AzTrials
AzTrials

Connective Tissue GraftNCT05194826

Using Fascia Lata Membrane Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Implants

A study testing Test in people with Connective Tissue Graft and Anterior Aesthetic Zone, run by Hams Hamed Abdelrahman at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) technique using fascia lata membrane versus connective tissue graft both with xenogenic lamina membrane in immediate implants of anterior aesthetic zone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 50 years
What is being tested?
Test
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jun 2021to 30 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Class II socket according to Elian et al, described as facial soft tissue is present but the buccal plate is partially missing following extraction of the tooth in the maxillary anterior region.
  • Thin gingival phenotype.
  • Bone quality ranges from D2-D3 as gained from preoperative cone-beam computed tomography.
  • Presence of at least 3 mm of keratinized gingiva.
  • Optimal compliance as evidenced by no missing treatment appointments and a positive attitude towards oral hygiene

Who cannot join

  • Medically compromised patients and systemic conditions precluding implant and periodontal surgery.
  • Smokers, diabetics, pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of chemotherapy, radiotherapy in head and/or neck region.
  • Bisphosphonate therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Tanta University

    Tanta

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Vestibular Socket Therapy Using Fascia Lata Membrane Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Implants of Aesthetic Zone

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) technique using fascia lata membrane versus connective tissue graft both with xenogenic lamina membrane in immediate implants of anterior aesthetic zone.

Being tested
Test, Control

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TestProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant and VST with fascia lata membrane + xenogenic lamina membrane and particulate bone graft composed of autogenous cortical chips harvested from the surgical site

  • ControlProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + xenogenic lamina membrane and particulate bone graft composed of autogenous cortical chips harvested from the surgical site

Study groups in NCT05194826
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fascia lata membraneExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Test
Connective tissue graft both with xenogenic lamina membraneActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in peri-implant mucosal level

    The changes in peri-implant mucosal level will be assessed by superimposition of scanning files of different intervals to monitor the changes in surface area calculated by software.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

  2. Changes in gingival phenotype

    The changes in gingival phenotype could be assessed at 6 months and 12 months intervals by superimposition of DICOM files on CBCT software.

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

  3. Chaneg in height of labial (facial) plate of bone

    Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

  4. Chaneg in thickness of labial (facial) plate of bone

    Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

    Measured: at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05194826
Sponsor's protocol ID
VST_21_22
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
4 Jan 2022
Last updated
18 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Test in people with Connective Tissue Graft and Anterior Aesthetic Zone, run by Hams Hamed Abdelrahman at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in peri-implant mucosal level (time frame: at baseline, 6 months and 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in