AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyNCT05198999

Aquatic-based Explosive Strength Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy

A study testing Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises and Standard Physical Therapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was designed to assess the effect of a 12-week aquatic-based plyometric (Aqua-PLYO) training on postural control and functional performance in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (h-CP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy
What is being tested?
Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises and Standard Physical Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
6 Aug 2018to 26 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Hemiparetic cerebral palsy
  • Age between 12 to 16 years
  • Spasticity level 1 or 1+ according to the Modified Ashworth Scale
  • Gross motor function level I or II according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System

Who cannot join

  • Structural deformities
  • Musculoskeletal or neural surgery in the last year
  • BOTOX injection in the last 6 months.
  • Cardiopulmonary disorders limit the ability to engage in explosive exercise training
  • Hemi-spatial neglect

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Saudi Arabia1 site
  • Ragab K. Elnaggar

    Al Kharj, Riyadh Region

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises for Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Study Investigating Effects on Postural Control and Functional Performance

This study was designed to assess the effect of a 12-week aquatic-based plyometric (Aqua-PLYO) training on postural control and functional performance in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy (h-CP). Fifty-six children with h-CP were randomly allocated to the Aqua-PLYO group (n = 28, received an Aqua-PLYO training program, trice/week, over 12 weeks) or the control group (n =28, received standard rehabilitation). Both groups were assessed for postural control and functional performance pre and post-treatment.

Read the detailed description

Fifty-six children with h-CP were recruited from the Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic of College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, King Khalid Hospital, and a tertiary referral hospital, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. Their age ranged between 12 and 16 years, were functioning at levels I or II on the Gross Motor Function Classification System, and had spasticity level 1 or 1+ per the Modified Ashworth Scale. Children were excluded if they had fixed deformities, had leg-length discrepancy, underwent neuromuscular or orthopedic surgery in the last 12 months, submitted to BOTOX injection in the past 6 months, attentional neglect, cardiopulmonary problems preventing them from performing high-intense exercise training.

Outcome measures

  1. Postural control: The dynamic limits of stability (LOSdynamic) indices were measured through the Balance Master system.
  2. Functional performance: Functional performance was quantified using the 30-second sit-to-stand test (30sec-STS), Timed Up and Down Stairs test (TUDS), and the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI).

The Aqua-PLYO group received a 12-week Aqua-PLYO training, 45 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks, in conformity with the National Strength and Conditioning Association guidelines and American Academy of Pediatrics safety standards. The Aqua-PLYO program consisted of ten unilateral and bilateral lower limb plyometrics in the form of hopping/bounding/jumping activities conducted in a water medium. The Aqua-PLYO training included a warm-up for 10 minutes and a cool-down for10 minutes. The control group received the usual physical therapy care, 45 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of advanced balance training, and gait training exercises, postural and flexibility exercises, strength training exercises.

Conditions
Cerebral Palsy
Being tested
Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises, Standard Physical Therapy
Keywords
Unilateral Cerebral Palsy, Balance, Rehabilitation, Exercise, Function, Activity, Participation
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aquatic-based Plyometric ExercisesOther

    The Aqua-PLYO group received the aquatic plyometric exercise training for 45 minutes, three times per week for 12 successive weeks. The training was conducted under close supervision of a licensed pediatric physical therapist according to safety performance guidelines defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US National Strength and Conditioning Association

  • Standard Physical TherapyOther

    The control group received the standard physical rehabilitation program conducted for 45 minutes, thrice a week for 12 consecutive weeks, and consisted of advanced balance training, gait training, postural and flexibility exercises, and strength training exercises.

Study groups in NCT05198999
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aqua-PLYO groupExperimentalParticipants in this group received the Aqua-PLYO training program
Receives: Other: Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises
Control groupActive comparatorParticipants in this group received the standard physical rehabilitation program
Receives: Other: Standard Physical Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Directional Control

    The amount of movement demonstrated in the desired direction, i.e. towards the target, to the amount of external movement in the opposite direction of the target, expressed as a percentage.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Reaction time

    The time, taken by an individual to start shifting his center of gravity from the static position after the cue, measured in seconds

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Movement Velocity

    The average speed at which the center of gravity shifts, measured in degree/second

    Measured: 2 months

  4. EndPoint Excursion

    The distance willingly covered by the subject in his very first attempt towards the target, expressed as a percentage (%)

    Measured: 2 months

  5. Maximum Excursion

    The distance, the subject actually covered or moved his center of gravity toward a target, expressed as a percentage (%) of the dynamic limit of stability

    Measured: 2 months

  6. Functional lower limb strength

    the functional strength of lower limbs was measured by the 30-second sit-to-stand test. The test determines the number of sit-to-stand task repetitions performed within 30 seconds. The higher number of repetitions indicates better performance.

    Measured: 2 months

  7. Functional mobility

    Functional mobility was assessed by Timed Up and Down Stairs test. the test measures the time (second) that the subject takes to go upstairs, turn around, and come back down. Shorter time indicates better performance.

    Measured: 2 months

  8. Gait balance

    Gait balance was measured by the Dynamic Gait Index. The dynamic gait index quantified the ability of the participant to maintain walking balance while responding to different task demands, through various dynamic conditions.

    The index includes eight items, walking on level surfaces, changing speeds, head turns in horizontal and vertical directions, walking and turning 180 degrees to stop, stepping over and around obstacles, and stair ascent and descent.

    Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 indicating normal performance and 0 representing severe impairment. The best possible score is 24. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2022
  2. Study start6 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion26 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion26 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A prospective pre-test post-test randomized controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05198999
Sponsor's protocol ID
RHPT/0018/0069
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
19 Dec 2021
Last updated
20 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aquatic-based Plyometric Exercises and Standard Physical Therapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Directional Control (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in