AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary IncontinenceNCT05194462

Home Biofeedback or Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence.

A study testing Pericoach® by Analytica and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in people with Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute) at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic floor dysfunction is commonly seen in the postpartum women with symptoms including urinary urgency and frequency, urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and home biofeedback devices have been shown to improve pelvic floor symptoms in postpartum and non-postpartum… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Disorders
What is being tested?
Pericoach® by Analytica and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Mar 2024to 8 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • following a vaginal delivery (primiparous or multiparous, spontaneous, forceps, or vacuum assisted)
  • willingness to participate in PFPT or home biofeedback exercises
  • access to a smartphone with Bluetooth capabilities
  • positive screen for urinary incontinence between 4 and 8 weeks postpartum defined as patient report of any urinary leakage within the prior two weeks

Who cannot join

  • multiple births or deliver at ≤34 weeks
  • previous urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery
  • self-identified pre-pregnancy pelvic floor disorder such as urinary incontinence
  • fecal incontinence or chronic pelvic pain or if they have a history of prior PFPT

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • AHN Forbes Hospital

    Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146

  • West Penn Hospital

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • AHN Wexford Hospital

    Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Home Biofeedback or Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence.: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic floor dysfunction is commonly seen in the postpartum women with symptoms including urinary urgency and frequency, urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and home biofeedback devices have been shown to improve pelvic floor symptoms in postpartum and non-postpartum populations, respectively. This randomized noninferiority clinical trial will assess urinary incontinence-related quality of life in postpartum women with self-reported urinary incontinence who are randomized to a program of home biofeedback or pelvic floor physical therapy.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this proposal is to determine if home biofeedback devices are noninferior to pelvic floor physical therapy for the treatment of postpartum urinary incontinence through a randomized noninferiority clinical trial. The hypothesis is that both interventions will improve incontinence-related quality of life and that home biofeedback will be noninferior to PFPT. Two specific aims will be investigated: 1) Determine the impact of both interventions on urinary incontinence-related quality of life measured by the change in score at 3-months on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF); 2) Determine patient impression of symptoms improvement (measured by the change in score at 3-months and 1-year on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale or PGI-I), overall pelvic floor symptoms (measured by the change in score at 3-months and 1-year on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory of PFDI) and changes in sexual function (measured by a change in score at 3-months and 1-year in the Female Sexual Function Index or FSFI). An additional exploratory aim will be to observe the change in pelvic floor symptoms in the postpartum period at 3-months and 1-year among a cohort of women who elect for the standard of care without PFPT or biofeedback.

Being tested
Pericoach® by Analytica, Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pericoach® by AnalyticaDevice

    This intervention will assess urinary incontinence-related quality of life in postpartum women with self-reported urinary incontinence who are randomized to a program of home biofeedback .

  • Pelvic Floor Physical TherapyOther

    This intervention will assess urinary incontinence-related quality of life in postpartum women with self-reported urinary incontinence who are randomized to a program of PFPT.

Study groups in NCT05194462
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy (PFPT)Active comparator6 sessions of PFPT over a 12 week period with planned home exercises as per physical therapist's recommendation.
Receives: Other: Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
Biofeedback deviceActive comparatorPericoach® by Analytica is a vaginal device with recommendation for daily use during the 12 week period.
Receives: Device: Pericoach® by Analytica

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine the impact of both interventions on urinary incontinence-related quality of life using validated questionnaire

    Measured by the change in score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) between baseline and 3 months; scored between 0 and 21 with higher score meaning larger symptom burden

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Determine the impact of both interventions on urinary incontinence-related quality of life using validated questionnaire

    Measured by the change in score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) between baseline and 12 months; scored between 0 and 21 with higher score meaning larger symptom burden

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Determine overall pelvic floor symptoms measured by validated questionnaire

    Measured by change in score on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFD-I) between baseline and 3 months; scored between 0 and 300 with higher score indicating greater symptom burden

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Determine overall pelvic floor symptoms measured by validated questionnaire

    Measured by change in score on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFD-I) between baseline and 12 months; scored between 0 and 300 with higher score indicating greater symptom burden

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Determine changes in sexual function following intervention measured by validated questionnaire

    Measured by change in score on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) between baseline and 3 months; scored between 2 and 36 with a lower score indicating more sexual dysfunction

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Determine changes in sexual function following intervention measured by validated questionnaire

    Measured by change in score on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) between baseline and 12 months; scored between 2 and 36 with a lower score indicating more sexual dysfunction

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Determine the patient impression of symptom improvement using validated questionnaire

    Measured by the change in score on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) between baseline and 3 months; scored between 1 and 7 with higher scoring meaning worsening symptoms

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Determine the patient impression of symptom improvement using validated questionnaire

    Measured by the change in score on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) between baseline and 12 months; scored between 1 and 7 with higher scoring meaning worsening symptoms

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion8 May 2025
  4. Study completion8 May 2025

Why it stopped: low accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05194462
Sponsor's protocol ID
POUT/IRB00297309
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
19 Sep 2021
Last updated
19 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Results will be published; patient identifiers will not be used in the research publications.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pericoach® by Analytica and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in people with Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute) at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: low accrual). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine the impact of both interventions on urinary incontinence-related quality of life using validated questionnaire (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in