Cervical CancerPhase 3NCT05189028
Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Definite Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Bulk Cervical Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine and cisplatin in people with Cervical Cancer and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Chuangzhen Chen at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This phase III randomized prospective clinical study was conducted to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of gemcitabine and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus definite cisplatin weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bulk cervical cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
- What is being tested?
- gemcitabine and cisplatin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 290 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to Jun 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologic proof of primary cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cell carcinoma.
- According to the 2018 International Federation of Cervical Cancer Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging standard, the patient was diagnosed with local tumor ≥4cm in stage IB3, IIA2, IIB-IVA by at least one expert with associate high degree or above in the department of gynecology and gynecology.
- Age≥18 \& ≤70.
- ECOG score 0-2.
- WBC ≥4.0×109/L, hemoglobin ≥60g/L, platelet ≥100.0×109/L; Serum bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal, ALT, AST, ALP ≤ upper limit of normal ×2.5; Urea nitrogen (BUN) ≤ upper limit of normal ×1.5, creatinine (Cr)≤ upper limit of normal ×1.5.
- Patients with prior malignancy are eligible if disease-free ≥ 5 years.
- Signed study-specific informed consent form prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- Line has anti-tumor treatment, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery).
- Stage Ia1- IB2 and IVB cervical cancer.
- Patients with uncontrolled serious medical or mental illnesses.
- Women in pregnancy or lactation.
- Psychological, family, social factors, such as lead to no informed consent.
- Into the group of the first five years in addition to the cervical cancer merger other patients with a history of malignant tumor.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, 515031
Chuangzhen Chen, MD, 86-13923995569, stccz@139.com
Yizhou Zhan, MD, 86-13929699280, 6780540@qq.com
About this study
Official title: Phase III Randomized Prospective Clinical Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin(GP) Versus Definite Cisplatin Combined Weekly Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Bulk Cervical Cancer
This phase III randomized prospective clinical study was conducted to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of gemcitabine and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus definite cisplatin weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bulk cervical cancer.
Read the detailed description
Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care recommended by the NCCN for locally advanced cervical cancer of stage IB3, IIA2 and IIB-IVA (2018 FIGO stage) (cervical tumor ≥4cm). The 5-year survival rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer has been reported in foreign literatures at 64.5-67%. The 3 - and 5-year survival rates of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our hospital were 78.6% and 70.5%, respectively, while the 3 - and 5-year survival rates of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin monotherapy were 66.4% and 63.1%, respectively. In the concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, although many studies have tried paclitaxel, irinotecan, gemcitabine and other concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin, some encouraging results have been obtained, but at the same time, more obvious toxic and side effects have also appeared in the combination drug. At present, there is no evidence that the combined use of these radiotherapy sensitizers is superior to the single use of cisplatin. Adjuvant chemotherapy also did not show a survival advantage.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a systemic chemotherapy given before local treatment of malignant tumors (surgery or radiotherapy), mainly used for the treatment of breast cancer, cervical cancer, and solid head and neck tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer research more, but there is no specification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation and chemotherapy research reports. Possible benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 1. Reduce tumor volume, reduce tumor displacement during radiation, and thus reduce the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues (rectum, bladder, etc.); 2. Reduce the proportion of hypoxic cells and increase the radiotherapy sensitivity; 3. Suppression or elimination of micrometastatic lesions may exist in the whole body, and can prevent distant metastasis.
Rydzewska et al. conducted a large sample study showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can prolong overall survival and progression-free survival. For early and locally advanced cervical cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical surgery is more meaningful than surgery alone. He et al. reported on 62 cases of Ⅰ b2 ~ Ⅱ b stage cervical cancer patients with paclitaxel plus cisplatin 2-3 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the total effective rate was 90.32%, among them the complete response rate was 30.65%, tumor after chemotherapy significantly smaller.
Gemcitabine (GEM) is a synthetic nucleoside derivative of cytosine, which mainly acts on S phase and has been used in solid tumors for more than 20 years. Duenas-Gonzalez et al. reported that gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induced chemotherapy in the primary treatment of locally advanced (IB2-IIIB) cervical cancer stage II study, the total response rate of induction chemotherapy plus surgery was 95% (7.5%CR and 87.5%PR), grade 3-4 granulocytopenia accounted for 13.8% and 3.4%, and non-hematological toxicity was slight. Therefore, the chemotherapy response rate of GP(gemcitabine/cisplatin) regimen was similar to that of PC (paclitaxel/cisplatin) regimen in cervical cancer, but the side effects were relatively small.
IMRT/VMAT modern precision radiotherapy technology is more and more popular in the radiotherapy of cervical cancer, precision radiotherapy has better conformal, can significantly reduce the external radiation dose of pelvis and small intestine; It is also possible to reduce the dose and volume of surrounding normal tissues (rectum, bladder, etc.) during target mapping and planning. However, the local tumor of the massive cervical cancer is huge, and the volume of the surrounding normal tissue decreases significantly during the radiotherapy and chemotherapy during irradiation, which results in increased displacement change of the surrounding normal tissue, so that the normal tissue outside the target area during the planning and design enters the irradiation field, and weakens the benefits of precise radiotherapy technology. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces local cervical tumors in advance, improves tumor hypoxia and reduces tumor displacement during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Theoretically, it has obvious benefits to reduce side effects in normal tissues around the week.
This study attempted to administer gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy in large locally advanced cervical cancer, with the expectation that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group could improve the local control rate, reduce the distant metastasis rate, and reduce the side effects of radiotherapy in normal tissues, thus improving the overall survival rate, and providing a scientific basis for the development of a rational, effective, low-toxicity, individualized comprehensive treatment plan suitable for modern precise radiotherapy technology for locally advanced cervical cancer.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
- Being tested
- gemcitabine and cisplatin
- Keywords
- Cervical Cancer, NACT(Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), Locally Advanced Bulk Cervical Cancer, Chemoradiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gemcitabine and cisplatinDrug
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy:gemcitabine and cisplatin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy group(NACT) | Experimental | Radiation: Radiotherapy with IMRT/VMAT+192Ir-HDR brachytherapy Radiotherapy: 46Gy/23F to external pelvic radiotherapy and 14Gy/7F boost to imaging diagnosis of positive lymph nodes 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy:A Point dose 6Gy*4-6F
Drug: gemcitabine plus cisplatin,cisplatin Neoadjuvant chemotherapy:gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen*2 cycles Concurrent Chemotherapy: Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy ≥5 cycles Receives: Drug: gemcitabine and cisplatin |
| Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer chemoradiotherapy group(CCRT) | Active comparator | Radiation: Radiotherapy with IMRT/VMAT+192Ir-HDR brachytherapy Radiotherapy: 46Gy/23F to external pelvic radiotherapy and 14Gy/7F boost to imaging diagnosis of positive lymph nodes 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy:APoint A dose 6Gy*4-6F
Drug: cisplatin Concurrent Chemotherapy: Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy ≥5 cycles Receives: Drug: gemcitabine and cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Local-regional control
Measured: 2 years
Distant metastasis-free survival
Measured: 2 years
Disease-free survival
Measured: 2 years after randomization
Acute and late toxicities using CTCAE v4.0
The probabilities of grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities and 2-year late toxicities of bladder and rectum.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 290 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chuangzhen Chen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Chuangzhen Chen, Shantou University Medical College
- Investigators
- Chuangzhen Chen, MD, Principal investigator, Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05189028
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NACT-CC-001
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Randomized Prospective Clinical Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin(GP) Versus Definite Cisplatin Combined Weekly Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Bulk Cervical Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05189028
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NACT-CC-001
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
- Keywords
- Cervical Cancer, NACT(Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), Locally Advanced Bulk Cervical Cancer, Chemoradiotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 290 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chuangzhen ChenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase III randomized prospective clinical study was conducted to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of gemcitabine and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus definite cisplatin weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bulk cervical cancer.
Detailed description
Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care recommended by the NCCN for locally advanced cervical cancer of stage IB3, IIA2 and IIB-IVA (2018 FIGO stage) (cervical tumor ≥4cm). The 5-year survival rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer has been reported in foreign literatures at 64.5-67%. The 3 - and 5-year survival rates of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our hospital were 78.6% and 70.5%, respectively, while the 3 - and 5-year survival rates of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin monotherapy were 66.4% and 63.1%, respectively. In the concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, although many studies have tried paclitaxel, irinotecan, gemcitabine and other concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin, some encouraging results have been obtained, but at the same time, more obvious toxic and side effects have also appeared in the combination drug. At present, there is no evidence that the combined use of these radiotherapy sensitizers is superior to the single use of cisplatin. Adjuvant chemotherapy also did not show a survival advantage.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a systemic chemotherapy given before local treatment of malignant tumors (surgery or radiotherapy), mainly used for the treatment of breast cancer, cervical cancer, and solid head and neck tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer research more, but there is no specification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation and chemotherapy research reports. Possible benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 1. Reduce tumor volume, reduce tumor displacement during radiation, and thus reduce the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues (rectum, bladder, etc.); 2. Reduce the proportion of hypoxic cells and increase the radiotherapy sensitivity; 3. Suppression or elimination of micrometastatic lesions may exist in the whole body, and can prevent distant metastasis.
Rydzewska et al. conducted a large sample study showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can prolong overall survival and progression-free survival. For early and locally advanced cervical cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical surgery is more meaningful than surgery alone. He et al. reported on 62 cases of Ⅰ b2 ~ Ⅱ b stage cervical cancer patients with paclitaxel plus cisplatin 2-3 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the total effective rate was 90.32%, among them the complete response rate was 30.65%, tumor after chemotherapy significantly smaller.
Gemcitabine (GEM) is a synthetic nucleoside derivative of cytosine, which mainly acts on S phase and has been used in solid tumors for more than 20 years. Duenas-Gonzalez et al. reported that gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induced chemotherapy in the primary treatment of locally advanced (IB2-IIIB) cervical cancer stage II study, the total response rate of induction chemotherapy plus surgery was 95% (7.5%CR and 87.5%PR), grade 3-4 granulocytopenia accounted for 13.8% and 3.4%, and non-hematological toxicity was slight. Therefore, the chemotherapy response rate of GP(gemcitabine/cisplatin) regimen was similar to that of PC (paclitaxel/cisplatin) regimen in cervical cancer, but the side effects were relatively small.
IMRT/VMAT modern precision radiotherapy technology is more and more popular in the radiotherapy of cervical cancer, precision radiotherapy has better conformal, can significantly reduce the external radiation dose of pelvis and small intestine; It is also possible to reduce the dose and volume of surrounding normal tissues (rectum, bladder, etc.) during target mapping and planning. However, the local tumor of the massive cervical cancer is huge, and the volume of the surrounding normal tissue decreases significantly during the radiotherapy and chemotherapy during irradiation, which results in increased displacement change of the surrounding normal tissue, so that the normal tissue outside the target area during the planning and design enters the irradiation field, and weakens the benefits of precise radiotherapy technology. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces local cervical tumors in advance, improves tumor hypoxia and reduces tumor displacement during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Theoretically, it has obvious benefits to reduce side effects in normal tissues around the week.
This study attempted to administer gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy in large locally advanced cervical cancer, with the expectation that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group could improve the local control rate, reduce the distant metastasis rate, and reduce the side effects of radiotherapy in normal tissues, thus improving the overall survival rate, and providing a scientific basis for the development of a rational, effective, low-toxicity, individualized comprehensive treatment plan suitable for modern precise radiotherapy technology for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy group(NACT) | Experimental | Drug: gemcitabine and cisplatinRadiation: Radiotherapy with IMRT/VMAT+192Ir-HDR brachytherapy Radiotherapy: 46Gy/23F to external pelvic radiotherapy and 14Gy/7F boost to imaging diagnosis of positive lymph nodes 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy:A Point dose 6Gy*4-6F Drug: gemcitabine plus cisplatin,cisplatin Neoadjuvant chemotherapy:gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) regimen*2 cycles Concurrent Chemotherapy: Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy ≥5 cycles |
| Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer chemoradiotherapy group(CCRT) | Active comparator | Drug: gemcitabine and cisplatinRadiation: Radiotherapy with IMRT/VMAT+192Ir-HDR brachytherapy Radiotherapy: 46Gy/23F to external pelvic radiotherapy and 14Gy/7F boost to imaging diagnosis of positive lymph nodes 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy:APoint A dose 6Gy*4-6F Drug: cisplatin Concurrent Chemotherapy: Weekly cisplatin chemotherapy ≥5 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologic proof of primary cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cell carcinoma.
- According to the 2018 International Federation of Cervical Cancer Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging standard, the patient was diagnosed with local tumor ≥4cm in stage IB3, IIA2, IIB-IVA by at least one expert with associate high degree or above in the department of gynecology and gynecology.
- Age≥18 \& ≤70.
- ECOG score 0-2.
- WBC ≥4.0×109/L, hemoglobin ≥60g/L, platelet ≥100.0×109/L; Serum bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal, ALT, AST, ALP ≤ upper limit of normal ×2.5; Urea nitrogen (BUN) ≤ upper limit of normal ×1.5, creatinine (Cr)≤ upper limit of normal ×1.5.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Line has anti-tumor treatment, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery).
- Stage Ia1- IB2 and IVB cervical cancer.
- Patients with uncontrolled serious medical or mental illnesses.
- Women in pregnancy or lactation.
- Psychological, family, social factors, such as lead to no informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemcitabine and cisplatinNeoadjuvant chemotherapy:gemcitabine and cisplatin | Drug | Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer chemoradiotherapy group(CCRT), Locally advanced bulk cervical cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy group(NACT) |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
4 secondary outcomes
Local-regional control
Time frame: 2 years
Distant metastasis-free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 2 years after randomization
Acute and late toxicities using CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2024.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chuangzhen Chen, MD principal investigator
Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine and cisplatin in people with Cervical Cancer and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, run by Chuangzhen Chen at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yizhou Zhan, MD (86-13929699280, 6780540@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2024.