation and emotional experience.

    Measured: Before treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.

  2. Pain severity

    Pain is an unpleasant sensation and emotional experience.

    Measured: After treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Range of motion

    Range of motion is the measurement of movement.

    Measured: Before treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.

  2. Range of motion

    Range of motion is the measurement of movement.

    Measured: After treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2022
  2. Study start3 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion9 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion23 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Hotpack, interferential current and exercise program were applied to the control group (n=15), the fascia technique was applied to the treatment group (n=15) in addition to the control group program for 2 weeks with 2 sessions per week.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05176028
Sponsor's protocol ID
FON 2017/71
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
3 Dec 2021
Last updated
4 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sgroi TA, Cilenti M. Rotator cuff repair: post-operative rehabilitation concepts. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Mar;11(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9462-7.

    PubMed 29399735
  • Simmonds N, Miller P, Gemmell H. A theoretical framework for the role of fascia in manual therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Jan;16(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

    PubMed 22196432
  • Kain J, Martorello L, Swanson E, Sego S. Comparison of an indirect tri-planar myofascial release (MFR) technique and a hot pack for increasing range of motion. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jan;15(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 27.

    PubMed 21147420

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing conventional physiotherapy and fascial release in people with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain severity (time frame: Before treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05176028, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in