Child Development DisorderNCT05190029
Craniosacral Test and Primitive Reflexes in Infant Neurodevelopment
A study testing Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form., Intervention by teachers and Physiotherapeutic evaluation in people with Child Development Disorder, run by Clinica Gema Leon at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Question(s): Can active primitive reflexes (APR) and cranial blocks (CB) in healthy children interfere with neurological balance causing psycho-behavioral and cognitive dysfunctions? Design: Cross-sectional and descriptive study analyzing perinatal, neurobehavioral and physiotherapeutic parameters. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Child Development Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form., Intervention by teachers and Physiotherapeutic evaluation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 5 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 8 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Apparently healthy children
- School group
- Within age range
Who cannot join
- Children with possible pathologies
- Older than the established age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Early Craniosacral and Primitive Reflex Assessment in Infant Neurodevelopment.
Question(s): Can active primitive reflexes (APR) and cranial blocks (CB) in healthy children interfere with neurological balance causing psycho-behavioral and cognitive dysfunctions? Design: Cross-sectional and descriptive study analyzing perinatal, neurobehavioral and physiotherapeutic parameters. Participants: School population of both genders (n=120) divided in two groups: 3-6 years old (n=60) and 6-8 years old (n=60). Intervention: Systematic evaluation of the children based on a parent survey, assessment by teachers and physiotherapeutic exploration. Outcome measures: Perinatal (surveyed parents) and neurobehavioral problems (assessed by teachers) were related to the presence of RPA and BC (analyzed by physiotherapeutic exploration).
Key words: primitive reflexes, craniosacral disfunctions, neurodevelopment, childhood, early diagnosis, screening.
Read the detailed description
Primitive reflexes (PR) are indispensable for the survival of the individual in the early stages of life. PR are necessary for a coordinated response to sensory stimuli during the period of cortical immaturity until the maturation of the central nervous system (CNS). However, PR must be gradually abolished as the subject's development proceeds, allowing for voluntary and functional movement responses. This process of PR abolition is due to the synaptic plasticity of the CNS. Persistent ROP can be identified by means of a systematic neurological examination. On the other hand, through craniosacral exploration, blockages in the craniosacral system can be evidenced; under physiological conditions, this system seeks to balance the mobility of membranes and cranial sutures, based on the coordinated movement of the cranial bones and the sacrum. If neurological homeostasis is disturbed in the child after diagnosing possible BC, this could manifest in the persistence of RPA and/or vice versa.
Observation of the child's different behavioral patterns in social and emotional areas, as well as his or her physical and psychological capacities, could help to detect early possible alterations in the onset of neurodevelopment. Such detection is essential for the health professional to be able to establish an appropriate treatment.
The aim of this study is to detect early infant neurodevelopmental dysfunctions and their possible relationship with RPA and/or BC in apparently healthy children.
Therefore, the research questions of this study were:
- Are RPA and/or BC related to child neurodevelopmental disturbances?
- In relation to the previous question, by means of the systematic evaluation of RPA and BC could children with neurodevelopmental disorders be identified in order to treat them early?
Design A cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study was conducted in a school population.
Participants, therapists, centers A total of 120 children between 3 and 8 years of age from a school in Córdoba (Spain) were evaluated. Subjects of both sexes were included and were divided into two groups according to age ranges: 3 to 6 years and 6 to 8 years. The neurodevelopmental assessment was made taking into account the growth stages standardized by the WHO.
Prior approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Córdoba for the present study. The harmonized tripartite standards of the Helsinki declaration, the Biomedical Research Law (Law 14/2007), and the Organic Law on Personal Data Protection (Organic Law 3/2018) were respected at all times. The application of tests and data collection for the research was performed within the facilities of the educational institution, with the collaboration of the teachers and having the due authorization of the academic director and the parents or legal representatives of the students.
- Conditions
- Child Development Disorder
- Being tested
- Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form., Intervention by teachers, Physiotherapeutic evaluation
- Keywords
- primitive reflexes, craniosacral disfunctions, neurodevelopment, childhood, early diagnosis, screening
- Medical subject headings
- Developmental Disabilities, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form.Diagnostic test
A questionnaire of 5 questions was provided in an online format addressed to the parents or legal representatives of each child. These questions were related to the child's own aspects (behavioral, psychomotor and cognitive parameters), as well as parameters oriented to the mother (pregnancy and childbirth).
Intervention by teachersOther
The school teachers examined neurobehavioral aspects of the students using the "Battelle Developmental Inventory" (BDI), which assesses five areas of development (personal/social, adaptive, motor, communicative and cognitive) between 2 and 8 years of age. The results are assigned in age-adjusted percentages, classified as: low (0-50%), normal (50-80%) and high (80-100%). Low and high values are considered impairments in one or more of the evaluated areas.
Physiotherapeutic evaluationProcedure or surgery
A physiotherapeutic evaluation of the state of the RP and craniosacral system was performed according to the method of Andrzej Pilat and John E. Upledger.
The 14 primitive reflexes explored were: Moro reflex, cervical asymmetric, supine labyrinthine tonic, prone labyrinthine tonic, palmar grasp, plantar grasp, lateral trunk propulsion, parachute, Galant, search, cervical symmetric, Babinski, cochleo-palpebral and acoustic. These reflexes were considered as: inactive (0), or active (1).
In the evaluation of the craniosacral system, the following parameters were explored: dura mater sway, frontal bone, parietal bones, temporal bones, temporomandibular joint and sphenoid bone. These parameters were considered as: normal (0), or blockage (1).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Complete sample | Experimental | Group of 120 children evaluated by craniosacral therapy for cranial blocks and primitive reflexes. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form.; Other: Intervention by teachers; Procedure: Physiotherapeutic evaluation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Series of questions to the children's parents
A questionnaire of 5 questions in an online format was sent to the parents or legal representatives of each child related to behavioral, psychomotor and cognitive aspects, pregnancy and childbirth.
Measured: one week
Teachers' test by means of the "Battelle Development Inventory" (BDI).
The school teachers examined neurobehavioral aspects of the students using the "Battelle Developmental Inventory" (BDI), which assesses five areas of development (personal/social, adaptive, motor, communicative and cognitive) between 2 and 8 years of age. The results are assigned in age-adjusted percentages, classified as: low (0-50%), normal (50-80%) and high (80-100%). Low and high values are considered impairments in one or more of the evaluated areas.
Measured: Three weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Craniosacral evaluation of possible cranial blocks
In the evaluation of the craniosacral system, the following parameters were explored: dura mater sway, frontal bone, parietal bones, temporal bones, temporomandibular joint and sphenoid bone. These parameters were considered as: normal (0), or blockage (1).
Measured: Three weeks
Craniosacral evaluation of active primitive reflexes.
14 primitive reflexes explored were: Moro reflex, cervical asymmetric, supine labyrinthine tonic, prone labyrinthine tonic, palmar prehension, plantar prehension, lateral trunk propulsion, parachute, Galant, search, cervical symmetric, Babinski, cochleo-palpebral and acoustic. These reflexes were considered as: inactive (0), or active (1).
Measured: Three weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion30 Dec 2021
- Study completion5 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Child Development DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- 120 children aged 3 to 8 years from a school in Córdoba (Spain). Subjects of both sexes were included and were divided into two groups according to age ranges: 3 to 6 years and 6 to 8 years.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Gema Leon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, GEMA LEÓN BRAVO, Clinica Gema Leon
- Investigators
- Irene Cantarero, Study Chair, Study chair, Universidad de CórdobaJavier Caballero Villarraso, Study Direct, Study director, Universidad de Córdoba
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05190029
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ART-GLB-PRIMITIVE REFLEXES
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The request for data will be studied and considered upon justified request.
Publications
Pecuch A, Gieysztor E, Telenga M, Wolanska E, Kowal M, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Primitive Reflex Activity in Relation to the Sensory Profile in Healthy Preschool Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 6;17(21):8210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218210.
PubMed 33172138Pecuch A, Gieysztor E, Wolanska E, Telenga M, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Primitive Reflex Activity in Relation to Motor Skills in Healthy Preschool Children. Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 23;11(8):967. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080967.
PubMed 34439585Gieysztor EZ, Choinska AM, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Persistence of primitive reflexes and associated motor problems in healthy preschool children. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jan;14(1):167-173. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.60503. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
PubMed 29379547Bob P, Konicarova J, Raboch J. Disinhibition of Primitive Reflexes in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder: Insight Into Specific Mechanisms in Girls and Boys. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 8;12:430685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.430685. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34819879Konicarova J, Bob P, Raboch J. Persisting primitive reflexes in medication-naive girls with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1457-61. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S49343. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
PubMed 24092983Melillo R, Leisman G, Mualem R, Ornai A, Carmeli E. Persistent Childhood Primitive Reflex Reduction Effects on Cognitive, Sensorimotor, and Academic Performance in ADHD. Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;8:431835. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.431835. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33282806Sohn M, Ahn Y, Lee S. Assessment of Primitive Reflexes in High-risk Newborns. J Clin Med Res. 2011 Dec;3(6):285-90. doi: 10.4021/jocmr706w. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
PubMed 22393339Marin Gabriel MA, Olza Fernandez I, Malalana Martinez AM, Gonzalez Armengod C, Costarelli V, Millan Santos I, Fernandez-Canadas Morillo A, Perez Riveiro P, Lopez Sanchez F, Garcia Murillo L. Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin reduce the expression of primitive reflexes associated with breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med. 2015 May;10(4):209-13. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0156. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PubMed 25785487Vreeling FW, Verhey FR, Houx PJ, Jolles J. Primitive reflexes in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;56(12):1323-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.12.1323.
PubMed 8270937Futagi Y, Toribe Y, Suzuki Y. The grasp reflex and moro reflex in infants: hierarchy of primitive reflex responses. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:191562. doi: 10.1155/2012/191562. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
PubMed 22778756Gieysztor E, Pecuch A, Kowal M, Borowicz W, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Pelvic Symmetry Is Influenced by Asymmetrical Tonic Neck Reflex during Young Children's Gait. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134759.
PubMed 32630679Huber SJ, Paulson GW. Relationship between primitive reflexes and severity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1298-300. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.11.1298.
PubMed 3794736Niklasson M, Norlander T, Niklasson I, Rasmussen P. Catching-up: Children with developmental coordination disorder compared to healthy children before and after sensorimotor therapy. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0186126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186126. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29020061Haller H, Lauche R, Cramer H, Rampp T, Saha FJ, Ostermann T, Dobos G. Craniosacral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Sham-controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 May;32(5):441-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000290.
PubMed 26340656Wetzler G, Roland M, Fryer-Dietz S, Dettmann-Ahern D. CranioSacral Therapy and Visceral Manipulation: A New Treatment Intervention for Concussion Recovery. Med Acupunct. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):239-248. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1222.
PubMed 28874926
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Craniosacral and Primitive Reflex Assessment in Infant Neurodevelopment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05190029
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ART-GLB-PRIMITIVE REFLEXES
- Conditions
- Child Development Disorder
- Keywords
- primitive reflexes, craniosacral disfunctions, neurodevelopment, childhood, early diagnosis, screening
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Gema LeonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Question(s): Can active primitive reflexes (APR) and cranial blocks (CB) in healthy children interfere with neurological balance causing psycho-behavioral and cognitive dysfunctions? Design: Cross-sectional and descriptive study analyzing perinatal, neurobehavioral and physiotherapeutic parameters. Participants: School population of both genders (n=120) divided in two groups: 3-6 years old (n=60) and 6-8 years old (n=60). Intervention: Systematic evaluation of the children based on a parent survey, assessment by teachers and physiotherapeutic exploration. Outcome measures: Perinatal (surveyed parents) and neurobehavioral problems (assessed by teachers) were related to the presence of RPA and BC (analyzed by physiotherapeutic exploration).
Key words: primitive reflexes, craniosacral disfunctions, neurodevelopment, childhood, early diagnosis, screening.
Detailed description
Primitive reflexes (PR) are indispensable for the survival of the individual in the early stages of life. PR are necessary for a coordinated response to sensory stimuli during the period of cortical immaturity until the maturation of the central nervous system (CNS). However, PR must be gradually abolished as the subject's development proceeds, allowing for voluntary and functional movement responses. This process of PR abolition is due to the synaptic plasticity of the CNS. Persistent ROP can be identified by means of a systematic neurological examination. On the other hand, through craniosacral exploration, blockages in the craniosacral system can be evidenced; under physiological conditions, this system seeks to balance the mobility of membranes and cranial sutures, based on the coordinated movement of the cranial bones and the sacrum. If neurological homeostasis is disturbed in the child after diagnosing possible BC, this could manifest in the persistence of RPA and/or vice versa.
Observation of the child's different behavioral patterns in social and emotional areas, as well as his or her physical and psychological capacities, could help to detect early possible alterations in the onset of neurodevelopment. Such detection is essential for the health professional to be able to establish an appropriate treatment.
The aim of this study is to detect early infant neurodevelopmental dysfunctions and their possible relationship with RPA and/or BC in apparently healthy children.
Therefore, the research questions of this study were:
- Are RPA and/or BC related to child neurodevelopmental disturbances?
- In relation to the previous question, by means of the systematic evaluation of RPA and BC could children with neurodevelopmental disorders be identified in order to treat them early?
Design A cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study was conducted in a school population.
Participants, therapists, centers A total of 120 children between 3 and 8 years of age from a school in Córdoba (Spain) were evaluated. Subjects of both sexes were included and were divided into two groups according to age ranges: 3 to 6 years and 6 to 8 years. The neurodevelopmental assessment was made taking into account the growth stages standardized by the WHO.
Prior approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Córdoba for the present study. The harmonized tripartite standards of the Helsinki declaration, the Biomedical Research Law (Law 14/2007), and the Organic Law on Personal Data Protection (Organic Law 3/2018) were respected at all times. The application of tests and data collection for the research was performed within the facilities of the educational institution, with the collaboration of the teachers and having the due authorization of the academic director and the parents or legal representatives of the students.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- 120 children aged 3 to 8 years from a school in Córdoba (Spain). Subjects of both sexes were included and were divided into two groups according to age ranges: 3 to 6 years and 6 to 8 years.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Complete sample | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form., Other: Intervention by teachers, Procedure: Physiotherapeutic evaluationGroup of 120 children evaluated by craniosacral therapy for cranial blocks and primitive reflexes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Apparently healthy children
- School group
- Within age range
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children with possible pathologies
- Older than the established age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form.A questionnaire of 5 questions was provided in an online format addressed to the parents or legal representatives of each child. These questions were related to the child's own aspects (behavioral, psychomotor and cognitive parameters), as well as parameters oriented to the mother (pregnancy and childbirth). | Diagnostic test | Complete sample |
| Intervention by teachersThe school teachers examined neurobehavioral aspects of the students using the "Battelle Developmental Inventory" (BDI), which assesses five areas of development (personal/social, adaptive, motor, communicative and cognitive) between 2 and 8 years of age. The results are assigned in age-adjusted percentages, classified as: low (0-50%), normal (50-80%) and high (80-100%). Low and high values are considered impairments in one or more of the evaluated areas. | Other | Complete sample |
| Physiotherapeutic evaluationA physiotherapeutic evaluation of the state of the RP and craniosacral system was performed according to the method of Andrzej Pilat and John E. Upledger. The 14 primitive reflexes explored were: Moro reflex, cervical asymmetric, supine labyrinthine tonic, prone labyrinthine tonic, palmar grasp, plantar grasp, lateral trunk propulsion, parachute, Galant, search, cervical symmetric, Babinski, cochleo-palpebral and acoustic. These reflexes were considered as: inactive (0), or active (1). In the evaluation of the craniosacral system, the following parameters were explored: dura mater sway, frontal bone, parietal bones, temporal bones, temporomandibular joint and sphenoid bone. These parameters were considered as: normal (0), or blockage (1). | Procedure or surgery | Complete sample |
Primary outcome
Series of questions to the children's parents
Time frame: one week
A questionnaire of 5 questions in an online format was sent to the parents or legal representatives of each child related to behavioral, psychomotor and cognitive aspects, pregnancy and childbirth.
Teachers' test by means of the "Battelle Development Inventory" (BDI).
Time frame: Three weeks
The school teachers examined neurobehavioral aspects of the students using the "Battelle Developmental Inventory" (BDI), which assesses five areas of development (personal/social, adaptive, motor, communicative and cognitive) between 2 and 8 years of age. The results are assigned in age-adjusted percentages, classified as: low (0-50%), normal (50-80%) and high (80-100%). Low and high values are considered impairments in one or more of the evaluated areas.
2 secondary outcomes
Craniosacral evaluation of possible cranial blocks
Time frame: Three weeks
Craniosacral evaluation of active primitive reflexes.
Time frame: Three weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2022.
- Background: PubMed 33172138Pecuch A, Gieysztor E, Telenga M, Wolanska E, Kowal M, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Primitive Reflex Activity in Relation to the Sensory Profile in Healthy Preschool Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 6;17(21):8210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218210.
- Background: PubMed 34439585Pecuch A, Gieysztor E, Wolanska E, Telenga M, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Primitive Reflex Activity in Relation to Motor Skills in Healthy Preschool Children. Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 23;11(8):967. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080967.
- Background: PubMed 29379547Gieysztor EZ, Choinska AM, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Persistence of primitive reflexes and associated motor problems in healthy preschool children. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jan;14(1):167-173. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.60503. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 34819879Bob P, Konicarova J, Raboch J. Disinhibition of Primitive Reflexes in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder: Insight Into Specific Mechanisms in Girls and Boys. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 8;12:430685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.430685. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 24092983Konicarova J, Bob P, Raboch J. Persisting primitive reflexes in medication-naive girls with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1457-61. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S49343. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 33282806Melillo R, Leisman G, Mualem R, Ornai A, Carmeli E. Persistent Childhood Primitive Reflex Reduction Effects on Cognitive, Sensorimotor, and Academic Performance in ADHD. Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;8:431835. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.431835. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 22393339Sohn M, Ahn Y, Lee S. Assessment of Primitive Reflexes in High-risk Newborns. J Clin Med Res. 2011 Dec;3(6):285-90. doi: 10.4021/jocmr706w. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 25785487Marin Gabriel MA, Olza Fernandez I, Malalana Martinez AM, Gonzalez Armengod C, Costarelli V, Millan Santos I, Fernandez-Canadas Morillo A, Perez Riveiro P, Lopez Sanchez F, Garcia Murillo L. Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin reduce the expression of primitive reflexes associated with breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med. 2015 May;10(4):209-13. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0156. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 8270937Vreeling FW, Verhey FR, Houx PJ, Jolles J. Primitive reflexes in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;56(12):1323-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.12.1323.
- Background: PubMed 22778756Futagi Y, Toribe Y, Suzuki Y. The grasp reflex and moro reflex in infants: hierarchy of primitive reflex responses. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:191562. doi: 10.1155/2012/191562. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 32630679Gieysztor E, Pecuch A, Kowal M, Borowicz W, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Pelvic Symmetry Is Influenced by Asymmetrical Tonic Neck Reflex during Young Children's Gait. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134759.
- Background: PubMed 3794736Huber SJ, Paulson GW. Relationship between primitive reflexes and severity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1298-300. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.11.1298.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The request for data will be studied and considered upon justified request.
Related trials for Child Development Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Brain Phenotype of Children With Williams Syndrome
Williams Syndrome, Duplication
Not yet recruiting
Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Treatment for Autistic Adolescents
Sleep, Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
TRIal of PPF3 vs. PlaCEbo in the TReatment of Children and AdolescenTs With NeurOdeveloPmental DisorderS
Autism Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness of the Autism Pupil Screen (APS) Detect Pupillometer for Identifying Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Routine Healthcare
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irene Cantarero, Study Chair study chair
Universidad de Córdoba
Javier Caballero Villarraso, Study Direct study director
Universidad de Córdoba
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Series of questions to parents of children in a virtual form., Intervention by teachers and Physiotherapeutic evaluation in people with Child Development Disorder, run by Clinica Gema Leon at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Series of questions to the children's parents (time frame: one week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05190029, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2022.