AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound HealDry_HeatNCT05186532

Dry Heat Versus Sitz Bath On Episiotomy Wound Heating And Pelvic Pain

A study testing Dry Heat Application and Moist Heat Application in people with Wound Heal and Pain, Postoperative, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: To compare the effect of dry heat versus moist heat application on episiotomy wound healing and pain among postnatal mothers. Research hypothesis H0: Postnatal mothers who apply dry heat on their episiotomy wound experience the same wound healing and pain as those who apply moist heat. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Wound Heal, Pain, Postoperative
What is being tested?
Dry Heat Application and Moist Heat Application
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
5 Jan 2021to 1 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primipara
  • First 2 hours after delivery
  • Have a normal vaginal delivery
  • Have episiotomy
  • complaining of perineal discomfort (pain)
  • Having a telephone for contact

Who cannot join

  • The women who were
  • use any pain-relieving drug
  • labor complications
  • postpartum complications
  • diabetes
  • anemia
  • Illiterate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Nursing

    Alexandria, 56321

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: To What Extent Does Application of Dry Heat is Effective in Promoting Episiotomy Wound Healing and Reducing Pelvic Pain Among Primipara Women?

Objective: To compare the effect of dry heat versus moist heat application on episiotomy wound healing and pain among postnatal mothers.

Research hypothesis H0: Postnatal mothers who apply dry heat on their episiotomy wound experience the same wound healing and pain as those who apply moist heat.

H1: Postnatal mothers who apply dry heat on their episiotomy wound experience faster wound healing and less pain than those who apply moist heat.

H2: Postnatal mothers who apply moist heat on their episiotomy wound experience faster wound healing and less pain than those who apply dry heat.

Read the detailed description

A quasi-experimental study was carried out at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital. A sample of 100 postnatal women were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Women in the control group received the moist heat, which entails; sitting in a warm water tub up to the hip level. While, the study group were subjected to infra red-light therapy that supplies radiant heat or infra-red rays to produce heat to the episiotomy wound.

Women who fulfilled the criteria from the postnatal inpatient ward at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital in El-Beheira Governorate. Each woman was randomly assigned to one of the (dry heat or moist heat) groups. The researchers explained the aim of the study to every woman, and then her consent to participate in the study was obtained.

All study subjects were individually interviewed by the researchers on the first two hours after delivery during hospital stay to collect the basic data, episiotomy pain intensity was assessed by, as well as the researchers inspect the episiotomy site for Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge and Approximation of the wound edges using REEDA scale within 2 hours after episiotomy repair to evaluate wound healing (Pretest).

After the assessment the researchers provided clear and concise information through illustrative pamphlet for the both groups.

Dry heat group included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to place an infrared lamp at distance of 45 cm from the perineum and the heat produced with 230 volts for ten minutes. But the mother is checked after the first five minutes to make sure that she was not being burned. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to use infrared lamp, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days. The researcher gives the infrared lamp device for each woman then restore it after completion of the study.

Moist heat group included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to sit in a basin (tub) of warm water (45 o C -59 o C) without pressure on the perineum and with the feet flat on the floor for 10 minutes. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to do warm sitz bath, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days.

At the end of the session the researchers gave each woman health education about the importance of follow-up to ensure woman compliance for the interventions they assigned to it and to assess wound healing. The researchers motivated the women to perform the interventions they assigned to it through daily telephone calls by reminding the women with its benefits and importance of follow up.

Follow up: Women of the two groups were instructed to come to the obstetric outpatient clinic at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital for follow up visits during the morning shift on the 5th and 10th day post-partum, the perineal area was observed for redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and approximation of the skin as well as perineal pain. During each follow up visit the researchers had evaluated the episiotomy pain intensity using and episiotomy wound healing.

Being tested
Dry Heat Application, Moist Heat Application
Keywords
Infrared Rays, Heat, Hydrotherapy, episiotomy, Pelvic Pain, wound healing
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Pelvic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dry Heat ApplicationRadiation

    50 postnatal women they were encouraged to place an infrared lamp at distance of 45 cm from the perineum and the heat produced with 230 volts for ten minutes. But the mother is checked after the first five minutes to make sure that she was not being burned. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to use infrared lamp, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days. The researcher gives the infrared lamp device for each woman then restore it after completion of the study.

  • Moist Heat ApplicationOther

    included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to sit in a basin (tub) of warm water (45 o C -59 o C) without pressure on the perineum and with the feet flat on the floor for 10 minutes. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to do warm sitz bath, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days.

Study groups in NCT05186532
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry heat groupExperimentalinfra red-light therapy that supplies radiant heat or infra-red rays to produce heat to the episiotomy wound.
Receives: Radiation: Dry Heat Application
Moist heat groupActive comparatorwarm sitz bath in which a woman is asked to sit in a warm water tub up to the hip level.
Receives: Other: Moist Heat Application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pelvic pain

    The researchers measured the pelvic pain intensity using Visual analogue scale: This scale was adopted and translated to an Arabic version to be used in the current study. It was developed by Melzack and Katz (1994). It is a self-reported device consisting of a horizontal line used for subjective estimation of patient's pain. It comprises 10-point numerical scale, corresponding to the degree of pain with zero representing no pain and 10 representing the worst degree of pain. Scores 1, 2, 3 indicate mild pain, while 4, 5, 6 scores indicate moderate pain and 7, 8, 9 scores indicate severe pain; finally, 10 indicate the worst unbearable pain

    Measured: After 10 days

  2. Episiotomy wound healing

    The researchers assessed episiotomy wound healing using The standardized Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale ; The REEDA scale is an observational check list used for assessing perineal wound healing that was primarily developed by Davidson (1974). It can be used to assess all types of postpartum perineal trauma. It has five components namely Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge and Approximation of the wound edges. Each component takes a score ranged from 0 to 3 . Total REEDA score ranges between 0 and 15. Higher score indicates poor wound healing while lower score indicates good wound healing. The total score of REEDA scale was categorized as follows; Completely healed from 0 to 2 , Moderately healed from 3 to 5 , Mildly healed from 6 to 8, and Not healed from 9 to 15

    Measured: After 10 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2022
  2. Study start5 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05186532
Sponsor's protocol ID
4445566888
Acronym
Dry_Heat
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
23 Dec 2021
Last updated
11 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Priddis H, Schmied V, Dahlen H. Women's experiences following severe perineal trauma: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Feb 21;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-32.

    PubMed 24559056
  • Steen M, Cummins B. How to alleviate perineal pain following an episiotomy. Nurs Stand. 2016 Mar 30;30(31):34-7. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.31.34.s43. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27027195
  • Swain J, Dahlen HG. Putting evidence into practice: a quality activity of proactive pain relief for postpartum perineal pain. Women Birth. 2013 Mar;26(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 May 8.

    PubMed 22575710
  • Petersen MR. Review of interventions to relieve postpartum pain from perineal trauma. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):241-5. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182182579.

    PubMed 21709521
  • Sarbaz Z, Yazdanpanahi Z, Hosseinkhani A, Nazari F, Akbarzadeh M. The Effect of Sitz Bath of Hydro-Alcoholic Extract of Myrrh Gum on Episiotomy Wound Healing in Nulliparous Women. J Family Reprod Health. 2019 Jun;13(2):89-97.

    PubMed 31988645

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dry Heat Application and Moist Heat Application in people with Wound Heal and Pain, Postoperative, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pelvic pain (time frame: After 10 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05186532, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in