StrokeBirehabNCT05176600
Bimanual Robotic Exoskeletal Platform for the Treatment of the Upper Limb in Patients With Stroke. A Feasibility Study
A study testing Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious games and Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious games in people with Stroke, run by Wearable Robotics srl. at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to test the technical functionality, safety, and feasibility of a bimanual robotic exoskeletal platform and associated serious games in order to offer information on technological and functional advances that will be included in the device's finalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious games and Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious games
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2022to Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- height between 150 and 190 cm;
- weight not exceeding 130 kg;
- ischemic injury;
- first cortical and supra-tentorial event;
- moderate motor deficit of the upper limb (score on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity between 29 and 42);
- time since stroke event between 1 and 6 months;
- trunk control test score greater than or equal to 48;
- healthy bone density and skeleton that does not suffer from unhealed fractures.
Who cannot join
- Relevant medical comorbidities (severe neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes / unstabilized hypertension);
- Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the exercises administered;
- Unavailability to provide informed consent;
- Pregnant women;
- Severe spasticity (Ashworth 4);
- Major muscle contractures;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Excessive asymmetry in the length of the arms;
- Upper limb prostheses;
- Excessive joint limitations that make it difficult or painful to use the device;
- Use of pacemakers or implantation of active devices;
- Patients who already participate in another clinical study or who are already undergoing another similar robotic rehabilitation treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
Rome, 00168
Irene Aprile, MD, PhD, +390688036553, iaprile@dongnocchi.it
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study on the Evaluation of the Functionality, Safety and Feasibility of a Bimanual Robotic Exoskeletal Platform for the Treatment of the Upper Limb in Patients With Stroke
The purpose of the study is to test the technical functionality, safety, and feasibility of a bimanual robotic exoskeletal platform and associated serious games in order to offer information on technological and functional advances that will be included in the device's finalization.
In addition, a secondary goal will be to assess the therapeutic effects of a rehabilitation therapy based on the bimanual configuration, comparing it to a unimanual treatment delivered on the same platform (using the specific configuration).
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious games, Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious games
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious gamesDevice
Patients will undergo a bimanual 30-session robotic rehabilitation, using the robot ALEx RS with the bimanual configuration and the related serious games. Each session will last 45 minute. Daily sessions will be provided, five days a week.
Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious gamesDevice
Patients will undergo a unimanual 30-session robotic rehabilitation, using the robot ALEx RS with the unimanual configuration and the related serious games.Daily sessions will be provided, five days a week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimanual group | Experimental | In this group, patients will perform a robotic rehabilitation based on bimanual serious games Receives: Device: Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious games |
| Unimanual group | Active comparator | In this group, patients will perform a robotic rehabilitation based on unimanual serious games Receives: Device: Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious games |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of adverse events and description
Number and description of adverse events related to the provided intervention
Measured: through the study, an average of 10 months
Secondary outcomes (18)
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Interhemispheric coupling evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 1-hour robotic rehabilitation session
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Interhemispheric coupling evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Interhemispheric coupling evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, 1 week after the end of the 30-session robotic intervention
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Connectivity evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 1-hour robotic rehabilitation session
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Connectivity evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Connectivity evaluated by means of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Measured: Before the intervention, 1 week after the end of the 30-session robotic intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
It is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal).
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
It is a stroke-specific, sensory impairment index. It ranges from 0 (worse) to 12points (best).
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Modified Ashworth Scale
It is a validated measure of spasticity. It ranges from 0 (normal) to 4 (rigid limb).
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Motricity Index for upper extremity
It is a validated measure of upper limb strength. It ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (normal strength).
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Wolf Motor Function Test
It is a validated measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks.
The scores ranges from 0 to 75; lower scores are indicative of lower functioning levels.
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
It is a valid measure of upper-extremity functional limitation. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the lowest score indicating that no movements can be performed, and the upper score indicating normal performance.
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Execution time (seconds) measured with the robot
It is the time (in seconds) required to perform reaching movement using the robot
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Range of Motion (degrees) measured with the robot
It is the range of motion (measured in degrees) of shoulder and elbow evaluated using the robot
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Number of velocity peaks measured with the robot
It is a measure of movement smoothness while performing reaching movements with the robot.
Measured: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
System Usability Scale
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate usability. It ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better usability.
Measured: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the acceptance of the provided.
It comprises several questions rated on a 7-point likert scale.
Measured: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Likert for Satisfaction
Satisfaction will be assessed using a 11-point likert scale. It ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean higher satisfaction.
Measured: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2022
- Study start10 Jan 2022
- Primary completionSep 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wearable Robotics srl.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lucia Lencioni, Wearable Robotics srl.
- Investigators
- Irene Aprile, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05176600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FDG_Birehab_2021
- Acronym
- Birehab
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Mauro MC, Fasano A, Germanotta M, Cortellini L, Insalaco S, Pavan A, Comanducci A, Guglielmelli E, Aprile IG. Aperiodic brain activity changes in patients with stroke following virtual reality-based upper limb robotic rehabilitation: a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Oct 17;19:1671804. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1671804. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41179260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study on the Evaluation of the Functionality, Safety and Feasibility of a Bimanual Robotic Exoskeletal Platform for the Treatment of the Upper Limb in Patients With Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05176600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Birehab / FDG_Birehab_2021
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wearable Robotics srl.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to test the technical functionality, safety, and feasibility of a bimanual robotic exoskeletal platform and associated serious games in order to offer information on technological and functional advances that will be included in the device's finalization.
In addition, a secondary goal will be to assess the therapeutic effects of a rehabilitation therapy based on the bimanual configuration, comparing it to a unimanual treatment delivered on the same platform (using the specific configuration).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bimanual group | Experimental | Device: Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious gamesIn this group, patients will perform a robotic rehabilitation based on bimanual serious games |
| Unimanual group | Active comparator | Device: Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious gamesIn this group, patients will perform a robotic rehabilitation based on unimanual serious games |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- height between 150 and 190 cm;
- weight not exceeding 130 kg;
- ischemic injury;
- first cortical and supra-tentorial event;
- moderate motor deficit of the upper limb (score on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity between 29 and 42);
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Relevant medical comorbidities (severe neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes / unstabilized hypertension);
- Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the exercises administered;
- Unavailability to provide informed consent;
- Pregnant women;
- Severe spasticity (Ashworth 4);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious gamesPatients will undergo a bimanual 30-session robotic rehabilitation, using the robot ALEx RS with the bimanual configuration and the related serious games. Each session will last 45 minute. Daily sessions will be provided, five days a week. | Device | Bimanual group |
| Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious gamesPatients will undergo a unimanual 30-session robotic rehabilitation, using the robot ALEx RS with the unimanual configuration and the related serious games.Daily sessions will be provided, five days a week. | Device | Unimanual group |
Primary outcome
Incidence of adverse events and description
Time frame: through the study, an average of 10 months
Number and description of adverse events related to the provided intervention
18 secondary outcomes
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 1-hour robotic rehabilitation session
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in EEG-based Interhemispheric coupling index
Time frame: Before the intervention, 1 week after the end of the 30-session robotic intervention
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 1-hour robotic rehabilitation session
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in EEG-based Connectivity index
Time frame: Before the intervention, 1 week after the end of the 30-session robotic intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Motricity Index for upper extremity
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Wolf Motor Function Test
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Execution time (seconds) measured with the robot
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Range of Motion (degrees) measured with the robot
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Number of velocity peaks measured with the robot
Time frame: Before the intervention, after a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
System Usability Scale
Time frame: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Time frame: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Likert for Satisfaction
Time frame: After a 6-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41179260Mauro MC, Fasano A, Germanotta M, Cortellini L, Insalaco S, Pavan A, Comanducci A, Guglielmelli E, Aprile IG. Aperiodic brain activity changes in patients with stroke following virtual reality-based upper limb robotic rehabilitation: a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Oct 17;19:1671804. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1671804. eCollection 2025.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irene Aprile, MD, PhD principal investigator
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and bimanual serious games and Robotic rehabilitation using the Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station (ALEx RS) and unimanual serious games in people with Stroke, run by Wearable Robotics srl. at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Irene Aprile, MD, PhD (+390633086553, iaprile@dongnocchi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of adverse events and description (time frame: through the study, an average of 10 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05176600, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2022.