AzTrials
AzTrials

ThyroidNCT05176184

A Deep Learning Method to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy Using Cervical Spine X-ray Image

An observational study of Thyroid and Surgery, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy is associated with serious airway-related complications. The investigators developed a deep learning-based model that predicts a difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4) from a cervical spine lateral X-ray using data from 14,135 patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Thyroid, Surgery, Intubation; Difficult or Failed
What is being tested?
A deep learning model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy based on a cervical spine lateral X-ray image
How many people
367 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 25 Nov 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who undergoing thyroid surgery under general anesthesia

Who may be able to join

  • elective thyroid surgery under general anesthesia

Who cannot join

  • age < 18 years
  • no C-spine lateral X-ray image obtained within 3 months before surgery
  • Patient who safety is not guaranteed when using a direct laryngoscope. (poor dental condition, risk of neck extension)
  • Patients who not cooperate with the physical examination for airway evaluation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hye-yeon Cho, MD contact

+82-10-3808-7110

bdbd7799@gmail.com

Hyung-Chul Lee, MD, PhD contact

vital@snu.ac.kr

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, Select A State Or Province, 03080

    Hye-yeon Cho, MD, bdbd7799@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Deep Learning Method to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy Using Cervical Spine X-ray Image: Prospective Validation Study

An unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy is associated with serious airway-related complications. The investigators developed a deep learning-based model that predicts a difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4) from a cervical spine lateral X-ray using data from 14,135 patients undergoing thyroid surgery. This model showed excellent predictive performance, which was higher than that of other deep learning architectures. In this study, the investigators prospectively validate the model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy and compare predictive power with clinical airway evaluation.

Read the detailed description

Predicting a difficulty of a laryngoscopy is important for patient safety, as an unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy is associated with serious airway-related complications, such as brain damage, cardiopulmonary arrest, or death. Although clinical predictors, such as the modified Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, inter-incisor gap, and the upper lip bite test, are used for airway evaluation in clinical practice, these indicators have low sensitivity and large inter-assessor variability and require patient cooperation.

The investigators developed a deep learning-based model that predicts a difficult laryngoscopy from a cervical spine lateral X-ray using data from 14,135 patients undergoing thyroid surgery. And this study is under submission.

This deep learning model showed the highest performance in predicting difficult laryngoscopy compared to other deep learning models (VGG-Net, ResNet, Xception, ResNext, DenseNet, and SENet) with a sensitivity of 95.6%, a specificity of 91.2%, and an area under ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.972.

However, as the model was a retrospective design using existing medical records, the presence or absence of cricoid pressure to obtain the optimal laryngoscopy was not evaluated, and not compared with airway evaluations.

In this study, the investigators prospectively validate the model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy and compare predictive power with clinical airway evaluation. If this study prospective confirm our results, this approach can be helpful in improving patient safety and preventing airway-related complications through objective and accurate airway evaluation.

Being tested
A deep learning model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy based on a cervical spine lateral X-ray image
Keywords
deep learning, cervical spine X-ray, difficult laryngoscopy
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • A deep learning model for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy based on a cervical spine lateral X-ray imageDiagnostic test

    The deep learning model uses the input of preprocessed C-spine lateral X-ray images and outputs the level of difficulty of a laryngoscopy. The easy laryngoscopy is defined as a combination of the Cormack-Lehane grades 1-2 and the difficult laryngoscopy is defined as a combination of grades 3-4.

    In addition, before general anesthesia, airway evaluations related to the difficulty of laryngoscopy are performed and the results are compared with the actual level of difficulty.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of deep learning model and airway evaluations for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy.

    Difficult laryngoscopy definition: Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4 . Airway evaluations: Inter-incisor gap (millimeter), thyromental distance (millimeter), thyromental height (millimeter), sternomental distance (millimeter), and modified Mallampati class

    Measured: during induction of anesthesia

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of deep learning model and airway evaluations for predicting a difficult intubation.

    Difficult intubation: Intubation Difficulty Scale (score)

    Measured: during induction of anesthesia

  2. Other Performances for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy of deep learning model.

    sensitivity (percent), specificity(percent), Positive predictive value(percent), Negative predictive value (percent), F1-score, and balanced accuracy.

    Measured: during induction of anesthesia

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion25 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion25 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
367 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05176184
Sponsor's protocol ID
2111-111-1272
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
12 Dec 2021
Last updated
4 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109 Suppl 1:i68-i85. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes393.

    PubMed 23242753
  • Lundstrom LH, Vester-Andersen M, Moller AM, Charuluxananan S, L'hermite J, Wetterslev J; Danish Anaesthesia Database. Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177 088 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):659-67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer292. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

    PubMed 21948956
  • De Cassai A, Boscolo A, Rose K, Carron M, Navalesi P. Predictive parameters of difficult intubation in thyroid surgery: a meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Mar;86(3):317-326. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.14127-2. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

    PubMed 31922378

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Thyroid and Surgery, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hye-yeon Cho, MD (+82-10-3808-7110, bdbd7799@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of deep learning model and airway evaluations for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy. (time frame: during induction of anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05176184, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in